Implications of COVID-19 for modern slavery challenges in supply chain management

Lead Research Organisation: University of Liverpool
Department Name: Management School

Abstract

As the devastating and complex impacts of Covid-19 began to emerge across the world, it became clear that the disease did not affect all people equally. People with certain underlying health conditions, the elderly and BAME communities, were disproportionately affected and faced worse health outcomes. Social inequities amplified health inequities as many could not work from home and those in illegal forced labour do not benefit from government aid for workers. Economic disparities too have emerged with many firms experiencing huge surges in demand, while others collapse or struggle to survive.

The business impacts in turn increase the risk of exploitation of vulnerable workers. While business leaders focus on securing supplies to resume production and trade, the commercial imperatives for low-cost, rapid sourcing are prioritised. In this environment, there is a significant risk that due diligence related to modern slavery is deprioritised. This research employs a large-scale quantitative survey of supply chain professionals and business leaders of large firms (turnover of £36 million and above) in the UK who fall under the UK Modern Slavery (2015) Act. The results identify if, and how, the new Covid-19 business landscape affects firms' commitments to tackle modern slavery in corporate supply chains.

The tensions emerging from Covid-19 creates two opposing scenarios. On the one hand, the impact of supply chain disruptions may concentrate attention on the firms' outcomes rather than a broader concern for social issues. Risks may be increased through new suppliers with where poorly analysed supply chain practices; contracting with new suppliers with logistical capacity rather than product expertise; increased subcontracting; and the furloughing of staff reducing firms' due diligence resources. In addition, in April 2020, the UK government relaxed the firms' obligations to publish modern slavery statements in response to the pandemic, potentially creating a perfect storm for de-prioritisation.

Yet, on the other hand, there are opportunities. The counter scenario is that Covid-19 has forced firms to examine their extended supply chains in more detail than they would normally to understand potential commercial vulnerabilities. In parallel, the impact of the pandemic has led to a rallying call for firms to consider the social implications of their activities on staff, workers, customers, and their communities. More active management of supply chains beyond tier one suppliers, necessitated by the Covid-19 crisis, therefore may present opportunities for firms to uncover the detail required to tackle modern slavery in a holistic, systemic, and human-centred approach.

This research explores how decision makers are responding to the inherent tensions between cost/resource pressures and social obligations. The insights will enable the start of an evidence-based dialogue with our research partners: The Ethical Trading Initiative and Fifty-Eight who work on the ground with individuals and organisations to combat modern slavery through training and education; Crown Commercial Service the buying arm for the UK's central government and wider public sector; the Home Office's Modern Slavery Unit; and the two academic partners, the University of Liverpool's Management School and the University of Nottingham's Rights Lab. This collaboration ensures appropriate co-design of the research, effective dissemination of the results, and co-creation of evidence-based solutions and policy. The Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply (CIPS) are an additional partner to ensure dissemination of results and recommendations through their membership of 200,000 professional buyers across the world, to engage a wider debate on how modern slavery can be tackled in parallel with other commercial pressures.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description The survey confirmed that a majority of businesses had experienced issues with their supply chains during the pandemic and had needed to increase their knowledge of supply chain structure beyond tier-1 (direct) suppliers. The increased structural awareness is also a positive development for improved transparency in supply chain reports. The survey also showed that practitioners awareness and commitment to modern slavery had increased during the pandemic (rather than decreased) but remained at a lower priority when compared with commercially oriented priorities.
Due diligence: Over 80% of respondents reported that due diligence relating to new supplier take-on had been expedited during the pandemic, such that adequate risk assessments relating to the supply chains of new suppliers may not have been undertaken.
The findings relating to sector level peer-collaboration and practitioners' legislation expectations indicate two important routes for further increasing practitioner awareness and commitment to improving modern slavery outcomes
Exploitation Route The outcomes of this funding are informing subsequent academic research being undertaken that will engage with supply chain practitioners in much greater depth to explore their attitudes and perceptions of agency relating to TISC reporting. The outcomes will also be used in discussions with CCS to inform procurement policy relating to tender evaluation (relating to modern slavery)
Sectors Government, Democracy and Justice

 
Description The findings have informed ongoing interaction with the Head of Policy Delivery at the Crown Commercial Service (CCS) on the specification and evaluation of modern slavery elements in public procurement. Findings showing that practitioners are aware of modern slavery challenges but prioritising them below other operational and commercial priorities has provided a basis for discussions on the specification, scoring and evaluation of modern slavery sections in public tenders (as and when the impact is formalised through a PPN this will be added as formal impact). These findings are also being used to inform the design of further research instruments currently being developed in a subsequent research project that is investigating in depth the behavioural triggers which will result in significant positive changes in firms' reporting practices. Interaction facilitated by the Modern Slavery Policy and Evidence Centre sharing results from multiple projects has led to more formal interaction with other researchers, including the Wilberforce Institute, Hull with whom we are collaborating on a practitioner training initiative.
First Year Of Impact 2021
Sector Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Policy & public services

 
Description Recognition in CCSs modern slavery statement
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Influenced training of practitioners or researchers
URL https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/crown-commercial-service/about/modern-slavery-statement
 
Description Translating modern slavery supply chain policy ambitions into practice: activating behavioural triggers
Amount £252,845 (GBP)
Funding ID AH/W00142X/1 
Organisation Arts & Humanities Research Council (AHRC) 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2022 
End 12/2023
 
Description CIPS knowledge exchange 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Reports produced by the study were disseminated to members of the Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply through their knowledge dissemination platforms.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description How to research modern slavery better: small NGOs in research 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Third sector organisations
Results and Impact Event on 30th January 2023, organised by the Modern Slavery and Human Rights Policy and Evidence Centre (Modern Slavery PEC), on building capacity of smaller NGOs to partner on academic research projects. It's the second event of the MSPEC series 'How to research modern slavery better', bringing together people from the anti-slavery sector and beyond to talk and learn from each other on ways of doing research better.
NGOs want to take part in academic research, but they may have limited experience. Professor Jo Meehan from Liverpool University, was one of two speakers who talked about the research process and our experience of engagement projects, including our recent MSPEC project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
URL https://modernslaverypec.org/latest/how-to-research-modern-slavery-better-small-ngos-in-research