The role of livestock in food system resilience in remote, upland regions

Lead Research Organisation: University of Edinburgh
Department Name: Science Technology & Innovation Studies

Abstract

This proposal will examine how beef cattle and sheep farmers in upland areas of Northern England and Scotland can improve their resilience to environmental, economic, and social change, and what impact their actions to improve resilience will have on food supplies, natural resources and society.
Uplands make up 70% of Scotland, 60% of Wales, 40% of Northern Ireland and 15% of England. Hence over the UK as a whole uplands are a substantial element of the agricultural land resource. The upland regions of Scotland and Northern England have been historically dominated by grazing beef cattle and sheep. Beef cattle and sheep are important to local livelihoods as well as the national food supply and economy. Scotland, for example, has around 2.6 million ewes, 12,700 agricultural holdings, providing the economy with an annual return of £189 million. The UK is a world player when it comes to producing sheep meat. It is the sixth biggest producer globally and exports 36% of output to more than 100 countries.
In addition, the UK uplands as a whole - including agricultural land - have a substantial role to play in addressing many wider environmental issues (e.g. flood prevention; biodiversity enhancement; carbon sequestration in upland moorlands, peatlands and forests). Reduced numbers of animals grazing can have positive impacts on biodiversity, but there are equally concerns that reduced grazing can have negative impacts on open habitats in upland landscapes.
Farming and other land uses in the uplands is extremely challenging, currently financially unviable, and needing to respond to the challenges such as climate change, livestock diseases and changing demands from society.
In this project we will study four upland case study areas in-depth, and work with the people living there, and with organisations working in those areas to understand better what are the critical factors that influence beef cattle and sheep farmers' resilience to change, and what impact changes in beef cattle and sheep farming can have on food supplies locally and globally, the upland environment, local employment opportunities, and local cultures. These four case study areas are Orkney, Lewis and the Isle of Skye, Scottish borders and Yorkshire Dales.
The aim of this project is to provide better tools for decision making for policy makers, local authorities and enterprise agencies, non-governmental organisations, food processors and retailers, farmers and farming groups and local people. By understanding better the interactions among different aspects of the food system, we will be able to appreciate who become vulnerable and how, and what actions will make these vulnerabilities better or worse.

Technical Summary

This proposal takes a Food System approach to understand the resilience of livestock production in remote upland regions of the UK, the consequences to the global and local food systems of these responses, and provide policy makers, food chain actors and individual stakeholders' knowledge with which to adapt to challenges to food systems.
This interdisciplinary project will examine four case study areas (Orkney, Lewis and Isle of Skye, Scottish borders and Yorkshire Dales). In each case study area we will:
Undertake a systematic stakeholder analysis and Social Network Analysis.
Characterise 20 farms on the basis of habitat occurrence and condition, herd and flock management practices and health.
Develop metrics to examine economic resilience using quantitative approaches. We will use survival analysis and path dependency modelling to identify individual farm variability over time, and measure the response of these systems to shocks. These data will parametrise a series of farm level optimisation models which characterise these systems and allow for future scenarios
Develop a set of metrics that can be used to assess the extent and condition of the terrestrial and freshwater resource on each farm together with the degree to which agricultural management is linked to the extent and condition of those resources. We will use multivariate analysis to identify clusters of generic and specific issues relating to resilience within and between areas, thereby helping to highlight whether or not approaches to address impacts need to be area, region or UK specific.
A standard method will be used to characterise each case study area in terms of food system activities (e.g. food processing, retailing), food security (e.g. food availability and access), societal factors (e.g. social and cultural impact of livestock production).
Scenario analysis will be undertaken, integrating the above data and developing four rich scenarios to be explored with a range of stakeholders.

Planned Impact

This research addresses the critical factors affecting the resilience of beef and sheep production in upland regions of Scotland and Northern England. The way in which these producers can increase resilience in the face of uncertain environments and policy landscapes, and what are the possible consequences of these responses to the global and local food systems, and ecosystem services provided by upland regions.
Key beneficiaries of this research are individual farmers, environmental and food-related organisations, policy makers and local organisations promoting the wellbeing of the area. More specifically we have support from local enterprise agencies (York, North Yorkshire and East Riding Enterprise Partnership, and Highlands and Islands Enterprise have both indicated this project is aligned with their strategic objectives). This research will benefit these organisations by providing knowledge useful for strategy development, with full exploration of different responses to increasing resilience of hill farms and the interactions of these responses with other activities (both intended and unintended consequences, and trade-offs among consequences).
Our approach is to treat farmer participants in this research as collaborators rather than research subjects. We have support from a number of farmer networks e.g. Yorkshire Agricultural Society, Yorkshire Farmers Network and Scottish Crofting Federation as well as existing farming networks via XLVets and SAC Consulting. The benefits to farmers of this project is a fuller understanding of the options for increasing resilience, and potential impact of adopting specific practices. The range of upland areas being covered in this project should provide knowledge that will allow farmers in specific situations to develop bespoke responses.
We will also interact with wider food system organisations with our existing extensive networks and new relationships established during the project, though interviews, workshops, participation in scenario planning and membership of the Advisory Committee. These links will reach beyond farming communities to food processors and retailers (e.g. supporting letter from Quality Meat Scotland provided) and environmental organisations, both agencies and non-governmental organisations (e.g. supporting letter from Scottish Natural Heritage provided). This research will benefit these organisations by providing a fuller understanding of the interactions in the food system, and resilience metrics that can be used in their strategy development.
The public in these areas also have an interest in the outcome of livestock farming practices, as they affect livelyhoods, the environment, culture and potentially local food sources. They will be engaged through interviews, workshops, food sourcing survey and stories told about the cultural values associated with local livestock. Public events such as Open Farm Sunday and Countryside Days at county shows are also targets for communication with publics. A project website and the use of social media will enable stakeholders and publics stay abreast of project developments and progress. Benefits include being able to contribute to an understanding of the impacts that activity to increase resilience of beef cattle and sheep farmers may have on others, the values that local communities hold and ideas about desirable futures and how to get there.
 
Title Am Fearann Math - airson clò-bhualadh 
Description A translation of stories around upland livestock farming in Skye, translated into the Gaelic language. These are two of the chapters in the book The Good Land. The translation is made to reflect the Gaelic language that is common among the residents of the Western Isles, and particularly among farming communities. 
Type Of Art Artefact (including digital) 
Year Produced 2021 
Impact It is too soon to have an impact 
 
Title The Good Land 
Description A booklet of 8 short stories based around the project. For each of the four case studies (Orkney, they Isle of Skye, Scottish Borders and Yorkshire Dales) two short stories were written by Pippa Goldschmidt, writer in residence at Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, of the University of Edinburgh. One story is located in the past, and the second a science-fiction story located in the near future. The intention of the stories was to examine and reflect on the traditional importance of upland farming. To explore the people's connections with the animals they farmed, and how these connections were in turn defined by the landscape around them. Farming is not just about economics, farming physically shapes the land and ties people into an intimate relationship with the animals. These stories are also intended as a reminder that farming has never stood still, and has always had to respond to change, whether environmental, social or technical. The stories were informed by data gathered during the research project and was the result of iteration between the author and project members. 
Type Of Art Artefact (including digital) 
Year Produced 2021 
Impact It is too soon to note impacts. 
 
Description Upland farming has become the focus of many public anxieties. It has become the location for many of our values-based disagreements. Should the areas be re-wilded? Should we plant more commercial forests? Should we stop eating meat? All of these provide challenges to existing patterns of working and living in uplands.
We found some shared features among the case study areas, with multiple and interacting stressors e.g. remoteness, limited infrastructure such as broadband, and weather challenges. But each case study area also has unique features in the combination of land ownership (e.g. large estates, tenanted farms, crofting), local tradition, culture and history, and the suitability for alternative land uses (e.g. forestry, energy generation, shooting or protected land).
The meaning of resilience for each case study could be very different: what is being maintained and whose resilience is the focus? There is no shared vision for what people want from the uplands (landscapes, tourism, agriculture, forestry, rewilding, carbon sinks, energy production). Yet all of these interact with each other.
But the people living in these area are important, and depopulation, and an ageing population, is a serious challenge. The centralisation of many services to call centres increases efficiency but the resulting fewer local jobs reduces resilience. New entrants to farming/crofting struggle to access affordable land and capital. Incomers need to demonstrate commitment to the area.
Uplands are well-positioned to offer solutions to emerging societal demands and delivering public goods, but are severely constrained compared to lowlands, heavily dependent on subsidies and the 'efficient' global production model does not fit these areas very well.
A survey of a sample of farms using the Public Goods Tool, developed by the Organic Research Centre, provided evidence of upland farms contributing positively to soil management, fertiliser management, food security, agri-environmental management, and particularly animal welfare and health. However, these data represent only a small number of farms, and the specific measures within the Tool, and may not fully reflect the upland situation.
Farm Business survey data suggest there is considerable diversity in economic viability and vulnerability among the Scottish upland farms. However, those that are vulnerable, tend to remain vulnerable, and those that are robust, tend to remain robust, with little change in resilience over time.
Economic modelling suggests that future climate change may substantially increase the economic consequences of liver fluke.

Upland farms have limited capacity to raise beef cattle and sheep to slaughter weight and so most are sold in the autumn as young animals ('stores'). The result is lack of information flow between consumers and producers. Consistency of supply (size, shape, fat cover, eating quality) is critical to retailers, butchers and hotels, but is difficult to maintain from the uplands where numbers are small, seasonality affects availability of grass-fed animals, and a wide-range of different breeds are maintained.
Agriculture in in remote areas relies on social networks to remain resilient. Strong ties with the community of farmers together with bridging ties to external networks enables openness to new ideas as well as the ability to work together. A study of Orkney found that there is considerable shared activity, with important social networks developed at school maintained in later life, and with the livestock mart forming a key centre for networking. Ensuring resilience of agricultural and food systems in remote areas requires paying attention to where and how social networks are formed, maintained and function, including the impact of policy areas other than agriculture, such as decisions around school catchment areas and maintenance of transport infrastructure.
Producing food in upland areas does not easily secure resilience in food supply for locals. Citizens in these remote, rural areas, mainly purchase food from supermarket chains, allied to global supply chains. Because they are at the extreme end of supply chains, they are vulnerable to perturbations in the system. Where local food is available, it tends to be an expensive, premium product, often aimed at tourists.
Exploitation Route The work is still ongoing.
Sectors Agriculture, Food and Drink

URL http://upland-resilience.org/
 
Description Collaboration with Scottish Rural College (SRUC) 
Organisation Scotland's Rural College
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution We have facilitated links to another organisation (RAFT solutions Ltd) with veterinary expertise. Through undertaking interviews with farmers and crofters, actors in the meat chain, actors in the rural and environmental areas, and consumers in rural areas, we have provided complementary expertise to that of SRUC. This process has enriched the understanding of their quantitative data and provided a more holistic analysis of the case study areas. It has allowed us to begin thinking through potential scenarios that can be developed further with stakeholders.
Collaborator Contribution SRUC have provided quantitative data on economics of upland production and a quantitative investigation of the public goods being provided by case study upland areas. They have a large programme of stakeholder engagement which we have been able to benefit from as a means of disseminating information from the project. As they are close to Agricultural policy (particularly in Scotland), they have also been able to advise on policy developments.
Impact The collaboration is very interdisciplinary. Main outcomes are a series of webinars with stakeholder groups. Integration of project findings is ongoing.
Start Year 2018
 
Description RAFT Solutions Ltd 
Organisation RAFT Solutions Ltd.
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Learned Society 
PI Contribution We have introduced a range of analyses based on interview data with stakholders
Collaborator Contribution Provision of contacts within the Yorkshire Dales area, facilitating focus groups, providing us with contextual data to better understand the project findings.
Impact Presentation at academic conference including findings from interviews with consumers in the area.
Start Year 2018
 
Description Resilience of the UK Food System in a Global Context programme 
Organisation University of Oxford
Department Environmental Change Institute
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution ResULTS is one of 13 projects in this programme, co-ordinated by the University of Oxford. Regular meetings have led to contributing to a number of joint activities, including workshops and sharing experiences. Key outputs include contirbution to programme level messages to policy makers and other stakeholders, as well as individual project level messages developed in a standard format, and contributing to a final report and stakheolder conference. A key collaborative workshop was developed together with the SEEGSLIP (https://www.foodsystemresilienceuk.org/seegslip/) project examining resilience of grazed livestock systems from which a policy briefing document was developed (https://www.foodsystemresilienceuk.org/grazing-livestock/) and a joint publication is in preparation. A contribution to a programme level presentation to the Scottish Government was provided. Contributions were also made to the programmes 'Boundaries' report (https://www.foodsystemresilienceuk.org/global-food-security-boundaries-report/ )
Collaborator Contribution The co-ordinating team at Oxford University have driven forward the joint activities of the programme.
Impact Enhancing the resilience of UK livestock grazing systems, policy briefing note https://www.foodsystemresilienceuk.org/grazing-livestock/ Final programme report https://www.foodsystemresilienceuk.org/fsr-messages/ Boundaries report https://www.foodsystemresilienceuk.org/global-food-security-boundaries-report/ This collaboration is extremely multidisciplinary, including natural and social sciences
Start Year 2017
 
Description Highland Show 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Ad-hoc discussions with a range of stakeholders, publicising the project, recruiting people for subsequent interview and where appropriate, engaging in discussion.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018,2019
 
Description Knowledge Exchange workshop in Orkney: Kirkwall 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact This activity was part of the engagement activities as part of the research project, including feeding back data from earlier interviews, discussing these data and engaging stakeholders in a data exercise to feed into the next part of the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Launch of policy brief on grazing livestock 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The intended purpose was to launch the policy brief, with the presence of invited commentators to stimulate further discussion on the subject of grazing livestock.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Orkney Science Festival Event 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact On September 6th 2019 Pippa Goldschmidt and Isabel Fletcher ran a stall at the 2019 Orkney International Science Festival Family Day. It included the ResULTs pop-up banner and handouts for individuals (adults and children) to fill out describing their favourite foods, now and in the past. Using post-it notes, these answers were sorted into appropriate categories. This exercise generated many useful conversations about the ResULTs project, changing perceptions of farmers and farming and Orcadians everyday eating patterns. Pippa, in particular, found these discussions a useful source of ideas for her work on capturing the cultural value of livestock.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Public event 'Should we all give up eating meat to save the planet' as part of Edinburgh International Science Festival 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Should We All Give Up Eating Meat to Save the Planet? was a 90 minute discussion event on the topic of sustainable diets held in the Red Theatre at Summerhall as part of the Edinburgh International Science Festival (EISF) on the evening of 6th April 2018. Tickets were sold via the EISF box office and attendance was 84 - capacity for this venue.
The event was structured around two short (15min) presentations - given by Dr Isabel Fletcher and Dr Pamela Mason (author of a book on sustainable diets with Professor Tim Lang) - followed by a 30 minute question and answer session that allowed audience members to ask questions about, or comment further on, specific issues covered in the two talks. Between the talks and the discussion session, there was also a short break in which a selection of sustainable snacks (based on local seasonal ingredients) were served. This were provided by Edinburgh Larder, a local catering business.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description RESAS Seminar 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact A presentation about the outcomes of the project to the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services. A positive follow-up email was received.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Scenario workshop in Yorkshire Dales 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact The scenario exercise involved inviting practitioners to engage with 4 imaginary scenarios and exploring the implications of each. A notable finding was the importance placed on the need for housing in the area.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Scottish Government Good Food Nation team 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact The event was intended to showcase the expertise available in the University of Edinburgh that could be relevant to the Good Food Nation team, and to hear about progress and needs of the team.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Stakeholder webinar 2/12/21 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Reporting back to our Advisory Group stakeholders (including representation from government, environmental organisations, industry association, farmer, educator). The objective was to present our findings and welcome reflections on these findings.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Webinar with farmers 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Webinar to present data from research project to farmers/crofters who participated in the research
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Webinar with farmers 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Second webinar with farmers who had contributed to the research, presenting additional data.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Workshop in Orkney: Westray 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This activity was part of the engagement activities as part of the research project, including feeding back data from earlier interviews, discussing these data and engaging stakeholders in a data exercise to feed into the next part of the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Workshop in Scottish Borders 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This activity was part of the engagement activities as part of the research project, including feeding back data from earlier interviews, discussing these data and engaging stakeholders in a data exercise to feed into the next part of the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Workshop in Skye 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This activity was part of the engagement activities as part of the research project, including feeding back data from earlier interviews, discussing these data and engaging stakeholders in a data exercise to feed into the next part of the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Workshop in Yorkshire Dales 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This activity was part of the engagement activities as part of the research project, including feeding back data from earlier interviews, discussing these data and engaging stakeholders in a data exercise to feed into the next part of the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020