Atmospheres of inclusion and identity: designing public open space in superdiverse cities.
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Sheffield
Department Name: Landscape Architecture
Abstract
This is a collaboration between a landscape architect academic (Rishbeth) and a multidisciplinary design and research practice (We Made That). The challenge that we will address through the secondment opportunity is of 1/ recognising nuanced aspects of belonging and exclusion in multi-ethnic urban public spaces, and 2/ meaningfully responding to this within design practice. The objective of the practice-based research will be to test how theories and methods regarding place 'atmospheres' might be useful in foregrounding, discussing, and responding to diversity in urban design processes.
Who feels they 'belong', where and why? Individual and collective everyday experiences of parks, squares and streets are shaped by many aspects of identity and intersections of these, including race, ethnicity, gender, class and age. The term 'atmospheres' is used to define 'in-betweeness', capturing subtle relationships 'between environmental qualities and human states' (Bohme, 1993). Building on this theory, research has explored emotional, sensory and inter-personal responses within urban spaces (e.g. Pink, S. et al. 2015). However, there is rarely an explicit focus on racial and ethnic diversity, and only emerging work on applications within the build environment (Adams et al., 2020). Rishbeth and We Made That aim to test how this theoretical lens may inform urban design approaches especially in ethnically diverse neighbourhood settings, where it is vital to understand dynamics of social connections and disconnections underpinned by narratives of racism, 'other-ing' or marginalisation.
Research Question: How can urban design and landscape architecture practice become more responsive to cultural and ethnically diverse dimensions of place experience though integrating the theory of atmospheres into the design process?
The research project used will focus on collaboration by Rishbeth in six of We Made That's projects in London, four of these in various stages of the design process and two completed, representing different scales of intervention. She will work closely within the multi-disciplinary design teams, and We Made That's own Urban Research Unit, to develop and test methods for participatory or collaborative site analysis, design interventions and post-occupancy evaluations. Methods will include discussions with practice staff, on-site observations and participation in collaborative stages of the design process, and interviews with stakeholders.
The project outputs will include a digital resource: 'Atmospheres of belonging: integrating intangible experiences and responses into urban design practice' and four stakeholder facing events (two for built environment sector professionals, one for interested general public, one within Higher Education).
We Made That have a practice ethos of radical inclusivity in their projects at planning, design and placemaking scales, working exclusively for the public sector and charities with a headline commitment to delivering public good. The collaboration will enable Rishbeth to explore practical applications to her longstanding research focused on migration, inclusion and public space, and contribute more specifically to the built environment sector through the project outputs.
Who feels they 'belong', where and why? Individual and collective everyday experiences of parks, squares and streets are shaped by many aspects of identity and intersections of these, including race, ethnicity, gender, class and age. The term 'atmospheres' is used to define 'in-betweeness', capturing subtle relationships 'between environmental qualities and human states' (Bohme, 1993). Building on this theory, research has explored emotional, sensory and inter-personal responses within urban spaces (e.g. Pink, S. et al. 2015). However, there is rarely an explicit focus on racial and ethnic diversity, and only emerging work on applications within the build environment (Adams et al., 2020). Rishbeth and We Made That aim to test how this theoretical lens may inform urban design approaches especially in ethnically diverse neighbourhood settings, where it is vital to understand dynamics of social connections and disconnections underpinned by narratives of racism, 'other-ing' or marginalisation.
Research Question: How can urban design and landscape architecture practice become more responsive to cultural and ethnically diverse dimensions of place experience though integrating the theory of atmospheres into the design process?
The research project used will focus on collaboration by Rishbeth in six of We Made That's projects in London, four of these in various stages of the design process and two completed, representing different scales of intervention. She will work closely within the multi-disciplinary design teams, and We Made That's own Urban Research Unit, to develop and test methods for participatory or collaborative site analysis, design interventions and post-occupancy evaluations. Methods will include discussions with practice staff, on-site observations and participation in collaborative stages of the design process, and interviews with stakeholders.
The project outputs will include a digital resource: 'Atmospheres of belonging: integrating intangible experiences and responses into urban design practice' and four stakeholder facing events (two for built environment sector professionals, one for interested general public, one within Higher Education).
We Made That have a practice ethos of radical inclusivity in their projects at planning, design and placemaking scales, working exclusively for the public sector and charities with a headline commitment to delivering public good. The collaboration will enable Rishbeth to explore practical applications to her longstanding research focused on migration, inclusion and public space, and contribute more specifically to the built environment sector through the project outputs.
Publications
Clare Rishbeth
(2025)
Feelings in Place: Emotional Honesty within Community Engagement Processes
| Description | The collaborative research developed guidelines towards understanding 'feelings in place' and about places, and how these can inform the design process. We have coined the phrase 'feelings in place' to encompasses the emotional and sensory experience of shared public spaces, and how these are shaped by cultural and social factors. We found that emotional, multisensory and body-centred methods were all useful starting points. To support a meaningful articulation of voices from local communities within the context of a commercial architectural practice, research methods on feelings in place often need to be adapted from those commonly used in academic settings. We argue that this adaption is not a 'dumbing-down' but a legitimate and ethical prioritisation of greater breadth requiring some loss of depth. Because urban areas are complex and require understanding of different perspectives and experiences: • Number of participants needs to be higher • Diversity of participants needs to be higher Because commercial viability is essential, for this to become realistic professional practice: • Time spent with participants needs to be lower • The skill set for facilitation needs to be less specialised The research findings are summarised in the 'feelings in place' principles. These principles set out to describe what 'good' can look like, with an emphasis on honest storytelling. It's not possible to force story-holders to be tellers, or story-tellers to be honest. But as design professionals we have found that the Feelings in Place principles can guide us to hear and validate the emotional dimensions of local experiences which shape an everyday quality of life. Acknowledge mixed emotions about different places to move past stereotypes and stigmatisation. • Reflect that people are more than one thing, and different aspects of peoples' identities and life history shape their relationship with local places. • Capture something of the way that experiences of place can change. People's experience of their 'feelings in place' needs to be heard and shared in ways that are honest and respectful. • Find languages and forms of communication that are meaningful within the setting and can reflect ambiguity and mixed emotions. • Be open to engaging with tricky experiences but do not require a rehearsal of trauma. Look out for telling details which can point to the stories behind the stories, and ensure that participants can decide what personal history to share. • Give space for non-judgemental discussion of the specifics of social dynamics, the 'me' or 'us' in relation to 'you' or 'them', and how this is connected to a sense of belonging or lack of belonging. Who is included and what happens next are both important. • Enable relaxed conversations in relatively short periods of time, so that an appropriate range of people can be included in an engagement programme. • What comes next is part of being accountable. Include time and give expertise for synthesis of findings, and the input of these into wider stakeholder decision making. |
| Exploitation Route | There is certainly scope to text a wider range of methods in a wider range of contexts, and with different formats of professional practice. The 'findings in place' guidelines could be used as a toolkit guide for developing new methods. I also believe there is a need for further debate within academic regarding how arts based and participatory methods can and should be adapted to be more widely used in professional contexts (beyond Architecture). |
| Sectors | Creative Economy Environment Leisure Activities including Sports Recreation and Tourism Culture Heritage Museums and Collections |
| URL | https://www.wemadethat.co.uk/insight/feelings-in-place |
| Description | The collaboration between 'We Made That' and Prof Clare Rishbeth informed a wide range of projects over the course of the secondment. Projects that we have worked on together include: + Vision for Richmond Town Centre, involving extensive engagement events with different community groups in Richmond, for which I developed bespoke resources. + Ten year review of Streatham High Street. Contribution to BID meeting. + Women's Safety Audits, a project for TFL and MOPEC, exploring how women's experiences of safety in London (especially at night) can be recorded and inform safety improvement actions plans. The work developed a toolkit of methods and a guide for conducting Women's Safety Audits, which will in time be published by MOPEC and TFL. The work was showcased at an end of project celebration in London December 2024. Apart from the outputs produced within the commercial projects, the findings of the research secondment have been shared with non-academic audiences in the following ways + engagement with general public and architecture sector professionals in a workshop within the London Festival of Architecture. + engagement with students on professional courses and build environment sector professionals in an event in Sheffield. + publication of the 'Feelings In Place' guide, hosted on We Made That's website. In all these projects I have designed and delivered materials for events from workshops to evaluation meetings, working in collaboration with We Made That staff. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2024 |
| Sector | Environment,Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections |
| Impact Types | Cultural Societal Policy & public services |
| Description | 'Insight' online journal piece about the research findings and to launch the 'Feelings in Place' guide on the We Made That website. |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | This is a written piece to introduce the feelings in place guide and to ensure it is free to download within the We Made That outputs. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2025 |
| URL | https://www.wemadethat.co.uk/insight/feelings-in-place |
| Description | 'Insight' online journal piece about the research on the We Made That website. |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | This article was published as a way of promoting our research collaboration with the We Made That community - architects and urban researchers. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| URL | https://www.wemadethat.co.uk/insight |
| Description | Feelings in Place: Methods to Progress Spatial Justice |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Local |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | This was a joint talk by Clare Rishbeth (University of Sheffield) and Holly Lewis (We Made That) about the process of the secondment, to launch the 'Feelings in Place' guide and to discuss the role of architecture practice in working towards social justice. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2025 |
| URL | https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/feelings-in-place-methods-to-progress-spatial-justice-tickets-1254493... |
| Description | Learning symposium to share lessons from the Women's Safety Audit Pilot Project, London |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Discover how Women's Safety Audits can help transform London's public spaces. Hear what key experts, panellists and community researchers have learnt from a year of pilot projects. Join us for a learning symposium to celebrate the lessons and outcomes from the Women's Safety Audit Pilot Project. The work has been delivered with community researchers, local authorities and an expert advisory board on behalf of Transport for London (TfL) and the Mayors Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://www.wemadethat.co.uk/insight/safer-london-for-all-delivering-women-s-safety-audits |
| Description | London Festival of Architecture: public walk on women's safety audits |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Local |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | This was a walking workshop hosted as part of the London Festival of Architecture. It included a walk in South London to demonstrate some of the methods developed as part of my secondment, and a discussion of the women's safety audit process. There were many questions and discussions about both of these, many of the participants were from built environment professions. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://www.londonfestivalofarchitecture.org/ |
