China's International Financial Integration - Impact on Financial Development and Stability

Lead Research Organisation: London School of Economics and Political Science
Department Name: Institute of Global Affairs

Abstract

One of the most important macroeconomic developments in the coming decades will be China's rapid financial integration into the world economy. Together as a group, emerging economies' GDP has risen from 20% to over 80% of advanced economies' GDP in the last two decades, and constitute 50% of world GDP. Global dynamics will increasingly be characterized by an advanced bloc and an emerging bloc, in which China plays a central role. There are important economic differences between the two sets of countries that can be crucial for determining the global equilibrium - perhaps most notably in financial development. In China's case its financial markets and macroeconomic conditions differ significantly from those of other emerging economies, suggesting caution when drawing historical parallels or lessons for globalization.

As the world's second largest economy, China's full integration into global financial markets will invariably impact the world economy. At the same time, the ramifications on the Chinese economy - given the particular characteristics of its financial development - are still largely unknown, as a result of the dearth of frameworks to analyze heterogeneous economies in a global setting. Our aim is to study the impact of its financial liberalization for China and the rest of the world-from a positive and a normative perspective.

Our research agenda focuses on developing hitherto non-existing frameworks for integrating China's particular financial market conditions in an open-economy macroeconomic setting. Typically, the existing literature focuses on the effects associated with particular financial frictions - such as collateral constraints, and limited enforcement in repayment. While these frictions may also be important for China, they are unlikely to be the most prominent. China's financial market distortions have certain distinct features: 1) financial repression; 2) a two-sector economy where the state sector is significantly less credit-constrained than the private sector; and 3) the prominence of banks in financial markets, among others.

The research projects intend to explore the impact of a country with these financial frictions and the process of financial integration. Important questions that deserve a thorough investigation include: given the described frictions, what is the impact of financial globalization on capital flows, exchange rate dynamics, and growth? Under what conditions would financial crises occur, and are they more or less costly than the crises that would have occurred in a closed-economy? From a normative perspective, should financial development and financial liberalization happen sequentially or simultaneously? Would liberalization induce faster financial development? Are these policy goals potentially conflicting and/or self-defeating? How are global financial shocks transmitted to China, and conversely how are China's shocks transmitted to the rest of the world?

China also differs from other emerging economies in its macroeconomic conditions. It is a net saver, and runs a significant current account surplus. Traditionally, emerging market financial crises have come from within: financial dollarisation, excessive deregulation, allocation inefficiencies due to high level of state ownership, etc. In the global financial crisis a negative shock from advanced economies was transmitted to emerging economies heavily financed through foreign investment, with domestic credit constraints amplifying these shocks. This research aims to fill a gap in the literature and directly address China's particular problems.

Planned Impact

This project addresses what is perhaps the most critical question for the integration of China into the world economy, ensuring that the Chinese economy benefits from foreign investment whilst maintaining the stability of the financial system. The strategy for impact in this project, and the wider initiative of which it is an important part, is to engage with key policy institutions and top centres of excellence. As emphasised in the Impact Summary, our policy counterpart the PBoC has been part of the design of the project and will participate in the generation (through Deputy Governor Zhang Tao) and dissemination of research results (through the PBoC Research Department).

Most importantly, by tying the research closely to the agenda G20 Working Group on International Financial Architecture, a work stream resurrected by the Chinese G20 Chair, we want to ensure that the research output get sufficient attention in Chinese policy circles. But the results can also benefit a wider set of emerging economies facing similar issues as they integrate into the international financial system. We have secured that one out of six parallel streams of parallel sessions at the Berlin policy conference hosted by the incoming German chair of the G20 will be devoted to the International Financial Architecture agenda and will have representatives from most or all G20 emerging economies as well as from the international financial institutions.

While the emphasis in the project is on the engagement of key policy institutions, particularly the PBoC, and top academics, there are other important pathways to impact. In particular, the business press (first Caijing Magazine, and more recently, Caixin Media) has played an important role in promoting transparency and uncovering corruption, starting in the financial sector. The researcher will work closely with these outlets, now also playing a major role in social media, both in China and internationally. We envision both closed-door events with key financial industry participants and representatives from the government and participation in Caixin's annual summit which is attended by most senior policymakers and senior management of financial institutions.

In addition, we will engage with the Chinese financial sector. Given its heavy dependence on the state, the financial sectors' independence and influence is likely to be less than in advanced economies, but it is nevertheless very important to engage with these institutions. We will ask the PBoC to help convene a reference group of representatives of domestic as well as international financial institutions active in China. We also intend to convene Chinese policymakers and business representatives in events in Russia and India, including at least one event co-organised with the Reinventing Bretton Woods Committee.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description There is a time-honored debate on whether trade liberalization is good for a developing country or not. Most findings suggest that there are welfare gains to trade, although the magnitude varies. Our research suggests that trade liberalization cannot be considered independent of the domestic economic conditions, specifically when there is a significant number of distortions in the economy. If the government subsidizes the car industry, for example, and the economy opens up to trade, resources will flow into the car industry not because it is highly competitive in productivity in the global economy, but because it is competitive as a result of subsidies. This would mean that opening up to trade would draw in more resources than is efficient for these low productivity sectors or firms, which would exacerbate the misallocation of resources and have a negative impact on aggregate productivity. This counters the view that trade liberalization is always welfare improving. China's experience offers a compelling case in which the prevalence of government subsidies and preferential treatments can mean that trade liberalization may worse distribution of resources. Thus, in this event, it is important to implement domestic reforms before opening up to trade. China's experience and our research findings provide a new way to think about sequencing liberalization and reforms for other developing nations. Based on these results we have implications about the impact of tariffs and trade wars, which is that they are not always bad, if tariffs are imposed on subsidized sectors, or sectors that are highly distorted. An implication of my work is that State owned enterprise reform, which is what the U.S. administration is currently demanding, will actually increase the gains to trade for China---something that is desirable from the part of the Chinese.

A second research paper is about how state owned enterprises race against private enterprises in China. There have been many papers about how private firms---more productive than SOEs---impact the economy with their growth, but few papers actually explain why the private firms are more productive in the first place. In other words, the productivity is always treated as exogenous. We provide a theory of why and how the productivity can diverge. The explanation we give is perverse incentives. When there is overindulgence, this can lead to a group of firms falling behind. For SOEs, who are able to borrow at low costs of capital, and enjoy implicit guarantees by the government, this incentivizes them to expand in size rather than to invest in productivity. Private sectors, albeit having a much more difficult time in obtaining capital, had more incentives to increase their productivity. We find that in the data, private firms do invest more in activities such as branding, distribution networks, managerial know-how etc, and that they experienced faster productivity growth than SOEs. This provides an explanation why groups of firms may diverge over time, and a theory of growth in China. In on going work, we plan to use the theory to explain other important factors such as the size distribution of firms, what is the impact of globalization and opening up on these firms, and various financial liberalization policies. The important contribution of this work is to provide a structural framework for analyzing these questions.

A third research paper relates to international financial liberalization rather than just to China. This is requested by the Journal of International Economics. This work documents that there was a puzzling change in the transmission of U.S. monetary shocks: a contractionary U.s. monetary shock causes a depreciation of the exchange rate (rather than appreciation), and a rise in global output in other countries. These are exactly the opposite of conventional results. We document that prior to the 1990's, the conventional channels are the prevailing ones, but there has been a surprising change in the transmission channel post 1990s and until 2008. These results are especially relevant in the context of global cycles and the interest in transmission of center countries to developing countries.
Exploitation Route The main contribution is to contribute to a theoretical foundation of the Chinese economy that actually describes is essential features. First, we develop a framework of trade that embeds domestic frictions and provide general theories that can be compared to the conventional results. We show that the framework gives very different predictions on trade liberalization. The second framework we develop is one that describes a key feature of the Chinese economy, which is the dual-sector one. These frameworks can be extended in many ways and we believe that it is more tailored to answering questions about China than the benchmark models.
On the policy side, there are new implications about important policy trends such as trade and financial liberalization. Only with a framework that is better suited to China can one analyze and assess the impact of these policies. Policy makers could potentially be interested in more nuanced views about their policy decisions. The world policy makers could be made more aware of the impact that China may have on the rest of the world. All of this requires appropriate frameworks to think about China, and its place in the world. It is possible that these findings may spur more research in the area of evaluating opening-up policies not as independent programs but as complementary to domestic reforms. When these things are usually treated as separate issues, our research suggest that they should be evaluated in conjunction to each other.


I believe that the research currently undertake is of great significance. Under plausible projections, China will soon be the largest economy in the world. Under reasonable expectations, China is also going to gradually open up its financial markets, liberalize its capital account and freely float its exchange rate. China will become the world's first systemic emerging market because though it will be the largest economy, it is still a developing country, with many developing country characteristics. Whether it is financial market development, economic distortions, or general policy uncertainty, China will be transmitting its domestic shocks to the rest of the world at unprecedented levels. What we have done here is to construct two models that are much more suited to analyzing the Chinese economy than the conventional model. One embeds domestic frictions so as to analyze trade liberalization. One provides a theory of the Chinese economy based on differences between state and private enterprises---from which one can analyze the impact of financial liberalization and reforms. In both of these papers we use data to discipline and check our theory. A broader question that builds on these works is understanding the transmission of the China shock to the rest of the world. This is the first time in history that an emerging market is on its way to becoming the largest economy in the world. How we think about international monetary and financial cooperation, and global financial architecture will need to include the rising and opening up of China.
Sectors Creative Economy,Financial Services, and Management Consultancy,Manufacturing, including Industrial Biotechology,Security and Diplomacy

 
Description The question of financial liberalization in China is important both for China and for the world itself. The wider impact of this line of research takes on two forms: 1) my engagement with policy circles in China and elsewhere around the world; 2) media exposure. I have paid visits to the Chinese government (China banking regulatory committee) and CSRC (China securities regulatory committee) and have engaged with senior officials on this particular topic. I have offered a rigorous analysis of the issues surrounding capital account liberalization when there are still substantial domestic financial challenges. They are taking seriously this line of research. Also, I'm presenting the work at the leading economic think tank in China, at CF40 and at the PBOC. The policy makers welcome this area of research in light of the paucity of serious work. How China's liberalization will impact the rest of the world is also critical for audience outside of China. I'm presenting the work as it evolves at the Bank of England and will present these results for policy institutes such as the IFS. A broader audience also involves the greater policy and business community. At Davos 2018, I have expressed my views on how a capital account liberalization in China can bring about substantial volatility which the world is not yet braced for. On one of the highest profile panels, I was with Christine Lagarde, Philipp Hammond, Steve Mnuchin, and Larry Fink debating about such issues. I was able to give a new insight as the result of this line of research. Euroasia also quoted me on how today's financial history is written by China. I've also given interviews for Bloomberg regarding this issue. In October 2017, I was invited to be on panel with Paul Krugman and Dani Rodrik. During the panel I referred to some of the research findings about China. We are in the process of writing this up as a book chapter for Princeton Press. I see the financial opening of China in the presence of China-specific characteristics as a fundamental problem the world has to understand. Thus, more solid research will help me engage with policy circles in China and in the West, as well as on a broader media platform that disseminates these views more broadly. I believe that the research currently undertake is of great significance . Under plausible projections, China will soon be the largest economy in the world. Under reasonable expectations, China is also going to gradually open up its financial markets, liberalize its capital account and freely float its exchange rate. China will become the world's first systemic emerging market because though it will be the largest economy, it is still a developing country, with many developing country characteristics. Whether it is financial market development, economic distortions, or general policy uncertainty, China will be transmitting its domestic shocks to the rest of the world at unprecedented levels. Using empirical estimates of how much it transmits its shocks to the rest of the world currently, we will provide some back of envelope calculations on what these effects look like in the future. This is the first time in history that an emerging market is on its way to becoming the largest economy in the world. How we think about international monetary and financial cooperation, and global financial architecture will need to include the rising and opening up of China. There has been recent interest in 2022 on the spillover of U.S. monetary policy in light of recent spikes in inflation. The unexpected tightening or policy and the general spillover onto other economies are subjects of great import, in both advanced and developing countries alike. Our research points to new findings about such spillovers and under what conditions it may overturn conventional channels of spillover. Another topic of debate is international technology competition, as it pertains to U.S. and China. I am working on two in depth research projects on how to think about international technology competition and optimal government policy in this scenario. We have developed some interest results on what each government should do to attain its goal of : 1) international technological supremacy; 2) domestic welfare concerns and competition; 3) policies that can indirectly affect other nations. Some of our key findings goes against conventional wisdom: a country's government should not passively accept changes to competition in the world, but actively support its own innovation or try to use trade and innovation policies to affect foreign innovation efforts. Also, there needs to be a balance between domestic welfare concerns and international dominance. We lay out these findings with more nuance in our works (in progress).
First Year Of Impact 2021
Sector Creative Economy,Education,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Economic,Policy & public services

 
Description China's most influential economic thinktank CF40
Geographic Reach Asia 
Policy Influence Type Influenced training of practitioners or researchers
Impact I share with Chinese policy makers and economic advisors my research outcomes on the international spillover of U.S. monetary policy on advanced and developing countries, enlightening them of a new empirical finding we have published that shows that U.S. monetary and fiscal policy spillover to the rest of the world has dramatically changed in the last two decades, compared to the period prior to that. This helps them understand that the traditional mechanism explaining the spillover (trade) can be dominated by a new channel of spillover (financial) , and the impact on exchange rates and outputs is the opposite of what the world economy experienced in the earlier years. This is important for Chinese policy makers as they evaluate the recent dramatic changes to the monetary policy stance of the U.S., and helps them think about a set of more nuanced mechanisms to determine the spillover onto China.
 
Description Chinese policymakers
Geographic Reach Asia 
Policy Influence Type Participation in a guidance/advisory committee
Impact I interact regularly with CF40, a group of the most illustrious economists in China. Many of them are senior officials, such as Chen Yuan. They work closely with decision makers and provide economic consultation. I published this research work associated with the grant in their annual publication of members, as an honorary member. I also regularly interact with them and attend their conferences and seminars, contributing my views.
 
Description Policy Impact
Geographic Reach Multiple continents/international 
Policy Influence Type Influenced training of practitioners or researchers
 
Description Report to the trilateral commission
Geographic Reach Europe 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to new or Improved professional practice
 
Title numerical methods 
Description The paper " Evolution of Productivity in China" which focuses on State owned enterprises versus private firm growth in the Chinese economy requires intense quantitative methodologies and skills; we develop sophisticated quantitative tools to solve complex numerical problem of heterogeneous firms with uncertainty and capital accumulation. 
Type Of Material Improvements to research infrastructure 
Year Produced 2019 
Provided To Others? No  
Impact So far, these methods are only suitable for economics of the similar modelling structure. 
 
Title Chinese data 
Description Data on enterprises collected by the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics, 2) the Chinese industrial survey, 3) a new database measuring policy uncertainty in China, which uses contents and specific keywords from 10 mainland Chinese newspapers for the period January 2000 to October 2018; 4) we have also obtained a monetary policy index from the Chinese central bank, the PBOC, which hasn't been employed to date. We have developed two theoretical models and in the process of developing a third model. The first two relates to the works cited above. In one paper we develop a model of trade that integrates with a model with firm-level distortions. We show that there may be elusive gains to trade for developing countries when they are subject to a vast array of policy distortions. The second model develops a dynamic theory of firms in the context of China, and investigates how productivity has evolved in China. We are in the midst of developing a third model based on network theory, adapted to discuss international macroeconomic issues such as propagation of financial shocks and sovereign debt risk. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2020 
Provided To Others? No  
Impact This model changes the way we think about trade liberalization. Our work suggests that only when domestic reforms aimed at reducing domestic distortions are implemented can emerging markets gain the most from trade. We use comprehensive dataset on Chinese firms to quantify and empirically discipline these models. 
 
Description Tsinghua 
Organisation Tsinghua University China
Department School of Economics and Management
Country China 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution We have organized a working seminar bringing together leading thinkers and academics in Uk and in China to discuss about issues surrounding the topic of China's financial stability and opening up process.
Collaborator Contribution Tsinghua University has hosted the working seminar, and invited participants to this seminar, supporting travel and organization. They have also assisted us in the process of obtaining data.
Impact 1. Research collaboration by researchers in China and in the UK 2. Hosting a series of seminars and conferences ;
Start Year 2017
 
Description Harvard Kennedy School's IOP 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact Panel debate at Harvard Kennedy School's IOP on China's new economic developments and direction. Participated with Larry Summers, former US treasury secretary and Graham Allison. I brought my insights on China and contributed a contrarian view.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Financial Times Oped July 2018 
Form Of Engagement Activity A magazine, newsletter or online publication
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Second Financial Times op-ed following up on the trade war dispute. one of the main academic papers contributed for this award is a trade paper on China. These opinion pieces have had an impact on the business and policymaker community.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL https://www.ft.com/content/80c3e006-845c-11e8-9199-c2a4754b5a0e
 
Description Financial times op-ed piece April 30, 2018 
Form Of Engagement Activity A magazine, newsletter or online publication
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact The third financial times op-ed published within a year on the US China trade war, again drawing from insights on our seminar and academic research.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL https://www.ft.com/content/80c3e006-845c-11e8-9199-c2a4754b5a0e
 
Description Financial times op-ed piece on trade 
Form Of Engagement Activity A magazine, newsletter or online publication
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Following on my research on trade, I have published three opinion pieces in the Financial times that were considered influential on the US China trade war dispute.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://www.ft.com/content/f79587da-0e7b-11e9-b2f2-f4c566a4fc5f
 
Description Interview on 60 minutes, CBS 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Exclusive interview on CBS regarding China's financial opening up and common prosperity measures.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://www.cbsnews.com/news/xi-jinping-china-capitalism-60-minutes-2021-12-05/
 
Description Presentation to Trilateral Commission 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Presented to the trilateral commission about China's tackling of inequality and financial opening up, and was on a panel with former Danish, Swedish prime minister to discuss international differences in approaching inequality. My views tapped into my research on Chinese financial opening up, trade, and technology competition.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Seminar in London 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact We have organised another seminar, this time in London, in which we presented various papers on Chinese financial markets, my own paper in this collaboration, and papers on Chinese skilled labor migration from the Chinese university.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Seminar with Tsinghua University : Liberalisation and Financial Resilience in a Global Context 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact China's Trade and Financial Globalisation Conference
The workshop economic distortions and the two-sector nature of the Chinese economy; financial liberalisation under such circumstances; and China's growing engagement in global financial governance - "Global China".
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Wall Street Journal Annual CEO Meeting in London 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Wall street journal has an annual flagship CEO council every year, and in 2019, they invited me to debate with Michael Pilsbury (China advsior to President Trump). The influence reached the top CEOS around the world, who attended the event.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Workshop with Tsinghua University 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact Financial resilience in a Global context

One of four joint workshops with Tsinghua University, in which new research on financial asset bubbles, exchange rates, evolution of productivity in China from the perspective of a state and private sector development were discussed and presented.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
 
Description Workshop: Liberalisation and Financial Resilience in a Global Context 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact Joint Tsinghua University - LSE Workshop
Venue: Tsinghua University, School of Economics and Management (Room 401, Weilun Building)
This workshop discusses distortions and the two-sector nature of the Chinese economy; financial liberalisation under such circumstances; and China's growing engagement in global financial governance - "Global China".
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
 
Description Workshop: financial integration under de-globalization pressures and incomplete markets 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact The topic of discussions and presentations surrounded financial liberalization that befits China, evolution of financial leverage in the Chinese economy, human capital and structural reforms. It brought together various actors in London and in China to conduct mutual exchange on the Chinese economy and the multilateral system. It enhanced further knowledge and research communication and dialogue between China and the UK.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018