Future of the City Centre

Lead Research Organisation: Northumbria University
Department Name: Fac of Engineering and Environment

Abstract

This project will establish an international research network exploring the Future of the City Centre, through a partnership between Northumbria University; University of Strathclyde; University of Newcastle, Australia; University of Paraiba, Brazil; and the University of South Africa. The research network will examine how city centres are being transformed by a number of internal, external and contextual factors and the implications of these changes for the Future of the City Centre. The theoretical perspectives will involve past, present and future. Emphasis will be visions for the post-industrial, post-commercial and post-retail city. This theme and the related sub-topics will enable the development of future city models and will help to contextualise urban change. Provision for creative industries, cultural events and different forms of entertainment may offer vitality, together with visitors and responsible tourism. City authorities are starting to realise that structural changes are happening in city centres, and are responding by establishing core groups of officers to consider these issues. This proposal will provide a distinct focus on innovation for the Future of the City Centre. It will also enable academic research to inform new policies, from an inter-disciplinary perspective incorporating views from different cities. The research network is proposed at a time when governments, communities, business, artists, entertainers, historians, sociologists and others, are re-evaluating their interactions with cities.

The key aim of this research network is to explore the Future of the City Centre, informed by international perspectives of expert knowledge from a range of disciplines in each locality. Invited speakers will represent education, local government, non-government organisations, business and community groups.

There will be four symposiums over 24 months. They will take place in four different continents and establish a view from developed and developing countries. While individual cities cannot represent continents or even countries, they can be indicative of responses from different geographies, governance systems, cultures, heritage and populations. The UK Government Office for Science City Futures Project established Newcastle upon Tyne as pilot city. According to the United Nations, Joao Pessoa in Brazil is the second greenest city in the world. Newcastle, Australia, has established a leading smart city approach, as part of its future. Mogale City in South Africa has created an integrated development plan, as a statement of independence from Pretoria. The universities and academics chosen from the cities for this proposal are each offering distinctive perspectives. Professor Giddings promotes the arts, architecture, and urban design in the culture of communities; Professor Silva researches sustainable urbanism; Dr Jefferies investigates public and private partnerships; and Professor Rwelamila practices city management systems. In addition Dr Rogerson will offer data and methodologies from the University of Strathclyde Institute of Future Cities. Each symposium will include selected speakers who will be asked to prepare position papers to establish the context for debates on the Future of the City Centre. Speakers will represent academia, local government, non-government organisations, businesses and communities. The outcome will be possible scenarios that may be formed into the inter-disciplinary policies. It is proposed that 20 invitees will attend each symposium over a two-day period, together with open access for all interested parties. In addition to world-wide availability of the project data through the website, publications and other outputs, participants will work with their local policy makers to develop novel scenarios. The focus on exploring a range of perspectives during an era of fundamental change will assist cities around the world to re-assess their strategies.

Planned Impact

The key beneficiaries of this research will be researchers, practitioners, policy makers and communities, in academia, industry, government, public institutions and society. The planned research will examine how cities are being transformed by a number of internal, external and contextual factors and the implications of these changes for the Future of the City Centre. Both individuals and groups will benefit from this research. A rich, international network will be established to explore these important issues. The research will inform education providers, eg universities, colleges, research organisations and schools. It will be of benefit to practitioners in environmental, social and economic domains, including: designers in creative industries, urban managers, carers, health professionals, entrepreneurs and business managers. Policy makers such as those in local, regional national and international contexts; including: governments, EU and the UN, will be able to apply the research. Communities are increasingly being required to propose their own scenarios and defend their own positions. The outputs from the network will assist community groups in formulating their proposals for innovative uses of city space. Moreover, this research will encourage cross-national, cross-cultural and cross-discipline approaches.

The impact is primarily achieved through the quality of the research proposed by the high calibre of the proposed international institutions engaged in the network. The impact of the research will be managed and disseminated through a range of national and international channels. They include regional networks of researchers and practitioners, consequent continuing professional development (CPD) workshops, and symposium events will be open to the public. Other channels will include public bodies and agencies, including those represented by the invited network of participants who will provide an effective context for the dissemination of the research findings; as well as established and relevant practice conferences, professional journals and community blogs. International channels will include the research project website, international academic journals and conferences, and other established organisations linked with the network, such as - The Association of Critical Heritage Studies; Royal Geographical Society; Urban Design Group; CIB's Working Commissions in Architectural Design and Management, and Spatial Planning and Infrastructure Development; City Futures Groups in Newcastle (UK), Sydney and Sao Paulo; South African City Futures at the African Centre for Cities; Future of Cities at GOV.UK; and the European Urban Research Association. The project's visibility will commence immediately after funding has been secured, as the dedicated project website will be built at this stage. Information on the proposed symposiums will be disseminated to the invited network participants, for them to distribute to an even wider international audience. More long-term impact will be managed via the development of an exploitation plan throughout the proposed research, developing opportunities with each of the universities' commercialisation departments. The host universities have a strong reputation in international research. Moreover, the institutions are excellent providers of dedicated training, CPD activities, and in capacity building support for commercial, public and third sector organisations. The potential impact of the proposed research therefore extends well beyond built environmental context, to include social, economic, cultural and quality of life contexts. In summary, the scope of exploitation channels is very broad, ranging from academia through to SMEs, public sector and community organisations. Outputs are planned in a variety of formats that allow us to match dissemination methods to potential beneficiaries.
 
Description All the symposia have now been completed. Issues have been identified in all four cities regarding city image, public realm, social groups, culture, heritage, governance, the role of universities, local economy and movement.
Exploitation Route All five universities are taking forward the findings, as are the city authorities. For wider dissemination, a monograph of cities and issues is being prepared and will be published this year. There were three journal papers in process for the academic audience, two of which have now been published; and three conference papers were planned for discussion with the academic community, two of which have been presented.

Since completion of the project, it has been transformed into a broader Network which engages with larger numbers of people in both the original four cities and other cities throughout the world. The Network is also engaged with CIB Conseil International du Bâtiment - collaborating for innovation in the built environment, and will be represented in their world building conference in 2022
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy,Creative Economy,Environment

URL http://www.futurecitycentre.com
 
Description There was a meeting with a Parliamentary Committee on 19 November 2018 The project has been featured by the Newcastles of the World organisation, for example in their newsletter
First Year Of Impact 2018
Sector Communities and Social Services/Policy,Creative Economy,Environment
Impact Types Cultural,Societal,Economic,Policy & public services

 
Description Urban Links advisory panel for Connected Places
Geographic Reach Africa 
Policy Influence Type Participation in a guidance/advisory committee
 
Description City Centre Commercial Office Performance Outcomes in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic's Catharsis on Previous Inhibitors to Occupancy Optimisation: PhD research project with the University of Newcastle, Australia 
Organisation University of Newcastle
Country Australia 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Marcus Jefferies contributed to the development of the project, and was tasked with identifying the City Centre Commercial Office Performance Outcomes in Response to the COVID-19
Collaborator Contribution The project resulted directly from the Future of the City Centre Newcastle NSW symposium
Impact This project has developed its framework (aim/objectives/problem/rationale etc), completed a literature review and is currently developing its methodology. There will be outputs in future years
Start Year 2022
 
Description Future of the City Centre Network 
Organisation State University of Paraíba
Country Brazil 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution we are all partners in the Agreement, with the exception of James Charlton and Sepideh Hajisoltani
Collaborator Contribution Robert Rogerson was Co-Investigator. He has been instrumental in helping to establish the Network The Future City Centre Network (thereafter FCCN) aims to be the internationally recognised academic collaboration, able to provide definitive expert understanding and insight of the future of city centres internationally and enabling cross-disciplinary research and analysis to be undertaken into the future of city centres. The FCCN is the outcome of the existing collaboration between University of Northumbria in the UK, the University of Strathclyde in the UK, University Newcastle in Australia, University of South Africa, Tshwane-Pretoria, and Universidade Federal da Paraiba in Brazil and each of these partners will be founding members of the FCCN. The FCCN will explore potential futures of the city centre across different cultural and socio-economic settings drawing on a variety of international perspectives and expert knowledge within a variety of disciplines. Its focus is in part in extending academic debate over the ways on which city centres function, are dynamic spaces, and how they respond to internal and external change factors. But it will also engage with wider sets of stakeholders, including urban government, commercial and other economic actors, and with citizens to help identify futures for city centres as they respond to change. The FCCN will be open by invitation to academic and non-academic organisations and individuals who are engaged with or have an interest in planning and managing city centres. Partners will be designated as those who contribute financially to specific research and fund raising activity with partnership status valid for the duration of that involvement. Partners will meet annually to review progress of the network and agree on the future agenda and priorities. Associates will be individuals and organisation who assist the network without providing funding support. The Agreement seeks to reinforce the existing collaboration to develop new opportunities collaboratively. These will include in the first 18 months: • Explore collaboration with existing network partners to attract further research funding; and • Co-development of joint projects extending themes on city centre futures with Network partners and colleagues in UFPB Looking to the longer term relationship, the Agreement will include: • Each partner University assisting to extend membership of the FCCN to other Universities and city partners in their respective countries; • Collaborating with the FCCN to foster and exchange ideas with other Universities and cities globally, including potentially staff and student exchanges. In progressing the above scope, the FCCN will seek to: a. Enhance understanding of the nature and functioning of city centres internationally, drawing out themes which are bringing about change to the city centre, and highlighting local and specific factors which help generate diversity in city centres; b. Identify new ways in which influences that are impacting on city centres can be examine, drawing on experiences from a variety of disciplines in social sciences and beyond; c. Assess the impact of existing interventions and strategies being deployed internationally to ensure that city centres have a future as locations of environmental, economic, social, political and technological significance to provide an overview of the differing approaches being adopted to plan city centre futures; d. Map out a research agenda of the challenges facing city centres and develop partnerships to enhance understanding of ways to address these; and e. Assist network partners in attracting research funding to contribute to this agenda. The intention is for the FCCN to explore possible future funding opportunities, including: a. Project specific research grants, secured to explore specific issues in city centres by teams from the network; b. City specific studies with non-academic stakeholders funded through commercial and knowledge exchange contracts to assist in planning the future of city centres; c. Funding for an expansion of the FCCN through regional hubs, each attracting research funding for more local studies of city centres; and d. A core grant to assist in managing the FCCN either through partner membership contributions or through funding from knowledge exchange/research bodies such as the British Council, Association of Commonwealth Universities, and Newton Fund. A key element of the network is its desire to be inclusive, open to engagement with an increasingly diverse range of stakeholders involved in the production, management and consumption of the city centre. To support this inclusiveness, a dedicated website for the FCCN will be hosted at the Institute for Future Cities in the University of Strathclyde. This will: a. Set out the aims and objectives of the network and provide publicly available reports on its plans and priorities; b. Provide a repository for the outputs from each of the symposia and from the AHRC research project, including videos of the main contributions, a summary of the conclusions from each meeting and background information on each city centre case study; c. Provide a single platform for other interested Associates to contribute to the debate and discussions, including material relating to other cities beyond those discussed in the symposia; and d. Be a means for potential Partners and Associates to contact the network and to submit information and ideas pertinent to aims of the network. The website will also enable interested individuals and organisations to register for attendance at network meetings. Contributing to discussion and debate over the future of city centres globally, the network will publish a range of academic and non-academic output. They will include in the first 12 months: a. Academic journal papers on the future of the city centre and the challenges faced globally; b. A set of case studies based on the symposia, providing a summary of the challenges, opportunities and approaches found in each of four cities across the world; c. An edited volume bringing together the symposia evidence to review the shared and different issues arising in the planning for city centre futures within the four cities, and setting out a future research agenda relevant to cities globally; and d. International conference papers given by the partners supporting knowledge change with non-academic stakeholders. Consideration will be given thereafter to collaborating with Associates to extend the dissemination of other city centre examples, and the development through that of other case studies. The parties must undertake all necessary precautions to prevent any risk of conflicts of interest which could affect their impartial and objective performance of the Agreement. Any situation constituting or likely to lead to any such conflict should be brought to the attention of the parties without delay in cause shall undertake to take all necessary measures to rectify this situation at once.
Impact none yet - the Network only started in November 2020
Start Year 2020
 
Description Future of the City Centre Network 
Organisation UNISA
Country South Africa 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution we are all partners in the Agreement, with the exception of James Charlton and Sepideh Hajisoltani
Collaborator Contribution Robert Rogerson was Co-Investigator. He has been instrumental in helping to establish the Network The Future City Centre Network (thereafter FCCN) aims to be the internationally recognised academic collaboration, able to provide definitive expert understanding and insight of the future of city centres internationally and enabling cross-disciplinary research and analysis to be undertaken into the future of city centres. The FCCN is the outcome of the existing collaboration between University of Northumbria in the UK, the University of Strathclyde in the UK, University Newcastle in Australia, University of South Africa, Tshwane-Pretoria, and Universidade Federal da Paraiba in Brazil and each of these partners will be founding members of the FCCN. The FCCN will explore potential futures of the city centre across different cultural and socio-economic settings drawing on a variety of international perspectives and expert knowledge within a variety of disciplines. Its focus is in part in extending academic debate over the ways on which city centres function, are dynamic spaces, and how they respond to internal and external change factors. But it will also engage with wider sets of stakeholders, including urban government, commercial and other economic actors, and with citizens to help identify futures for city centres as they respond to change. The FCCN will be open by invitation to academic and non-academic organisations and individuals who are engaged with or have an interest in planning and managing city centres. Partners will be designated as those who contribute financially to specific research and fund raising activity with partnership status valid for the duration of that involvement. Partners will meet annually to review progress of the network and agree on the future agenda and priorities. Associates will be individuals and organisation who assist the network without providing funding support. The Agreement seeks to reinforce the existing collaboration to develop new opportunities collaboratively. These will include in the first 18 months: • Explore collaboration with existing network partners to attract further research funding; and • Co-development of joint projects extending themes on city centre futures with Network partners and colleagues in UFPB Looking to the longer term relationship, the Agreement will include: • Each partner University assisting to extend membership of the FCCN to other Universities and city partners in their respective countries; • Collaborating with the FCCN to foster and exchange ideas with other Universities and cities globally, including potentially staff and student exchanges. In progressing the above scope, the FCCN will seek to: a. Enhance understanding of the nature and functioning of city centres internationally, drawing out themes which are bringing about change to the city centre, and highlighting local and specific factors which help generate diversity in city centres; b. Identify new ways in which influences that are impacting on city centres can be examine, drawing on experiences from a variety of disciplines in social sciences and beyond; c. Assess the impact of existing interventions and strategies being deployed internationally to ensure that city centres have a future as locations of environmental, economic, social, political and technological significance to provide an overview of the differing approaches being adopted to plan city centre futures; d. Map out a research agenda of the challenges facing city centres and develop partnerships to enhance understanding of ways to address these; and e. Assist network partners in attracting research funding to contribute to this agenda. The intention is for the FCCN to explore possible future funding opportunities, including: a. Project specific research grants, secured to explore specific issues in city centres by teams from the network; b. City specific studies with non-academic stakeholders funded through commercial and knowledge exchange contracts to assist in planning the future of city centres; c. Funding for an expansion of the FCCN through regional hubs, each attracting research funding for more local studies of city centres; and d. A core grant to assist in managing the FCCN either through partner membership contributions or through funding from knowledge exchange/research bodies such as the British Council, Association of Commonwealth Universities, and Newton Fund. A key element of the network is its desire to be inclusive, open to engagement with an increasingly diverse range of stakeholders involved in the production, management and consumption of the city centre. To support this inclusiveness, a dedicated website for the FCCN will be hosted at the Institute for Future Cities in the University of Strathclyde. This will: a. Set out the aims and objectives of the network and provide publicly available reports on its plans and priorities; b. Provide a repository for the outputs from each of the symposia and from the AHRC research project, including videos of the main contributions, a summary of the conclusions from each meeting and background information on each city centre case study; c. Provide a single platform for other interested Associates to contribute to the debate and discussions, including material relating to other cities beyond those discussed in the symposia; and d. Be a means for potential Partners and Associates to contact the network and to submit information and ideas pertinent to aims of the network. The website will also enable interested individuals and organisations to register for attendance at network meetings. Contributing to discussion and debate over the future of city centres globally, the network will publish a range of academic and non-academic output. They will include in the first 12 months: a. Academic journal papers on the future of the city centre and the challenges faced globally; b. A set of case studies based on the symposia, providing a summary of the challenges, opportunities and approaches found in each of four cities across the world; c. An edited volume bringing together the symposia evidence to review the shared and different issues arising in the planning for city centre futures within the four cities, and setting out a future research agenda relevant to cities globally; and d. International conference papers given by the partners supporting knowledge change with non-academic stakeholders. Consideration will be given thereafter to collaborating with Associates to extend the dissemination of other city centre examples, and the development through that of other case studies. The parties must undertake all necessary precautions to prevent any risk of conflicts of interest which could affect their impartial and objective performance of the Agreement. Any situation constituting or likely to lead to any such conflict should be brought to the attention of the parties without delay in cause shall undertake to take all necessary measures to rectify this situation at once.
Impact none yet - the Network only started in November 2020
Start Year 2020
 
Description Future of the City Centre Network 
Organisation University of Newcastle
Country Australia 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution we are all partners in the Agreement, with the exception of James Charlton and Sepideh Hajisoltani
Collaborator Contribution Robert Rogerson was Co-Investigator. He has been instrumental in helping to establish the Network The Future City Centre Network (thereafter FCCN) aims to be the internationally recognised academic collaboration, able to provide definitive expert understanding and insight of the future of city centres internationally and enabling cross-disciplinary research and analysis to be undertaken into the future of city centres. The FCCN is the outcome of the existing collaboration between University of Northumbria in the UK, the University of Strathclyde in the UK, University Newcastle in Australia, University of South Africa, Tshwane-Pretoria, and Universidade Federal da Paraiba in Brazil and each of these partners will be founding members of the FCCN. The FCCN will explore potential futures of the city centre across different cultural and socio-economic settings drawing on a variety of international perspectives and expert knowledge within a variety of disciplines. Its focus is in part in extending academic debate over the ways on which city centres function, are dynamic spaces, and how they respond to internal and external change factors. But it will also engage with wider sets of stakeholders, including urban government, commercial and other economic actors, and with citizens to help identify futures for city centres as they respond to change. The FCCN will be open by invitation to academic and non-academic organisations and individuals who are engaged with or have an interest in planning and managing city centres. Partners will be designated as those who contribute financially to specific research and fund raising activity with partnership status valid for the duration of that involvement. Partners will meet annually to review progress of the network and agree on the future agenda and priorities. Associates will be individuals and organisation who assist the network without providing funding support. The Agreement seeks to reinforce the existing collaboration to develop new opportunities collaboratively. These will include in the first 18 months: • Explore collaboration with existing network partners to attract further research funding; and • Co-development of joint projects extending themes on city centre futures with Network partners and colleagues in UFPB Looking to the longer term relationship, the Agreement will include: • Each partner University assisting to extend membership of the FCCN to other Universities and city partners in their respective countries; • Collaborating with the FCCN to foster and exchange ideas with other Universities and cities globally, including potentially staff and student exchanges. In progressing the above scope, the FCCN will seek to: a. Enhance understanding of the nature and functioning of city centres internationally, drawing out themes which are bringing about change to the city centre, and highlighting local and specific factors which help generate diversity in city centres; b. Identify new ways in which influences that are impacting on city centres can be examine, drawing on experiences from a variety of disciplines in social sciences and beyond; c. Assess the impact of existing interventions and strategies being deployed internationally to ensure that city centres have a future as locations of environmental, economic, social, political and technological significance to provide an overview of the differing approaches being adopted to plan city centre futures; d. Map out a research agenda of the challenges facing city centres and develop partnerships to enhance understanding of ways to address these; and e. Assist network partners in attracting research funding to contribute to this agenda. The intention is for the FCCN to explore possible future funding opportunities, including: a. Project specific research grants, secured to explore specific issues in city centres by teams from the network; b. City specific studies with non-academic stakeholders funded through commercial and knowledge exchange contracts to assist in planning the future of city centres; c. Funding for an expansion of the FCCN through regional hubs, each attracting research funding for more local studies of city centres; and d. A core grant to assist in managing the FCCN either through partner membership contributions or through funding from knowledge exchange/research bodies such as the British Council, Association of Commonwealth Universities, and Newton Fund. A key element of the network is its desire to be inclusive, open to engagement with an increasingly diverse range of stakeholders involved in the production, management and consumption of the city centre. To support this inclusiveness, a dedicated website for the FCCN will be hosted at the Institute for Future Cities in the University of Strathclyde. This will: a. Set out the aims and objectives of the network and provide publicly available reports on its plans and priorities; b. Provide a repository for the outputs from each of the symposia and from the AHRC research project, including videos of the main contributions, a summary of the conclusions from each meeting and background information on each city centre case study; c. Provide a single platform for other interested Associates to contribute to the debate and discussions, including material relating to other cities beyond those discussed in the symposia; and d. Be a means for potential Partners and Associates to contact the network and to submit information and ideas pertinent to aims of the network. The website will also enable interested individuals and organisations to register for attendance at network meetings. Contributing to discussion and debate over the future of city centres globally, the network will publish a range of academic and non-academic output. They will include in the first 12 months: a. Academic journal papers on the future of the city centre and the challenges faced globally; b. A set of case studies based on the symposia, providing a summary of the challenges, opportunities and approaches found in each of four cities across the world; c. An edited volume bringing together the symposia evidence to review the shared and different issues arising in the planning for city centre futures within the four cities, and setting out a future research agenda relevant to cities globally; and d. International conference papers given by the partners supporting knowledge change with non-academic stakeholders. Consideration will be given thereafter to collaborating with Associates to extend the dissemination of other city centre examples, and the development through that of other case studies. The parties must undertake all necessary precautions to prevent any risk of conflicts of interest which could affect their impartial and objective performance of the Agreement. Any situation constituting or likely to lead to any such conflict should be brought to the attention of the parties without delay in cause shall undertake to take all necessary measures to rectify this situation at once.
Impact none yet - the Network only started in November 2020
Start Year 2020
 
Description Future of the City Centre Network 
Organisation University of Strathclyde
Department Institute for Future Cities
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution we are all partners in the Agreement, with the exception of James Charlton and Sepideh Hajisoltani
Collaborator Contribution Robert Rogerson was Co-Investigator. He has been instrumental in helping to establish the Network The Future City Centre Network (thereafter FCCN) aims to be the internationally recognised academic collaboration, able to provide definitive expert understanding and insight of the future of city centres internationally and enabling cross-disciplinary research and analysis to be undertaken into the future of city centres. The FCCN is the outcome of the existing collaboration between University of Northumbria in the UK, the University of Strathclyde in the UK, University Newcastle in Australia, University of South Africa, Tshwane-Pretoria, and Universidade Federal da Paraiba in Brazil and each of these partners will be founding members of the FCCN. The FCCN will explore potential futures of the city centre across different cultural and socio-economic settings drawing on a variety of international perspectives and expert knowledge within a variety of disciplines. Its focus is in part in extending academic debate over the ways on which city centres function, are dynamic spaces, and how they respond to internal and external change factors. But it will also engage with wider sets of stakeholders, including urban government, commercial and other economic actors, and with citizens to help identify futures for city centres as they respond to change. The FCCN will be open by invitation to academic and non-academic organisations and individuals who are engaged with or have an interest in planning and managing city centres. Partners will be designated as those who contribute financially to specific research and fund raising activity with partnership status valid for the duration of that involvement. Partners will meet annually to review progress of the network and agree on the future agenda and priorities. Associates will be individuals and organisation who assist the network without providing funding support. The Agreement seeks to reinforce the existing collaboration to develop new opportunities collaboratively. These will include in the first 18 months: • Explore collaboration with existing network partners to attract further research funding; and • Co-development of joint projects extending themes on city centre futures with Network partners and colleagues in UFPB Looking to the longer term relationship, the Agreement will include: • Each partner University assisting to extend membership of the FCCN to other Universities and city partners in their respective countries; • Collaborating with the FCCN to foster and exchange ideas with other Universities and cities globally, including potentially staff and student exchanges. In progressing the above scope, the FCCN will seek to: a. Enhance understanding of the nature and functioning of city centres internationally, drawing out themes which are bringing about change to the city centre, and highlighting local and specific factors which help generate diversity in city centres; b. Identify new ways in which influences that are impacting on city centres can be examine, drawing on experiences from a variety of disciplines in social sciences and beyond; c. Assess the impact of existing interventions and strategies being deployed internationally to ensure that city centres have a future as locations of environmental, economic, social, political and technological significance to provide an overview of the differing approaches being adopted to plan city centre futures; d. Map out a research agenda of the challenges facing city centres and develop partnerships to enhance understanding of ways to address these; and e. Assist network partners in attracting research funding to contribute to this agenda. The intention is for the FCCN to explore possible future funding opportunities, including: a. Project specific research grants, secured to explore specific issues in city centres by teams from the network; b. City specific studies with non-academic stakeholders funded through commercial and knowledge exchange contracts to assist in planning the future of city centres; c. Funding for an expansion of the FCCN through regional hubs, each attracting research funding for more local studies of city centres; and d. A core grant to assist in managing the FCCN either through partner membership contributions or through funding from knowledge exchange/research bodies such as the British Council, Association of Commonwealth Universities, and Newton Fund. A key element of the network is its desire to be inclusive, open to engagement with an increasingly diverse range of stakeholders involved in the production, management and consumption of the city centre. To support this inclusiveness, a dedicated website for the FCCN will be hosted at the Institute for Future Cities in the University of Strathclyde. This will: a. Set out the aims and objectives of the network and provide publicly available reports on its plans and priorities; b. Provide a repository for the outputs from each of the symposia and from the AHRC research project, including videos of the main contributions, a summary of the conclusions from each meeting and background information on each city centre case study; c. Provide a single platform for other interested Associates to contribute to the debate and discussions, including material relating to other cities beyond those discussed in the symposia; and d. Be a means for potential Partners and Associates to contact the network and to submit information and ideas pertinent to aims of the network. The website will also enable interested individuals and organisations to register for attendance at network meetings. Contributing to discussion and debate over the future of city centres globally, the network will publish a range of academic and non-academic output. They will include in the first 12 months: a. Academic journal papers on the future of the city centre and the challenges faced globally; b. A set of case studies based on the symposia, providing a summary of the challenges, opportunities and approaches found in each of four cities across the world; c. An edited volume bringing together the symposia evidence to review the shared and different issues arising in the planning for city centre futures within the four cities, and setting out a future research agenda relevant to cities globally; and d. International conference papers given by the partners supporting knowledge change with non-academic stakeholders. Consideration will be given thereafter to collaborating with Associates to extend the dissemination of other city centre examples, and the development through that of other case studies. The parties must undertake all necessary precautions to prevent any risk of conflicts of interest which could affect their impartial and objective performance of the Agreement. Any situation constituting or likely to lead to any such conflict should be brought to the attention of the parties without delay in cause shall undertake to take all necessary measures to rectify this situation at once.
Impact none yet - the Network only started in November 2020
Start Year 2020
 
Description How Placemaking can be Understood as an Emergent Feature of Urban Spaces Over Time: PhD research project with the University of Newcastle, Australia 
Organisation University of Newcastle
Country Australia 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Marcus Jefferies contributed to development of the project, and was tasked with identifying the features and characteristics of public space. The project resulted directly from the Future of the City Centre Newcastle NSW symposium
Collaborator Contribution The University of Newcastle proposed the project, obtained the funding, and will manage it
Impact The project is is now at the data analysis stage, but there will be outputs in future years
Start Year 2021
 
Description Sustainable Smart City Transformation through the Utilization of 3D GIS by Analyzing its Outcomes from Social, Environmental and Economic Perspectives 
Organisation University of Newcastle
Country Australia 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Marcus Jefferies contributed to the development of the project, and was tasked with identifying smart city transformation
Collaborator Contribution The project resulted directly from the Future of the City Centre Newcastle NSW Symposium
Impact The project is in its early stages, the will be outputs in future
Start Year 2023
 
Description The role of the city centre in net zero futures 
Organisation University of Waterloo
Country Canada 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Robert Rogerson is collaborating with a joint project developed with Future Cities Initiative, University of Waterloo, Canada on 'the role of the city centre in net zero futures'. This project seeks to accelerate a transition to net zero futures for the city centre/downtown through harnessing circular economy (CE) initiatives. It builds on existing research being conducted in both Glasgow and Waterloo in partnership between the universities and civic stakeholders as part of a drive towards enhanced circular economies.
Collaborator Contribution as contribution made by research team
Impact This collaboration is multi-disciplinary but as yet there are no outputs
Start Year 2021
 
Description Academic member of Expert Validation Panel 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Marcus Jefferies was the academic member of an Expert Validation Panel, with council planners and private sector consultants, to provide feedback on data collection process and theoretical modelling for the research project 'the emergence of placemaking in an urban space over time'
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description CPD course for Geography teachers 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Robert Rogerson led a training session on the Future of Cities after Covid-19 as part of the Princes Education Trust CPD course for Geography teachers, drawing on the insights provided by the four case studies in the AHRC project in November 2020.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Inclusive Communities 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Robert Rogerson was a contributor to DebaTable discussion on 'Inclusive Communities', Geneva December 2021: exploring the repopulating of city centres. This 'Chatham House' rules event brought together eight community activists, designers and academics to explore how interventions in the city centre could help to create a more diverse and inclusive communities.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Joint Event with the International Public Policy Observatory IPPO Cities and the Future of the City Centre Network 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact This was an online event as part of the IPPO Cities programme. The International Public Policy Observatory (IPPO) now has a specific cities-and-COVID policy workstream, IPPO Cities, supported by Bloomberg Philanthropies. It is designed to be a global observatory of city-level policy responses. At the heart of IPPO Cities' work are regular virtual events in which they bring together city policymakers, frontline practitioners, researchers and other specialists from cities all over the world to discuss specific themes. This event features four of the topic authors for the book from the project ie Visions and Public Space, Governance, Movement, and Heritage. The Future of the City Centre Network was introduced to the participants, and the project and book presented to them. there were approximately 40 participants.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://theippo.co.uk/ippocities/
 
Description Smart Neighbourhoods 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Robert Rogerson negotiated a £12,000 Bridging Disciplines fund, University of Strathclyde, to explore 'smart neighbourhoods' in and around the city centre. In seeking to conceptualise the smart neighbourhood as providing opportunities to address some of the inequalities associated with smart urbanism, this project will identify the social and spatial characteristics of 'smartness' needs within different 'neighbourhood' boundaries in order to support development of new communication protocols that enable just community responsive and real-time management of resources - both social and environmental. The focus is on city centre and inner city areas.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Symposium at Joao Pessoa Brazil 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This symposium was led by Geovany Silva, supported by Carlos Nome, Bob Giddings, Robert Rogerson, Marcus Jefferies, and Pantaleo Rwelamila
1. Public Ministry - MPF Representative / José Godoy
The Public Ministry has the role ofhttps://www.futurecitycentre.com/jp-symposium-papers supervising and protecting the fundamental principles and interests of society, and its operation is independent of any of the three branches, Executive, Legislative and Judiciary - seems like top down Government

2. Cidade de Conde / Planning - Flávio Tavares
The architect and urban planner Flávio Tavares, secretary of municipal planning, brings the experiences of the past years to the front of the city of Conde-PB, a city in the metropolitan region (southern part of the coast), where important planning legislation and urban projects in the city, involving public participation and architectural and urban design competitions, as well as innovative community building initiatives.

3. INCITI Recife Projects - Circe Monteiro
research and design institute responsible for various urban projects and recovery of degraded areas in the city of Recife. She demonstrated strong social engagement in the institute proposals and intense community action and participation in the recovery of public areas

4. BR Cidades / IAB PB - Aida Pontes
Brazilian Institute of Architects - public debates about the city and society. She emphasized the need to think about public housing integrating public spaces with more quality and focusing on multiple users.

5. Habitat Brasil - Mohema Rolim
As representative of Habitat for Humanity in Brazil, a survey of empty and idle properties in another city. 100 unoccupied private properties, that is 41% of the total. It is estimated that there is a total of 105.3 thousand m² of unoccupied built area with potential for housing use, which corresponds to approximately 2,106 residential units. Most of these properties have debts with the city, totaling more than R20 million. On the other hand, in the center there are about 29 thousand people in communities of social interest and 3.8 thousand in risk areas, the vast majority, 47% of people, working in the center.

6. Urban interventions in squares - Architect Marco Suassuna
an example of community participation and involvement in the creation of a small public square. Through a participatory process and social engagement,

7. Project Galleries - Luciana Balbino
take expressions of the arts to poor communities and could also promote the local economic and touristic development. The themes of the works were diverse, from expressions of the local culture, such as self-portraits of its inhabitants, local symbols, and regiona

8. João Pessoa Sustainable Plan UEP / BID - José Rivaldo and Caio Silva (1:13:00)
In the IDB program, membership was for medium-sized cities with rapid growth. The 2013 "João Pessoa Sustentável UEP / BID" plan for sustainable growth planned for the next 30 years, (find on the city hall website). In terms of resources, this is US $ 100 million from the IDB and US $ 100 million from the city of João Pessoa. .

There is the need to migrate to a 100% online process to reduce bureaucracy and monitor the progress of the program. The selection processes will be through expressions of interest followed by sharing of terms of reference for the selected companies followed by price assessments and qualification of services.


9. IPHAN Heritage Institute - Raglan Gondim
The mission of IPHAN is the identification, protection, preservation and inspection of the preservation of the national historical heritage

10. Eccus Institute Initiatives - Diego Sousa
Since 2017, the NGO has been working with integration between the pedagogical and cultural politicians The political pillar that concerns Governance and empowerment through transformation of citizens, knowledge of legislation and mechanisms of social control.

11. Projects Raízes da Alma Institute - Carolly Barbosa
It aims to bring food production and consumption closer to consumers
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://www.futurecitycentre.com/jp-symposium-papers
 
Description Symposium at Newcastle NSW Australia 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This symposium was led by Marcus Jefferies and supported by Bob Giddings, Robert Rogerson, and Geovany Silva
Revitalisation of the city centre played a significant role in the Newcastle Symposium. In itself, this indicates that there are issues to be addressed. The Greater Newcastle Metropolitan Plan 2036 (State of New South Wales Government, 2018) attempts to present the city plan as a series of precincts in accordance with the national planning ethos of creating compact cities (see Figure 1). However, as demonstrated by one of symposium presenters (see Figure 2) and confirmed by the delegates (se Figure 3), it is really a linear city comprised of three hubs. Newcastle East is not a centre but appears as an adjunct to the East End. At the West End, Wickham is an inner suburb. It is a little disturbing to see the hubs identified by function, as the superseded planning policy from the mid 20th Century. The East End is designated as retail, entertainment, tourism and heritage; Civic as culture, maritime and education; and the West End as a new Central Business District - a model criticised by observers since Jane Jacobs. It would be interesting to learn about the tourist infrastructure proposals for the East End, including hotels. The most recent hotel proposal will replace the council offices at Civic; which are moving to the West End, which has been an area of significant dilapidation. This is all part of what appears to be a re-definition of the word Civic. As terms such as municipal are disappearing from the lexicon, Civic seems to be losing connection with local government. It is being used more in a cultural sense and significantly in the changing role of universities. Other than the council offices, the concept of the West End appears as a vertical city, which is the Australian interpretation of compact cites. Also, the uses are wider than just business, ie including vertical childcare, vertical seniors village, vertical student accommodation, and vertical school. Is this aimed at creating a new compact city centre, and if so,what are the implications for the existing hubs? Moreover, it is unclear why verticality is the most appropriate form. The recently opened interchange seems to be a catalyst for this development, although the significance of the interchange is debatable.

Since 2008, the height of dilapidation of buildings and vacancy rates in Newcastle's city centre, Renew Newcastle has been a mechanism for revitalising dilapidated properties, predominantly in terms of meanwhile uses. However, Renew ceased operation in mid 2019. This work has promoted the notion that there should be a move away from extensive new construction to the re-use of a significant stock of redundant buildings. Future plans continue to be based on new development. At the least, it needs to be investigated whether demand for buildings will be significant in the future, or whether other forms of city centre will be needed. Emphasising the notion of the linear city, a new light rail project has replaced the passenger and former mining rail connection. This is a very positive initiative as it is a visible expression of public transport. While not indicating a move towards a car-free city, it does support Henri Lefaivre's idea that space is a cultural construct, with citizens' access and right to the city. However, there are conditions. First, to be effective, there needs to be an extensive light rail network serving Greater Newcastle, bringing people into the city centre. The land released by the removal of the heavy rail line from the city centre, needs to make a positive contribution to the public realm. Yet, it is claimed that the last remaining stretch of Newcastle's surplus rail corridor is being offered for sale to help facilitate new jobs, homes and improved urban outcomes. The long and narrow site provides the opportunity to create a high quality streetscape that, together with residential and commercial outcomes, and will help to attract more people into the city centre. This is supported by the City of Newcastle Development Control Plan and the Newcastle Local Environmental Plan 2012, but the strategy requires further investigation. The Development Corporation has already funded pedestrian and cycle space along the harbour edge from Honeysuckle to the East End. This is certainly a great asset for public amenity, but there needs to be a counterbalance to the pattern of linear strips of public space, streets and property. Museum Park will be a new pedestrian space for people to access local businesses, the University's NewSpace, Honeysuckle and Newcastle Museum - all metres from the Civic light rail stop.

A number of questions emerged regarding roles, eg -
• The role of State and Local Governments in leading revitalisation?
• The role of the university and other key partners, including businesses, in city centre change or continuity?
• The role of the citizens and community?

There is a need for more interaction between the public sector, private sector and citizens - as identified in the other symposia. Similarly, the local government has plans but is there any consensus on the future role of the city centre? One proposal is a committee for Newcastle that would bring together business and local government leaders, create a unified voice, and agree on priorities. There is evidence of similar strategies in other international and Australian cities particularly those, like Newcastle, with a regional focus. In itself, this proposal generates further considerations. To date, the Development Corporation has taken a leading role, providing significant finance for revitalisation projects. Its contract has been extended several times, but development corporations are not intended to be permanent mechanisms; and therefore perhaps other arrangements may be necessary in the future. There are issues of accountability and representation, especially in terms of the community, which does not seem to be mentioned in this proposal. Universities are perceived as having capability to exercise increased influence in the city centre, not just one of multi-discipline expertise but also one of probity, and fair and equitable governance. This may be the case but there is more than a suggestion that the strategy is really to introduce increasing numbers of students to the city centre, as a means of re-invigorating the economy. The concept of students and tourists as transient populations was introduced in the response to the Pretoria Tashwane Symposium, and neither has a commitment to the city centre that they inhabit for short periods. There needs to be confirmation of students' financial contribution to the infrastructure of the city centre, if any. It is unlikely that a tourist tax would be introduced to Newcastle, but it should be evaluated. A city centre should provide for various social groups but insiders and regulars will predominantly determine its shape (see Pretoria Tashwane response); and the extent to which they are satisfied will mostly determine its success. Statistics would be valuable, but the impression is that Newcastle has good proportion of insiders. The debate appears to be more about demographics, the prospect of ghettoisation and conflict with other activities. There is recognition that affordable housing for inner city service workers, accommodation for professionals wishing to live near work, and retirees wanting to live near social and cultural centres; as well as student housing will be required. However, the thirty new affordable rental units in the heart of Newcastle for service workers could be viewed as tokenism. The scale of regulars and their potential expansion are unclear.

The coal economy continues to be very significant in Newcastle; but the apparent implications of climate change are starting to concern the citizens of New South Wales. In this context, the end of the coal economy may happen earlier than previously anticipated. There needs to be strategies for emergent economies. At the same time, there is a call for a smart city that generates more energy than it consumes.

There is a principle that the public sector, especially local government would be a major anchor, but as seen in other cities, it seems to be moving out to anonymous commercial office buildings. This approach diminishes the presence of local government, loses the symbolism of its buildings and reduces the community's access to it. Despite assertions from Northumbria and Pretoria that students and tourists can provide hope for income generation, they cannot provide the basis for a future city centre ethos. Both are transient, and neither has a commitment to the city centre that they inhabit for short periods. A city centre should provide for various social groups but insiders and regulars will predominantly determine its shape; and the extent to which they are satisfied will mostly determine its success.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://www.futurecitycentre.com/copy-of-newcastle-nsw-symposium
 
Description Symposium at Newcastle upon Tyne 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This symposium was led by Bob Giddings and supported by all of the Research Team
Newcastle upon Tyne is a compact city centre that still seems to be actively enjoying a strong retail core. Recent developments have been an expansion of bars and restaurants, hotels and student housing. The social structure is a resident population with a variety of demographics, but an increasingly high proportion are students. The city remains the regional capital with numbers of people travelling into the centre. The hotel development responds to, and generates visitors and tourists; and there are debates about a tipping point where citizens start to feel like strangers in their own city. The Council promotes - getting the balance right. It states that the objectives are:

• a city centre that is open for business
• a destination for tourists
• a place where local people feel at home.

These objectives are set in a climate of diminishing local public sector influence, as Central Government retains greater proportions of local finance and exercises its decision-making. The received wisdom is that the future of the city centre should be directed by a partnership of the public sector, private sector, and the community. However, there are no indications as to how this might be enacted and currently, there is a governance leadership vacuum. The private sector needs a strong public sector. For example, an impoverished local authority may try to generate income by applying disproportionate business rates to locally-based companies.

There is clear intent to create a city centre that is more attractive to visitors and investors. Spaces are increasingly viewed as settings for events and activities, with the aim of providing attractive places for all age groups. Architecturally, the centre has a distinctive backdrop but public spaces are predominantly streets - whether vehicular or pedestrian. The concept of access being defined by a maximum of 10 minutes walk to a station, is achieved by the Metro system. The population is suspicious of grand plans, mainly as a result of damage to the city fabric from the grand plans of the 1960s. The centre is still a great place for spectacular events, although there is concern about large scale exhibitions that occur at irregular intervals and have dubious legacy. Inward investment is perceived as necessary for the local economy. Nevertheless, the outcomes are also invariably large scale, may not touch local people, and based on visions and decisions made at considerable distance from the city. There are two established city centre universities, which like others in the UK, are divesting themselves of student accommodation. This is encouraging a huge quantity of private developments in the city centre.

The developments are distorting social activity and the local economy with student purchasing patterns, no council tax payments, and occupancy for 30 weeks in the year. The city has an inherent culture, based on its industrial and maritime heritage. NE1, the Business Improvement District is being innovative in its ability to persuade city centre businesses to invest in improving its appearance and attractiveness. The City Council's core strategy Planning for the Future 2010 - 2030, does not contain any clear vision but seems to rely on more of the same ie

• retail, leisure and commercial activity as the primary basis of the economy
• increased pedestrianisation of streets
• increased cycle routes
• identified potential for public open space - no strategy for how it will be achieved; private sector development has not delivered the promised public realm eg Stephenson Quarter
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL https://www.futurecitycentre.com/copy-of-newcastle-uk-symposium
 
Description Symposium at Pretoria-Tshwane South Africa 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This symposium was led by Pantaleo Rwelamila, supported by Bob Giddings, Robert Rogerson, Geovany Silva and Carlos Nome
The vox pop that asked - who is the city centre for? generated some interesting responses. The general tone was that it should be for everyone - all ages and denominations, from cradle to grave. However, some respondents were more specific. There was a notion of it being the focus of a region. There was a comment that every citizen thinks it belongs to them, and therefore people from the country have a right to it. It does not matter if they are wealthy, not so rich or at the bottom of the social ladder. Others suggested that it is for the future working generation, where they would live and work; and specifically not for the retired. Others again proposed that it is for tourists.
Perhaps surprisingly, activities and built form came to the fore, almost more than who the city is for. Businesses and residences featured strongly, as did education, employment, entertainment and culture. There was a theme of contact with the Government and access to Government buildings. The Global village was also mentioned. Access appeared a number of times - to services, social activity, formal and informal economy, and inaccessibility for those who do not have cars. One perspective was as a place to make money to send home. Provided there is a clean room, bathroom and communal kitchen - it would enable people to save money. This perspective presents a lack of engagement with the city centre, using it but not contributing to it - with an inherent temporary and transient overtone. An overarching view was the need for respect and security.
The Summary Report identified current issues in the city centre:
• Buildings in poor condition and lack of infrastructure
• Traffic congestion and illegal taxis
• Informal trading often due to limited business and entrepreneurial skills
• Different layers of Government and a private sector agenda
• Informal settlements and illegal occupation
• Migrants and transitory settlements - seeking work
As a non-national, the most striking socio-economic observation was the huge difference between rich and poor. The creation of a more egalitarian society is a massive challenge. There is also the notion that an urban resolution would generate increased migration by the rural poor; to an extent that may never be satisfied.
The Economic Development Agency stated that there is a vision including significant public sector plans to revitalise the city centre. Public transport and safety are clearly other major issues. The decision by women to settle in an informal settlement is strategic. Government-led settlement programmes do not adequately address the practicalities for women accessing the city centre to find employment opportunities. Indeed, there is a general issue about marginalised populations being drawn into the city centre for somewhere to work and live. Social housing provides a good response but the demand seems almost insatiable. Informal trading appears predominantly in a market context. Perhaps there needs to be a form of licencing within a public sector infrastructure. Informal trading is viewed by the City as a temporary form of economic activity, from which traders should eventually be able to progress to other forms of employment. There is a disturbing view of the city centre as a transitory place, where predominantly young people are seeking work and not permanent housing. If and when they achieve employment and partnerships, they tend to move out of the city centre for permanent housing. As with both Newcastles, students and tourism seem to provide hope for income generation. However, issues of mobility and safety were raised once more. There was a proposal that citizen action is needed to create a city's personality; rather than infrastructure, policy and procedures. The lack of local government buy-in, bureaucratic red tape, political and personal agendas have been impediments. An issue may be metaphorical ownership of parts of the city through active citizenry, where the community takes positive action to enhance the visual appeal and safety. It certainly appears that there needs to be more interaction between the public sector, private sector and citizens - as identified in the previous symposia. The local government has plans but is there consensus on the future role of the city centre?
There was considerable mention of crime and grime throughout the symposium. There are unhealthy practices taking place, which could be tackled by the public sector. The insecurity and isolation of individual houses is evident throughout; and in the suburbs, there is very high incidence of gated communities. Inclusiveness is a major issue. The tone of the symposium was that city centres are vital places but for safety and security, people often move out of them. There is a principle that the public sector, especially local government would be a major anchor, but as seen in other cities, they seem to be moving out to anonymous suburban commercial office buildings. This approach diminishes the presence of local government, loses the symbolism of its buildings and reduces the community's access to it. Despite assertions in the two Newcastles, students and tourists cannot provide a basis for a future city centre ethos. Both are transient, and neither has a commitment to the city centre that they inhabit for short periods. A city centre should provide for various social groups but insiders and regulars will predominantly determine its shape; and the extent to which they are satisfied will mostly determine its success.
Insiders comprise residents of the city centre. The choice of living in the city centre, hinterland or suburbs depends on how the notion of residential amenity is valued by them. They can be at different stages of their lives, their period of residency within the city centre can vary, and as a result they may value the notion of amenity differently. For this group, certain features including proximity to work and access to consumption, cultural and leisure amenities can be the main attraction of city centre living. There will be differences in attitude between age groups of insiders, with younger adults placing greater value on the range of social and cultural activities, while older people express high level of satisfaction with physical elements including attractiveness of the physical environment. In terms of residential amenity, given the diversity of the uses and activities in the centre, the interchange of residential amenity and non-residential activities, particularly in terms night-time activities can be relevant to this social group as they would directly impact on the quality of their place of residence. Unlike other areas of the city, the inconvenience of living in the centre is not a major problem for most insiders because for this social group, the attraction of city centre living goes beyond the notion of convenience.
Perceptions of the centre can include different aspects of change over time as they may have memories of the centre in the past. Dealing with negative perceptions associated with such environmental factors as noise and light pollution, and other negative elements such as crime can be part of the challenge of promoting the varied attractions of city centre living to a mix of social sub-groups. Some commentators argue that increased number of insiders and encouragement of city centre living can result in safer city centres and a more pleasant living environment for them. City centres are seen to be more attractive and vibrant if they are accommodating a significant population of insiders.
The other group comprises users who spend time in the city centre on a regular basis. The reason for such regular visits by these habitual participants can be work, education, leisure, pleasure, shopping or a combination of these factors. The period of time spent can vary depending on the reason for their visit and associated activities. The length of engagement and the mix of activities in the centre can influence the sense of belonging to the centre. If the attraction to the centre is due to work, they may have a sense of belonging due to economic dependence on the place as a source of income. Regulars choose a range of places in the suburbs or hinterlands as their place of residence. Their choice of not considering city centre living can be due to access to a higher level of residential amenity in those areas; for example in the form of larger properties or access to open green space or cheaper and better value accommodation options. Given their distance to the centre and the requirement for regular commute, they have to choose from available transport options. Accordingly a key factor in understanding this social group is the element of travel and their experience during the commute to the city centre. Depending on their residential context, certain important factors such as distance to the centre and proximity to transport options can influence their experience. These factors also have an impact on the time and travel cost. Congestion and the level of control on certain private transport options may encourage the use of public transport to and from the centre. However, this highly depends on the quality of transport infrastructure, reliability and safety.
The Pretoria Tshwane Symposium exposed the socio-economic, political and environmental issues that are currently evident, and that will govern the role of the city centre in future. It is the inclusive centre that will offer the best chance for this urban form to flourish in changing circumstances.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://www.futurecitycentre.com/tshwane-presentations
 
Description Urban Links Africa Solutions Showcase 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Urban Links Africa Solutions Showcase, March 2021 : engaging UK SMEs to help solve African city issues. Robert Rogerson engaged with the workshop hosted by Connected Places Catapault brought into conversation the academic panel of experts and the projects teams of UK based SMEs and African based community organisations, addressing identified key urban challenges.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021