Writing Our History, Digging Our Past Phase 2

Lead Research Organisation: University of Nottingham
Department Name: History

Abstract

This programme aims to sustain longer-standing collaborations between UoN researchers with non-academic historians and archaeologists, build on recently-launched projects, and foster the emergence of new community groups researching their own heritage.

The All Our Stories projects that we will be working with focus on oral histories, archive-based research and understanding the built, buried and natural environment. In response, we have put together a project team that can support the needs of the groups with a mix of historians, archaeologists and cultural geographers. With a combination of expertise in political, social and economic history as well as a thorough knowledge of the history and geography of the East Midlands, the research team bring a diverse range of intellectual perspectives which will enhance the capacity of the community partners to understand, interpret and assess their projects in a range of related contexts. In support of the project team, a larger academic body can be called upon to respond to community group needs, with dedicated research time and access to specialist facilities enabled through a Challenge Fund targeted to cover any core costs incurred which cannot be met by the community groups' AOS funding.

Our programme of engagement will include three milestone events (launch, mid-term showcase and final showcase) and a programme of enabling workshops focused on the key requirements of the groups as articulated through a consultation process which enabled the Phase 1 project team to identify the key training and skills development needs. This programme will deliver networking and knowledge exchange opportunities between the community groups and between the community groups and non-academic partners and the academic team.

Key to the success of the project are the three Early Career Researchers (Johnson, Mills and Veale) - they will act as direct support for the core projects and the point-of-contact (through a dedicated hotline) for general enquiries from other groups. Working with the NCCPE and other sections of the University (Centre for Advanced Studies, Community Partnerships and Information Services) they will facilitate access to relevant, specialist academic support and University facilities for All Our Stories community groups.

The programme will benefit from strong institutional support from the UoN including the Centre for Advanced Studies, Community Partnerships, Information Services and the University Museum. It will also draw on the UoN's non-HEI partners including Nottingham City Museums and Galleries, Derbyshire County Record Office and Trent & Peak Archaeology (part of York Archaeological Trust).

Our programme will be taking place between February and December 2013 to time with the life-cycle of the All Our Stories projects.

The benefits of the programme will be the enhancement of existing community-based research, the fostering of new community groups and the co-design of research bids for HLF funding. In the longer term, the programme will build new capacity for academic engagement with volunteer researchers.

Planned Impact

As a community-focused project, the proposed programme is inherently geared towards knowledge exchange and impact. Since it aims to enable community groups who are actively involved in research to have greater engagement with academics, its starting-point for planning and evaluating impact is very different from that of the more usual type of research project carried out by academics which seeks to build wider public impact into the project plan. Nevertheless, a number of specific ways can be identified in which the proposed programme will have wider benefits.

Firstly, the research process can be envisaged as having a direct and immediate impact on the non-academic researchers involved in terms of the research and professional skills they have the opportunity to acquire. Academic engagement with community groups and their volunteer researchers should enable volunteers to:

a) ask broader research questions and develop themes with the potential to enhance more far-reaching analysis, for instance linking together case studies into a larger framework;

b) acquire hands-on archaeology techniques including intrusive and non-intrusive survey and sampling techniques, management and analysis of finds;

c) develop historical research skills: extracting data from newspapers; map research; using local record offices; accessing documents in The National Archives e.g. poor law records, judicial records, census returns (many now online);

d) learn new digital technologies (with input from Information Services and the Digital Humanities Centre);

e) record data appropriately, present findings and create research resources: e.g. collecting/recording data 'collectively' to allow searches across the work of a group or several groups; using video and audio equipment to capture testimonies effectively; drafting texts and managing visual images; making the most of a website to communicate research results.

Secondly, more indirect benefits can be envisaged arising from the research process. Among those indirectly benefiting from the research would be other staff such as room stewards in museums or heritage sites who will gain from the knowledge disseminated by volunteer researchers. Another group of more indirect beneficiaries are respondents drawn into community research projects whose testimonies are solicited as part of oral history data gathered by the researcher group: respondents, often a generation older than those interviewing them, are generally glad to have their knowledge, opinions and memories taken seriously and captured as part of a research process.

Thirdly, the project offers an opportunity to have a positive impact on non-academic bodies such as museums, libraries and archives, and other heritage bodies such as the National Trust, through the development of new links to communities (and potentially new audiences and users), new knowledge and understanding of the holdings and sites cared for by these organisations and an increased capacity in mobilising community groups and academics to participate in future collaborative research projects.

Finally, longer-term benefits can arise from the research findings, their dissemination to different audiences, and their potential applicability to current social and economic challenges. Community archaeology and local history typically chart the origins, rise, evolution and decline of particular communities over time: such research can offer clues into what makes communities flourish and how communities adapt, or fail to adapt, to a changing environment. In particular, it is clear that there are contemporary lessons that may be drawn from projects looking at community resilience and adaptation to change with factors such as the demise of a major industry which can lead to social deprivation but also, under certain circumstances to forms of economic regeneration.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description Reflecting on our experience of the 'Research for Community Heritage' programme from our perspective as academics, we have learned lessons which we would like to share with the AHRC as pointers for the future if - as we would hope - the cross-council and inter-agency collaboration represented by the programme paves the way for further similar initiatives.

The first lesson is that longer lead times - both with regard to the advance notice provided concerning new funding opportunities, and with regard to the lead time for the submission of applications - are crucial if there is to be any prospect of extending the 'reach' of programmes based on community heritage groups to new and emerging groups and harder-to-reach communities. If time is short, it is established and experienced groups, or groups with professional input from community arts organizations, that will benefit most from the programme.

When we submitted our initial bid to Phase 1 of the scheme, we had hoped that we would be able to encourage disadvantaged or marginalized groups to explore their heritage and apply for HLF 'All Our Stories' funding. Our experience was that we would have needed more time to develop contacts and foster relationships than was available: effectively, we had only 3-4 months between the start of the 'Research for Community Heritage' funding and the deadline for the 'All Our Stories' applications to work with community groups on their ideas for an application.

The second lesson we learned is the vital importance of synchronizing AHRC and HLF schedules. For instance, there was a time-lag between the announcement at the end of October 2012 of HLF 'All Our Stories' awards, which then had to commence immediately, and the confirmation and start of the AHRC Phase 2 'follow-on funding', which could only start in February 2013. This time-lag created uncertainty for the community groups in receipt of HLF awards, since they were not able to count on academic institutions receiving funding and could not factor such funding into their calculations, and a delay in the provision of essential academic input and support at the start of their projects.

Finally, there are also lessons to be learned and risks to be highlighted to our own academic institutions. We will seek to press these home through our own internal channels, but we mention them since they may also be of relevance to researchers in other institutions. Thanks to the 'Research for Community Heritage' programme we have widened considerably our own and our colleagues' experience of working with community heritage groups, and we have in the process appreciated the access to the wider experience of the NCCPE in this area through the AHRC 'summits' and the NCCPE's training programmes. At the same time, we are aware that much of the positive energy and relationship-building will be dissipated if there are no resources to follow up and maintain the connections we have forged during the lifetime of the funded programme. We may in some cases have unwittingly created expectations on the part of community groups which are hard to fulfil. In addition, sustainability with regard to the maintenance of digital resources (for instance websites hosted by universities) is an issue that needs to be addressed.
Exploitation Route In ongoing and future projects, we anticipate building on and widening our experience working across disciplines (hitherto focused on history and archaeology) and establishing partnerships with external organizations.
Some new cross-disciplinary connections and external collaborations have already emerged, other possible research directions are still at a speculative stage.

1. Further collaborative projects have followed on from this project:
(a) AHRC Follow-on Funding: Research for Community Heritage Digital Building Heritage: Phase 3 (P.I. Dr Douglas Cawthorne, Leicester De Montfort University; Co-I Dr Chris King, University of Nottingham; Co-I Dr David Petts, Durham University). This multi-disciplinary community heritage and archaeology project is being undertaken by three UK universities (De Montfort [lead], Nottingham and Durham) by staff who have all led or been Co-I's in AHRC Connected Communities projects in 2012-13 working with successful HLF 'All Our Stories' community heritage projects. The aim of the research is to understand how the explanatory and interrogatory potential of mobile device technology (software 'apps') can be used to build community-led analysis and interpretations, presentation and education within community archaeology projects. Academic researchers, computer scientists and community partners will work together through a series of workshops to design and test different 'app' models to visualise archaeological data and interpretations, and encourage feedback and input from community users. Critical lessons will be learnt and shared about the challenges and opportunities presented by these new technologies for small-scale community heritage organisations.

(b) Early fabric in historic towns: pre-1750 buildings in Southwell: volunteer recording project (P.I. Dr Chris King, University of Nottingham; project partners: Trent and Peak Archaeology [York Archaeological Trust]; Southwell Community Archaeology Group [SCAG])
English Heritage announced a call under the National Heritage Protection Programme for new projects dedicated to early buildings in historic towns, to be led by established community groups. The Southwell buildings project provides training in building recording methods for SCAG, through a reconnaissance survey of early buildings in Southwell and detailed recording of a selected number of structures with a programme of tree-ring dating. Early response from the community has been very positive with over 30 volunteers joining the project. The outcome of the survey will be presented in both an academic article and a popular booklet about Southwell's historic buildings.

(c) Manor Park, Toton (Friends of Toton Fields, Trent and Peak Archaeology [York Archaeological Trust])
The Friends of Toton Fields were provided with a £750 grant from the Challenge Fund to enable Paul Johnson (ECR) to undertake a geophysical survey on the site of a historic watermill at Manor Park, Toton, with Trent and Peak Archaeology (project partner) providing professional support. This provided the basis for a larger HLF 'Our Heritage' project to survey the park and adjacent Toton Fields with a variety of techniques and to excavate the mill site and nearby post-medieval manor house as a community engagement venture and present these results to the public via on-site interpretation. The HLF has awarded the Friends of Toton Fields £57,000 to make this project happen, with Trent and Peak Archaeology providing professional support.


2. Other directions for future research can be considered which arise from this project. For example, a need to analyse and compare systematically the role of academics in relation to volunteer researchers exploring community heritage projects can be identified.
a) What are the factors that make for a successful genuinely co-designed and co-researched project, as opposed to a community research project to which academics provide advice and support?
b) What are the appropriate outcomes of such a project and how do these outcomes meet the needs and expectations of the contributing partners?


3. A potentially exciting prospect for future research would be to connect community heritage projects internationally. There could be different motivations for this but it seems that a compelling rationale for networking internationally would be to focus on projects which are inherently transnational in content; for instance, in relation to the history of trade, long-distance transport and mobility and the transfer of technology and knowledge across borders. Similarly, community histories in relation to 20th century conflict, or the history of migrant and diaspora groups where border-crossing has been fundamental to a community's identity, are also appropriate subjects for transnational consideration.
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy,Creative Economy,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Education,Environment,Healthcare,Leisure Activities, including Sports, Recreation and Tourism,Government, Democracy and Justice,Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections

URL http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/history/research/projects/connected-communities.aspx
 
Description Writing our History, Digging our Past was an AHRC-funded Connected Communities project (Research for Community Heritage strand) to assist community groups in the East Midlands and beyond delve into their local history and archaeology, by providing access to the expertise and resources of professional arts and humanities researchers. Over the course of two years, the University supported more than 20 local heritage projects with training in research skills and digital technology, funding and expertise for historical and archaeological research, and workshops and showcase events to bring community heritage groups together. Many of these projects are continuing with ongoing research collaborations between University academics, local heritage organisations and community partners. Writing Our History, Digging Our Past ran in two phases in 2012 and 2013. The project was funded under the Arts and Humanities Research Council's (AHRC) Connected Communities initiative, which aims to encourage understanding of the changing nature of communities and community values and the impact which their heritage and cultural contexts have on our quality of life. The project had objectives that were achieved through a combination of events, road-shows, workshops, a Challenge Fund and follow-up activities. They were: 1. Promote and reinforce existing collaborative links between University of Nottingham researchers and non-HEI partners and community groups. The value and potential of collaborative projects was promoted to academics and community partners at a launch event on 18 February 2013, attended by academic staff from across the University, County Archivists, the York Archaeological Trust and representatives of existing community-based projects. 2. Enable existing collaborative groups to extend their activities in terms of research and dissemination. This was achieved by: a) A Challenge Fund which extended and supported existing collaborations by providing money to pump-prime and scope pilot projects that would lead to community-led bids to the HLF. The Challenge Fund was used to provide support to HLF-funded groups to extend their projects in new and relevant directions or to meet unexpected contingencies for which funding was not available. The Fund was also able to accommodate requests from new community partners for small pieces of research work, as part of a pathway of modelling partnerships between academics and community heritage organisations. b) Development of a Community Heritage website by staff within Information Services, University of Nottingham. The site will be maintained by the University but its success or failure will depend on the willingness of the community partners to continue submitting material relating to their projects. 3) to build long-term capacity within the University to develop research opportunities, by raising knowledge and awareness of the benefits of community collaboration and modelling a mechanism for working with such groups in a mutually-beneficial way. In addition to the Challenge Fund and Community Heritage website mentioned above, this objective was achieved by helping to enhance the skills of community partners through a series of training workshops and events conducted by University staff and external project partners. The first element of activity was the provision of six training workshops in digital technologies for community heritage research, including website development, oral history and videoing, and the use of social media, organised by Information Services. These workshops were well-attended and received very positive feedback from the community groups. Training workshops on archival research skills, 'Introduction to Archives' and 'Preserving your Collection', in collaboration with Derbyshire Record Office, were scheduled during the project, as were training workshops in geophysical survey and the use of GIS for archaeological research. These were held in collaboration with Trent and Peak Archaeology [York Archaeological Trust].
First Year Of Impact 2012
Sector Communities and Social Services/Policy,Creative Economy,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Education,Leisure Activities, including Sports, Recreation and Tourism,Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections
Impact Types Cultural,Societal

 
Description AHRC Research for Community Heritage Case-Study
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Citation in other policy documents
URL http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/News-and-Events/News/Documents/AHRC%20Research%20for%20Community%20Heritage%20...
 
Description AHRC Follow-on Funding: Research for Community Heritage Digital Building Heritage Phase 3
Amount £40,000 (GBP)
Organisation Arts & Humanities Research Council (AHRC) 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2014 
End 01/2015
 
Description National Heritage Protection Programme (Early Buildings in Historic Towns)
Amount £12,000 (GBP)
Organisation English Heritage 
Sector Charity/Non Profit
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2014 
End 10/2014
 
Title Community Heritage website 
Description Development of a Community Heritage website by staff within Information Services, University of Nottingham. The modelling for such a site was undertaken initially by the PI, Co-I and Information Services and the results were put forward at an open consultation with Phase 2 community partners (7 February 2013). Funding for the development of the site arose out of the project's successful bid to the AHRC Connected Communities Showcase in London (18 March 2013), at which an early prototype of the site was modelled. The rationale for the website was that, whilst many of the community partners with whom the project worked already had group or society websites, very few of them focused on the actual HLF-funded 'All Our Stories' project. The intention behind the site was to bring forward the exciting discoveries emerging out of individual projects in order to publicise them to a wider audience whilst relating them to discoveries of a comparable nature from other project groups. This was an area where technical expertise by staff in Information Services and the academic context provided by the PI and Co-I was invaluable: groups were invited to think of their findings in a broader context relating to generic themes and types of material: See http://community-heritage.nottingham.ac.uk/ During the project, training was provided in the submission of appropriate material and the website was launched officially at the end of project Showcase event on 7 December 2013. The site will be maintained by the University but its success or failure will depend on the willingness of the community partners to continue submitting material relating to their projects. 
Type Of Material Improvements to research infrastructure 
Year Produced 2013 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact Groups have submitted some material to the generic site, helping to make connections between sometimes disparate projects in terms of regional location and project type. 
URL http://community-heritage.nottingham.ac.uk/
 
Description Challenge Fund 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Participants in your research and patient groups
Results and Impact The Challenge Fund was used to provide support to HLF-funded groups to extend their projects in new and relevant directions or to meet unexpected contingencies for which funding was not available. Groups could bid for grants of up to £500 with no limit on the number of applications made. Applications were reviewed by the PI and University colleagues. The Fund was also able to accommodate requests from new community partners for small pieces of research work, as part of a pathway of modelling partnerships between academics and community heritage organisations.

In total, some £9,000 was awarded to support specific research activities:
i) Barrow-upon-Trent: a geophysical investigation and archaeological survey of mysterious earthworks on the edge of the village; also funding to assist with the production of a final book;
ii) Darley Abbey: creation of a digital 3D visualisation of the historic school building by a student from the University of Nottingham's Department of Architecture and the Built Environment, and the creation of a physical display model using a 3D printer;
iii) Thoresby in WWII: workshops and visits by volunteers to the University's Manuscripts and Special Collections, and digitisation and preparation of images for the final project exhibition;
iv) Southwell Archaeology: training for volunteers on using digital maps for presenting archaeological heritage; also expert pottery analysis and training workshops for volunteers to interpret the ceramic assemblage from the Burgage Green archaeology project;
v) Derwent Valley: two training workshops for volunteers on recording and editing oral testimony, run by the University's Information Services;
vi) Friends of Toton Fields: three days of archaeological and geophysical survey [for the consequences of which, see below under 'Recommendations for future research'];
vii) Raleigh Project (Hanby and Barrett): production of educational materials and an interactive digital map of the Raleigh factory site;
viii) Caistor Roman Town: three archaeological finds-identification workshops run by specialists;
ix) Anglo Saxons in the Meon Valley: historical and place-name research by Dr Kelly Kirkpatrick, School of English;
x) Diseworth Parish Trust: an archaeological survey of the medieval parish church;
xi) Leicester Secular Society: research and preparation of a report on the experience of secularists in the nineteenth century, by a student in the Department of Theology and Religious Studies;
xii) Newark Heritage Barge: funding to assist with publication of a book;
xiii) The Peel Society: reproduction and lamination of caricatures for display and for production of a related book (see outputs - publications).

The Challenge Fund has generated a wide number of impacts including publications, talks, workshops, reports and the groundwork for successful funding applications; a notable example would be The Friends of Toton Fields, who were provided with a total of £750 from the Challenge Fund to enable Paul Johnson (ECR) to undertake a geophysical survey on the site of a historic watermill at Manor Park, Toton, with Trent and Peak Archaeology (project partner) providing professional support. This provided the basis for a larger HLF 'Our Heritage' project to survey the park and adjacent Toton Fields with a variety of techniques and to excavate the mill site and nearby post-medieval manor house as a community engagement venture and present these results to the public via on-site interpretation. The HLF has awarded the Friends of Toton Fields £57,000 to make this project happen, with Trent and Peak Archaeology providing professional support. This has generated local media interest including a lengthy feature on Notts TV (Freeview Channel 8 in the East Midlands).
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2013
URL http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/history/research/projects/connected-communities.aspx
 
Description Collaborative Working Workshops 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? Yes
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Participants in your research and patient groups
Results and Impact The activities led to more reflection on the processes of community engagement work; NCCPE invited some of the groups represented at the event to their national symposium on the Connected Communities Research for Community Heritage project and also to the follow-up international event held at Copenhagen in the aftermath of the project.

The groups were asked to participate in events which transcended the local reach of their projects.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2013
URL http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/history/research/projects/connected-communities.aspx