Risk, Hazards, Disasters and Cultures: Exploring an Integrated Humanities, Natural Sciences and Disaster Studies Approach

Lead Research Organisation: University of Bristol
Department Name: School of Modern Languages

Abstract

'Natural' disasters are set to become one of the key challenges confronting governments and communities in the decades ahead as climate change, the number of people living in hazard-prone (especially coastal) locations, and the sheer density of the urban fabric increase the potential for loss from natural hazards. Societies in the past were also severely tested by disasters, however, often to the limits of their endurance. Some cultures proved more resilient and overcame these tribulations; others showed less flexibility and failed. What makes any society vulnerable or resilient in the present is in part an historical question, and understanding how different cultures at different times were able to prepare for, mitigate, manage and recover from such events provides useful lessons for disaster risk managers today.

A key aim of this network is to explore how to incorporate the distinctive cultural and temporal insights that history and the humanities more broadly can contribute to DRR. Steps towards collaborative approaches to integrated hazard research are currently emerging through the development of historical databases such as ACRE and the Global Historical Earthquake Catalogue, but there has not yet been a comprehensive conversation to enhance communication between historians, natural scientists and disaster specialists, identify common areas of concern, and frame research questions and methodologies to address them. RHDC is structured to build towards such a conversation. It encourages an interdisciplinary dialogue to identify a) what special input history and the humanities can make to DRR; b) the optimal ways in which our disciplines can collaborate; and c) the practical contribution such an interdisciplinary (but humanities-led) approach can make to disaster risk management today. To this end, we plan to hold a series of themed workshops, each of which will focus on a pressing issue in DRR studies that will enable participants to share perspectives, create a common framework for cooperation, and provide guidance on how such an integrated approach might be better incorporated into disaster risk management.

Selected contributions from the workshops will be published in a special edition of an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal such as Disasters or Global Environmental Change. We will engage non-academic audiences via the participation of organisations such as AXA and CAFOD in our workshops, by producing working papers intended for the research community and stakeholders outside academe which we will publish open-access on the network website, and by maintaining a blog to keep network participants and the wider public informed about RHDC events, and provide commentary on past and contemporary natural disasters. We will also hold public-facing events including a public lecture hosted by the University of Bristol's Cabot Institute and a historians and scientists 'in conversation' evening hosted by the University of Oxford.

The network will benefit a wide range of academic and non-academic stakeholders. It brings together participants with diverse interests and experience who seek common ground in disaster research through integrating methodologies, sharing data, and identifying critical shared questions. As an outcome of establishing strong interdisciplinary connections, it is anticipated that the network will lead to one or more applications for major collaborative research funding.

Planned Impact

In keeping with its core aim to build a research community able to make practical contributions to scholarly debate and policy-making, RHDC will engage with stakeholders beyond the academy, including:

1. Industry and humanitarian organisations. The inclusion of AXA and CAFOD as project partners and advisors to the network will help identify areas of common concern, ensure workshop discussions are framed with policy implications and management concerns in mind, and aid in disseminating briefing notes as well as working papers published on the project website to wider sector audiences, including INGOs and UN agencies such as Save the Children and UNICEF. Dissemination of outputs will encourage collaboration across academic/practitioner boundaries and contribute new knowledge with the potential to enhance the effectiveness of disaster response and recovery.

2. Policy makers. Preparing for, mitigating, and responding to natural hazards such as floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions are already key challenges facing policy makers and will become more acute in the future, not only in developing nations but even in more developed societies such as the UK. Vulnerability to environmental hazards and the ability to adapt to them are not, however, solely phenomena of our time. Societies in the past were also severely affected by disasters, and how they reacted, responded to, and dealt with the aftermath of disasters can provide lessons for risk managers and community workers today. In emphasizing the importance of historical sources and an appreciation of the historical cultural context in particular to the work of scientists and disaster specialists, RHDC will contribute to DRR and help in making communities more resilient. Understanding the short and long term impact of past events not only offers instructive parallels but also serves to highlight the importance of culture to understanding people's behaviour in disaster situations. We will also engage with government agencies in the UK and overseas through network participants' contacts as well as the University of Bristol's Cabot Institute in order to increase policymakers' awareness of the long-term nature of disaster preparedness, mitigation, and recovery.

3. Media and the public. Disasters are headline-grabbing events. RHDC's website and blog, which will contain working papers, discussions of past and contemporary disasters, and commentaries on the value and uses of historical sources will form the beginnings of a significant resource for journalists and the wider public to understand that disasters are not isolated instances but part of a continuing relationship between natural and human processes.

4. Community organisations. As an initial step in the formulation of a large-scale citizen science project that will draw both on the participants' knowledge and experience as well as the cumulative output of the workshops, we will engage with the wider public and tap into local community knowledge and activism.

5. Libraries and members of the public. To coincide with the opening of the first workshop, the University of Bristol's Cabot Institute will host a public lecture to be delivered by Co-I Greg Bankoff. The Oxford workshop will coincide with an exhibition at the Bodleian Library in spring 2017. It will be based around case studies of specific volcanoes including Vesuvius (79) and Tambora (1815), and is designed to demonstrate how archival material of various types can help scientists understand the nature and effects of past eruptions and predict how events may play out in the future. We will hold a public-facing 'in conversation' event featuring scientists and historians engaging with the exhibition materials. Here, as above, we will be engaging with the public understanding of how different disciplines approach the study of disasters past and present and how by collaborating we can improve appreciation of the nature of the risks people face.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description The PI on this project, Caroline Williams, very regrettably and totally unexpectedly died towards the end of summer 2019. It is still the aim of this project to publish a monograph based on the workshops and the ideas generated by these in mid 2021.

Greg Bankoff


The RHDC network set out to create a humanities, natural sciences, and disaster studies research community, brought together through an arts and humanities-led concern to share disciplinary insights and knowledge and improve understanding of the nature of risk and how to reduce it. We have largely met this objective through holding four workshops (in effect, two at the University of Bristol, hosted by the Cabot Institute, one at the University of Hull, and one at the University of East Anglia), and two public events (Bristol and Hull). We invited speakers where appropriate to address the workshop theme - e.g. Mirca Madianou (Goldsmiths), Amii Harwood (UEA), Martin Dittus (UCL), presented on Disasters & Digital Culture, Geographic Information Systems and Citizen Science and its uses/abuses at the Hull workshop, which was also attended by Professor Virginia Murray (Public Health, England); the University of East Anglia workshop was opened to colleagues in International Development (Roger Few, Teresa Armijos), and Politics (Hazel Marsh), leading to invitations a research event at UEA ('After Shock: recurrence and representation') that was attended by Dan Haines on behalf of the RHDC leads.
The four workshops enabled cross-disciplinary dialogue on the main themes of the network, and over time demonstrated where the greatest potential for collaboration (and buy-in) lay - namely, across the humanities and environmental sciences, where the value of collaborative approaches to hazard research were already acknowledged and ongoing (e.g. Pyle, Barclay, McMahon, Armijos; Haines, Weber; Williams, Cashman, Rust). Accordingly, we have refined our aims and are focusing our outputs and future work on developing these connections further.

Bankoff, Williams and Haines are working on an edited collection of essays (Why the Historical Approach Matters in DRR), for which we have 10 abstracts and an agreed chapter submission date of September 2019 (with a view to having the manuscript with a publisher by early 2020). Our international members (Virginia García Acosta, Francis Gealogo, and Chioma Onyige) will each be contributing a chapter. Seven chapters will be co-authored, and of these some will specifically combine humanities/sciences sources and approaches. The network leads (Williams, Bankoff, Haines) will co-author the introduction as well as contributing chapters.

This research will form the basis for additional outputs in the form of briefer contributions aimed at wider audiences that will be published on the RHDC blog, which will remain live (e.g. Williams on historical perspectives on the impact of rumour in the context of a natural disaster). Together, these will also enable us to take forward possibilities for research funding applications (in 2018, attention was diverted to GCRF Global Research Hubs).
Exploitation Route A key aim of the RHDC network was to to highlight the important role that humanities researchers - through, for example, their knowledge of how societies in the past responded to and recovered from disasters, and their understanding of the historical cultural context of risk at particular times and in specific situations - can play in informing DRR today. The workshops held over the course of the network have provided opportunities for engagement across disciplinary boundaries, and the outputs, especially our edited collection of essays (Why the Historical Approach Matters in DRR) will showcase and serve as a model for academic researchers and DRR practitioners once published.
Sectors Environment

 
Description "So Much Bad Weather": Compiling a history of extreme weather events in the UK 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This was a public lecture by Dr Lucy Veale, of the University of Liverpool, to open the second of four workshops of the RHDC network, on 'Addressing Communications in Disaster Research: Digital Culture, Geographic Information Systems and Citizen Science'.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://rhdcblog.wordpress.com/2017/11/21/disasters-and-digital-culture/
 
Description Network Event (July 2018). Risk, Hazards, Disasters and Cultures: Reflections and Next Steps 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact In light of prior workshops, we (Williams, Bankoff, and Haines) designed this final event to enable participants to reflect on the network, to agree outputs, and to plan follow-up work and potential future collaborations. Crucially, it provided us with an opportunity to reflect on which had been the most promising conversations across disciplines that had taken place over the course of the network, and where we saw the greatest likelihood of further collaboration. With some exceptions, the most productive discussions took place between humanities scholars and environmental scientists, reflected in a commitment to continue exploring ways in which we can work together to develop our shared concerns and research interests. This has enabled us to refine our aims, and to focus our efforts in relation to the order of outputs.

The main output of the network will be an edited collection of essays (Why the Historical Approach Matters in DRR), which will in turn serve as the basis for briefer contributions aimed at wider audiences that will be published on the RHDC blog, which will remain live (see Key Findings).
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Network Event: Crises, Culture and the Sustainable Development Goals 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact This was the third of four workshops to be held over the duration of the network. Organised by Professor Jenni Barclay, it took place at the University of East Anglia. Our numbers were slightly depleted due to the extreme weather over the last few days of February and 1-2 March 2018, but Dr Francis Gealogo from Ateneo de Manila University (Philippines), Dr Vinita Damodaran (Sussex) and Dr Teresa Armijos (UEA) were all present and able to give their keynote addresses. We had a particularly good turnout from colleagues at UEA, staff and postdocs, who contributed from their different disciplinary perspectives on the themes and break-out groups on the day. The overarching theme for the workshop was 'Crises, Culture and the Sustainable Development Goals'. The three sessions aimed to address the following issues: 1) Collaborating in Other People's Cultures and Dabbling in their Sustainable Development Goals: lessons learned, best practice and building collaborations with communities; 2) Collaboration across disciplines: how it helps sustainable development; 3) The Sustainable Development Goals, Culture and Risk: The Low Hanging Fruit. Discussions were extensive and fruitful, enabling us to achieve a key aim of the sessions which was to identify a theme for the final workshop to facilitate the development of future research proposals.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Network event: Disasters and Digital Culture: Perspectives from the Arts and Humanities/Social Sciences 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact This second workshop of the RHDC network was held at the University of Hull.
The event opened with an evening public lecture by Lucy Veale. We invited three keynote speakers with expertise in Digital Culture, Geographic Information Systems and Citizen Science to open the three sessions the following day and to lead discussions. Mirca Madianou (Goldsmiths, University of London) delivered a presentation on 'Disasters & Digital Culture: Perspectives from the Arts and Humanities/Social Sciences'; Amii Harwood (Geography, University of East Anglia) spoke on 'Geographic Information Systems/other digital methodologies and the Physical Sciences'; and Martin Dittus (Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis) delivered a keynote on 'Citizen Sciences and its uses/abuses'.
The public lecture and three keynote addresses sparked considerable discussion and provided us with the opportunity to ask questions aimed at enabling us to address one of the aims of the network, namely, exploring the potential for, and design of, a large-scale citizen science project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://rhdcblog.wordpress.com/2017/11/21/disasters-and-digital-culture/
 
Description Panel at the UK Alliance for Disaster Research, March 2018 (organised by Daniel Haines) 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This was a panel on 'Historical Perspectives on Hazards', organised by Daniel Haines and chaired by John Young (ODI). Five papers were presented, three by members of the RHDC network (Haines, Williams & Cashman, Werner). Although specific impacts are difficult to measure (beyond presenting the outcomes of our ongoing collaborations), the panel was well-attended and sparked considerable discussion in the Q & A session. We hope that it will encourage the inclusion of history and the humanities in future UKADR conferences.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL http://www.ukadr.org/conference2018.html
 
Description Presentation at the NERC Global Challenges Research Fund Workshop: Sustainable Development Goal Interactions: The role of environmental science 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This two-day workshop aimed to facilitate opportunities for collaboration between the UK environmental science community and academics, international development practitioners, beneficiaries and users across a range of disciplines. The invitation to attend the workshop as PI of the AHRC Network Risk, Hazards, Disasters and Cultures and to contribute to the Interdisciplinary Perspectives Session was specifically to facilitate links across disciplinary communities and to show the potential for the arts and humanities to contribute to interdisciplinary work in addressing SDGs. Together with Daniel Haines (University of Bristol) we presented on 'Working with Environmental Scientists: A View from the Humanities'. We set out the aims and objectives of our network, discussed a number of projects, including GCRF Building Resilience projects, in which arts and humanities researchers have participated, and, more broadly, made the case for the opportunities for collaboration between historians and environmental scientists in addressing SDGs. Both presenters (Williams and Haines) have subsequently been included in GCRF Interdisciplinary Research Hub applications.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://www.nerc.ac.uk/research/partnerships/international/gcrf/news/workshop-outcomes/
 
Description Public lecture delivered by Professor Greg Bankoff: 'Earthquakes and Communists in Kazakhstan: What Happened to the Second World?' (University of Bristol) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Public Lecture, delivered by Professor Greg Bankoff, and hosted by the Cabot Institute (University of Bristol). The audience included network participants (national/international), members of the public, and postgraduate students. The lecture attracted an audience of approximately 60-70 and served as the launch event of the network.
Abstract: Despite its collapse, the USSR still exerts a defining influence over the way people think and behave. In this talk, Prof. Bankoff looks at the extent to which the legacy of the Soviet Union and the infrequency of major earthquakes combine together to affect attitudes and policies in Kazakhstan today. Specifically, it is shown how the USSR continues to shape how people think about nature and their attitudes towards earthquakes, how it influences the way people behave and respond to emergencies, and the extent to which it continues to affect the development of civil society. This research is based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines the social with the natural sciences, theoretical insights with historical perspectives, to illustrate how each informs the other and why both are essential to making people safer from earthquakes.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cabot/events/2016/earthquakes-and-communists.html
 
Description The AHRC International Development Summit: Mobilising Global Voices 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This was a break-out session at the AHRC's International Development Summit (7 June 2017), the aim of which was to showcase the multiple ways in which arts and humanities research seeks to, and helps, address international development challenges.

Convened by PI Williams, panel members included Professor Virginia Murray, (Consultant in Global Disaster Risk Reduction, Public Health England), co-I Greg Bankoff
(Professor of History, University of Hull), Michael Hutt (Professor of Nepali and Himalayan Studies at SOAS, and PI of the AHRC-funded 'After the Earth's Violent Sway: the tangible and intangible legacies of a natural disaster'), Daisy Chioma Onyige (Senior Lecturer at the Department of Sociology, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria, Fellow of the Rachel Carson Centre for Environment and Society, and Commonwealth Research Fellow, African Studies Centre, University of Oxford), and Wendy McMahon (Senior Lecturer in Latin American Studies at UEA, and PI of the AHRC-funded project, 'Explosive Transformations: Cultural Resilience to Natural Hazard on St Vincent and Montserrat').

Entitled 'Reading the ruins: Past voices, present concerns', the theme of the session was as follows:

Why is the past important to the present? How can arts and humanities research contribute to our understanding of the relationship between 'natural' disasters and human culture? We aim to open a dialogue between arts and humanities researchers, social scientists, and practitioners in order to explore how we can work together to enhance resilience and facilitate disaster risk reduction in ODA countries. Our panel will address the following questions:
- Why is Interdisciplinarity Important?
- Why are Voices of the Past Relevant?
- How can we "Listen" to them?: Data and Methodologies
- How can we Apply them to Contemporary Issues?: Application (two case studies from Nepal and St. Vincent and Montserrat)
The invitation to present at the NERC Global Challenges Research Fund workshop - Sustainable Development Goal Interactions: The role of environmental science in September 2017 came as a direct result of our participation in the AHRC Summit.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/research/readwatchlisten/features/international-development-summit/
 
Description Workshop: What is Risk? A starting point for discussion of disciplinary differences in understanding of risk and how to develop a common framework for collaboration 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact This was the first of four workshops to be run as part of the network. The workshop involved approximately 20 participants, and brought together wUK-based and international historians, natural scientists, disaster specialists to address the following questions:
1. What special input can history and the humanities make to informing scholarship and improving DRR policy and implementation?
2. What are the intellectual and methodological barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration, and how can these be overcome?
3. How best can historical sources and perspectives, and an appreciation of the importance of culture to understanding people's behaviour in disaster situations, be integrated into future research agendas?
To this end the programme for the day was divided into the following sessions:
Session 1: Do we think differently? What is Risk? Disciplinary Perspectives
Session 2: Practical Experience of Working across Disciplines: Practical experience of working across disciplines
Session 3: What should be the Research Agenda? Planning a research proposal
Session 4: Discussion and Conclusions: Next Steps (Workshop 2; Website and blog; Further suggestions)
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cabot/research/research-centres/rhdc/