Understanding Phenotypic Trait Differences and their Impact on Habitual Behaviour: A Fully Translational Approach
Lead Research Organisation:
Anglia Ruskin University
Department Name: Faculty of Science and Engineering
Abstract
Abstracts are not currently available in GtR for all funded research. This is normally because the abstract was not required at the time of proposal submission, but may be because it included sensitive information such as personal details.
Technical Summary
Phenotypic trait differences lead to differences in psychological processing, ultimately producing differences in behaviour. One example is the ability of reward-associated conditioned stimuli (CSs) to command attention and support the attribution of incentive value (supporting 'sign-tracking') or to control behaviour, as in CS-response habits. We previously observed in rats an association between sign-tracking and dysfunctional behaviour on the Observing Response Task (ORT), a fully translational, rodent-to-human task assessing functional and dysfunctional checking. Similar associations have been observed between sign-tracking and compulsive-like drug-seeking behaviour in rodents, leading us to hypothesise that sign-tracking correlates with habitual, compulsive behaviour, whether expressed through drug-seeking or dysfunctional checking. Furthermore, these rodent data parallel findings in humans, that behaviours analogous to sign-tracking correlate with self-reported compulsive behaviour. We hypothesise that phenotypic trait differences in the attribution of incentive value predict, and may promote, habit formation and compulsive-like behaviour across species, and across the continuum from adaptive to maladaptive habits.
The reliance of previous work on self-report measures limits comparability between the human and rodent data. If we are to test whether the same mechanisms relate sign-tracking, habit formation and compulsivity in humans and animals, we need to test empirically whether sign-tracking in humans is associated with objective behavioural measurements, such as the human ORT. Furthermore, we need to know whether repetitive behaviours measured by the ORT are maladaptive and compulsive, and if sign-tracking leads to habit formation and compulsivity. We will use a cross-species approach to address these questions, providing a springboard for future neural interrogation of brain circuits while consolidating the translational relevance of our approach.
The reliance of previous work on self-report measures limits comparability between the human and rodent data. If we are to test whether the same mechanisms relate sign-tracking, habit formation and compulsivity in humans and animals, we need to test empirically whether sign-tracking in humans is associated with objective behavioural measurements, such as the human ORT. Furthermore, we need to know whether repetitive behaviours measured by the ORT are maladaptive and compulsive, and if sign-tracking leads to habit formation and compulsivity. We will use a cross-species approach to address these questions, providing a springboard for future neural interrogation of brain circuits while consolidating the translational relevance of our approach.
People |
ORCID iD |
| Sharon Morein-Zamir (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Emily Breese
(2023)
Seeking certainty in an uncertain world
Felippe Espinelli Amorim
(2023)
Is motivation toward a reward a predictor of dysfunctional behavior?
| Description | As noted elsewhere, as part of this award we have engaged in dissemination and engagement activities to the general public including adults and children and families. Engagement activates that were developed could be used in future education and engagement activities (e.g., online demonstrations of incentive salience successfully adapted for under 10 year olds). |
| First Year Of Impact | 2024 |
| Sector | Other |
| Impact Types | Cultural |
| Description | Amy Milton at University of Cambridge |
| Organisation | University of Cambridge |
| Department | Department of Psychology |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | As outlined in the grant application |
| Collaborator Contribution | As outlined in the grant application |
| Impact | Training 1 manuscript for publication in academic journal 4 abstract submissions for scientific meeting |
| Start Year | 2020 |
| Description | "Breaking bad and building good" : 2 days of interactive activities and engagement at the Cambridge Science Festival (over 10K attendees for the this specific event as part of activities for families and the general public). |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | A stall and table with different activities and information - each activity explores a different element of habit formation and provides the general public with an interactive and accessible way to learn about the science behind habits. Researchers and student volunteers were on hand to answer questions and guide the audience through the activities. : "Join us for an interactive and educational experience that explores the science of we form habits and its implications for both humans and animals. Don't miss out on this opportunity to uncover the secrets of your own habits and learn about how we investigate habits we share with our animal counterparts! " Activities consisted of colourful and engaging posters to convey key information, interactive demonstration of animal research testing in this space and the following specified activities around habit formation: 1. Discover your habits The public write down/draw a good and a bad habit they have, which can be grouped into different domains visually, and they are then discussed with the researcher 2. The Distraction Challenge A target finding game run on a laptop where children and adults locate a target amongst some distracting stimuli (sweet) asked how hungry they are and how much they like sweets, Researcher then explained about incentive salience, how cues in the environment can acquire 'power' to influence our motivation to carry out repetitive behaviours. 3. Are habits human? An example of the testing set up for rats involving Perspex testing chamber and stuffed rat toy. Researchers explained we can learn about how habits are formed in different species and how translational experiments can be useful (or, humans aren't that special) 4. Rewards lead to learning leads to habits: A learning game on the tablet (2-4 minutes per person). Accompanied with explanation of how the same game could be set up for animals (train your pet!). Audience asked can you learn to predict which buttons will cause a reward to fall out of a magic box? Can you learn to predict which abstract picture will predict a reward? Task involved one instrumental block and one pavlovian block. Rewards were images of food (e.g., sweets, popcorn or crisps), or gamified rewards (magic eggs). Following the event we were informed by organisers that they monitored over 10,000 attendees to the family and public event that this was part of. Feedback was overwhelmingly positive on the day with the stall seeing excellent public engagement and involvement (e.g., a constant line of children and adults to play the 'distraction challenge' and avid discussion between family members). The activities in addition to the discussions with the public led to greater awareness and interest in relation to habit formation, the role of incentives and their nature and translational research between human and animal psychology. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://www.aru.ac.uk/community-engagement/community-events-listing/cambridge-festival-2024/breaking... |