TRAnsforming the DEbate about livestock systems transformation (TRADE)

Lead Research Organisation: University of Edinburgh
Department Name: The Roslin Institute

Abstract

Livestock (farmed mammalian species, poultry, and fish) has been central to UK agriculture for centuries, being culturally embedded in the popular image of national farming systems. But the sustainability of the sub sector is increasingly questioned due to environmental and health impacts related to production methods and meat and dairy consumption. Livestock will have to play a role if the UK is to meet climate change mitigation targets. Meat consumption, particularly processed meat, is under scrutiny for its potentially detrimental health impacts. Some production systems are constantly criticized due to their animal welfare impacts. There is some consensus around the idea that livestock farming must change or transform, but there is less agreement on how this might happen. A shared view of a specific system challenges and opportunities is a pre requisite to the development of a system transformation. Yet, it is unclear whether stakeholders in the livestock sector share the same vision of the system and its current structure and where it needs to get to. TRADE will work with sector stakeholders including scientists, farmers, processors, retailers, consumers, investors and policy makers. It will seek a consensus on the increasingly contested role of livestock in the UK agricultural economy, balancing its market value and opportunities for innovation with its less tangible contributions to food systems, health, rural economies and social wellbeing. Consensus will be substantiated with the evidence on the innovation potential in production systems (e.g. genetics and breeding techniques), and with reference to public preferences for the future of livestock systems in the UK and internationally. Ultimately, the objective is to understand and measure the environmental, health, economic and societal trade-offs inherent in transformation scenarios. Without better quantification of these trade-offs we are unlikely to develop consensus on transformational pathways that acknowledge and addresses relative gainers and losers. TRADE will comprise 5 work packages using mixed qualitative and quantitative methods to explore better integration of social science with biological sciences to understand and mitigate societal, political and economic barriers that may hinder uptake of new solutions into practice. Objectives are :1) Mapping UK stakeholders and determining baseline production and consumption patterns and associated market and non-market impacts (net external costs), their origin, distributional impact and regulation; 2) understanding competing views on the technical, economic, behavioural and policy potential of production technologies and supply side shifts to regulate market and non-market impacts; 3) understanding evolving health and social impacts and public preferences for livestock goods and related ecosystem services; 4) understanding regulatory objectives and establishing consensus on roles and responsibilities of market participants and government; 5) Iterative modelling of the livestock system using participatory methods and co-constructed scenarios; 6) Development of a co-constructed pathway to specific and measurable outcomes related to market, environment health and social impacts related to production and consumption of livestock products.
The project will ultimately define an agreed pathway to transform the UK livestock in readiness for a changing future.

Publications

10 25 50