Novel Procedures for Simulating Phylogenetic Trees and Speciation

Lead Research Organisation: University of Leeds
Department Name: Inst of Integrative & Comparative Biolog

Abstract

Biodiversity is in decline and conservation is becoming increasingly important in today's society. The process of speciation, how new species evolve, is fundamental to biodiversity maintenance but is not fully understood. Phylogenetic trees show the origins of present day diversity, pinpointing when species evolved and describing their relatedness. They are also used in modeling the different strains of diseases such as flu. A lot of research has taken place with the aim of interpreting speciation and phylogenetic trees by evaluating various models. In this project, we use neutral models, which make the controversial assumption that all individuals interact with the system in an identical manner regardless of their species. Despite their assumptions, these models match ecological data with astounding precision, attracting a lot of research attention. For modeling phylogenetic trees, neutral models improve on many earlier models because the probability of a species becoming extinct becomes proportional to the number of representative individuals. Point mutation is one of three modes of speciation regularly used in these models. It states that every newborn individual has a constant probability being a new species. A powerful computational method based on coalescence traces the ancestry of individuals backwards in time. This solves the problems of waiting for equilibrium and restrictive simulation sizes associated with alternative forwards simulations. Point mutation creates a lot of species with only one member, which is not observed in reality. The phylogenetic trees it generates consequently appear unrealistic having many passing mutations counted as novel species. The other two mechanisms are random fission and peripheral isolate speciation where new species arrive as a small founding population. This approach is promising but the coalescence simulations cannot be used for these modes of speciation. This is extremely restrictive and prevents detailed studies. We will develop novel modification of coalescence to make it suitable for investigating the random fission and peripheral isolate modes of speciation. Speciation in nature is a gradual process but all three existing mechanisms assume a sudden speciation event. We propose a novel speciation mechanism where each individual has a simple genome including two genes. This solves the problem of passing mutations in a different way; they exist but would never be defined as a distinct species because the passing mutation would only influence one of the two genes. This mechanism of speciation is gradual because time passes between the mutation of the first gene and mutation of the second gene. It is mutation of the second gene that completes the speciation process. We will fully investigate this mode of speciation and the phylogenetic trees it generates. We have a number of exciting applications for these novel methods, each of which requires a different spatially explicit structure in the model. A two dimensional spatially explicit version of the model is suitable for comparison with empirical phylogenies from collaborator Stephen Hubbell. We have access to a further dataset collected across a rainfall gradient. This will give us the opportunity to test a version of the model that includes habitat heterogeneity. A network of distinct communities is an appropriate spatial structure for many applications including archipelagos and disease dynamics. For example, our collaborator Luke Harmon has zooplankton data collected from fresh water lakes, where a comparison with neutral models would be insightful. A medical application also exists regarding bioflms. These are adhesive matrices and infections that are untreatable with antibiotics. Recent research has shown an extreme rate of diversification in these biofilms. A test using a three dimensional neutral model would be insightful research in understanding within biofilm competition.

Publications

10 25 50

publication icon
McInnes L (2011) Integrating ecology into macroevolutionary research. in Biology letters

publication icon
Rosindell J (2012) The case for ecological neutral theory. in Trends in ecology & evolution

publication icon
Rosindell J (2011) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. in Trends in ecology & evolution

publication icon
Rosindell J (2012) OneZoom: a fractal explorer for the tree of life. in PLoS biology

publication icon
Wennekes PL (2012) The neutral-niche debate: a philosophical perspective. in Acta biotheoretica

 
Title The neutral theory of biodiversity and macroevolution 
Description The unification of ecology and evolution represents a great challenge for understanding the natural world. One promising direction that has received a great deal of recent attention is the neutral theory of biodiversity. Neutral theory provides a suite of mechanistic models that encompass speciation over evolutionary timescales as well as ecological processes such as dispersal limitation. These models make a wide variety of predictions; however in practice most studies have been restricted to species abundance distributions and other purely ecological patterns. We will investigate the evolutionary predictions of neutral theory that have either gone unexplored, or appear to contradict neutral theory. These include the lifetimes of species, the shapes of phylogenies and the distributions of endemic species on different islands. We show that whilst the best-known neutral model does not produce empirically realistic predictions of these evolutionary patterns, more advanced neutral models often can. Perhaps the most useful insights emerging from neutral models will be an understanding of when they fail to match empirical observations of ecology and evolution, and the details of which additional factors need to be incorporated to resolve the problems. We conclude that the neutral theory of biodiversity does indeed take a significant step towards integrating ecology into macroevolutionary research. 
Type Of Art Film/Video/Animation 
Year Produced 2011 
Impact This video has been watched over 300 times. 
URL http://vimeo.com/21981986
 
Description The highest impact research of the grant was the introduction and further development of the 'protracted speciation model', an improved version of the model that formed a cornerstone of the original application. The first paper I published on this topic has already received 20 citations. The key feature of protracted speciation was that it allowed speciation to take time rather than being an instantaneous event - this made a huge difference to model predictions even if speciation remains phenomenological. The protracted speciation model solved a number of serious outstanding problems with ecological neutral theory, but also proved useful as a concept in other models of phylogenetics and island biogeography.
Exploitation Route The protracted speciation model and island biogeography models that I developed during this grant have already been taken further by researchers more broadly in further research and continue to form part of my own research.
Sectors Environment,Other

 
Description This funding has led to the publication of 14 papers. I was first author on six of these papers including two in 'Ecology Letters'. I was second of two in authorship for two further papers, one of which was in 'Systematic Biology'. There are several further first author works that benefited from the funding and are expected to appear soon but are not yet accepted. I have given 28 research presentations during the grant including 12 at international conferences. The highest impact research of the grant was the introduction and further development of the 'protracted speciation model', an improved version of the model that formed a cornerstone of the original application. The first paper I published on this topic has already received 20 citations. The key feature of protracted speciation was that it allowed speciation to take time rather than being an instantaneous event - this made a huge difference to model predictions even if speciation remains phenomenological. The protracted speciation model solved a number of serious outstanding problems with ecological neutral theory, but also proved useful as a concept in other models of phylogenetics. For example, it provides a novel explanation for the observed slowdown in diversification near to the present day. Of the originally envisaged applications of the work, island biogeography proved the most successful. I developed a quantitative, general, mechanistic model for species richness and endemicity on islands. The model spanned all sizes of islands and all possible levels of isolation ranging from those where the island is essentially a sample from the mainland to the case where the island contains large radiations of endemic species. The findings of this work were in accord with existing qualitative theory and empirical data and made use of a version of protracted speciation that implicitly accounted for gene flow between populations. Beneficiaries: Other scientific researchers
First Year Of Impact 2009
Sector Environment,Other
Impact Types Cultural

 
Description Theory of Biodiversity, Extinction and Habitat Change on Islands and Mainlands
Amount £283,842 (GBP)
Funding ID NE/I021179/1 
Organisation Natural Environment Research Council 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2012 
End 12/2014
 
Description Collaboration with Albert Phillimore 
Organisation University of Edinburgh
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Collaboration with Albert Phillimore for the publication of work modelling island biogeography problems using neutral theory
Collaborator Contribution Involvement at all stages of the research leading to this publication.
Impact One publication as co-author in Ecology Letters
Start Year 2009
 
Description Collaboration with Luke Harmon 
Organisation University of Idaho
Country United States 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Further work on neutral theory and it's predictions in phylogenetics.
Collaborator Contribution Co-authorship and advice on a number of scientific publications.
Impact A number of scientific publications.
Start Year 2009
 
Description Collaboration with Rampal Etienne 
Organisation University of Groningen
Country Netherlands 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Ideas, software, time
Collaborator Contribution Ideas, time, expertise - in general we have both contributed similarly to the collaboration, but come from different perspectives.
Impact 10 publications - see publications list
Start Year 2006
 
Description Collaboration with Stephen Hubbell 
Organisation University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Country United States 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Ideas, software, working on joint projects and papers
Collaborator Contribution Expertise in the specific area of study that is of interest.
Impact Three publication have so far come from this collaboration, two in TREE and one in Ecology Letters.
Start Year 2010
 
Title Dynamic islands simulator 
Description Accompanying the paper "A unified model of species immigration, extinction and abundance on islands" This software is freely available for general use as an appendix to the paper. 
Type Of Technology Software 
Year Produced 2012 
Open Source License? Yes  
Impact The software has been used by other researchers working in this field to assist with their own outputs. 
 
Title Spatially explicit neutral phylogeny simulator 
Description SImulation software for a spatially explicit neutral model Outputs: the spatial distribution of all species within a sample region and the phylogenetic tree of all sampled species in newick format Variables: dispersal kernel, speciation mode, speciation rate, speciation duration (if applicable), boundary conditions, survey area Application: Numerous studies are underway with different collaborators to analyse the output of this software. The software will ultimately be released for general use. 
Type Of Technology Software 
Year Produced 2011 
Impact At this time, only I have used the software for producing further research.