Civic Data Identity Partnership

Lead Research Organisation: University of Manchester
Department Name: School of Health Sciences

Abstract

The use of health data in research is well recognised as a potential driver of economic development in areas including machine learning, edge computing and internet of things, digital healthcare, genomics, and wellbeing. Public health, wider society and the $8tn global healthcare market face diminishing returns on late, expensive, imprecise and unfairly distributed care. As the US struggles with health system reforms moving from "volume to value" the UK has the data and governance to measure health needs and care value with sufficient resolution to create new supply chains of health and care. For example, NHS primary care data are sufficiently detailed to train algorithms in predicting needs and personalising notifications to help patients manage medications when they have more than one condition. Such advances in predictive, preventive, personalised care need social contractsand currencies for experimenting with algorithms in supply chains across different providers. The goal of the Civic Data Identity Partnership (CDIP) is to create a platform for patients and clinicians to manage their data and interactions with digital health solutions, such as predictive algorithms. By building the CDIP using Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) the platform will take advantage of the secure, decentralised properties of DLT to ensure privacy, identity and trust based on an open technology. The use of DLT in health data management has been considered but not yet resolved, with approaches often being led by technology enthusiasts rather than driven by user need, which must include the views of citizens, the NHS, research organisations and industry. Over the course of two years the project will take a multi-disciplinary approach to research the potential of the CDIP platform based on four key objectives:

-CDIP Platform: providing the infrastructure for the management of predictive algorithms ensuring a provenance trail and validation record are maintained on the ledger

-Security and Trust: Developing a model that can be trusted by patients, clinicians and researchers to generate insight and learning on the efficacy of digital health interventions that demonstrates the efficacy of how apps can be used

-Consent: Building a clear and transparent governance platform to support patient consent so access to data can become easier. The ability to review who has access to data and how it is being used is increasingly important at an increasingly granular level.

-Efficacy and Reputation: There is a need to develop a model that can be trusted by patients, clinicians and researchers to generate insight and learning on the efficacy of digital health interventions that demonstrates the efficacy of how apps can be used, not just a rating in an app store. As algorithmic models are developed in interaction with data there is a ledger of use and outcomes that can be recorded, used and tested.CDIPs have the potential to transform the ways in which: citizens think about their personal data; and how public and private organisations use the data for improved safety, better management of complex care pathways and transparency of consent for use of data in health research.

Planned Impact

UK healthcare has a rich longitudinal patient record that exists in very few places across the world - it is a national asset, enabling research that cannot be done easily anywhere else. Releasing the latent value of these data will generate a vibrant health and life sciences industry, based in the UK, developing businesses and local economies. The outcomes of this research on CDIP will potential benefit four key groups: Patients, the NHS, the pharmaceutical industry and digital technology companies. Patients will benefit by having better access and control of their personal data, independent of the source, alongside being more informed around consent for the use of their data in algorithms and apps that they may use to support their health. This will provide increased trust and understanding of their care. This could lead to better compliance, safety and outcomes. Additionally they will be able to participate in wider research opportunities. Citizens who provide data extend a personal ledger with interactive avatars composed of algorithmic supply chains that can be managed and evaluated by both the care system and the patients. This system will support the sharing of the reputation and reliability of different algorithm and data models to enable greater transparency and safety in the combination of different interventions for individual patient pathways. The NHS needs to have the appropriate governance and ability to measure the efficacy and safety of digital interventions. In particular, with the predicted rise in the use of machine learning the CDIP platform could provide an opportunity to support enforcement of an ethical framework for AI. Currently digital SMEs have no clear interface to engage with the patients and public sector data to develop relevant algorithms. At the same time, regulators are calling for algorithm validation and more transparent/governable interfaces with data. CDIP would provide a key platform for addressing these challenges of access and validation. The pharmaceutical industry is also under-served by UK data assets because of the lack of public trust in the institutions that supply data and because citizens see no return on the investment the industry is prepared to make in accessing data. Research and innovation is being suffocated through the lack of a data supply. By making the link between data, research and patient outcomes more transparent it should support the growth in the available of data, the quality of the data collected and improve access to patients who consent to be approached for research. Further opportunities for investigation include the use of the platform to help identify consented citizens for clinical trials recruitment along with mixed levels of micro-billing for sharing and use of data based on participation. For example, more drug interventions are being developed with a digital component to support better compliance and management in combination with AI. Future healthcare, built on deeper connection with patients/citizens and more predictive information, will depend on supply chains of analytics that can manage the validity and provenance of the information that supports decisions, as available through the CDIP platform.

Publications

10 25 50

publication icon
Leeming G (2019) Blockchain in health care: hype, trust, and digital health. in Lancet (London, England)

publication icon
Cunningham J (2021) Blockchain Native Data Linkage in Frontiers in Blockchain

publication icon
Cunningham J (2022) Non-Fungible Tokens as a Mechanism for Representing Patient Consent. in Studies in health technology and informatics

 
Description This project had three themes:
Theme 1 - Ethical, legal and socio-technical issues and user requirements for personal health data sharing utilising Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). Insights from Theme 1 can be summarised as:
- DLT in health care is a complex intertwinement of technical features, legal context, and organisational models for data sharing, in which choices are driven by the objects of an envisioned platform and socio-political values behind and of those initiating and maintaining it
- Some features of DLT were regarded as useful for data sharing such as transparency, possibilities of collective decision making and the management of individual and common digital resources
- Public engagement participants preferred collectivist approaches to data sharing, such as cooperatives and regarded data donation as the most desirable DLT application as it filled a gap within the existing health care environment in the UK
- Legal barriers to DLT persist in current legislations (e.g. GDPR), most of which were drafted with hierarchical system models in mind, hence challenges such as place of jurisdiction for distributed ledgers, or features such as immutability in DLT crashing with the right to be forgotten

Theme 2 - Technical Platform Development. There were two main technical outputs produced by the project relating to this theme:
- In the area of consent management we produced a reference architecture for a DLT-based consent management system along side a prototype implementation of this architecture.
- In the area of Distributed Autonomous Organisations (DAO) based governance we produced a smart contract based API for enabling various voting mechanisms for participants in data management cooperatives.

Theme 3 - Business Models and Sustainability aimed to identify if and how a DLT based data sharing infrastructure (BDSI) could be realised as viable business.
- Following business model development and value chain analysis based on the analysis of these projects we constructed three potentially viable business models for a future CDIP, categorized around the underlying type of DLT infrastructure:
* Hosting on a public DLT
* Providing an self-hosted DLT
* Utilising a third-party DLT
- We developed a business model simulation tool in order to analyse the viability of these three models.
- The results of the simulation analysis indicate that a future CDIP platform based on a self-hosted DLT infrastructure would provide the only viable business model.
- However, a self-hosted DLT negates the key benefits of a distributed infrastructure, specifically: transparency, distributed control, collective decision making, trust and immutability.

In summary, DLT has properties that can overcome some of the concerns people have about health data sharing. It is most promising as a mechanism for collective decision making and this is technically viable using publically available DLT. However, such a data sharing system can not be sustained using publicly available DLT infrastructure as the usage costs are too high.
Exploitation Route Outputs relevant to data sharing initiatives, particularly in health.
Sectors Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Healthcare

URL http://cdip.lancs.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Final_Project_Report5.pdf
 
Description The project findings on the core set of preferences people have for sharing health data and incentives for doing so, informed the Department of Health and Social Care when developing the national data sharing strategy "Data saves lives: reshaping health and social care with data" (available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-saves-lives-reshaping-health-and-social-care-with-data/data-saves-lives-reshaping-health-and-social-care-with-data).
First Year Of Impact 2022
Sector Healthcare
Impact Types Policy & public services

 
Description Department of Health and Social Care national data strategy
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
URL https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-saves-lives-reshaping-health-and-social-care-with-da...
 
Description Data Trust Initiative
Amount £90,000 (GBP)
Organisation Patrick J McGovern Foundation 
Sector Charity/Non Profit
Country United States
Start 04/2022 
End 12/2022
 
Title CDIP Business Model Simulator 
Description Performs parameter sweep of business model variables to identify viable combinations. 
Type Of Material Computer model/algorithm 
Year Produced 2022 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact Showed that all data sharing initiatives based on distributed ledger technology are not financially viable. 
URL https://github.com/cdip-uk/cdip-sim
 
Title CDIP Governance - Distributed Autonomous Organisation 
Description Implementation of governance for a data cooperative using Distributed Autonomous Organisation based on blockchain. 
Type Of Technology Software 
Year Produced 2022 
Open Source License? Yes  
Impact Prototype 
URL https://github.com/cdip-uk/cdip-governance
 
Title CDIP Platform Software 
Description Blockchain implementation of data sharing preferences. 
Type Of Technology Software 
Year Produced 2022 
Open Source License? Yes  
Impact Prototype 
URL https://github.com/cdip-uk/cdip
 
Description (Un)Controllable control: Public perceptions of blockchain in health care 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Presentation held at the annual meeting (conference) of the Society for the Social Study of Science (4S) held virtually from the 6-9th of October 2021.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description DAO Design Workshop for a Health Data Collective 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact This design workshop brought together several members of the public recruited through the Research for The Future participant pool to co-create a DAO (Decentralised Autonomous Organisation) for collectively managing personal health information. In particular, the workshop explored various voting, incentivisation and communication mechanisms following an experimental design method using feature cards. This activity led to extensive group discussions around the implications of adopting particular tenets of a personal health data DAO.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Data Sharing Societal Compact - Round Table 6 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact A societal compact or social contract (Compact) is a voluntary agreement between a range of multi-stakeholders to cooperate together to achieve social benefits.

This round table further developed the EU wide compact, focusing on:
a) Specific social benefit and purposes

b) Access terms to health data

c) Governance arrangements and structure

d) What uses of health data

e) Adherence and monitoring arrangements

f) Annual reporting of activities of the compact, societal benefits achieved and compliance with the Guiding Principles
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description End of project meeting 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact We have planned an end of project event to take place on 28th March 2022, before the project ends. The purpose of this event is to share the key outputs from this project and to engage with potential collaborators for future work in this area. Participants include about 50 people who took part in some of the project workshops, focus groups and interviews, techno-legal contacts, data trust contacts, data security and software contacts, academic colleagues, industry contacts.
we can report on the impact of this event at next year's researchfish return.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Everything Under Control? On Access Control, Privacy and Security of Blockchain Technologies in Health Care 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Presentation held at the joint conference of the European Association for the Study of Science and Technology (EASST) and the Society for the Socail Study of Science (4S) held virtually from the 18th-21st of August 2021.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Phase 2 Focus Groups (Business Model Attitudes) 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Three follow-up focus groups (based on outcomes from phase 1 user focus groups) explored DLT platform business models and governance issues with a select number of participants from phase 1. This was held as a virtual online focus group event that led to a provoked discussion regarding the general public's attitudes towards alternative business models for data personal health data.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Presentation at Senior Seminar for Centre for Social Ethics and Policy 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact A presentation on the ethico-legal implications of the use of Blockchain technology in health data sharing, and an account of the meaning and importance of stewardship in these activities
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Public and academic focused CDIP website 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact The project created an online information website targeted at both members of the public and academics with an interest in health informatics and distributed ledger technology research. In particular, the website has provided a remotely accessible resource for the delivery of key information to support participants during CDIP focus groups and workshops.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL http://cdip.lancs.ac.uk
 
Description Radical neoliberal visions: The case of blockchain in health care 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Talk and position paper presented at the Digital Workshop Festival 2021 of the Tensions of Europe research network on history, technology and Europe held from 28 June - 2 July 2021. Feedback from the panel 'Data as a new resource? Similarities and differences of data vs. material resources' led to restructuring and improving the paper.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description User group workshops 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact During September and December 2020, the research team spoke with 30 members of the general public, recruited from a range of health research charities and patient and public involvement groups in addition six PhD students as part of a pilot discussion group. Participants aged between 20 and 76 years took part in a series of five online focus group discussion groups which lasted between ninety minutes and two-hours. Each focus group included discussion based on at least two of the aforementioned scenarios which were rotated between discussion groups in order to ensure equal exposure. The focus groups were held via the videoconferencing tool Zoom as this phase of fieldwork took place during the pandemic with social distancing policies in place, which significantly impacted upon opportunities for more interactive workshop activities.

Discussion groups were capped at a maximum of six in order to maximise opportunities for participants to express their views. Three researchers were also involved in the facilitation of the focus groups in order that a researcher was readily available to address any technological issues at any point during the discussions. Participants were also encouraged to use the chat facility during focus group discussions to comment or raise concerns whilst another participant was speaking or if they felt unable or uncomfortable with verbal interaction. Chat comments were moderated by a researcher and any points raised via this facility were introduced to verbal discussions throughout the duration of the focus group.

The pilot was conducted to test if materials, timing and format of the focus group designs were appropriate and accessible to a wider public audience. The pilot revealed that, despite considerable effort to produce easy-to-understand information (short animation, beginner level technological introduction into basic concepts) about DLTs, participants spent the majority of time questioning and trying to understand how blockchain technology worked, rather than discussing design requirements for the CDIP platform and scenario use-cases. Consequently, we omitted the animation and reformatted the materials so that they highlighted the features of DLTs (such as transparency, immutability or decentralisation) rather than attempting to articulate a beginner's guide to understanding blockchain technology more widely. We also introduced stakeholder perspectives to trigger a deeper exploration of the topics based on the previous work [xx]. The restructuring of the focus group format and presentation proved to be much more successful in generating useful points for further deliberation and debate between focus group participants. The final focus group format included an overview of the project aims and objectives, a short description of the current health data sharing context and presentation of two use case scenarios. After the presentation of each user story scenario, we asked participants the following questions:
1. What are major benefits and drawbacks of this use case example?
2. What choices and controls would you like to have over your own health data?
3. What information is important for you to know before using a platform like this?
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL http://cdip.lancs.ac.uk/index.php/stakeholder-engagement/