📣 Help Shape the Future of UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR)

We're improving UKRI's Gateway to Research and are seeking your input! If you would be interested in being interviewed about the improvements we're making and to have your say about how we can make GtR more user-friendly, impactful, and effective for the Research and Innovation community, please email gateway@ukri.org.

Provision and use of preschool childcare in Britain

Lead Research Organisation: University College London
Department Name: Childhood, Families and Health

Abstract

Families benefit from childcare. The availability of affordable childcare is a major influence on women's ability to take up paid work. According to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, 'Helping families to combine work and care is an essential step in achieving equality by enabling better access to the labour market for women'. Good quality childcare also improves children's long-term intellectual and social development.
A feature of good quality childcare is the level of qualification of the childcare staff. In 2011 the government published a major strategic document, Supporting Families in the Foundation Years, which renewed the government's commitment to the fundamental importance of the early years and contained recognition of the value of good qualifications for this workforce. This report focused on formal childcare provision, including provision by nurseries, playgroups or childminders. However, the majority of childcare is provided not in formal settings, but is provided informally by friends and relatives, especially by grandparents. Until recently, very little was known about this informal care, but two major reports published in 2011, from the Daycare Trust and Grandparents Plus, drew attention to the major role played by grandparents. With greater longevity, these grandparents may be looking after young children at the same time as caring for their own elderly parents. They form a 'pivot generation', with caring responsibilities for the young and the old.

Little research has so far been conducted which brings together the needs of parents, of the formal childcare workforce and of informal carers. This study will address this gap by combining information about the users (parents) and the providers of childcare, both formal and informal. It will do this through a secondary analysis of a number of large-scale, national quantitative datasets. The aim of this research is to inform understandings of the future shape of childcare provision and usage in Britain.

We will investigate the coverage and characteristics of childcare usage and provision and the childcare workforce (formal and informal) through a secondary analysis of large-scale national quantitative data, including the Labour Force Survey, the Family Resources Survey, Childcare and Early Years Providers Survey, and Childcare and Early Years Survey of Parents.

To examine the use of childcare, this research will identify those parents using childcare, both formal and informal, for their preschool children. It will examine what combinations of childcare parents are using. We shall relate the use of childcare to the demographic characteristics of the parents: these would include social class measures and income, and - perhaps most importantly - the employment status of the mother. We will compare these demographic characteristics with families that have preschool children, but are not making use of childcare.

To examine formal childcare provision, we will use the Standard Occupational Classification to identify people who are currently employed in the childcare workforce. We will examine their demographic characteristics, including gender, age, ethnicity and whether they have children of their own.

Some of the datasets include questions about providing childcare informally, rather than as a job. These data will be used to identify those who are providing informal childcare. We will describe their demographic characteristics, and identify whether they are also providing care to anyone else.

The National Day Nursery Association (representing providers) and the Daycare Trust (representing parents) have agreed to collaborate. They will contribute their own perspectives to the design of the research, and will also help develop dissemination materials that will ensure the research findings are relevant for members of their organisations and to wider non-academic audiences.

Planned Impact

Key non-academic beneficiaries include policy makers from a range of government departments (e.g. the DH, DfE, DWP), early years' practitioners and childcare charities, such as the Daycare Trust and the National Day Nursery Association (NDNA). We have agreed collaboration from the NDNA and the Daycare Trust and will work directly with them to achieve a wide breadth of communication of the research findings. To ensure the research maximizes its impact, Claire Schofield, Director of Membership, Policy and Communications at the NDNA, has agreed to draw out the key implications of the research for NDNA's members (which will be posted for free on their website) and a summary of key policy messages to circulate to policy makers. The former summary will be the basis of a presentation we have been invited to give to the NDNA annual conference. Additionally, Jill Rutter, Policy and Research Officer at the Daycare Trust, will assist us with developing a summary for parents.

We have agreed input from a variety of key stakeholders: Claire Schofield, at the NDNA, Valerie Christian, at the DWP, Neil Leitch from the Pre-School Learning Alliance, Sarah Wellard from Grandparents Plus, Celia Hannon at the Family and Parenting Institute and Professor Dick Wiggins, Director of Methodology in the Centre for Longitudinal Studies at the Institute of Education. They will be involved in the research through a stakeholder/advisory group. Communication with this group will begin within the first month or so of the start of the project, in order that the groups' views of the research can be incorporated into the planning of the research. The group will then meet two-thirds of the way through the research, when the substantive part of the analysis has been completed, and then towards the end of the research, when the key findings have been written up. This will enable the group to discuss and evaluate the research findings at the key stages.

The medium to long term impact of the research will be to provide policy makers and practitioners with a picture of how childcare usage and provision has changed over time. This will help inform understandings of the future shape and nature of childcare provision in the UK. It will also help inform policies concerned with children's general well-being. Additionally, the findings will illuminate the characteristics of people working formally and informally in the early years' workforce, which will help inform where to target recruitment drives.

These impact outcomes of will be achieved through the planned communication and dissemination activities, such as presentations to the annual British Educational Research Conference (BERA), the European Early Childhood Research Association (EECRA) annual conference and NDNA annual conference for early years' providers. Also, through publishing in practitioner journals / magazines, such as 'Nursery World' - the UK's leading professional journal for early years' professionals working in community settings. Summaries of the key research findings will be produced collaboratively with NDNA and disseminated to the organisations centrally concerned with the early years' workforce and childcare usage and provision. In order to ensure that the findings leave a legacy, it is anticipated that dissemination will continue beyond the timeline for this research. Part of this will be to seek to present our findings to the 'All-Party Parliamentary Group on Childcare'.
 
Description 1. Recent policy drives have been to increase the access to good quality, affordable childcare. Quality has been linked to qualifications of the childcare workforce. While we identified that qualification levels of the workforce are modestly rising (a 12 per cent increase between 2005 and 2014 in NVQ level 3+ qualifications in the Labour Force Survey) suggesting policy initiatives are working, we found pay remains very low compared to other occupations (average pay is only 10 pence above the minimum wage level). This is a concern because low pay risks childcare workers leaving the sector which could lead to children not being looked after as well as parents have the right to expect. It also raises concerns about who will do the caring in the future.

2. We found parents of preschool children use multiple forms of childcare and use differed according to family circumstances (e.g. informal childcare used more by younger mothers; formal childcare by higher income families). We identified a dearth of data from the perspective of providers of informal childcare for pre-school children. More data is needed that captures the characteristics of those providing informal childcare for preschool children, including their work patterns and the extent to which these carers are providing work to others (such as elderly parents). There is also a lack of data about parental preferences for formal and informal childcare. These important gaps in current knowledge hinder understandings of the future shape of childcare provision and usage in Britain.

3. Collaborating with the National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA), and the Family and Childcare Trust, had a significant impact on the research direction and the reach of the key findings. Both organisations were instrumental in the design and write up of the key findings and contributed to the study's dissemination events and even hosted an event for us (at the NDNA). A key outcome of this collaboration was to jointly submit with the NDNA a letter to the Office for the National Statistics suggesting areas for improving their classification of the childcare workforce which we expect to directly change the way these workers are counted and classified in national statistics in the future. The collaboration with these organisations also meant the outputs were directly relevant to the users of the research.

4. An important but unexpected finding from this research was that more people describe themselves as working as childminders in the Labour Force Survey (LFS) than are registered with Ofsted as childminders. In 2014 Ofsted reported a total of 53,000 childminders, whilst the LFS estimated over 100,000. This difference could indicate a body of unregistered (illegal) childminding, but it could also be a result of the variation in the way 'childminders' are defined between the two sources. For example, the LFS childminder category includes 'related occupations', such as nannies and au-pairs who are not required to register with Ofsted, and there is no reliable estimate of their numbers. However, the size of difference in estimates between the two data sources makes this unlikely.

5. We took part in a national consultation by ONS to improve data harmonisation which led to some important changes to the Social Classification System late 2018. For example, some titles were changed and some codes disaggregated which will help with future analysis of the Labour Force Survey, particularly when examining qualifications and pay separately for 'managers' and 'frontline staff'.
Exploitation Route There are a number of ways our research is being taken forward, including:

1. The National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA), the Family and Childcare Trust and the Preschool Learning Alliance using our research as evidence to campaign for a better qualified workforce especially related to the 30 free childcare hours pledge.

2. Impact generation through submitting with the NDNA a letter to the Office for the National Statistics to work with them to improve their future classification of the childcare workforce using the Standard Occupational Classification System.

3. Encouraging dialogue between groups attending our recent key findings dissemination event on 24 July to take forward the key messages, particularly about low pay and the viability of the government's 30 free childcare hours offer, but also how the workforce should be defined and grouped in the future.

4. Encouraging people to 'keep the conversation going' through the #childcareinbritain hashtag on Twitter and our project microsite: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/childcareinbritain .

5. Having meetings with the DfE and DWP to discuss how to take forward the key research messages in their future planning for childcare provision and usage.

6. Highlighting important research gaps at academic presentations to the EECERA conference (7-11 September 2015).
Sectors Education

Government

Democracy and Justice

URL https://www.ucl.ac.uk/childcareinbritain
 
Description Childcare in Britain website - we developed a website https://www.ucl.ac.uk/childcareinbritain, where we publish policy briefing papers from the project, slides from conference presentations, blogs from stakeholders and press releases. Visitors to the website are invited to leave comments. The website has been 'live' since July 2015 and we are planning to keep it 'live' for at least another couple of years, adding in more materials as they become available. Policy - we delivered a briefing focused on key recommendations for taking the research forward for DWP on 20th November 2015 to Helen Stephenson (then Director of Early Years, Child Poverty, and Children's Services Strategy Children's Service and Departmental Strategy Directorate), and two senior researchers in the 'Early Years and Childcare Analysis' unit (which is in charge of the two main DfE surveys: Childcare and Early Years Survey of Parents and the Childcare and Early Years Providers Survey). In advance of this briefing we liaised with our Advisory Group (including a member from the DfE government department) to agree content which would be most useful to their work. The session was very well received and DfE gave us very positive feedback. As a result of meeting with us to discuss the implication of our results for the DfE they advised us: • They would carry out their own internal review of the classification of childcare workers in the Labour Force Survey (LFS), and that if they agreed with our findings, they would feed this back to the Office of National Statistics to support our own letter to the ONS (see below) calling for changes to be made to the Standard Occupational Classification system. • They acknowledged and agreed with our findings of the lack of data on childcare preferences and would be supportive of further research in the area to encourage better understanding of what parents want alongside patterns of childcare usage. • They were interested in our conclusion that delivery of future services needs to bear in mind flexibility for parents, especially those working a-typical hours. We have since seen evidence of a recognition of the need for greater flexibility in the Childcare Act of 2016, regarding how the increase in universal free childcare provision will be delivered. • Our findings on low workforce pay would inform a new workforce strategy due in September 2016. Since then they have informed us that this research has "particularly raised awareness of the SOC coding issues and we recognise that this is a limitation when we're analysing the LFS and other data (such as ASHE [ONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings]) which will inform our own future analysis of these datasets and the workforce". (13/06/2016). We submitted a letter to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) outlining possible adjustments that they might like to consider making to the Social Occupational Classification System to improve the information that can currently be obtained about the childcare workforce using the Labour force Survey. We were informed that this letter was of great value to the ONS's open consultation review of the SOC which took place in Spring-Summer 2016 - the results of which are due sometime in August 2016. As a direct result of the work carried out for this project, we were invited among a small pool of researchers in the field to apply to carry out a small piece of research to help the Department of Education better understand the role of childminders in delivering the free childcare offer. We were successfully awarded this research and carried it out between May-June 2016. NGOs - Disseminating findings of the project to stakeholders was one of our priorities from the beginning, which resulted in an active Advisory Group as well as a number of practitioner-focused dissemination events we organised (see other outputs on Researchfish for details.) Below is what some of the stakeholders told us about our research and how useful it was to them in their work. Jill Rutter, Head of Research at the Family and Childcare Trust said she cited our work was invaluable in her work producing recommendations for 'Creating an anti-poverty childcare system' (funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation for their programme of research on tackling issues related to poverty) and she cited our research within their 2016 publication: 'In for a pound. The relationship between staff wages and Ofsted grades in group-based childcare provision': http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_93434-6.pdf (see page 6). The Professional Association for Childcare and the Early Years (PACEY) have also cited our research in various publication campaigning for better workforce pay, including this recent report: 'Towards an Early Years Workforce Development Strategy for England' https://www.pacey.org.uk/working-in-childcare/workforce-development-policy-briefing-jan16.pdf (see pages 2 and 8). The National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA) was a collaborator in the project and represented on the Advisory Group. They have told us that "the Provision and Use of Pre-School Childcare in Britain project has been beneficial in providing evidence to help NDNA inform the policy agenda on the childcare workforce. We used evidence from the report when engaging with policy makers and in our submissions to public consultations, including our submissions to the Low Pay Commission's consultation on the National Minimum and National Living Wage and the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee Inquiry into Free Entitlement to Early Education. Evidence from the study was used in our media work to make the case for reform of education funding to allow greater investment in the childcare workforce and a workforce strategy. The government has announced that it will develop a childcare workforce strategy and committed to reforms to childcare funding ahead of expanding the entitlement for free childcare to 30 hours per week for working parents of three and four-year-olds." (19/06/2016). The Preschool Learning Alliance was represented on the Advisory Group. Neil Leitch, director, told us: "This work on the impact of low pay and conditions in the childcare sector has helped inform the debate on the need for adequate early years funding, a central part of the Alliance's lobbying and campaigning work over recent years. We have also cited this research in discussions on the reasons for the low numbers of male practitioners in the childcare sector, and I cited the UCL study directly in a speech on the issue of men in childcare in February 2016. The research has also highlighted the potential challenges to recruitment in the sector going forward, another key focus of the Alliance ahead of the roll-out of the 30 hour offer, and has helped inform discussions with peers and government around the current recruitment crisis in the sector." (17/06/2016). Academics - we have received a number of enquiries from academics about our research, including e.g. Dr Barbara Da Roit, University of Amsterdam, Department of Sociology, who contacted us to obtain some further information about the ethnic breakdown of the childcare workforce. Although we hadn't published this material, we were able to supply her with some information on this for a paper she is writing. Antonia Simon was recently invited to co-author a chapter, 'Driving towards a united early childhood workforce? Common heritage and touchstone issues in workforce development in New Zealand and England' for a global policy handbook on early years. We carried out a major dissemination event in July 2015 to raise awareness of the need for a better paid workforce. We are continuing to highlight the importance of this message by writing a blog and regularly tweeting on the subject, which have been used in turn by others to campaign for better policies for childcare for families in Britain.
First Year Of Impact 2015
Sector Education,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Societal

Policy & public services

 
Description Changes made to the Social Classification System for coding of the childcare workforce
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
URL https://gss.civilservice.gov.uk/user-facing-pages/standard-occupational-classifications-soc/#profess...
 
Description Private sector childcare in England
Amount £121,165 (GBP)
Organisation Nuffield Foundation 
Sector Charity/Non Profit
Country United Kingdom
Start 02/2019 
End 06/2020
 
Description Childcare collaborators 
Organisation National Day Nurseries Assciation
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution We developed a summary drawing out the key implications of the research for NDNA's providers which has been posted for free on their website and on our microsite: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/childcareinbritain. The research team also gave a presentation we were invited to give to the NDNA policy committee in May 2015.
Collaborator Contribution NDNA helped us to develop a summary to draw out the key implications of the research for NDNA's providers which has been posted for free on their website and on our microsite: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/childcareinbritain. This summary is one of the research key outputs for this grant provided by us on ResearchFish. The output was created to ensure the research messages were directly relevant to childcare providers, a key user group of this research.
Impact A key outcome of this collaboration was to jointly submit with the NDNA a letter to the Office for the National Statistics suggesting areas for improving their classification of the childcare workforce which we expect to directly change the way these workers are counted and classified in national statistics in the future. We are trying to organise in partnership with the NDNA a meeting with DfE to discuss with them how the research messages can be taken forward into policy.
Start Year 2012
 
Description Family and Childcare Trust partnership 
Organisation Family and Chidcare Trust
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution We developed a policy briefing summary in collaboration with Jill Rutter from the Family and Childcare Trust which we used to inform policy and practice. This forms one of our key outputs from the research and is included in ResearchFish.
Collaborator Contribution The Family and Childcare Trust formed part of our project advisory group. They assisted us with developing a policy briefing summary which we used to inform policy and practice. This forms one of our key outputs from the research and is included in ResearchFish.
Impact A policy briefing summary paper called 'Provision and Use of Preschool Childcare in Britain' which is one of our key outputs from the research and is included in ResearchFish. This paper has received a considerable amount of media interest and has been received by all leading government and childcare organisations. Along with the National Day Nurseries Association and the Preschool Learning Alliance, the Family and Childcare Trust has used this paper as evidence to campaign for a better qualified workforce especially related to the 30 free childcare hours pledge.
Start Year 2012
 
Description Preschool Learning Alliance collaboration 
Organisation Pre-school Learning Alliance
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution Throughout the research we have informed the Preschool Learning Alliance about our research development and findings through our project advisory group meetings. We have invited the Preschool Learning Alliance to be involved in our 24th launch of findings to engage in a public policy debate with government departments and childcare practitioners.
Collaborator Contribution The Preschool Learning Alliance were an active member of our project advisory group. Neil Leitch, director of the Preschool Learning Alliance was a panel member of our 24th July 2015 launch findings event.
Impact Along with the National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA), and the Family and Childcare Trust, the Preschool Learning Alliance using our research as evidence to campaign for a better qualified workforce especially related to the 30 free childcare hours pledge.
Start Year 2012
 
Description 24th July 2015 Key Findings Press Release 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Press release issued by our UCL press office day before our 24th July Key Findings launch event which resulted in considerable media interest - see below.

Our research results sparked articles in several national newspapers and childcare professional journals:
•The Telegraph - Children at risk as nurseries face funding squeeze, report says
•The Mirror - Tory 30 hours' childcare pledge 'could put children at risk' as nurseries are starved of cash
•Nursery World - Danger of childcare workforce shortage without wage increase
•Children & Young People Now - Meagre pay could spark nursery staff shortage
•daynurseries.co.uk - Low pay and rising costs threaten staffing levels
•Voice The Union - Voice welcomes Institute of Education report on childcare
•Early Years Educator - Improving economy may lead to staff shortages in nurseries
•Teach Early Years: Wages inadequate, P10, quotes ANTONIA SIMON
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL https://www.ucl.ac.uk/childcareinbritain/resources-media
 
Description Conference presentation - RSS 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Paper presented at the Royal Statistical Society for the Family Resources Survey User Group, London, United Kingdom:
Simon, A., Owen, C. and Hollingworth, K. (2013). Provision and use of preschool childcare in Britain, Family Resources Survey User Group. JISC, London.

None aware of.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2013
 
Description Daycare Trust Annual Conference 2012 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Conference to discuss key childcare issues. Heard address by Elizabeth Truss, which were were invited to debate in small groups in the afternoon.

None aware of.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2012
 
Description Free childcare is one policy all party manifestos support - and the one that won't work 
Form Of Engagement Activity A magazine, newsletter or online publication
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Invited Blog for London School Of Economics to comment on proposed childcare political party manifestos
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/free-childcare-party-manifestos/
 
Description How does childcare usage compare for different family types in Britain? 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.)
Results and Impact Presentation to the EECERA 25th Annual Conference, Wednesday 9th September 2015, Barcelona. This conference reaches a mixture of academics and childcare professionals from all over the world. The talk stimulated a lot of discussion about the how and why parents use different forms of childcare and what could support mothers back into work.

We had enquiries from attendees to the conference to receive more information.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL http://www.eecera.org/documents/pdf/conferences/conference-programme-barcelona-2015.pdf
 
Description Is the quality of preschool childcare, measured by qualifications and pay, improving in Britain? 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.)
Results and Impact Presentation to the EECERA 25th Annual Conference, Wednesday 9th September 2015, Barcelona. This conference reaches a mixture of academics and childcare professionals from all over the world. The talk stimulated a lot of discussion about the future shape and professionalization of the childcare workforce and how and why there were differences between various countries.

We had enquiries from attendees to the conference to receive more information. A fellow academic asked to be invited to our university to share her research further and have the opportunity to discuss our research at more length. We were invited to submit our findings for this paper to the American Journal of Education Research for consideration for publication.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL http://www.eecera.org/documents/pdf/conferences/conference-programme-barcelona-2015.pdf
 
Description NDNA press release about our research 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact One of our project collaborators, the National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA) produced its own press release to accompany our press release for our 24th July Key Findings launch event in London. The press release was intended to influence media and their members' thinking about issues facing the childcare workforce.

Not aware of any impact yet
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL http://www.ndna.org.uk/NDNA/News/Press_releases_2015/Funding_for_30_hours_free_childcare_must_enable...
 
Description Networking - IPPR 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an open day or visit at my research institution
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.)
Results and Impact Dalia Ben-Galim, Associate Director for Families and Work at IPPR came to TCRU to give a seminar about childcare. I chaired the session. Later I met with Dalia to discuss this project and I also addressed the assembled staff and students about the project. the aim was to inform people about the work being done at TCRU in the early years field and to network with another instituion carrying out similar research. Dalia was able to advise on possible avenues we might wish to pursue for dissemination of our findings next year.

People were interested in the research and students asked for more information. I gave them a leaflet summary of the study with the project contact details.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
 
Description Patterns of childcare use 24 July 2015 presentation 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact This presentation 'Patterns of childcare use' was one of two key presentations we delivered at the 'Provision and Use of Preschool Childcare Key Findings Seminar', 24 June 2015, UCL Institute of Education. Key policy makers from the Department for Education, the Department for Work and Pensions and local government, practitioner organisations, trade unions and prominent academics working in the area of childcare and child wellbeing attended. At the end of the presentations, we had a panel discussion delivered by Claire Schofield of the National Day Nurseries Association, Jill Rutter from the Family and Childcare Trust and Neil Leitch from the Preschool Learning Alliance - who all discussed what about our research was significant for them in their future work. The presentations and panel discussion sparked numerous questions from the assembled participants and discussion afterwards.

The National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA), the Family and Childcare Trust and the Preschool Learning Alliance used this research as evidence to campaign for a better qualified workforce especially related to the 30 free childcare hours pledge.

The results received considerable media interest from national press and from specialist media such as 'Nursery World', and 'Children & Young People Now' and 'Voice The Union'.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL https://www.ucl.ac.uk/childcareinbritain/resources-media/videos
 
Description Policy discussion - IPPR 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact The team were invited to attend a policy discussion on 'Maternal employment and childcare' at the offices of Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR). The aim was to listen to recent research from Mike Brewer and to engage in a public polixy discussion with the other assembled invitees, which included policy makers and heads of childcare organisations such as the Preschool Learning Alliance. We were able to publicise our research at this event.

People were interested in our study and some asked for further information.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
 
Description Presentation to NDNA policy committee 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The talk was designed both to share information and stimulate thinking. At the end of our presentation, the research sparked both questions and discussion - in particular, how an organisation such as the National Day Nurseries Association can take forward these results in their future practice and campaigning for better workforce provision from the DfE. The research was also helpful to them for highlighting the national data sources that are useful for their work (such as the Childcare and Early Years Providers Survey) and those which had limitations for providing information about senior staff (The Labour Force Survey).

After the talk, the National Day Nurseries Association worked with us to produce a summary of key messages from the research and the discussion with their policy committee which could be disseminated to their members (childcare providers) to influence the members' future practice.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL https://www.ucl.ac.uk/silva/childcareinbritain/documents/Summary_for_NDNA_members.pdf
 
Description SDAI networking event - presentation 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.)
Results and Impact ESRC Secondary Data Analysis Initiative Two Day Networking Event - British Library, St Pancras, London, 06/07 June 2013. Presented on our project aims and methods, questions were invited from other funded projects.

Simon, A., Owen, C. and Hollingworth, K. (2013). Provision and use of preschool childcare, ESRC: Secondary Data Analysis Initiative Networking Event. British Library, London.

None aware of.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2013
URL http://www.busman.qmul.ac.uk/academicwebpages/documents/101683.pdf
 
Description TCRU presentation: A secondary analysis of the provision and use of preschool childcare in Britain 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.)
Results and Impact The talk was provided to both disseminate the research to our peers and to spark discussion. After the presentation, the group assembled discussed what the research meant for the future direction of early years research and the strengths and limitations of some of the data analysed for researching preschool childcare in Britain. For some junior researchers the talk also sparked interest in using secondary data analysis in their research.

I was asked to provide further information about the key findings for people to use in their research and information for some students to use secondary data resources in their research.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL http://www.ioe.ac.uk/research/59300.html
 
Description The formal childcare workforce 24 July 2015 presentation 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact This presentation 'The formal childcare workforce' was one of two presentations we delivered at the 'Provision and Use of Preschool Childcare Key Findings Seminar', 24 June 2015, UCL Institute of Education. Key policy makers from the Department for Education, the Department for Work and Pensions and local government, practitioner organisations, trade unions and prominent academics working in the area of childcare and child wellbeing attended. At the end of the presentations, we had a panel discussion delivered by Claire Schofield of the National Day Nurseries Association, Jill Rutter from the Family and Childcare Trust and Neil Leitch from the Preschool Learning Alliance - who all discussed what about our research was significant for them in their future work. The presentations and panel discussion sparked numerous questions from the assembled participants and discussion afterwards.

The National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA), the Family and Childcare Trust and the Preschool Learning Alliance used this research as evidence to campaign for a better qualified workforce especially related to the 30 free childcare hours pledge.

The results received considerable media interest from national press and from specialist media such as 'Nursery World', and 'Children & Young People Now' and 'Voice The Union'.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL https://www.ucl.ac.uk/childcareinbritain/resources-media/videos