First and Foremost - Understanding and optimising the electoral participation of first time voters
Lead Research Organisation:
London School of Economics & Pol Sci
Department Name: Government
Abstract
First times are moments that many never forget. According to Bruter and Harrison (2017), 73% of British people, 82% of Americans, and 90% of South Africans remember their first vote. The existing literature has also confirmed the long-term importance of that first electoral experience. Butler and Stokes (1971) showed that electoral choice in the first two elections largely determines future vote. Franklin (2004) and Coppock and Green's (2016) works show how turnout at the first opportunity may start a habituation process. Lodge, Gottfried at al. (2014) and Bruter and Harrison (2017) go even further and find that voting in the first two elections of their lives will likely make citizens regular participants, whilst abstaining in both may lead them to become chronic abstentionists instead. First elections thus determine likely electoral turnout and behaviour for much of people's lives, and First and Foremost dedicates systematic attention to the way new voters experience them, the psychological, institutional, and political determinants of their behaviour, and potential institutional responses.
First and Foremost is a fully piloted empirical comparative project based on mixed quantitative and qualitative methods which focuses on characterising the experience of citizens' first vote, understanding the psychological, institutional, and contextual factors that impede or improve their likely participation, satisfaction, and likelihood to participate in future elections. We also assess how Election Management Bodies can use the opportunity of this first vote to improve potential first time voters' engagement and satisfaction notably by experimentally testing very specific instruments directed at first time voters. The project features a unique collaboration with Election Management Bodies in the UK, Australia, South Africa, France and the USA to ensure the highest level of impact of our proposed work.
At the heart of our model is the idea that whilst youth participation is a challenge, a citizen's first vote is also a unique opportunity. We use psychological research on other 'first times' - from sexuality to alcohol and parenthood - to understand how the first time dynamics can be best adapted to the question of the first vote.
The project will answer the following research question: How is a young person's first election experienced, what are the personal, institutional, and contextual determinants of potential first time voters' emotions, attitudes (satisfaction with the electoral process, efficacy, alienation), and turnout in their first and subsequently second election? It relies on four methodological elements: 1) a panel-study survey of people reaching electoral franchise for the first time, 2) focus groups, 3) election diaries, and 4) experiments and field experiments on the impact of measures aimed to make a first election special and successful.
The project makes impact a priority, predominantly focusing on three key avenues to translate our research findings into political solutions and engage users with our research from its conception and organisation to the implementation of its most important findings: collaboration with leading Electoral Commissions/Election Management Bodies as well as Inter-Governmental Organisations involved in the support for electoral democracy; collaboration with think tanks which are concerned with youth engagement and participation; collaboration with leading media outlets with a strong audience amongst young citizens.
First and Foremost is a fully piloted empirical comparative project based on mixed quantitative and qualitative methods which focuses on characterising the experience of citizens' first vote, understanding the psychological, institutional, and contextual factors that impede or improve their likely participation, satisfaction, and likelihood to participate in future elections. We also assess how Election Management Bodies can use the opportunity of this first vote to improve potential first time voters' engagement and satisfaction notably by experimentally testing very specific instruments directed at first time voters. The project features a unique collaboration with Election Management Bodies in the UK, Australia, South Africa, France and the USA to ensure the highest level of impact of our proposed work.
At the heart of our model is the idea that whilst youth participation is a challenge, a citizen's first vote is also a unique opportunity. We use psychological research on other 'first times' - from sexuality to alcohol and parenthood - to understand how the first time dynamics can be best adapted to the question of the first vote.
The project will answer the following research question: How is a young person's first election experienced, what are the personal, institutional, and contextual determinants of potential first time voters' emotions, attitudes (satisfaction with the electoral process, efficacy, alienation), and turnout in their first and subsequently second election? It relies on four methodological elements: 1) a panel-study survey of people reaching electoral franchise for the first time, 2) focus groups, 3) election diaries, and 4) experiments and field experiments on the impact of measures aimed to make a first election special and successful.
The project makes impact a priority, predominantly focusing on three key avenues to translate our research findings into political solutions and engage users with our research from its conception and organisation to the implementation of its most important findings: collaboration with leading Electoral Commissions/Election Management Bodies as well as Inter-Governmental Organisations involved in the support for electoral democracy; collaboration with think tanks which are concerned with youth engagement and participation; collaboration with leading media outlets with a strong audience amongst young citizens.
Planned Impact
First and Foremost is a project explicitly built around the need to answer a fundamental societal challenge: How can we optimise the first electoral experience of young voters in order to improve the quality of, satisfaction, and engagement of young citizens with electoral democracy. Young people have often been identified as one of the groups most alienated by the functioning of contemporary democratic systems, included by Election Management Bodies who have identified first time voters as their top target in a survey that we conducted on behalf of the Electoral Stakeholders Network. Consequently, our project aims to allow nations to improve this situation and bring young people in the electoral democratic process from the very beginning in order to create positive electoral habituation. This objective is doubly supported by a systematic knowledge exchange plan involving key decision makers and institutions, and an equally ambitious users engagement plan which will equip civil society organisations and groups of young people themselves with the knowledge that we will have created to enable them to directly weigh in the debate for the improvement of their first electoral experience.
To achieve this goal, we have made impact a priority, predominantly focusing on three key avenues to translate our research findings into political solutions and engage users with our research from its conception and organisation to the implementation of its most important findings:
- Collaboration with leading Electoral Commissions/Election Management Bodies as well as Inter-Governmental Organisations involved in the support for electoral democracy;
- Collaboration with think tanks which are concerned with youth engagement and participation;
- Collaboration with leading media outlets with a strong audience amongst young citizens.
This will come in addition to an ambitious academic impact plan
The impact plan uses our unique links with leading Election Management Bodies, IGOs, Think Tanks, and media group Vice to organise our impact, associated all users categories at every stage of the project from conception (notably through membership of the Advisory Board) to fieldwork (field experiments), dissemination (specialised workshops) and adaptation of our findings into specific policy solutions.
To achieve this goal, we have made impact a priority, predominantly focusing on three key avenues to translate our research findings into political solutions and engage users with our research from its conception and organisation to the implementation of its most important findings:
- Collaboration with leading Electoral Commissions/Election Management Bodies as well as Inter-Governmental Organisations involved in the support for electoral democracy;
- Collaboration with think tanks which are concerned with youth engagement and participation;
- Collaboration with leading media outlets with a strong audience amongst young citizens.
This will come in addition to an ambitious academic impact plan
The impact plan uses our unique links with leading Election Management Bodies, IGOs, Think Tanks, and media group Vice to organise our impact, associated all users categories at every stage of the project from conception (notably through membership of the Advisory Board) to fieldwork (field experiments), dissemination (specialised workshops) and adaptation of our findings into specific policy solutions.
Publications
Bruter M
(2019)
Electoral Ergonomics: Three Empirical Examples of the Interface between Electoral Psychology and Design
in Societies
Bruter Michael
(2020)
Inside the Mind of a Voter: A New Approach to Electoral Psychology
Bruter, M
(2022)
Inclusive or Exclusive Elections - Special Issue
in Societies
Harrison S
(2019)
The psychology of voters
Harrison S
(2022)
Psychology of Democracy - Of the People, By the People, For the People
Harrison S
(2020)
A Vote of Frustration? Young Voters in the UK General Election 2019
in Parliamentary Affairs
Harrison S
(2020)
Democratic frustration: concept, dimensions, and behavioural consequences
in Societies
Harrison S
(2020)
Democratic Frustration: Concept, Dimensions and Behavioural Consequences
in Societies
| Description | Key findings include: - We developed the concept of "electoral ergonomics" to capture the interface between elements of electoral organisation (design and organisation of polling stations, ballot paper design, remote voting options, etc) and voters' psychology and emotions and show its major impact on electoral experience, attitudes, and behaviour; - Participating in one of the first two elections of our lives determines lifelong participation; - Voting franchise at 16 leads to more positive electoral experience and long term engagement than when people can only vote from an age of 18; - Young and first time voters have significantly more positive experience when voting in polling stations rather than remotely; - Young people's participation is largely unaffected by questions of duty to vote and far more likely to participate in elections because a first vote is an exciting "first time". They want that election to feel special; - Disabilities significantly (negatively) impact electoral experience, but hidden disabilities in particular have a far more negative impact than visible disabilities; - Horizontal socialisation (notably between siblings) has stronger effects than often perceived; by contrast, civic education as currently conceived often fails to result in better electoral experience or greater engagement. |
| Exploitation Route | Our research has contributed to generating new concepts, insights, and data. It has improved the electoral participation and perceptions of young people. It has opened new discussions on generational effects in electoral behaviour. Following on from many years of successful partnerships with electoral commissions, our work continues to inform electoral management and make elections more inclusive. We are also publishing a book on first-time voters which showcases findings from the project, as well as finalising other research publications. |
| Sectors | Communities and Social Services/Policy Education Government Democracy and Justice Other |
| Description | Our research has benefited diverse groups of electoral stakeholders and ultimately citizens across the world, particularly disabled and first-time voters. Our research has been used by international electoral stakeholders to improve electoral practice and processes, including the International Centre for Parliamentary Studies (ICPS), which promotes effective electoral management, and the Delian Project, an NGO dedicated to helping jurisdictions optimise democratic voting processes, which have placed greater emphasis on electoral psychology as a consequence of our research. When the Delian Project served as election observers for the Falklands independence referendum, it used questions developed by our research team to gain insights citizens' emotions in the independence referendum. Our research has been used as part of initiatives intended to give first-time voters and those with learning and cognitive disabilities a greater voice in electoral processes in the UK, South Africa, Australia, the Palestinian Territories, and Sweden. Bruter and Harrison have worked with the South African Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) to test pilot measures improving the electoral experience of first-time voters and boost engagement. The IEC subsequently began running pilot information campaigns in a selection of electoral wards. EPO organised two policy labs in collaboration with the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) and the state-level commissions of South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory. Here, research findings focusing on the experience of voters with mental health issues were shared with commissioners and a team of 20+ divisional heads at the AEC. Our team and AEC organised a joint observation of the 2019 Federal Election, focused on the experience of disabled and special-needs voters. In the Palestinian Territory, we ran training for senior staff of the Central Elections Commission (CEC), which underpinned initiatives to promote inclusion of women and younger voters. In Sweden, Michael Bruter was invited as an academic partner as part of a select group of experts to visit the Swedish electoral management body during the 2022 election. Following this event, he was invited in 2023 to share his experiences with the electoral management body, with whom our research team is currently discussing future collaborations. In partnership with the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, we decided to adapt some of the questions and methodologies from the "First and Foremost" project to conduct a pilot study on first-time voters in Zambia in 2023, embracing the country's unique situation, risks and opportunities, and the immense importance of optimising the experience of first-time voters in the country with a view to potentially expanding the project in further phases. In November 2024, we ran a study in partnership with the LA County Office Registrar to optimise the experience of first-time voters during the US Presidential Election. This involved a field experiment whereby a set of vote centers across LA Country invited first-time voters to go cast their ballot on a pre-polling day which featured dedicated first-time voter information booths and election workers to help answer their queries and guide them through to the process. The initiative was effective in improving the overall evaluation of the first voting experience and in enhancing feelings of democratic inclusion. Bruter and Harrison have further worked on the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group on Votes at 16 to help it build a case to lower the voting age to 16. Moreover, the award has led to a Knowledge exchange event in the House of Commons with the heads of the UK and 9 international Electoral Commissions. We also worked with the British Council (the Big Conversation) and the European Commission DG JUST on advising the EU Electoral Network on optimising electoral processes for citizens (starting with the questions of e-voting and the electoral experience of disabled voters). Our research influenced the opinion polling agency Opinium to take voter psychology into account in their political polling. This led to new ways of identifying voters most likely to change their minds, and more precise measures of youth abstention rates. These innovations helped Opinium become the most accurate polling agency at the 2019 UK general election. Our impact has been recognised by the ESRC's Celebrating Impact 10th Anniversary Prize for Outstanding International Impact 2022. |
| Sector | Communities and Social Services/Policy,Education,Government, Democracy and Justice |
| Impact Types | Cultural Societal Policy & public services |
| Description | Collaboration with Electoral Commissions |
| Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to new or improved professional practice |
| Impact | Our research findings have been used as part of initiatives intended to give first-time voters and those with learning and cognitive disabilities a greater voice in electoral processes in Sweden, South Africa, Australia, and the Palestinian Territories. In South Africa, Bruter and Harrison have worked with the South African Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) to test pilot measures improving the electoral experience of first-time voters and boost engagement. The IEC subsequently began running pilot information campaigns in a selection of electoral wards. In Australia, we organised two policy labs in collaboration with the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) and the state-level commissions of South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory. Here, research findings focusing on the experience of voters with mental health issues were shared with commissioners and a team of 20+ divisional heads at the AEC. Our research team and AEC organised a joint observation of the 2019 Federal Election, focused on the experience of disabled and special-needs voters. In the Palestinian Territory, we ran training for senior staff of the Central Elections Commission (CEC), which underpinned initiatives to promote inclusion of women and younger voters. In Sweden, Michael Bruter was invited as an academic partner as part of a select group of experts to visit the Swedish electoral management body during the 2022 election. Following this event, he was invited in 2023 to share his experiences with the electoral management body, with whom our research team is currently discussing future collaborations. |
| Description | Consultancy work for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) in partnership with the Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD) |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to a national consultation/review |
| Description | Influenced polling practices of research agency Opinium |
| Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to new or improved professional practice |
| Description | Report for UK All-Party Parliamentary Group on Votes at 16 |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to new or improved professional practice |
| URL | https://www.jrrt.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Votes-at-16-APPG-Campaign-Report-2019.pdf |
| Description | The Big Conversation (British Academy) |
| Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
| Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
| Impact | Changed BC strategy and improved training and guidelines for staff. |
| URL | https://www.britishcouncil.org/research-policy-insight/research-reports/the-big-conversation-pilot |
| Description | Work for European Commission DG JUST on e-voting and voting experience of disabled populations |
| Geographic Reach | Europe |
| Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
| Impact | New guidelines to the EU Electoral network (network of all EU Election Management Bodies) on optimising electoral arrangements. This is initially in the field of e-voting and the experience of disabled voters. |
| Description | ESRC Celebrating Impact Prize 2022 - Outstanding International Impact |
| Amount | £10,000 (GBP) |
| Organisation | Economic and Social Research Council |
| Sector | Public |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Start | 11/2022 |
| End | 05/2024 |
| Title | Almanac of Electoral Ergonomics |
| Description | Data on electoral ergonomics notably initiatives on the vote of first time voters across democracies. |
| Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
| Year Produced | 2020 |
| Provided To Others? | Yes |
| Impact | Research almanac and database compiled by Sarah Harrison and Michael Bruter with data openly available through our website. A follow up database on US counties is currently in preparation. |
| URL | https://www.epob.org/the-almanac/ |
| Description | Event in the UK Houses of Parliament on patterns of hostility |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Event organised in the UK Houses of Parliament with cross-party chairing from three MPs (1 Conservative, 1 Labour, 1 Liberal Democrat) attended by MPs, heads of Electoral Commissions, Ambassador, NGOs, local government representatives, and some academics and students. Held in Parliament on 6 February 2023 |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| URL | http://www.epo.org |
| Description | Global Elections Day workshop at the United Nations |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | We hosted a panel with EU and UN representatives, as well as representatives of electoral commissions, to showcase and discuss our research findings on they way citizens conceptualise democracy and voting. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k10/k10ye71aik |
| Description | Keynote Speech at the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) Annual Lecture 'Making Democracy Work for Everyone', European Parliament (Brussels) |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | The European Parliament STOA Annual Lectures feature eminent scientists - often Nobel Prize laureates - invited to present the best of European scientific research. Prof. Michael Bruter was invited to deliver this year's Keynote and he is the first social scientist invited by the European Parliament to do so. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Launch event for the Electoral Psychology Observatory and debate in Parliament on the vote of first time voters |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | As part of the launch of our new Electoral Psychology Observatory and of the "First and Foremost" project, we organised a series of events at the LSE and in Parliament. This included a roundtable with the Chairman of the UK Electoral Commission and several Chairpersons of international Electoral Commissions, MPs and Peers, representatives of IGOs and EU institutions, etc. Future work is plan though has been delayed by Covid. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020 |
| URL | http://www.epob.org |
| Description | Nobel Prize Dialogue on The Future of Democracy, Palais des Beaux Arts (Brussels), |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Professor Bruter joined several eminent Nobel Prize laureates and world-leading scientists at Brussels's first Nobel Prize Dialogue to discuss the Future of Democracy and how science can enlighten us about it. The event was organised by the Nobel Prize in partnership with the European Research Council and the Belgian Presidency of the European Union. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Report to the House of Commons All Party Parliamentary Group on the vote at 16 |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Expert work for the All Party Parliamentary Group on the Vote at 16, writing up of a report on the implications of our findings for their work, and of a summary section for the Group's own report. Further meetings and collaborations were scheduled but have been delayed due to Covid. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019,2020 |
