Conversational alignment in children with an Autistic Spectrum Condition and typically developing children

Lead Research Organisation: University of Edinburgh
Department Name: Sch of Philosophy Psychology & Language

Abstract

Conversational deficits are often the first thing people notice about children with an autism spectrum condition (ASC), which affects around 1% of the population. Many ASC children experience communication difficulties and unrewarding interactions, and in turn people who interact with ASC children often find their conversations awkward. These conversational deficits have been linked to impaired theory of mind (ToM), the ability to attribute thoughts and feelings to others. But it is not clear exactly how these impairments might affect their communication, and particularly language production.

Our research investigates ASC children's conversational deficits by focusing on conversational alignment: the tendency for partners to imitate each other's use of language (e.g., word choice and grammar). Such alignment appears to be important for both effective communication and satisfying interactions. Our research examines whether ASC children show disturbed patterns of alignment, in ways that might explain some of their communication difficulties. We investigate whether ASC children spontaneously align with a conversational partner, and whether they do so in the same ways as typically developing (TD) children. By examining alignment under different conditions, we can draw inferences about the nature of their communicative impairments.

Our research focuses on the relationship between alignment and two factors where we might expect differences between ASC and TD children: 'audience design' and social-affective goals. Previous research suggests that although speakers may align just because they have heard a word or a structure before (and so have been 'primed' to re-use it), they also align in order to achieve particular goals, in ways that may implicate ToM. For example, they may adapt their language according to what they think their partner will best understand (audience design). They may also be guided by the desire to build a stronger relationship with their partner (i.e., social-affective goals), imitating their partner's language to express affiliation. ToM and social-affective impairments are common in ASC, and we hypothesise that ASC children may therefore showed a reduced tendency to align with a partner, compared to TD children. We consider this issue in two separate strands.

The first strand investigates whether and how far audience design influences ASC children's alignment. Specifically, we ask whether there is a relationship between alignment and ASC children's ability to adopt another person's perspective during language production. In TD children, perspective-taking is guided by inhibitory control (IC). ASC children have poor IC, which could explain why some who pass ToM tasks nonetheless display conversational deficits. We aim to discriminate effects of ToM and IC impairment on ASC children's communication.

The second strand builds on findings that typical speakers show a two-way relationship between affiliation and imitation: greater affiliation leads to more imitation and vice versa. We hypothesise that ASC children will show a weaker relationship between alignment (linguistic imitation) and social-affective factors, so that they will be less responsive to their partner's behaviour. This research will complement a limited literature on how affective impairments might contribute to ASC children's communication difficulties.

In sum, our research will deepen our understanding of whether and how different aspects of impaired social understanding impact ASC children's language processing in conversation. If ASC children align in an atypical way, this could help explain why and under what circumstances communication is difficult for them, and why their conversational partners in turn find their interactions odd and unrewarding. Our findings will also cast light on TD children's language production in conversation, and so are relevant to the study of alignment, and social imitation more broadly.

Planned Impact

The power to communicate one's needs and views effectively is a fundamental requirement of social participation, one which is blocked for many individuals with an autism spectrum condition (ASC). The main potential for impact of this research lies in increasing understanding of the nature of communication difficulties, with the potential to inform educational and clinical interventions to support more effective communication and so to enhance quality of life for ASC individuals and relevant stakeholders in the community. The research findings will also have implications for understanding typical development of communication skills, and hence implications for policy and practice in early years teaching and provision for young children. There may also be implications for the design of automated dialogue systems which are widely used across the world.

Paediatricians, speech and language therapists, education professionals and policy makers: we will reach this audience via dissemination of findings through research briefings (e.g., to the UK Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST), the Scottish Parliamentary Information Centre (SPICe), and the Scottish Cross Party Group on Learning Difficulties); magazine articles (e.g. TES Teaching Magazine, The Teacher), and talks at professional conferences with which we already have links, e.g. UK Literacy Association, British Educational Research Association, National Paediatric Neurodisability Network. The findings will be useful for interventions to support educational and clinical approaches to developing conversation skills in ASC children and adults.

Stakeholders in the ASC community: There are many stakeholders involved in concerns of individuals with autism: ASC individuals, their families and carers, health and education workers, teachers and support groups (e.g. Autism Sussex, National Autistic Society, Research Autism). These groups are often well-informed and engaged with research so it is important to communicate results in a timely and suitable manner.

Technology developers: Understanding of alignment is valuable to developers of automated chat agents, widely used in commerce and service industries: the research addresses sources and patterns of natural dialogue alignment that can inform development and improvement of automated agents.

Media: There is considerable media interest in autism, fostered by national, regional and local agencies such as the National Autistic Society, Research Autism, regional groups such as Autism Scotland and Autism Sussex, and local groups. Further, there are misconceptions about features of communication in autism, meaning that engagement with media about current approaches is both important and welcomed.

Academic beneficiaries: As outlined above, the immediate academic beneficiaries will be engaged through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications, and hosting a symposium on alignment via the Experimental Psychology Society. In particular, alignment research is not well-integrated with related work in other highly-relevant areas, notably cognitive psychology, human-computer dialogue design, developmental psychopathology and the study of imitation in both social and developmental psychology: our proposal touches on each of these areas and will support links between these through targeted publication across an appropriate range of journals and conferences.

Publications

10 25 50

publication icon
Branigan H (2017) Structural priming and the representation of language in Behavioral and Brain Sciences

publication icon
Hopkins Z (2017) Inhibitory control and lexical alignment in children with an autism spectrum disorder. in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines

publication icon
Hopkins ZL (2022) Autistic children's language imitation shows reduced sensitivity to ostracism. in Journal of autism and developmental disorders

publication icon
Lelonkiewicz JR (2021) Does it pay to imitate? No evidence for social gains from lexical imitation. in Royal Society open science

 
Title Competition and exhibition 
Description competition for children in schools across the UK to design a logo for the project 
Type Of Art Artwork 
Year Produced 2018 
Impact engagement from schools, children an dparents 
URL http://wechat.org.uk/wechat-logo-competition/
 
Title Guidelines for Professionals: Language Development 
Description A 2-page flyer summarising findings for relevant practitioners working on language development with children and adults 
Type Of Art Artefact (including digital) 
Year Produced 2022 
Impact The guidelines are ot be launched at a forthcoming online workshop for practitioners 
 
Description This project set out to investigate the way in which autistic children and their typically developing peers align with, or imitate, their conversational partner's language use, focusing on alignment of word choice (lexical alignment) and grammar choice (syntactic alignment). Language alignment has been shown to play a crucial role in successful communication. We were interested in whether autistic children show disrupted alignment compared to neurotypical children, in ways that might explain some of their communicative impairments, and the role that cognitive and social-affective mechanisms might play in language alignment in both autistic and neurotypical children.

Additionally, we addressed closely related issues in adults using online testing methods; here, we investigated alignment of word choice across the lifespan in the general population, exploring the extent to which they might relate to autistic traits and considering what mechanisms might give rise to them (with particular reference to social-affective factors).

Our key findings were as follows, organised under four main headings:

Autistic and neurotypical primary-school-aged children's conversational alignment

- Autistic and neurotypical primary-school-aged children spontaneously aligned with their partner's word choice (and associated way of conceptualising an object, i.e., the "perspective" that they take on an object) in structured interactions, even when this was not their own preferred perspective. For example, even though they would usually prefer to call an object a "horse", they switched to calling it (and thinking of it as) a "pony" if their partner had called it a pony.

- Autistic and neurotypical primary-school-aged children did not differ in their superficial pattern of lexical alignment in structured interactions. This suggests that autistic children do not have a fundamental across-the-board disruption in conversational alignment. It further suggests that highly structured interactions may mitigate some of autistic children's pragmatic deficits and that a partner's use of language can scaffold their use of referring expressions (i.e., how to refer to objects - crucial for successful communication). However, it also suggests that assessments of autistic children's communication skills that involve semi- or highly structured interactions may not adequately capture the nature of their conversational difficulties, as the partner's language may support and to some extent "normalise" at least some aspects of their language use.

- Autistic and neurotypical children differed in how their conversational alignment behaviours might be driven by social-affective factors.

- Primary-school-aged neurotypical children were more likely to use the same word choice as their conversational partner after experiencing ostracism (specifically, being left out in an online ball-throwing game); there was no such effect for structure choice (i.e., syntactic alignment). Importantly, these results demonstrate for the first time that ostracism can increase neurotypical children's linguistic imitation in the same way that it has been found to increase their motor imitation. The results therefore suggest that linguistic imitation in neurotypical children may fulfil an affiliative function, in other words that it is used as a means to reinforce and repair social relationships.

- In contrast, autistic children did not show a link between conversational alignment and affiliation. Autistic children did not align more with their partner after experiencing ostracism, suggesting that social-affective factors do not contribute to their communicative behaviours in the same way as they do in neurotypical children. These results suggest that unlike neurotypical children, autistic children are not able to adapt their language behaviour in the service of affiliative goals. In other words, increased language imitation-a potentially valuable form of social adaptation that can lead to satisfying interactions-is unavailable to autistic children, likely reflecting impaired affective understanding.

- We found some suggestion that cognitive flexibility (the ability to switch between different mental sets, tasks, or strategies) may play a role in neurotypical children's lexical alignment. Children who were more cognitively flexible were more likely to align with their partner, which can be interpreted in terms of their ability to suppress their own preferred perspective and switch to their partner's preference. This finding supports other findings that general cognitive abilities may play an important role in successful communication.

- We found no evidence that audience design (i.e., explicitly modelling what their partner thinks or knows) plays a role in either autistic or neurotypical children's lexical alignment in structured interactions. Nor did we find any evidence that conflict inhibition (the ability to control interference, through suppressing a salient response and generating a novel response) plays a role in either autistic or neurotypical children's lexical alignment in such interactions.

- Overall, our studies suggest that in structured interactions, a partner's language can scaffold both autistic and neurotypical primary-school-aged children's conversational language use and support successful communication via automatic priming mechanisms that make recently used representations more easily accessible, without requiring cognitively costly partner modelling. In neurotypical but not autistic children, these priming mechanisms may be reinforced by mechanisms that are concerned with fostering social relationships. These results highlight the importance of interactive language input in children's communicative development. They also suggest that autistic children's communicative impairments cannot be attributed to a basic disruption in conversational alignment - but that some of their social communicative impairments might be related to their inability to adapt their language appropriately for social-affiliative purposes.

Conversational alignment in typically developing children's early communicative development

- Conversational alignment occurs early in children's language development. Even at 3-4 years, typically developing children spontaneously converged with their partner's word choice. We found this robust and pervasive effect not just in simple and highly structured contexts, but also in more complex and cognitively demanding settings (e.g., giving a partner a series of instructions). This finding provides strong evidence against previous claims that young children are unable to think about, and label, objects flexibly (i.e., engage in flexible perspective-taking).

- Lexical alignment in typically developing pre-schoolers does not rely on their explicitly modelling what their partner thinks or knows. Nor did we find any evidence that it is affected by social-affective factors (i.e., that pre-schoolers imitate their partner's word choice in order to affiliate with them and strengthen their social relationship, as has been found for imitation of non-linguistic behaviour). Instead, our results suggest that, to some extent, typically developing young children may be able to achieve successful communication without undertaking cognitively demanding audience design, through automatic priming mechanisms that ultimately support them to adopt their partner's perspective and so automatically promote mutual understanding. As such, our research emphasizes that adult partners' language can help to scaffold typically developing children's communicative language use, by facilitating - and so strengthening - a range of linguistic representations and associated perspectives, which may in turn support children's developing knowledge of how to refer to objects within their speech community. However, their ability to refer to objects appropriately in more complex situations, and to respond appropriately to interactive feedback from their partner, will depend on the development of other cognitive skills such as inhibitory control.

Syntactic alignment in typically developing children's and children with Developmental Language Disorder's grammatical development
- Equally, a conversational partner's language use plays a key role in supporting typically developing children's early grammatical development. Typically developing preschoolers and primary-school-aged children tended to repeat their partner's recent grammatical choice, even for a complex structure that they did not tend to produce independently; for example, children were more likely to use a complex passive sentence (e.g., the girl is getting hugged by the sheep) to describe an event after hearing their partner use a different passive sentence (e.g., the king is being scratched by the tiger) than an active sentence (e.g., the tiger is scratching the king). Again, we did not find any evidence that children did this in order to reinforce social relationships; rather, they tended to do so because the relevant grammatical representations were automatically made more accessible through previous use.

- Importantly, we found that primary-school-aged children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) did not show the same benefit of a partner's language as age-matched typically developing children with respect to grammar: they were less likely to repeat their partner's grammatical structure, and the beneficial (supportive) influence of a partner's grammatical choices dissipated more rapidly. Interestingly, however, they did not differ from typically developing children who were matched for their verbal age. These results provide important novel evidence that children with DLD have an impairment in implicit learning mechanisms that specifically affects how they learn grammar, and suggests that they may require more language input to experience the same learning outcomes as typically developing children.

Lexical alignment in online interaction in adults across the lifespan
- Online experiments testing the general adult population showed that adults tended to align word choice with a conversational partner during online interaction. This tendency occurred across the adult lifespan (from 18-60+ years), and speakers showed individual consistency in the extent to which they aligned. Importantly, and in keeping with our findings from autistic and neurotypical children, lexical alignment in the general adult population was not modulated by autistic traits. Nor was it affected by speakers' perception of their own language skills.

- Importantly, however, lexical alignment varied by age, with older adults being more likely to use the same (normally disfavoured) word as their conversational partner than younger adults. These results are informative about variations across the lifespan in how speakers refer to objects, with implications for how older adults update their language use and acquire new vocabulary on the basis of their experiences - which in turn may provide insights into how best to support effective intergenerational communication.

- Further online experiments testing the general younger adult population showed that experiences with individual conversational partners also play an important role in how speakers learn about language use in a community as a whole. Speakers tended not only to align with a conversational partner's lexical choices, but also extrapolated from their partner to generalise to a new partner from the same speech community. For example, if their partner came from a different speech community and referred to an object as a "pony" where the speaker would usually refer to it as a "horse", the speaker would tend to assume that other people from the same community as their partner also preferred to think of it as a "pony". Thus speakers encode speech community information during individual encounters and store it to inform their future language use. In this way, they update their knowledge of language conventions in specific communities.

- We did not find strong evidence that conversational alignment during online interaction has a social-affective component in the general adult population, suggesting that any social affective mechanisms associated with adult alignment behaviours are selective in their occurrence: they do not inevitably occur in all interactive contexts.

- More specifically, we did not find consistent evidence that young adults are more likely to align with a partner after experiencing ostracism (in contrast to our findings for neurotypical children during face-to-face interaction). It is possible that language imitation in adults does not fulfil an affiliative function. However, it seems more likely that online interactions have importantly different social dimensions from in-person interactions; this is an important topic for future investigation.

- Nor did we find any evidence that being aligned with (i.e., being imitated) promoted prosocial behaviour - younger adults were no more likely to cooperate with a partner in an investment game if their partner had previously lexically aligned with them than if they had not (and this was the case irrespective of individuals' autistic traits.
Exploitation Route Our results give further insight into the role of interactive language experience in typical and atypical communicative development. They open up new directions for both theoretical and applied research.

From a theoretical perspective, they can be taken forward to inform psychological and computational theories of language development, in particular the role of language experience in children's lexical and syntactic acquisition, the specific contributions that input from a conversational partner vs. a child's own output might play in these processes, and the extent to which interaction (as opposed to more passive experience) might be important. Relatedly, these findings can be used to inform theories of children's communication and dialogue, in particular the extent to which successful communication might be supported during early childhood by automatic mechanisms that do not rely on e.g., executive function, the circumstances under which such mechanisms are inadequate (i.e., result in communication breakdown), and the transition from reliance on such mechanisms to more cognitively taxing mechanisms that might involve explicit partner modelling. One particularly important aspect is the extent to which they can inform such theories for clinical populations as well as the general population.

We similarly anticipate that they will inform theories of language use and communication across the adult lifespan. As well as their implications for research focusing on older adults, they are relevant to the as-yet understudied question of how language use and communication vary across the 30-60 age group.

From an applied perspective, our results are relevant to clinicians and professionals concerned with language development and communication. These include offering methods/materials for providing structured input as well as methods (and theoretical insight) for investigating what kinds of language experience (e.g., ideal intensity, spacing, communicative context) might be most relevant in therapeutic interventions for supporting language development and communication skills in a wide range of populations, including the acquisition/use of new vocabulary and acquisition/consolidation of grammatical knowledge. The results of our experiments involving online interaction are also potentially of interest for the development of robust and naturalistic computer dialogue systems.
Sectors Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Education,Healthcare

 
Description Our strategy to achieve impact for the WeChat project has been to target both direct and indirect routes to communicate our findings with stakeholders. Thus we have taken a broad approach. First, we have focused on routes to directly sharing our results - and in turn to receiving valuable input - through interacting with key non-academic stakeholders such as Speech and Language Therapists, clinical psychologists and educators, as well as parents, caregivers and individuals with lived experience. Second, we have also pursued routes to communicating with academic stakeholders who may themselves have close relationships with key stakeholders (whether as educators, collaborators or professional colleagues) and may therefore also play a role in further disseminating our findings. In all of our activities, we have been concerned with knowledge exchange and co-production, and we have begun to establish a strong pathway to impact that is beginning to influence thinking and practice beyond academia. In particular, we have sought to raise awareness among these audiences of the theoretical importance of language imitation in interaction for language development and communication, as well as practical understanding of how this can be promoted in educational, therapeutic and home settings. We have capitalised on the close complementary links between WeChat and the Language Experience and Development (LEaD) project, which focuses on the role of language experience and syntactic alignment in young typically-developing children's language development, to hold joint events and develop materials that draw on the theoretical framework and research findings of both projects. This has allowed us to attract a wider audience than would otherwise be possible, and to offer them a broader perspective on children's communication and communicative development. We have sought to promote the impact of our research throughout the duration of the project. At the outset of the project, we set out to engage stakeholders with our research programme and to gain their insights as well as their input about which aspects of our research were of most relevance to their work. We presented the project at the EPSRIG (Educational Professionals Research Interest Group) meeting in 2017 to a group of education professionals and students in the Brighton and Sussex area and shared with the 80-member mailing list. A workshop in Edinburgh in 2018 to launch the LEaD project, but which also included findings from the WeChat project, was attended by two educational psychologists, two early years practitioners and a teaching fellow in early years education. At this workshop, the theoretical background and methodology of the two projects was presented, followed by an informal, round table discussion of the themes and ideas introduced in the talks and any other issues raised by attendees. Attendees were enthusiastic about the method and how it could be applied within an educational setting, as well as appreciating the theoretical background - and in turn contributed valuable suggestions about potential areas of focus. We also presented interim research findings to a group of c. 30 Speech and Language therapists (SLTs) in 2018 and discussed with them the implications for language learning in children with developmental language disorder (DLD). We invited practitioners (educational professionals and clinicians) to our online 2-day research event in 2021 with the LEaD project, entitled Language Learning through Communicative Interaction, which brought together researchers with an interest in language development in neurotypical and autistic learners. Keynotes from 7 leading national and international researchers were followed by roundtable discussions moderated by a panel of 6 experts. There were 370 registrations with 79 and 59 attendees on Day 1 and 2 respectively, from institutions all over the world, including Australia, Canada, China, Europe, India, Israel, Japan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South America, Taiwan, UK, and USA. Recordings were also made available afterwards to all those who registered. A survey showed 100% of respondents rated all aspects as good, very good, excellent, or exceptional. In 2023, we ran an online stakeholder event (again with the LEaD project) for SLTs, other professionals, parents, carers, and adults with lived experience of autism with contributions from researchers and a research practitioner, building on the structure of our previous successful participatory events. The timing and format of this event was chosen to make it inclusive and accessible to as wide an audience as possible. During this event, we presented our results and their implications, as well as demonstrating how our picture-matching game method could be used with children to promote interaction and language development. This event was advertised to a wide audience via our networks, including the Autism Community Network Sussex (ACoRNS: approx 150 individuals and organisations with lived experience of autism); the University of Edinburgh Wee Science Facebook group (2.5k followers, largely parents and caregivers); the University of Warwick Developmental Psychology Facebook group and local nurseries and schools who participated in our research; the University of Nottingham Autism Social Network (50 autistic students); the University of Nottingham Autism Research Team and Developmental Psychology (PAHDL) Group (c.20-30 academics, many of whom have strong links with community organisations providing support to autistic individuals and/or conduct high-impact research with a focus on improving the lives of autistic people); Autistic Nottingham (c.100+ people - a Nottingham-based charity with a focus on supporting autistic adults without intellectual disabilities); and the University of Lancaster and LuCiD ESRC centre's Facebook group and Twitter handle. Recordings of the talks have been made available to those who signed up. All of our respondents found the stakeholder event "informative" and "helpful" (mean ratings 4.8/5 for usefulness and 4.4/5 for likelihood of applying in own practice), with useful ideas for adding to teaching materials and understanding better the therapeutic benefits of imitation. Attendees suggested ideas for further work, such as with older autistic young people and those with lower language levels, and investigating differences between in-person and online interaction. During this event, we also launched a set of illustrated guidelines for language learning and education based on our findings, for a nationwide audience. These are available for download on our website, as well as being advertised through our own autism and educational community networks and through our nationwide contacts (eg Paediatric Neuropsychology special interest group, ACoRNS): we have found that short online materials garner wider reach than research papers or blogs. The guidelines also contain a link to our online picture-book and snap game, which allows parents and caregivers to read a story and play an interactive language game that our research has shown to enhance grammatical development and the use of complex syntax in young children. A further related event to present our methods and findings to teachers, local SLTs, teacher training educators and trainee teachers in the Warwick area will take place in May 2023.
First Year Of Impact 2018
Sector Education,Healthcare
Impact Types Societal

 
Description The association of verbal and motoric imitation in typically-developing pre-schoolers (Challenge Investment Fund)
Amount £4,852 (GBP)
Organisation University of Edinburgh 
Sector Academic/University
Country United Kingdom
Start 03/2020 
End 09/2020
 
Title Conversational alignment in children with an Autism Spectrum Condition and typically developing children_ESRC_grant_datasets 
Description ## Access ## External users may request access to a copy of the data by contacting the Principal Investigator, Contact Person or Data Manager named on this page. University of Edinburgh users who wish to have direct access should consult the information about retrieving data from the DataVault at: http://www.ed.ac.uk/is/research-support/datavault . 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2021 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact Publications arising from award 
URL https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/datasets/f0325f7d-d282-4d9c-bb8d-0e4e3c28cccf
 
Description Brighton Science Festival 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Over 500 people visited our 'digital classroom' to find out how technology can support learning, and about our seminars and apps
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL http://www.brightonscience.com/events/bright-sparks-saturday-2018/
 
Description Conducting language research with autistic children 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact Presentation to students and staff at South China Normal University, about how to conduct language research with autistic children. Discussion followed about how we might collaborate on language research with the newly establish Autism Centre at SCNU.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Conversational alignment in children with autism 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact Presented an overview of our grant findings thus far, to students and staff in Psychology at Warwick University.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Free online symposium 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact A free online symposium on October 21st and 22nd 2021 which brought together researchers/professional practitioners/students with a common interest in language learning through communicative interaction in typical and autistic development to share research from a range of perspectives and discuss emerging themes. Seven academic keynote speakers from across the UK, Europe, N. America and Canada took part across 2 days: Day 1 consisted of four 40-minute talk slots (approx. 25-30-minute talk plus 10-15 minutes of questions) and day 2 of three 40-minute talk slots and a 60-minute roundtable discussion. Registrations were from people in a range of careers (although primarily from within academia) and at a range of career levels. This included undergraduate and postgraduate students, postdoctoral researchers and other research scientists, university lecturers, university faculty members, university professors, educational professionals, and clinicians. Day one - 79 attendees from institutions in Australia, Canada, China, Europe, India, Israel, Japan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South America, Taiwan, UK, and USA.
Day two - 59 attendees from institutions in Australia, Canada, China, Europe, India, Israel, Japan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South America, Taiwan, UK, and USA. Respondents were asked to rate the symposium as very poor, poor, fair, good, very good, excellent or exceptional in the following areas: Interest of content, Importance of research themes, Organisation, Communication from organisers, Atmosphere, and Opportunities for discussion. 100% of respondents rated all areas as good, very good, excellent, or exceptional.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL http://wechat.org.uk/symposium/
 
Description Stakeholder event 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact We ran an online stakeholder event for SLTs, other professionals, parents, carers, and adults with lived experience of autism with contributions from researchers and a research practitioner, building on the structure of our previous successful participatory events. During this event, we presented our results and their implications, as well as demonstrating how our picture-matching game method could be used with children to promote interaction and language development, as well as gaining feedback and suggestions for further research. Recordings of the talks have been made available to those who signed up, together with a set of illustrated guidelines for language learning and education based on our findings. The guidelines also contain a link to our online picture-book and snap game, which allows parents and caregivers to read a story and play an interactive language game that our research has shown to enhance grammatical development and the use of complex syntax in young children. All of our respondents found the stakeholder event "informative" and "helpful" (mean ratings 4.8/5 for usefulness and 4.4/5 for likelihood of applying in own practice), with useful ideas for adding to teaching materials and understanding better the therapeutic benefits of imitation. Attendees suggested ideas for further work, such as with older autistic young people and those with lower language levels, and investigating differences between in-person and online interaction.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
 
Description Talk at Brighton General Hospital, Brighton, UK 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presentation of research findings to NHS SALT team working in Brighton and Hove. Discussed developing a research link between the SALT team and our grant.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Talk to Educational Professionals Research Interest Group (ESPRIG), Sussex University 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Zoe Hopkins delivered a talk - entitled 'What can alignment tell us about childhood language disorders?' - which offered an accessible introduction to the theoretical framework of our grant, and explained how alignment could be applied to understanding language and communication difficulties in autism and developmental language disorder. Audience feedback was overwhelmingly positive: we received follow-up correspondence from NHS speech and language practitioners; we recruited an undergraduate project student to work on a topic addressing questions raised by the talk; and we have been able to recruit participants to our research via parents/caregivers who were not in attendance but who heard about the talk via the EPSRIG mailing list (which has a circulation of c. 100 people).
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017