A Behavioural Economic Analysis of Reproductive Health in Burkina Faso and Tanzania

Lead Research Organisation: University of East Anglia
Department Name: International Development

Abstract

The proposed research will contribute to answering the first overarching question of this call "What factors shape pathways into and out of poverty and people's experience of these, and how can policy create sustained routes out of extreme poverty in ways that can be replicated and scaled up?" The project will do so by focusing on the low or inadequate uptake of reproductive health services in sub-Saharan Africa which directly influences the health and survival prospects of women and their children, as well as their economic participation and poverty. Despite the growing availability of reproductive health services, the uptake of these services remains inadequate among the poorest in society. The research is timely because achieving 'universal access to reproductive health' was one of the Millennium Development Goals on which least progress was made in sub-Saharan Africa. The new Social Development Goals which will form the basis of the post-2015 development agenda have recognized this slow progress and have included updated reproductive health targets.

One of the main causes of the inadequate uptake of reproductive health services is women's weak control over pregnancy-related decisions. When and how many children to have, and whether and where to seek pre-natal, delivery and post-natal care, are crucial decisions that may shape an important pathway into or out of extreme poverty. To identify policy initiatives that can break the vicious circle between women's low empowerment, poor reproductive health and poverty, we need more knowledge about the decision-making processes around the use of reproductive health services.

We plan to do this by conducting new, innovative research in Burkina Faso and Tanzania, while focusing on four stages of the reproductive health cycle 1) use of family planning services (including contraceptives) before pregnancy; 2) use of antenatal care during pregnancy, 3) use of delivery services at childbirth and 4) use of post-natal services after delivery. For each of these stages we propose to analyse how the uptake of reproductive health services is influenced by a bargaining process between women and their spouses or partners, who might have diverging beliefs, preferences and access to resources. We will also study how these beliefs, preferences and access to resources are shaped by the community networks in which women and their spouses or partners are embedded.

Finally, guided by the generated evidence and in collaboration with the ministries of health in Burkina Faso and Tanzania we will identify and test innovations to existing reproductive health interventions that we expect to increase the uptake of the services offered. This will make sure that the proposed research is translated into more effective policies.

This research will bring together researchers from the United Kingdom, Norway, Burkina Faso and Tanzania who have expertise in reproductive health, behavioural economics, gender, the design and implementation of field experiments and surveys in developing countries, and an excellent contextual understanding of West and East Africa in general and the proposed study areas in particular.

Identified stakeholders will be engaged throughout the entire research programme. Local and national stakeholders will be invited to participate in an inception workshop and to sit on an advisory board, which will discuss promising new lines of inquiry and preliminary findings. The advisory board will be strengthened with identified international stakeholders and will operate via an online platform, which facilitates exchange between both African countries. Project findings will also be disseminated through policy briefings with leading international organisations as well as discussion papers before being published in high-impact peer-reviewed academic journals. The proposed research will also contribute to the further development of research capacity of the African research partners.

Planned Impact

Our research aims to generate new insights that explain the low or inadequate uptake of reproductive health services in sub-Saharan Africa. By applying a behavioural economics lens to reproductive health and engaging African researchers as full research partners in this research we will not only make an important academic contribution; we will also build up research capacity in an area in which expertise is still limited. The generated knowledge would then be used to identify and test innovations to existing reproductive health initiatives that would increase the uptake of the services offered. Engaging policy-makers and practitioners in this research would increase the effectiveness of policies and ultimately benefit the lives of poor people.

More specifically, we envisage the following groups of beneficiaries from the findings of our research:

1. Development economists, experimental economists and social scientists in development studies, gender and reproductive health. They will benefit from our research for the reasons given in the section Academic Beneficiaries. We intend to publish about six papers in top academic journals in the fields mentioned and present our findings widely at appropriate academic seminars and conferences.

2. Researchers in Burkina Faso and Tanzania in an area that is fast-growing, but in which expertise is still very limited: behavioural development economics. To this end, we will engage researchers from both African research partners in co-production of knowledge to reach the full potential of the proposed research, and we plan to employ and thoroughly train large teams of local assistants in the use of experimental methods. We also expect the new expertise to spread beyond the African research institutes, via existing local collaborations (for example Centre MURAZ collaborates with Africsanté; and MITU with Ifakara Institute).

3. Public and private providers of reproductive health services in Burkina Faso and Tanzania. Through providing new insights in the low or inadequate uptake of reproductive health services and testing innovations to existing initiatives, our proposed research can lead to the improved design of existing policies and initiatives.

4. International development organisations involved in research and advocacy for combating poverty and stimulating gender equality and reproductive health (such as the United Nations' UN Women, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations Development Programme, World Health Organisation and the World Bank, EngenderHealth, Marie Stopes International) as well as international organisations or networks of organisations that translate research into useful information for policymakers (e.g. Population Reference Bureau, the Population and Poverty Research Network). Our research should help predict responses to policy interventions that these organisations recommend or implement, and could therefore help modify/sharpen their recommendations or increase the effectiveness of their interventions.

5. The final beneficiaries of our research will be women and their future children in the developing world who - if the tested innovations to reproductive health initiatives are successful - will have better reproductive health. This will reduce maternal mortality and morbidity, increase women's control about their fertility, increase their economic participation, and lower the poverty of their households and children.

Representatives of local and national stakeholders will be invited at an inception workshop in Burkina Faso and Tanzania separately, and a second workshop in the middle of the project. Details of these workshops and information about additional communication and engagement activities we have planned with each group of non-academic beneficiaries are described in the Pathways to Impact document.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description This research project demonstrated that lowering supply-side constraints by offering free contraceptives might not be sufficient to increase the uptake of modern contraceptives. In both countries, family planning preferences of both the husband and the wife are key to the uptake of contraceptives.

In Tanzania, we found that spouses often have incomplete information about each others' fertility preferences, which is due to the little communication spouses have about this topic. As a result, women who think their husband disagrees with contraceptives, are more reluctant to use contraceptives. Under these conditions, stimulating communication among spouses would increase the uptake of contraceptives.

In addition, we found that the potential for covert use of contraceptives, which is common in Tanzania but less so in Burkina Faso, is substantially reduced among couples affected by intimate partner violence. It is, therefore, important in what kind of contexts injectables (the main concealable contraceptive) are promoted and offered.

In Burkina Faso, where polygamy is widespread, we compared the role of the husbands between monogamous and polygamous households. We found that the involvement of husbands in the decision-making process around the use of modern contraceptives tends to have a negative effect on contraceptive use in monogamous unions, but could increase the uptake of contraceptives in polygamous unions. The latter is the result of the competitive nature of the relations among co-wives of the same polygamous household.

These findings are important for both countries, where despite the growing availability of contraceptives, the uptake of these services remains inadequate among the poorest in society. The research is timely because achieving 'universal access to reproductive health' was one of the Millennium Development Goals on which least progress was made in sub-Saharan Africa. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) which form the basis of the post-2015 development agenda have recognized this slow progress and have included updated reproductive health targets, under SDG 3.7.
Exploitation Route Researchers such as colleagues in the social and health sciences, from senior experts to younger researchers, including PhD students, can use the very rich data that was collected in both countries. An important feature of the data relates to the information collected from private interviews of both spouses from a large number couples, which allows the analysis of the role of spousal differences in opinion and preferences for intra-household decision-making.
Sectors Education,Healthcare

 
Description In Burkina Faso, we disseminated our research findings in a workshop organised by the local research partner, in which a broad range of local and national policymakers participated. As the government was about to implement a new policy that would make contraceptives freely available, our research findings came at the right time. In our research, we offered women vouchers that gave them free access to contraceptives. We found that the uptake of these vouchers, however, was very low. This suggested to us that factors other than financial resources could be responsible for the persistently low uptake of contraceptives. Our findings suggested that the involvement of the husband has a determinant influence. After the workshop, we continued this discussion with the government, and we suggested evaluating their new policy. While there was some initial interest, insufficient resources were available to organise these additional activities. In Tanzania, we organised a local workshop with professional practitioners, convened by the medical district officer. As the focus was on professional practitioners who attended the communities covered by our study, there was little scope for engagement of policymakers. In a second event, we also presented one of the research papers at a research seminar organised by the local research partner. After both workshops, we developed a policy brief that summarized the research findings and policy implications, which we presented at UNFPA and the Guttmacher Institute, both important international organisations based in New York. Participants found the findings very interesting, and we had interesting discussions.
First Year Of Impact 2019
Sector Healthcare
Impact Types Policy & public services

 
Description Collaboration with Centre MURAZ (Burkina Faso) 
Organisation MURAZ Center
Country Burkina Faso 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Our expertise, intellectual input and the training of staff on the design and implementation of a survey.
Collaborator Contribution Local support with data management (coding of data entry devices), design of data collection instruments and data collection.
Impact inception workshop
Start Year 2016
 
Description Collaboration with Choice Lab 
Organisation BI Norwegian Business School
Department Choice Lab
Country Norway 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution joint design of study
Collaborator Contribution joint design of study
Impact academic seminar (August 2016)
Start Year 2016
 
Description Collaboration with LSHTM (UK) 
Organisation London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Joint design of study
Collaborator Contribution Joint design of study
Impact research instruments
Start Year 2016
 
Description Collaboration with MITU (Tanzania) 
Organisation National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania
Department Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit (MITU)
Country Tanzania, United Republic of 
Sector Public 
PI Contribution Our expertise, intellectual input and the training of staff on the design and implementation of a survey.
Collaborator Contribution Local support with data management (coding of data entry devices), design of data collection instruments and data collection.
Impact Inception workshop
Start Year 2016
 
Description Contribution to VOXDEV 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact We shared important research findings from our research in Tanzania on the VOXDEV website, which is an online platform that makes research findings accessible to "policymakers, practitioners, donors, the private sector and others interested in development to discuss key policy issues".
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://voxdev.org/topic/health-education/uptake-family-planning-services-tanzania-role-husband
 
Description Dissemination workshop in Misungwi - Mwanza (Tanzania) 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact In Tanzania, we organised a local workshop with professional practitioners, convened by the medical district officer. As the focus was on professional practitioners who attended the communities covered by our study, there was little scope for engagement of policymakers. In a second event, we also presented one of the research papers at a research seminar organised by the local research partner.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Dissemination workshop in New York at UNFPA and Guttmacher Institute 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact After both workshops organised in Tanzania and Burkina Faso, we developed a policy brief that summarized the research findings and policy implications, which we presented at UNFPA and the Guttmacher Institute, both in New York. Participants found the findings innovative and we had interesting discussions
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Dissemination workshop with policymakers in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso) 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact We disseminated our research findings in a workshop organised by the local research partner, in which a broad range of local and national policymakers participated. As the government was about to implement a new policy that would make contraceptives freely available, our research findings came at the right time. In our research, we offered women vouchers that gave them free access to contraceptives. We found that the uptake of these vouchers, however, was very low. This suggested to us that factors other than financial resources could be responsible for the persistently low uptake of contraceptives. Our findings pointed to the role of the involvement of the husband. After the workshop, we continued this discussion with the government, and we discussed the possibility of evaluating their new policy.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Inception workshop (Burkina Faso) 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The aim of the workshop was to present the project and to obtain feedback on its objectives and research questions. More specifically, the participants were informed of the projects' intentions and helped identify the specific policy questions they thought the research findings could potentially speak to. This gave the research team a useful initial sense of the concrete stakeholder needs.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
 
Description Inception workshop (Tanzania) 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The aim of the workshop was to present the project and to obtain feedback on its objectives and research questions. More specifically, the participants were informed of the projects' intentions and helped identify the specific policy questions they thought the research findings could potentially speak to. This gave the research team a useful initial sense of the concrete stakeholder needs.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016