Overcoming immunological barriers to regenerative medicine
Lead Research Organisation:
King's College London
Department Name: Genetics and Molecular Medicine
Abstract
The goal of the field of regenerative medicine is to replace damaged or diseased tissue and thereby find cures for diseases that are currently untreatable. At present two different approaches appear feasible: one is to stimulate the body's own cells to repair the tissue and the other is to transplant new cells into the body. In the case of cell transplantation one could transplant cells from one individual to another (allogeneic cells), as happens routinely in blood donation. Alternatively, one could isolate a small number of a patient's own skin or blood cells and convert them in the lab into cells called pluripotent stem cells that can then form any tissue in the body, so that patients can be treated with their own cells.
No matter which strategy is taken, it is essential to overcome the body's natural immune defences in order for the treatment to succeed. In the case of allogeneic cells, the body recognises that the cells as foreign and kills them - the reason why this is not a problem in blood donation is that there are so many donors in the population that good matches for different individuals can be found. Even when the potential treatment involves the patient's own cells, the immune system can be provoked in response to tissue damage, resulting in inflammation whereby immune cells of the body respond to danger signals and engulf the transplanted cells.
We have assembled a team of researchers from different backgrounds to collaborate in order to find new ways to control the immune system to make regenerative medicine treatments more effective. Our team includes researchers with many years' experience in organ transplantation, who are developing ways of reducing the need for immunosuppressive drugs, and researchers who are already carrying out clinical trials of cell transplantation to cure certain forms of blindness and liver failure. We also have experts who are comparing whether cell transplantation or endogenous repair are better approaches for treating heart failure, experts in immunology, pluripotent stem cells and cells from adult tissues.
We have set out to answer three questions that are of central importance in regenerative medicine. We want to identify the proteins that transplanted cells secrete to communicate with the immune system and discover whether different cell types produce different signals. It might be that liver cells produce different signals to eye cells, or that liver cells produce different signals if they have come from an adult rather than a pluripotent stem cell. This information will help us decide whether cells from one source might be better for transplantation than those from another source, and will also give us clues about the best ways to protect the cells from immune attack. The next question is whether the signals we identify as potentially contributing to transplant failure can be blocked, for example by coating cells with a protein that protects them from attack or by transplanting back immune cells generated from pluripotent stem cells. The final question is how inflammation contributes to endogenous repair and influences the fate of transplanted cells. We will identify different types of inflammatory cell and then examine whether destroying each cell type improves or worsens tissue repair.
Our research will lead eventually to improved treatments for blindness, heart failure, liver failure and inflammatory bowel disease. Our discoveries will be shared with other researchers, so that they can apply our observations, experimental skills and tools to other important diseases. We believe that collaborations amongst researchers with very different perspectives offer the best opportunity to harness the body's immune system to make treatments more effective.
No matter which strategy is taken, it is essential to overcome the body's natural immune defences in order for the treatment to succeed. In the case of allogeneic cells, the body recognises that the cells as foreign and kills them - the reason why this is not a problem in blood donation is that there are so many donors in the population that good matches for different individuals can be found. Even when the potential treatment involves the patient's own cells, the immune system can be provoked in response to tissue damage, resulting in inflammation whereby immune cells of the body respond to danger signals and engulf the transplanted cells.
We have assembled a team of researchers from different backgrounds to collaborate in order to find new ways to control the immune system to make regenerative medicine treatments more effective. Our team includes researchers with many years' experience in organ transplantation, who are developing ways of reducing the need for immunosuppressive drugs, and researchers who are already carrying out clinical trials of cell transplantation to cure certain forms of blindness and liver failure. We also have experts who are comparing whether cell transplantation or endogenous repair are better approaches for treating heart failure, experts in immunology, pluripotent stem cells and cells from adult tissues.
We have set out to answer three questions that are of central importance in regenerative medicine. We want to identify the proteins that transplanted cells secrete to communicate with the immune system and discover whether different cell types produce different signals. It might be that liver cells produce different signals to eye cells, or that liver cells produce different signals if they have come from an adult rather than a pluripotent stem cell. This information will help us decide whether cells from one source might be better for transplantation than those from another source, and will also give us clues about the best ways to protect the cells from immune attack. The next question is whether the signals we identify as potentially contributing to transplant failure can be blocked, for example by coating cells with a protein that protects them from attack or by transplanting back immune cells generated from pluripotent stem cells. The final question is how inflammation contributes to endogenous repair and influences the fate of transplanted cells. We will identify different types of inflammatory cell and then examine whether destroying each cell type improves or worsens tissue repair.
Our research will lead eventually to improved treatments for blindness, heart failure, liver failure and inflammatory bowel disease. Our discoveries will be shared with other researchers, so that they can apply our observations, experimental skills and tools to other important diseases. We believe that collaborations amongst researchers with very different perspectives offer the best opportunity to harness the body's immune system to make treatments more effective.
Technical Summary
The innate and adaptive immune system can present formidable obstacles to successful regenerative medicine applications. To identify and circumvent these obstacles, the co-applicants propose to form a UK Regenerative Medicine Platform (UKRMP) hub on immunomodulation. We will pool our collective clinical and laboratory-based expertise in stem cell biology, whole organ transplantation, cell therapy, endogenous tissue repair and innate and adaptive immunity to answer the following questions:
1. How do differentiated cells signal to the host innate and adaptive immune system?
2. How do transplanted cells provoke adaptive immune responses?
3. How does the inflammatory niche contribute to endogenous repair and influence the fate of transplanted cells?
Each question will be tackled in one work package. In work package 1 we will use in vitro assays to compare how differentiated human cells isolated from the relevant tissue or induced from iPS cells signal to the immune system under steady state and hypoxic conditions. In work package 2 key findings from work package 1 will be validated in vivo using humanised mice. The use of iPS cell-derived dendritic cells to modulate immune tolerance and enhance Treg therapy, alone or in combination with complement inhibitory peptides, will be explored as a means of improving the survival and function of transplanted cells. In work package 3 we will examine the contribution of recently discovered subsets of macrophages, fibroblasts and dendritic cells to the inflammatory niche in the context of cell transplantation, chronic inflammation and endogenous repair.
Each question will be approached in the context of the following long-term clinical deliverables: improved efficacy of photoreceptor cell therapy to treat blindness; improved repair of damaged heart and intestine; and improved survival and functionality of transplanted hepatocytes as an alternative to liver transplantation.
1. How do differentiated cells signal to the host innate and adaptive immune system?
2. How do transplanted cells provoke adaptive immune responses?
3. How does the inflammatory niche contribute to endogenous repair and influence the fate of transplanted cells?
Each question will be tackled in one work package. In work package 1 we will use in vitro assays to compare how differentiated human cells isolated from the relevant tissue or induced from iPS cells signal to the immune system under steady state and hypoxic conditions. In work package 2 key findings from work package 1 will be validated in vivo using humanised mice. The use of iPS cell-derived dendritic cells to modulate immune tolerance and enhance Treg therapy, alone or in combination with complement inhibitory peptides, will be explored as a means of improving the survival and function of transplanted cells. In work package 3 we will examine the contribution of recently discovered subsets of macrophages, fibroblasts and dendritic cells to the inflammatory niche in the context of cell transplantation, chronic inflammation and endogenous repair.
Each question will be approached in the context of the following long-term clinical deliverables: improved efficacy of photoreceptor cell therapy to treat blindness; improved repair of damaged heart and intestine; and improved survival and functionality of transplanted hepatocytes as an alternative to liver transplantation.
Planned Impact
WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THIS RESEARCH?
The immediate academic beneficiaries include all investigators who participate in the immunomodulation hub, both as PIs and collaborators, and all investigators associated with the UK Regenerative Medicine Platform. The benefit will extend to the diverse stem cell biology, transplant, immunology and cancer research communities in the UK and internationally. Clinicians involved in organ transplantation and regenerative medicine therapies will also be beneficiaries. The commercial sector will benefit, including companies named in the application, companies who subsequently partner the hub and companies that are less directly associated with the area. Members of the lay public, both healthy individuals and patients, will benefit. UK government agencies, including politicians, the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), MRC and regulatory agencies, such as the MHRA, will benefit. The benefits will not be restricted to the UK but will have an impact globally.
HOW WILL THEY BENEFIT FROM THIS RESEARCH?
Academics will benefit by increased knowledge of how the immune system can be harnessed to improve regenerative medicine therapies, through obtaining data to facilitate further funding applications and publications, through career progression and, particularly in the case of the staff employed directly on the grant, training opportunities that enable them to pursue an independent research career or transfer to other employment sectors (timescale: 3-5 years).
Several of the PIs involved in this application are clinically active and have close associations with NIHR Biomedical Research Centres. Clinicians will benefit by obtaining new knowledge that leads to the design of new clinical trials (timescale: 3-8 years).
Patients will benefit by improved treatment for a variety of diseases that currently lack optimal treatments, including heart failure, inflammatory bowel disease, blindness, and liver failure (time scale: 5-15 years). Healthy individuals will benefit by improved quality of life in old age (timescale 10-15 years), increased understanding of research (timescale 3 years), increased willingness to participate in clinical trials (timescale 3-5 years), and by seeing the successful achievement of key goals within the charitable sector, such as the British Heart Foundation (timescale: 5-10 years).
The commercial sector will benefit by having new knowledge on which to develop new therapeutics, new possibilities for partnering with academics, facilitated by the TSB Cell Therapy Catapult, and by selling materials, such as kits and antibodies, to researchers funded by the hub (timescale: 1-10 years).
The UK government (timescale: 1-15 years) will benefit by generation of intellectual property, leverage of ongoing MRC investment in the Centre for Transplantation, commercialisation of products arising from the research, reduced health care costs and by involvement in the work force of people who would otherwise be unable to work through ill health. The reduced burden to the National Health Service will allow resources to be channelled into other areas, such as acute care. The stature of the UK internationally will increase, because the research carried out by the hub will impact on the global field of regenerative medicine.
The immediate academic beneficiaries include all investigators who participate in the immunomodulation hub, both as PIs and collaborators, and all investigators associated with the UK Regenerative Medicine Platform. The benefit will extend to the diverse stem cell biology, transplant, immunology and cancer research communities in the UK and internationally. Clinicians involved in organ transplantation and regenerative medicine therapies will also be beneficiaries. The commercial sector will benefit, including companies named in the application, companies who subsequently partner the hub and companies that are less directly associated with the area. Members of the lay public, both healthy individuals and patients, will benefit. UK government agencies, including politicians, the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), MRC and regulatory agencies, such as the MHRA, will benefit. The benefits will not be restricted to the UK but will have an impact globally.
HOW WILL THEY BENEFIT FROM THIS RESEARCH?
Academics will benefit by increased knowledge of how the immune system can be harnessed to improve regenerative medicine therapies, through obtaining data to facilitate further funding applications and publications, through career progression and, particularly in the case of the staff employed directly on the grant, training opportunities that enable them to pursue an independent research career or transfer to other employment sectors (timescale: 3-5 years).
Several of the PIs involved in this application are clinically active and have close associations with NIHR Biomedical Research Centres. Clinicians will benefit by obtaining new knowledge that leads to the design of new clinical trials (timescale: 3-8 years).
Patients will benefit by improved treatment for a variety of diseases that currently lack optimal treatments, including heart failure, inflammatory bowel disease, blindness, and liver failure (time scale: 5-15 years). Healthy individuals will benefit by improved quality of life in old age (timescale 10-15 years), increased understanding of research (timescale 3 years), increased willingness to participate in clinical trials (timescale 3-5 years), and by seeing the successful achievement of key goals within the charitable sector, such as the British Heart Foundation (timescale: 5-10 years).
The commercial sector will benefit by having new knowledge on which to develop new therapeutics, new possibilities for partnering with academics, facilitated by the TSB Cell Therapy Catapult, and by selling materials, such as kits and antibodies, to researchers funded by the hub (timescale: 1-10 years).
The UK government (timescale: 1-15 years) will benefit by generation of intellectual property, leverage of ongoing MRC investment in the Centre for Transplantation, commercialisation of products arising from the research, reduced health care costs and by involvement in the work force of people who would otherwise be unable to work through ill health. The reduced burden to the National Health Service will allow resources to be channelled into other areas, such as acute care. The stature of the UK internationally will increase, because the research carried out by the hub will impact on the global field of regenerative medicine.
Organisations
- King's College London (Lead Research Organisation)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Co-funder)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Co-funder)
- UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM (Collaboration)
- UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE (Collaboration)
- IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON (Collaboration)
Publications
Alhabbab R
(2018)
Galectin-1 is required for the regulatory function of B cells.
in Scientific reports
Armstrong JPK
(2020)
A blueprint for translational regenerative medicine.
in Science translational medicine
Armstrong M
(2016)
Glucagon-like peptide 1 decreases lipotoxicity in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
in Journal of Hepatology
Armstrong MJ
(2016)
Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
in Lancet (London, England)
Armstrong MJ
(2016)
Identifying patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis that are nonresponders to therapy.
in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
Athanasiou T
(2016)
Mentoring perception, scientific collaboration and research performance: is there a 'gender gap' in academic medicine? An Academic Health Science Centre perspective.
in Postgraduate medical journal
Boardman DA
(2016)
What Is Direct Allorecognition?
in Current transplantation reports
Boardman DA
(2017)
Expression of a Chimeric Antigen Receptor Specific for Donor HLA Class I Enhances the Potency of Human Regulatory T Cells in Preventing Human Skin Transplant Rejection.
in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
Brunetti-Pierri N
(2016)
AAV-mediated liver-directed gene therapy for Acute Intermittent Porphyria: It is safe but is it effective?
in Journal of hepatology
Description | Crack It Mini Challenge : Monitoring contractility of bio-realistic human cardiac tissue in vitro |
Amount | £100,000 (GBP) |
Funding ID | NC/C013106/1 |
Organisation | Medical Research Council (MRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 01/2014 |
End | 07/2014 |
Description | Demonstrating that Extracellular vesicles from iPSC-derived hepatocytes can positively modulate immunosuppression |
Organisation | University of Cambridge |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Determining immunosuppressive activity of extracellular vesicles both in vitro and in vivo |
Collaborator Contribution | Immunophenotyping of extracellular vesicles |
Impact | 1. Immunophenotyped extracellular vesicles from iPSC-derived hepatocytes 2. Extracellular vesicles with demonstrated immunosuppressive activity from iPS-derived hepatocytes. |
Start Year | 2016 |
Description | Microparticles for the induction of immune tolerance in the transplant niche |
Organisation | University of Nottingham |
Department | School of Mathematical Sciences Nottingham |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Testing controlled PLGA microparticles for local induction of immune tolerance in two complementary transplantation models |
Collaborator Contribution | Development of PLGA microparticles |
Impact | 1. PLGA microparticles with varying release profiles, soluble factors, and presented tethered ligands 2. Microparticles for tolerance induction in a mouse skin graft model 3. Microparticles as an adjunct therapy to IPS delivery in a liver fibrosis model |
Start Year | 2015 |
Description | Tolerance of and functional support from iPSC-derived hepatocyte cell lines in mice with drug-induced liver disease |
Organisation | Imperial College London |
Department | Faculty of Medicine |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Transplanting hepatocytes (iPSC and adult) into a humanised mouse model of acute liver failure i |
Collaborator Contribution | Development of humanised mouse model of acute liver failure |
Impact | 1. iPSC-derived hepatocyte cell lines and adult hepatocyte cell line that can support liver function in Fah-/- mice. 2. iPSC- derived hepatocyte cell lines that can be tolerated in Fah- /- Humanized Mice (HuMice) based on CD8 T and CD4 T cell responses. |
Start Year | 2016 |
Description | Academy of Medical Sciences and Association of Physicians |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | To bring together world class speakers and leading industry experts from across European Pharma, Biotech and Academic sectors to share, discuss, collaborate and innovate. Latest scientific breakthroughs, target validation studies, innovative technologies, and new therapeutics will be discussed. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Advice for applicants for Wellcome Trust Sir Henry Dale Fellowships http://elifesciences.org/elife-news/webinar-report-Sir-Henry-Dale |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Advice to postdocs on obtaining a career development award. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://elifesciences.org/elife-news/webinar-report-Sir-Henry-Dale |
Description | BM1305 COST meeting |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | A discussion on how the last grant period has been |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | British Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (BSHI) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Talks and discussions on new advances in both technology and therapy for transplantation |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Cellular and Molecular mechanisms and new therapeutic concepts in translation |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | A 2 day symposium |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Co-organiser and chair person at Humanised Mouse Symposium |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Co-organised and chaired a workshop humanised mouse symposium |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Diseases Plenary Session at ISCT 2017 London |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | so that the broad membership of ISCT can attend the Plenary Sessions for education in areas in which they are not experts and then attendees with specific interest in a field can attend the Plenary Breakout sessions which relate to their specific fields of interest for a more in depth presentation of the research. ISo that invited speakers have a greater opportunity to present their work in a single conference. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | ELRIG Research and Innovation conference |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Regulatory T cell therapy in organ transplantation |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | ESOT 2017 Barcelona |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | An educational experience to a broad audience with discussion |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Final ONE meeting |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | mmmmmm |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Immunotherapies in transplantation and cancer |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | A meeting focused on immunological mechanisms and treatments in transplantation and cancer that are common but have opposite final effects in each of these situations; a given tolerogenic mechanisms need to be fostered in transplantation and inhibited in cancer and viceversa. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2012,2017 |
Description | London Immunology Group and the British Society for Immunology |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Annual Symposium with debate with panel of invited speakers. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | NIHR BTRU in ODT |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | NIHR BTRU in Organ Donation and Transplantation |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |
Description | NIHR in BTRU in ODT |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | interactive workshop involving academics creating a forum to present and share ideas |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Regulation of the immune response in support of hematopoietic progenitor cell and solid organ transplantation |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | British Society for Immunology Congress |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Stem Cell Research: From Utopian Dream to Reality (2016) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIqULf7xJ90&feature=em-subs_digest |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Exhibition and video as part of 'Utopia 2016' exhibition at Somerset House. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
URL | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIqULf7xJ90&feature=em-subs_digest |
Description | Therapeutic Tolerance Workshop |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | informal networking opportunity with discussion |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | UCB Seminar |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Collaboration project |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | UK Humanised Mouse Symposium |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | A working group |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |
Description | UK Kidney Week 2017 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | an update on therapies in renal transplantation |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | UKRMP 2 Meeting |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | A working group |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |
Description | UKRMP NHSBT joint workshop |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Study participants or study members |
Results and Impact | forum to plan future strategy and collaborations in the field |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | YouTube Video: Commercialisation of Cell Therapies; Tackling Challenges and Creating Opportunities |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press) |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | On December 10th-11th 2015, the UKRMP Immunomodulation Hub held a workshop on Immunomodulation of Stem Cells at the Academy of Medical Sciences in London. Fiona Watt chaired a panel session involving David Mooney (Harvard University), Cathy Prescott (Biolatris Ltd), Eleuterio Lombardo (TiGenix) and Stuart Forbes (Edinburgh) on the commercialisation of cell therapies. The panel discussed ways of tackling challenges and creating opportunities in this field. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
URL | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pQTJZM1O9c |
Description | YouTube Video: Opportunities and challenges in cell therapies |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press) |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | The goal of the field of regenerative medicine is to replace damaged or diseased tissue and thereby find cures for diseases that are currently untreatable. At present, two different approaches appear feasible: one is to stimulate the body's own cells to repair the tissue; and the other is to transplant new cells into the body, but both approaches are classed cell therapies. The drive to move regenerative medicine from the bench to clinic is currently at its strongest and on an international scale, which has resulted in many opportunities and challenges for the field. What viewers learn: *The regulatory landscape in the UK *The role of the commercial sector *Logistics involved in clinical trials *The future potential of cell-based therapies Who this will interest: *Basic researchers in regenerative medicine *Clinicians involved in regenerative medicine clinical trials *Regenerative medicine investors |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
URL | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t56dUDlMjV0 |