Safety and lower airway immunogenicity of two candidate Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) vaccines administered to the respiratory tract
Lead Research Organisation:
Imperial College London
Department Name: Infectious Disease
Abstract
For a COVID-19 vaccine to have maximum impact, it should not only prevent severe infection but also limit the shedding of virus so that transmission is interrupted and pandemic spread is controlled. Experience with the influenza vaccine FluEnz (which is given as a nasal spray) has shown that intranasal vaccines can be effective for both outcomes. All COVID-19 vaccines currently being trialled are delivered by injection but it is known that directly stimulating immunity at the site of infection (i.e. the nose and lung) induces specialised protective responses that may more quickly and completely control infection.
This study will test the two leading UK COVID-19 vaccines to show that they are safe, well-tolerated and capable of stimulating immune responses both in the blood and the lung when administered to the respiratory tract. Using standardised methods, we will directly compare immune responses in the blood, nose and lower airway between these two vaccines as well as with data from ongoing clinical trials of intramuscular vaccination. Thus, we will show the effect of different vaccine technologies as well as delivery method and provide the critical information required to begin further clinical trials to show the efficacy of this needle-free vaccination strategy.
This study will test the two leading UK COVID-19 vaccines to show that they are safe, well-tolerated and capable of stimulating immune responses both in the blood and the lung when administered to the respiratory tract. Using standardised methods, we will directly compare immune responses in the blood, nose and lower airway between these two vaccines as well as with data from ongoing clinical trials of intramuscular vaccination. Thus, we will show the effect of different vaccine technologies as well as delivery method and provide the critical information required to begin further clinical trials to show the efficacy of this needle-free vaccination strategy.
Technical Summary
Substantial literature indicates that stimulation of mucosal immunity by direct antigen delivery can induced tissue-specific responses that are more effective in preventing respiratory disease, limiting viral shedding and interrupting transmission. However, in order to proceed rapidly, all COVID-19 vaccines currently in development are administered by parenteral injection.
The aim of this study is to test the safety and mucosal immunogenicity of the two leading UK COVID-19 vaccines (ChAdOx1 nCoV19 and LNP-nCoV RNA) when administered by aerosol in healthy adult volunteers. Each vaccine will be administered at 3 dose levels (in groups of 3 participants) with a further 6 individuals vaccinated with the highest tolerated dose. Systemic immunogenicity will be quantified using standardised assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (by ELISA and virus neutralisation) and T cells (by IFN-g ELISpot). Serology will be performed in the same laboratory as the ongoing phase I/II/III trials of intramuscular ChAdOx1 nCov19, allowing direct data comparison. Additionally, all participants will undergo bronchoscopic sampling of the lower airway at pre-vaccination, day 21 and day 182 timepoints. Together with nasal specimens, these will be analysed for mucosal IgA, T cells by intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry, and soluble mediators by MesoScale Discovery using techniques aligned with previous human respiratory virus challenge studies.
Thus, we will provide proof-of-concept that these vaccines can safely induce specialised mucosal immune responses that may correlate with greater efficacy, accelerating the deployment of clinical trials to test their ability to prevent disease and transmission in the field.
The aim of this study is to test the safety and mucosal immunogenicity of the two leading UK COVID-19 vaccines (ChAdOx1 nCoV19 and LNP-nCoV RNA) when administered by aerosol in healthy adult volunteers. Each vaccine will be administered at 3 dose levels (in groups of 3 participants) with a further 6 individuals vaccinated with the highest tolerated dose. Systemic immunogenicity will be quantified using standardised assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (by ELISA and virus neutralisation) and T cells (by IFN-g ELISpot). Serology will be performed in the same laboratory as the ongoing phase I/II/III trials of intramuscular ChAdOx1 nCov19, allowing direct data comparison. Additionally, all participants will undergo bronchoscopic sampling of the lower airway at pre-vaccination, day 21 and day 182 timepoints. Together with nasal specimens, these will be analysed for mucosal IgA, T cells by intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry, and soluble mediators by MesoScale Discovery using techniques aligned with previous human respiratory virus challenge studies.
Thus, we will provide proof-of-concept that these vaccines can safely induce specialised mucosal immune responses that may correlate with greater efficacy, accelerating the deployment of clinical trials to test their ability to prevent disease and transmission in the field.
Publications
McKendry R
(2022)
Human Challenge Studies with Coronaviruses Old and New.
in Current topics in microbiology and immunology
Description | 28 healthy adults aged 30-55 were administered the Astrazeneca/Oxford AZD1222 vaccine by aerosol inhalation. All participants had previously had a full course of COVID-19 vaccination. This route of administration was safe and well tolerated. The vaccine stimulated large numbers of T cells in both the blood and the lower respiratory tract. |
Exploitation Route | These results will support the further development of inhaled vaccines that may enhance the effectiveness and transmission-blocking capacity of next-generation vaccines against respiratory viruses. Further immunological analysis is underway and will provide increased understanding of how the immune system in the human lung may be harnessed to improve vaccine effectiveness. |
Sectors | Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and Medical Biotechnology |
Description | IMMPROVE: Immune Memory and Mechanisms of Protection from Vaccines |
Amount | £8,563,239 (GBP) |
Funding ID | MR/Y004450/1 |
Organisation | Medical Research Council (MRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 12/2023 |
End | 11/2028 |
Description | Analysis of immune responses to AZD1222 |
Organisation | University of Oxford |
Department | Oxford Hub |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Providing samples from aerosol AZD1222 vaccinated individuals for analysis of T cells and antibodies |
Collaborator Contribution | Analysis of T cells and antibodies on validated assays comparable with clinical trials of intramuscular AZD1222 |
Impact | None as yet |
Start Year | 2020 |
Description | Phase I clinical trial of aerosol AZD1222 |
Organisation | AstraZeneca |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Private |
PI Contribution | Data resulting from clinical trial of aerosol AZD1222 |
Collaborator Contribution | Running of phase 1 clinical trial of aerosol AZD1222 |
Impact | None as yet |
Start Year | 2021 |