Exploring how to increase access to healthcare services for border resident communities in East Africa

Lead Research Organisation: Makerere University
Department Name: School of Public Health

Abstract

Access to healthcare remains a big challenge in Africa. The situation is particularly appalling for border resident communities as they are often not given priority by policy makers. The existence of different state territorial sovereignty, administrative frameworks with different currencies, support services, legal/regulatory systems, and languages make healthcare access for border resident populations even more complex. Unlike in the central areas; in some sparsely populated border areas, the nearest facility may be in another country. Another significant barrier lies in the economic deprivation to which the border areas are usually exposed.
In this era of Universal Health Coverage, how are communities residing along national borders going to be served without any financial burden as well as ensuring their overall wellbeing? This is an overarching question we intend to contribute to. This will be done through a study conducted at five paired-cross border sites in East Africa. Specifically; four interrelated objectives are proposed;
Objective 1: This will explore the existing legal-institutional contextual constraints and enablers to access to cross border healthcare services for border resident communities, by way of two main methods; 1) review of administrative and legal documents and 2) Key Informant Interviews with border officials and managers of political administrative units near the border.
Objective 2: This objective will explore the health systems constraints and implications for serving border communities. Key informant interviews will be the main methods for this objective. District or county health managers and providers will provide the bulk of this category of respondents. CBOs working to improve health services will also be included in the survey as key informants.
Objective 3: This objective will determine how border resident communities navigate legal-institutional and health systems constraints and enablers to health service access. Two main methods will be used a) Survey of those that successfully manage to access services across the border and b) Focus Group Discussions (FGD). For the survey, Appreciative Inquiry (AI) approach will be taken to probe the access pathways for those that have successfully navigated access to three selected services on the other side of the border. We will undertake FGDs to help to mitigate the limitation of surveying only those that successfully navigated the access barriers. The FGD participants will include potential services for cross-border services ie 1) mothers attending child immunization services, and 2) community leaders - including community health workers.
Objective 4: This objective aim to identify feasible actions to advance the access and coverage agenda to services for the communities residing along state borders. This will be done through; 1) convening stakeholders to deliberate on the findings from objectives 1, 2 and 3 in order to influence policy and practice and 2) sharing the study findings with the highest regional policy platforms. At these meetings we shall engage sub national, national, and regional policy practitioners to make salient the need to plan for border resident communities. Relatedly, the findings will also be disseminated at local, regional and international conferences in addition to publishing in peer review journals.
The survey is anticipated to increase understanding of healthcare access issues and the health systems implications for serving border resident communities. In turn border resident communities will benefit from improved cross border healthcare provision and greater EAC cooperation in health care delivery.

Technical Summary

The goal of any health system is to improve the health of the population it serves (WHO 2000). For UHC realisation, health systems should respond to the needs of the population and enable access to health care services without creating financial hardships and ensuring equity in access [WHO 2010]. However, this is particularly challenging for health systems serving communities resident along international borders where several legal-institutional and health systems constraints exist. Evidence from the European Union where political integration prevails highlights health systems challenges including variations in information systems, treatment modalities and standards enforcement among countries [Derose KP et al, 2011].
Whereas research has been conducted to understand determinants of access to health services in developing contexts in general [EAC Secretariat, 2015], there is a dearth of evidence on access enablers and barriers facing communities resident along the international borders in developing countries. This study aims to address that gap in knowledge, policy and practice. Opportunity exists to ride on the current economic and political integration discourse for the East African Community (EAC) to stimulate policy dialogue among key stakeholders on the interventions that are necessary to overcome the barriers and/or to leverage identified enablers to a wider scale. The four project objectives are: 1) To explore the existing legal-institutional constraints and enablers to cross-border health care services among communities resident along EAC borders. 2) To explore health systems constraints and implications for serving communities resident along EAC borders.3) To determine how communities resident along EAC borders navigate legal-institutional/health systems constraints to health service access. 4) To explore feasible solutions to advance the access and coverage agenda to health services for the communities resident along EAC border

Planned Impact

This study seeks to explore healthcare access constraints and enablers as well as the health systems implications for serving border resident communities in East Africa. The findings of this study will be used to increase understanding of healthcare access issues for border resident communities among the different actors/stakeholders at the different levels i.e. local (border site), sub national, national, and regional. Among the actors/stakeholders to be targeted include; service providers, health systems managers, border managers/ other public authorities, policy makers at different levels, and funders.

The ideal situation would be to influence the East Africa Federation to pass legislation that allows cross border health systems to function in a more collaborative way. The beneficiaries (the border resident populations) will in-turn benefit from this intervention through increased access to and uptake of integrated healthcare services at cross-border sites in East Africa. This will come as a result of improved access to health services due to well coordinated healthcare provisions, people centered service delivery approaches, relaxed regulations etc.

Relatedly, this study will provide evidence to inform policy and practice. The study findings will be shared with county/district health offices, implementing partners working with cross border populations, public authorities, funders and policy makers. These results could also benefit other national border settings or can be used elsewhere. The gaps and opportunities identified by the study will be used by the stakeholders to develop action plans in relation to practice, policy, and funding. Some of the anticipated action plans include; actors/organizations networking strategies, revised or re-aligned healthcare interventions, budget allocations, bi-laws, and new or revised policies that ease access barriers at border sites.

The proposed study also has potential to benefit several academic areas in the fields of health policy, health system management, health diplomacy and international relations, economics, geography, political science, epidemic intelligence service, field epidemiology, public health, emergency management and community development that related to the topic of cross-border health care access. The gaps and opportunities identified in this study can be used by scholars, students and faculty within the research institutions in the region to establish research networks to address cross-border health issues in the region.

We propose to stimulate stakeholder engagement and collaboration within and across health systems, organizations and borders through the planned joint stakeholder engagement activities at the different levels. For example; local/sub national validation and dissemination meetings, regional stakeholder meetings, and the engagements with the Directors' Joint Consultative Committee (DJCC) which is the highest technical committee of the ECSA Health Community. We shall identify and actively engage relevant users of research and stakeholders at appropriate stages. In the engagements, stakeholders will be tasked to do action planning for improved cross border healthcare access and continued networking among actors and organizations. These processes will benefit the overall health systems through triggering better coordination of border health care systems exemplified by budget collaboration and establishment of cross border task forces at local level. This in turn will strengthen the capacity of stakeholders to analyze and resolve their own problems functionalising the EAC goal.

This project will also impact national governments in the East African Federation. In particular, through joint networking and monitoring of cross border healthcare programming by governments; increased efficiency and effectiveness of cross border service delivery; and establishment of a supportive regulatory environment for cross-border health programming.
 
Description African Research Advisory Panel for WHO AFRO
Geographic Reach Africa 
Policy Influence Type Membership of a guideline committee
URL https://www.afro.who.int/about-us/leadership/aachrd
 
Description Lead Consultant for UHC Road Map for Uganda
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
Impact I have led as Director a project that has provided vital preparations, analyses and deliberations about UHC in Uganda. As Director the SPEED project, we have published a book on universal health coverage - drawing attention to the marginalised communities were access to healthcare will required more policy tools and affirmative actions in investments and design of the provision systems. It is upon this background that I was identified to lead the preparation of the National Road Map of Universal Health Coverage. The Study supported by MRC on cross Border access provided more evidence about the need and approaches to focus efforts and attention to the remote rural settings as well as enabling policy tools to leverage care investments nearest to the border communities ill respective administrative borders and citizenship.
 
Description Scientific Advisory Committee for COVID-19
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Membership of a guideline committee
Impact I have served as Lead for Public Health Policy within the National COVID-19 Scientific Advisory Committee. Main tasks has been to Generate Evidence, customise evidence to the realistic response actions/strategies for the pandemic response in Uganda. I have also provided media training about different topics for the journalists to report better for the Pandemic and interventions like lockdowns, behavioural control and vaccinations and SOPs for several sections of societal functions like hospitals, schools, markets etc. I have also prepared internal discussion papers - policy advice for the Minister of Health on issues commissioned by Govt. Cross border movement was a key transmission route for COVID-19 - especially on the border with Tanzania where the political leadership was doing little to acknowledge the pandemic or to control it. Uganda side of the boarder required more vigilance with surveillance and COVID-19 testing mitigate the spread of infection arise from Tanzania. Our prior study and dialogues with communities and officials (Health and Customs) provided us with fresh evidence to support cross-border surveillance. In particular, We were able to advocate for more personnel and testing capacity on the Uganda-Tanzania Boarder as well as other border crossing pints since Truckers were the main vector of transmission early in the pandemic (April to July 2020).
URL https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/gifted-brains-hands-in-the-covid-19-fight-1892136
 
Description United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of MEASURE Evaluation cooperative agreementAID-OAA-L-14-00004
Amount $1,250,000 (USD)
Organisation University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 
Sector Academic/University
Country United States
Start 02/2018 
End 09/2018
 
Description Global Health and Development Group 
Organisation Imperial College London
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution The IDSI at Imperial Collage London, has partnered with us to undertake some some related to health technology assessment. This is partly related to the work we are doing on UHC and Healthcare Benefit package. We are undertaking a landscaping study - covering the institutions and stakeholders involved in Health Technology Assessment and regulation in Uganda.
Collaborator Contribution The budget is still being negotiated. It is in the range of GBP 12,000 to 18,000.
Impact No outputs yet
Start Year 2021
 
Description University of York 
Organisation University of York
Department Centre for Health Economics (CHE)
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution in 2019, We were invited to join Thanzi la Onse partnership - that is funded through the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF). The partnership to improve population health and reduce health inequities in Malawi, Uganda and Southern and East Africa. The main research is to inform resource allocation decisions in the region and supporting policy environments for the productive use of that research and application of health economics tools in decision making. Out contribution to the partnership is the depth on Universal health coverage that we have undertaken in the region including the research on exploring how to expand healthcare access for communities most in need such as those in remote/border areas. We have also added expertise to the partnership in modelling benefit packages and capacity to provide services in areas where capacity is likely to be less developed in remote/border areas.
Collaborator Contribution The Lead partner - University of York has signed an MOU with Makerere University. Provided GBP 120,000 to support ongoing research on benefit package for primary health care services in Uganda and develop curriculum on a graduate course in Health Economics for Makerere University School of Public Health,
Impact 1) It is early for the research products - We have completed the data collection for Modelling the PHC benefit package for Uganda. 2) Held/presented at over 5 Webinars regularly organised by the Partnership over 2019 and 2021 and attended about 10 Webinars during the same period. 3) Contributed by Hosting an ODI Fellow from UK to Uganda as part of the partnership. 4) Hosted the University of York Delegation to Uganda at the Conference Hosted by Makerere University (August 2019). 5) Completed the drafting of the Health Economics Curriculum for post graduate course at Makerere University. This is now undergoing the approval process by the university authorities.
Start Year 2019
 
Description Dissemination Meeting At 69th ECSA-HC Conference of Health Ministers in Lusaka Zambia 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact A presentation of the study findings and their policy implications was made to the plenary session-6 of Health Ministers and Health Officials attending the 69th ECSA-HC Conference of Health Ministers in Lusaka Zambia. The theme of the Conference "Innovation and Accountability in Health towards achieving Universal Health Coverage" was also related to our study exploring ways to improve access for cross border communities in the East African region.
Delegates received a research brief and key policy actions to address healthcare access gaps in border regions of the ECSA community.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://ecsahc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Final-HMC-Program.pdf
 
Description Dissemination and Validation Meetings at Study Sites 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Study findings were taken to the study sites in Busia, Katuna and Isebania and Rusaka Boarder sites.
These meetings convened Govt officials from District Health, Border Control/customer and major community based organisations in these communities.
The presentation were discussed, implications for local actions were explored and recommendations were made for follow-up actions by local stakeholders.
Implications for national level actions were also identified for discussion with national level policy actors.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019,2020
 
Description Keynote to the East Central and Southern Africa (ECSA) Health Community 11th Best Practices Forum (BPF) held from 26th to 28th June 2018 in Arusha, Tanzania 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact This was the 27th Directors Joint Consultative Committee (DJCC) Meeting for the Directors of Health Services from the East Central and Southern Africa (ECSA) Health Community. We were invited to present our work on universal health coverage in Uganda. We also had opportunity to inform the meeting about the Cross Border Study we were undertaking in the region to aExploring how to increase access to healthcare services for border resident communities in East Africa (MR/R020280/1)
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Study site pre-visits and stakeholder engagements 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Following the study clearance in the four study countries of E. Africa, the study team conducted pre-visits to the four study sites. The aim of the pre-visits was to obtain stakeholder buy-in and prepare the ground for data collection. This was done through joint cross border stakeholders' meeting. The four meetings were attended by about 120 people (25-30 people each), including political leaders, technical leaders, implementing partners, Civil Society Organization representatives and health service providers among other. In the meetings, stakeholders deliberated on cross border health issues, which increased awareness of the problem.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018