The Environment of the Arctic: Climate, Ocean and Sea Ice (TEA-COSI)
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Oxford
Department Name: Earth Sciences
Abstract
Look at a map of the world and find the Shetland Islands. Follow the 60 degrees north latitude circle eastwards. You pass through St. Petersburg, the Ural Mountains, Siberia, the Bering Sea, Alaska, northern Canada, the southern tip of Greenland, then back to the Shetlands. All these places are cold, harsh environments, particularly in winter, except the Shetlands, which is wet and windy but quite mild all year. This is because in the UK we benefit from heat brought northwards by the Atlantic Ocean in a current called the Conveyor Belt. This current is driven by surface water being made to sink by the extreme cold in and around the Arctic. It returns southwards through the Atlantic at great depths. Scientists think it is possible that the Conveyor Belt could slow down or stop, and if it did, the UK would get much colder.
We know the planet has been warming for the last century or more, and we think this is due to the Greenhouse Effect. Burning fossil fuels puts a lot of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which stops heat from leaving the Earth, like the glass in a greenhouse. In a warming world, ice melts faster, and there is a lot of ice on the Earth: ice caps on Greenland and Antarctica, sea ice in the Arctic and Antarctic Oceans, glaciers in high mountains. And we know that the Arctic is the fastest-warming part of the planet. This causes extra amounts of fresh water to flow into the oceans. Now this fresh water can affect the Conveyor Belt by acting like a lid of water too light to sink, so the Conveyor Belt stops.
What is the chance of this happening? We do not know, because there is much we do not understand about how the Arctic Ocean works. You need a powerful icebreaker to get into the Arctic Ocean, and that's only really possible in the summer, because in winter the sea ice thickens and the weather is bad. Scientists all over the world agree that the Arctic Ocean is important because it contains a lot of freshwater, which is why, although it is difficult to make measurements in the Arctic, the UK's Natural Environment Research Council has decided to fund a programme of scientific research in the Arctic.
We want to be able to make better predictions of how the Arctic climate will change during the 21st century, so this project will help improve our ability to make these predictions. We will do this by improving the way that computer models of the Earth's climate represent the Arctic. We are going to treat the Arctic Ocean as a box, with a top, a bottom, sides and an interior, and we're going to examine all these parts of the box using measurements from space, from ships, from instruments moored to the sea bed, and from robotic sensors attached to drifting sea ice. We'll use all these measurements together to improve the scientific equations within the computer models, and then we'll run the models into the future to create better predictions not just of the Arctic, but of how changes in the Arctic might influence UK, European and global climate. With better predictions, we can make better plans for the future.
We know the planet has been warming for the last century or more, and we think this is due to the Greenhouse Effect. Burning fossil fuels puts a lot of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which stops heat from leaving the Earth, like the glass in a greenhouse. In a warming world, ice melts faster, and there is a lot of ice on the Earth: ice caps on Greenland and Antarctica, sea ice in the Arctic and Antarctic Oceans, glaciers in high mountains. And we know that the Arctic is the fastest-warming part of the planet. This causes extra amounts of fresh water to flow into the oceans. Now this fresh water can affect the Conveyor Belt by acting like a lid of water too light to sink, so the Conveyor Belt stops.
What is the chance of this happening? We do not know, because there is much we do not understand about how the Arctic Ocean works. You need a powerful icebreaker to get into the Arctic Ocean, and that's only really possible in the summer, because in winter the sea ice thickens and the weather is bad. Scientists all over the world agree that the Arctic Ocean is important because it contains a lot of freshwater, which is why, although it is difficult to make measurements in the Arctic, the UK's Natural Environment Research Council has decided to fund a programme of scientific research in the Arctic.
We want to be able to make better predictions of how the Arctic climate will change during the 21st century, so this project will help improve our ability to make these predictions. We will do this by improving the way that computer models of the Earth's climate represent the Arctic. We are going to treat the Arctic Ocean as a box, with a top, a bottom, sides and an interior, and we're going to examine all these parts of the box using measurements from space, from ships, from instruments moored to the sea bed, and from robotic sensors attached to drifting sea ice. We'll use all these measurements together to improve the scientific equations within the computer models, and then we'll run the models into the future to create better predictions not just of the Arctic, but of how changes in the Arctic might influence UK, European and global climate. With better predictions, we can make better plans for the future.
Planned Impact
The academic beneficiaries will be UK, Arctic and global climate scientists. We specifically included the UK Meteorological Office's Hadley Centre early in the planning for this project, and, as major project collaborators, we will fund part of their work in order to help keep the Hadley Centre at the forefront of the global climate modelling community.
The UK government departments that will benefit directly from this project are the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), and the Department of Transport (DfT). DECC are responsible for advising the UK government on climate risks and developing mitigation strategies at UK, European and international scales and for international adaptation. DEFRA is responsible for advising on UK adaptation strategies. The FCO are responsible for developing and shaping the UK's relationship with Arctic-rim nations and the forward look of this strategy. The DfT are tasked with ensuring that the UK's shipping/ports are operated in an efficient manner, and that UK shipping remains a globally competitive industry in the future. All these government departments will benefit directly from an improvement in UK capability to predict Arctic climate through the 21st century.
We will maximise the project's impact and achieve the project's goals for knowledge exchange through early and continued stakeholder engagement in consultation with the NERC Arctic Office, the Arctic programme management, and via planned activities within the project itself.
As measures of success, we will attend international science meetings (as normal). We will also catalogue the use of the Project's science findings in assisting government decisions and policy, in collaboration with nominated contacts in the relevant departments, and we will record the utilisation of project results in adjustments and modifications to Hadley Centre models and modelling approaches. We plan an open end-project meeting aimed at the scientific and stakeholder communities. Its success will be measured by the extent to which it attracts informed and wide user and scientist attendance.
The UK government departments that will benefit directly from this project are the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), and the Department of Transport (DfT). DECC are responsible for advising the UK government on climate risks and developing mitigation strategies at UK, European and international scales and for international adaptation. DEFRA is responsible for advising on UK adaptation strategies. The FCO are responsible for developing and shaping the UK's relationship with Arctic-rim nations and the forward look of this strategy. The DfT are tasked with ensuring that the UK's shipping/ports are operated in an efficient manner, and that UK shipping remains a globally competitive industry in the future. All these government departments will benefit directly from an improvement in UK capability to predict Arctic climate through the 21st century.
We will maximise the project's impact and achieve the project's goals for knowledge exchange through early and continued stakeholder engagement in consultation with the NERC Arctic Office, the Arctic programme management, and via planned activities within the project itself.
As measures of success, we will attend international science meetings (as normal). We will also catalogue the use of the Project's science findings in assisting government decisions and policy, in collaboration with nominated contacts in the relevant departments, and we will record the utilisation of project results in adjustments and modifications to Hadley Centre models and modelling approaches. We plan an open end-project meeting aimed at the scientific and stakeholder communities. Its success will be measured by the extent to which it attracts informed and wide user and scientist attendance.
Publications
Brannigan L
(2017)
Generation of Subsurface Anticyclones at Arctic Surface Fronts due to a Surface Stress
in Journal of Physical Oceanography
Carmack E
(2016)
Freshwater and its role in the Arctic Marine System: Sources, disposition, storage, export, and physical and biogeochemical consequences in the Arctic and global oceans
in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Cornish S
(2020)
Response of Arctic Freshwater to the Arctic Oscillation in Coupled Climate Models
in Journal of Climate
Davis P
(2016)
Competing Effects of Elevated Vertical Mixing and Increased Freshwater Input on the Stratification and Sea Ice Cover in a Changing Arctic Ocean
in Journal of Physical Oceanography
Davis P
(2019)
Propagation and Vertical Structure of the Tidal Flow in Nares Strait
in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Heuzé C
(2017)
Pathways of Meltwater Export from Petermann Glacier, Greenland
in Journal of Physical Oceanography
Ilicak M
(2016)
An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part III: Hydrography and fluxes
in Ocean Modelling
Jackson J
(2014)
On the waters upstream of Nares Strait, Arctic Ocean, from 1991 to 2012
in Continental Shelf Research
Johnson H
(2014)
On the Link between Arctic Sea Ice Decline and the Freshwater Content of the Beaufort Gyre: Insights from a Simple Process Model
in Journal of Climate
Johnson H
(2018)
Arctic Ocean Freshwater Content and Its Decadal Memory of Sea-Level Pressure
in Geophysical Research Letters
Description | 1. The timescale on which the Arctic Ocean circulation and its freshwater content adjust to a change in wind forcing or sea-ice cover depends on eddies, and is about a decade. 2. Both the mean circulation of the sub-surface Atlantic Water layer in the Arctic, and its variability, are influenced by wind forcing over the basin as well as inflow conditions. 3. In the future, warmer waters around Greenland will likely enhance the melting of the Greenland ice sheet in sectors that have so far shown little signs of change. 4. Thorough assessment of ability of current ocean and climate models to represent the Arctic Ocean. 5. Mechanism for explaining the existence of isolated eddies observed in the Arctic. 6. Deep ocean convection may begin in the Eurasian Basin of the Arctic as a result of sea-ice decline. 7. The recent increase in liquid fresh water stored in the Arctic Ocean can be explained by changes in wind forcing, and could simply be the result of natural variability. |
Exploitation Route | Our findings will ultimately inform the development of the next generation of models used to predict global and regional climate. |
Sectors | Aerospace Defence and Marine Energy Environment Transport |
URL | https://www.o-snap.org/news-events/blog/ |
Description | Collaboration with MIT ocean general circulation modellers |
Organisation | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
Country | United States |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Idealized modelling of the Canadian Archipelago and Arctic Ocean |
Collaborator Contribution | Model support |
Impact | Lique et al. (2015a), Lique et al. (2015b). |
Start Year | 2012 |
Description | Dr Camille Lique (Brest) |
Organisation | Intellectual Property Office (IPO) |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Public |
PI Contribution | Co-supervision of students and postdocs, and project partner on research grant applications. |
Collaborator Contribution | Co-supervision of students, and project partner on research grant applications. |
Impact | Successful funding to French collaborator (with travel etc. for me as UK project partner). |
Start Year | 2015 |
Description | FAMOS |
Organisation | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution |
Country | United States |
Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
PI Contribution | This is a model inter comparison study of the impact of step changes in surface forcing on Arctic freshwater storage and circulation (Climate Response Functions). Hosted under the FAMOS umbrella at Woods Hole, but involving partners in the US, France, Germany, Norway, Japan, etc. We are using multiple lagged regression analysis to determine the Climate Response Functions in CMIP5 coupled climate models. |
Collaborator Contribution | Our partners are using forward model experiments to determine the Climate Response Functions in a variety of ocean-only models. |
Impact | Paper in preparation. |
Start Year | 2016 |
Description | Participation in the N-ICE2015 project |
Organisation | Norwegian Veterinary Institute |
Country | Norway |
Sector | Private |
PI Contribution | We collaborate in the Norwegian Young Sea Ice project (N-ICE) which is run out of NPI in Tromso but involves a large international team of scientists focused on understanding ice-ocean-atm processes in the marginal ice zone. We sent a student to participate in the drift of a research vessel and collect physical and chemical oceanography data through the ice. We are involved in analysing the data from the project, and engaged in related modelling activities which will add value to the campaign. |
Collaborator Contribution | Our Norwegian partners funded the ship-time and project expenses, and took the lead in directing the project. |
Impact | Few concrete outcomes as yet, but will result in several publications over the next year or two |
Start Year | 2014 |
Description | Outreach talk (GXSA) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Talk sparked questions and discussion afterwards. Many audience members requested further information, and expressed a desire to hear from related speakers in the future. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2013 |
Description | Outreach talk (RMS Saturday talks) |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | Yes |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Supporters |
Results and Impact | Talk sparked questions, discussion and requests for materials afterwards. Several requests for further information after my talk, as well as links made to artists (playwright, choreographer...) interested in communicating climate change message to a broad public audience. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2013 |
Description | WCRP CLiC Arctic Freshwater Synthesis |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | Yes |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.) |
Results and Impact | Report and papers in progress. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2014 |
URL | http://www.climate-cryosphere.org/activities/targeted/afs |