A hierarchical approach to the examination of the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem service flows across coastal margins

Lead Research Organisation: RSPB
Department Name: Conservation Science Department

Abstract

CBESS Summary:

The health of the UK's coastlines is inextricably linked to our success as an island nation, and resonates through our economy, our recreation, and our culture. Most pressingly, of all the UK's many and varied landscapes, its coastal systems are the ones most immediately sensitive to climate change. As temperatures increase, sea levels will rise and the forces experienced where land and sea meet will become more destructive. Salt marshes, mudflats, beaches and rocky shores will all be affected but, of these areas, the most sensitive are the mudflats and salt marshes that are common features of coastal systems, and which comprise just over half of the UK's total estuarine area. Not only do these landscapes support a wide range of economically valuable animal and plant species, they also act as sites of carbon storage, nutrient recycling, and pollutant capture and destruction. Their preservation is, therefore, of the utmost importance, requiring active and informed management to save them for future generations. The Natural Environment Research Council's call to help understand the landscape-scale links between the functions that these systems provide (ecosystem service flows) and the organisms that help provide these services (biodiversity stocks) offers an important opportunity to move beyond most previous work in this field, which has been conducted at small or laboratory scales. While of foundational scientific importance, the implications of laboratory studies can be hard to translate into policy, and coastal managers require a clearer evidence base to understand how ecosystem service flows operate at much larger spatial scales, e.g. entire salt marshes or regions of intertidal flat and salt marshes. The programme we are proposing 'A hierarchical approach to the examination of the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem service flows across coastal margins' (CBESS) will provide such a large scale understanding. Our consortium of UK experts ranges from microbial ecologists, through environmental economists, to mathematical modellers, including organisations like the BTO and the RSPB, who have immediate and vested interest in the sustainable use of coastal wetlands.

Together, CBESS will create a study that spans the landscape scale, investigating how biodiversity stocks provide the following ecosystem services (cf. National Ecosystem Assessment).

- Supporting' services: nutrient cycling, healthy habitat
- Provisioning services; goods obtained from the landscape
- Regulating' services: coastal protection, climate regulation (greenhouse gas exchange, carbon sequestration)
- Cultural services: Recreation (walking, canoeing, angling, birding, hunting and beauty)

CBESS will combine the detailed study of two regional landscapes with a broad-scale UK-wide study to allow both specific and general conclusions to be drawn. The Regional study will compare two areas of great local and national importance: Morecambe Bay on the west coast and the Essex coastline on the east coast. We will carry out biological and physical surveys at more than 600 stations and use these results to clarify how biodiversity can provide these important ecosystem functions. This information will be shared with those interested in using and managing coastal systems and, after our analysis; we will propose practical methods and improved tools for the future analysis, management, and sustainability of the UK's coastal wetlands.

Planned Impact

CBESS Impact Summary:

Who will benefit from this research, and how?

Commercial private sector and the knowledge economy: CBESS provides new knowledge, new data, and tools to assist the sustainable management of coastal landscapes. Theme 5 of CBESS will also deliver new and innovative methodologies, equipment, techniques, and technologies to assess the role of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystems services. This framework is based on the HiMOM (Hierarchical monitoring of marine systems) EU programme, in providing a 'tool kit' and case studies for use by coastal managers. The research itself is based on an interdisciplinary framework that will provide a model for future programmes in the UK and abroad, through initiatives such as the Cambridge Conservation Initiative, the world's largest cluster of conservation organisations that focus on biodiversity research, policy and practice. Since many commercial interests rely on sustainable wetland socio-ecosystem service flows, beneficiaries will be correspondingly varied: Recreation (e.g. wildfowling, angling, walking) and commerce (e.g. fisheries, farming, cafes, museums, exhibits) that uses the local landscape will see long-term benefits.

Policy professionals, governmental and devolved governmental organisations: The CBESS consortium hinges on the full involvement (see attached Letters of Support) of a wide range of partner organisations with an explicit interest in policy and the management of coastal wetlands. Members will disseminate information far beyond the immediate circle of CBESS. Our Partners include the Government Office for Science, the Environment Agency and its devolved counterparts (NIEA, SEPA), the Freshwater Biological Association, the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, and The James Hutton Institute. In addition, through the Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland (MASTS), the Consortium has access to the Scottish Marine Forum, Marine Scotland, Marine Science Scotland, The Centre of Expertise for Waters, and the Centre of Expertise for Climate Change; a constituency of several thousand members.

The British public: The intrinsic value of publically accessible wetland is widely recognised, enhancing our culture, quality of life, and health. Given that most people experience their surroundings at, and live their daily lives within, the 'landscape' scale, CBESS will enhance evidence based policy-making and support robust legislation at a local, regional, national and international level (see Pathways to Impact).
Voluntary sectors and wider public: Wetland wildlife habitats attract dedicated support from the voluntary sector (e.g The British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Essex Wildlife Trust). CBESS's econometric approach will examine the scale-dependence of wetland use by public, recreational (e.g fishing, birdwatching) and voluntary groups (Litter clearance, nature guides), adding to our Partners' understanding of overall wetland service provision. Through our Partners, new groups will become part of the CBESS constituency and informed about the project.

Skills training. Three areas of benefit arise from CBESS. In addition to academic progression, early career researchers will gain experience in planning and conducting a large and complex programme. PhDs associated with CBESS will gain from the interdisciplinary, and highly cooperative, nature of the work. Finally, areas of CBESS work lie in the traditional skills of sampling and taxonomy (cf. floral and infaunal biodiversity) which will be supported within CBESS and staff encourage to develop skills (taxonomy courses include in costings).

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description The collaborative research has helped to elucidate the relationships between perceptions of various elements of biodiversity and impact on people's wellbeing during recreational visits to the coast. These findings, which are in review with a journal, contribute to a growing volume of research addressing the importance of biodiversity in underpinning human wellbeing which, for a membership-based conservation organization, is useful in nuancing how we talk about biodiversity to different audience segments.
Exploitation Route This research forms part of a wider suite of evidence emerging from the linked BESS programme that greatly in forms our understanding of the relationship between ecosystem / biodiversity state and human wellbeing, such that there are implications for both environment and health practitioners.
Sectors Environment,Leisure Activities, including Sports, Recreation and Tourism,Other

 
Description Our findings contribute to a growing volume of research addressing the importance of biodiversity in underpinning human wellbeing which, for a membership-based conservation organization, has been useful in developing the nuancing around how we talk about biodiversity to different audience segments. These results have now been published.
First Year Of Impact 2020
Sector Environment,Other
Impact Types Cultural

 
Description Cross-disciplinary work with Queens University Belfast 
Organisation British Trust for Ornithology
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution As a team, we are trying to determine how decisions on use of the coast affect human well-being, via biodiversity-well-being relationships. As a biologist and conservationist my role, with partner BTO, has been to help consider appropriate metrics of biodiversity for these assessments.
Collaborator Contribution The Belfast partner (Dr Marco Boeri) brings a wealth of social science experience to the partnership, introducing me to approaches such as contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments.
Impact Publication submitted to scientific journal in February 2017. Under review. This paper has now been resubmitted to another journal and is currently undergoing revision.
Start Year 2014
 
Description Cross-disciplinary work with Queens University Belfast 
Organisation Queen's University Belfast
Department School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution As a team, we are trying to determine how decisions on use of the coast affect human well-being, via biodiversity-well-being relationships. As a biologist and conservationist my role, with partner BTO, has been to help consider appropriate metrics of biodiversity for these assessments.
Collaborator Contribution The Belfast partner (Dr Marco Boeri) brings a wealth of social science experience to the partnership, introducing me to approaches such as contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments.
Impact Publication submitted to scientific journal in February 2017. Under review. This paper has now been resubmitted to another journal and is currently undergoing revision.
Start Year 2014
 
Description Cross-disciplinary work with Queens University Belfast 
Organisation University of St Andrews
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution As a team, we are trying to determine how decisions on use of the coast affect human well-being, via biodiversity-well-being relationships. As a biologist and conservationist my role, with partner BTO, has been to help consider appropriate metrics of biodiversity for these assessments.
Collaborator Contribution The Belfast partner (Dr Marco Boeri) brings a wealth of social science experience to the partnership, introducing me to approaches such as contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments.
Impact Publication submitted to scientific journal in February 2017. Under review. This paper has now been resubmitted to another journal and is currently undergoing revision.
Start Year 2014
 
Description BESS - Science Meeting 2014 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.)
Results and Impact BESS organised meeting for all consortia and partners.
- generated discussion and debate
- greater understanding and dialogue


Informed CBESS science.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
 
Description Socio-economic Workshops 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Socio-economic data collection on recreational activities in saltmarsh and mudflat habitats in Morecambe Bay and Essex Marshes.
- Discussion and debate about the types and level of recreational activity on these habitats.
- Participation by local groups.
- Collaboration with NGOs

- Dissemination of CBESS research to local stakeholders.
- Stakeholders were given a platform to discuss their recreational activity with other users and how that impacts access, enjoyment, environment etc...
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2013,2014