📣 Try out the NEW Gateway to Research and let us know what you think.

We're looking for users to test the new service during August and September and share their feedback. Express your interest by completing this short form.

NSFGEO-NERC: Conjugate Experiment to Investigate Sources of High-Latitude Magnetic Perturbations in Coupled SWMIG system

Lead Research Organisation: British Antarctic Survey

Abstract

Measurements of surface magnetic field perturbations are important to remotely sense and characterize space weather phenomena that affect electrical power grids, ground-based radio communications, and satellites and their services such as satnav. Ultimately the goal is to use the scientific understanding gained from analysing such measurements to develop computer models that can forecast the space weather impacts so that power grid and satellite operators can be warned and mitigate their effects. The first space weather forecasting services are now provided 24/7 in the UK and USA by the Met Office and NOAA, respectively, but forecasting skill is limited and greater scientific understanding and better measurements are required to improve this.

Understanding the sources of magnetic perturbations in the huge space weather system is challenging due to their simultaneous dependence on how they are driven from Space, the electrical conductivity of the upper atmosphere (ionosphere) and ground, and various asymmetries between the northern and southern polar regions. It is also hampered by insufficient data to investigate processes and validate global models, particularly in the southern hemisphere. The proposed investigations will overcome these problems through the operation and use of data from existing and future autonomous instrument platforms strategically deployed in Antarctica and Greenland, combined with supporting datasets and numerical modelling. A new combined array of magnetometers (super-accurate specialist compasses) will provide unprecedented simultaneous coverage beneath the so-called northern and southern lights (aka the aurora borealis and aurora australis), where many space weather effects are concentrated. These data enable novel experiments to isolate the respective contributions of how big the source in Space is, ionospheric conductivity, and local ground conductivity in the generation of ground magnetic perturbations.

The work will result in (1) new constraints regarding the sources of magnetic perturbations and (2) new information concerning the applicability of various assumptions widely used by the geospace research community to
interpret magnetic perturbation measurements. In addition, we will exploit a unique and exciting opportunity to explore the impacts of rapid spatial variations in ionospheric conductivity during the December 2021 solar eclipse.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description 1. A multi-year statistical analysis was performed of the similarities and differences of geomagnetic field fluctuations measured at equivalent positions in the Arctic and Antarctic with respect to the geomagnetic pole. The results show differences are greatest at the solstices when the electrical conductance of the ionosphere is most different in the two hemispheres. Specifically, geomagnetic perturbations due to eastward ionospheric electrical currents are enhanced in the summer hemisphere but it's the opposite for westward currents. It's found that this is because an intermittent space weather phenomenon called the substorm is stronger in the winter hemisphere, and can be entirely suppressed in the summer hemisphere. A theory has been developed to explain this. A poster presentation of the results was prepared for a national meeting (but couldn't be presented due to illness) and an invited talk will be given at an upcoming international conference. A research paper is in preparation for publication.
2. A theory was developed of the effect of a solar eclipse on the ground geomagnetic field. However, publication is suspended because the solution can only currently be found for approximations that are considered too simplistic.
3. An upgraded low power magnetometer was designed and built with Iridium satellite communications capability that reduces latency and cost of the housekeeping and space weather data return. Three units have been deployed in Antarctica.
Exploitation Route Understanding the physics of ground geomagnetic perturbations is important for forecasting hazards to electrical power grids.
The new satellite communications capability adds value to ongoing BAS national capability to provide Antarctic space weather data to the international research community.
Sectors Environment

 
Title Substorm Onsets and Phases (SOPHIE), 2000-2002 with varied EPT 
Description Outputs from the SOPHIE (Forsyth et al., 2015, 10.1002/2015JA021343) substorm onset and phase detection technique for SuperMAG data between 2000 and 2002 (inclusive).This version has been updated in to include the MLT and MLAT of the SuperMAG station providing the SML data and as well as the change of SML during the phase (DeltaSML) value of SML at the end of each phase (SMLatEnd)The files provide the start times of growth/energy input, expansion and recovery phases determined by SOPHIE for the following EPTs: 2023JA031812_DS01 - EPT 052023JA031812_DS02 - EPT 10 2023JA031812_DS03 - EPT 15 2023JA031812_DS04 - EPT 20 2023JA031812_DS05 - EPT 25 2023JA031812_DS06 - EPT 30 2023JA031812_DS07 - EPT 35 2023JA031812_DS08 - EPT 40 2023JA031812_DS09 - EPT 45 2023JA031812_DS10 - EPT 502023JA031812_DS11 - EPT 55 2023JA031812_DS12 - EPT 60 2023JA031812_DS13 - EPT 65 2023JA031812_DS14 - EPT 70 2023JA031812_DS15 - EPT 75 2023JA031812_DS16 - EPT 80 2023JA031812_DS17 - EPT 85 2023JA031812_DS18 - EPT 90 2023JA031812_DS19 - EPT 95 Data generated for "On the association of substorm identification methods" by Lao et al., submitted to J. Geophys. Res.The data is presented in 7 columns: -The date and time of the first data point in the given phase (YYYY/MM/DD-HH:MM:SS)The phase number (1 for growth/energy input, 2 for expansion, 3 for recovery)A flag indicating that the rate of change of SMU is similar to that of SML in the expansion phase (0 for no flag, 1 for flag)MLT of the active SML station at the shown timeMLAT of the active SML station at the shown timeThe change in SML from the start of the phase to the end of the phase (i.e. from the time given on that line to the time given on the following line)The value of SML at the end of the phase.The original SuperMAG indices can be downloaded from https://supermag.jhuapl.edu/ 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2024 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact N/A 
URL https://rdr.ucl.ac.uk/articles/dataset/Substorm_Onsets_and_Phases_SOPHIE_2000-2002_with_varied_EPT/2...