The Changing Arctic Ocean Seafloor (ChAOS) - how changing sea ice conditions impact biological communities, biogeochemical processes and ecosystems

Lead Research Organisation: Newcastle University
Department Name: Sch of Natural & Environmental Sciences

Abstract

ChAOS will quantify the effect of changing sea ice cover on organic matter quality, benthic biodiversity, biological transformations of carbon and nutrient pools, and resulting ecosystem function at the Arctic Ocean seafloor. We will achieve this by determining the amount, source, and bioavailability of organic matter (OM) and associated nutrients exported to the Arctic seafloor; its consumption, transformation, and cycling through the benthic food chain; and its eventual burial or recycling back into the water column. We will study these coupled biological and biogeochemical processes by combining (i) a detailed study of representative Arctic shelf sea habitats that intersect the ice edge, with (ii) broad-scale in situ validation studies and shipboard experiments, (iii) manipulative laboratory experiments that will identify causal relationships and mechanisms, (iv) analyses of highly spatially and temporally resolved data obtained by the Canadian, Norwegian and German Arctic programmes to establish generality, and (v) we will integrate new understanding of controls and effects on biodiversity, biogeochemical pathways and nutrient cycles into modelling approaches to explore how changes in Arctic sea ice alter ecosystems at regional scales.
We will focus on parts of the Arctic Ocean where drastic changes in sea ice cover are the main environmental control, e.g., the Barents Sea. Common fieldwork campaigns will form the core of our research activity. Although our preferred focal region is a N-S transect along 30 degree East in the Barents Sea where ice expansion and retreat are well known and safely accessible, we will also use additional cruises to locations that share similar sediment and water conditions in Norway, retrieving key species for extended laboratory experiments that consider future environmental forcing. Importantly, the design of our campaign is not site specific, allowing our approach to be applied in other areas that share similar regional characteristics. This flexibility maximizes the scope for coordinated activities between all programme consortia (pelagic or benthic) should other areas of the Arctic shelf be preferable once all responses to the Announcement of Opportunity have been evaluated.
In support of our field campaign, and informed by the analysis of field samples and data obtained by our international partners (in Norway, Canada, USA, Italy, Poland and Germany), we will conduct a range of well-constrained laboratory experiments, exposing incubated natural sediment to environmental conditions that are most likely to vary in response to the changing sea ice cover, and analysing the response of biology and biogeochemistry to these induced changes in present versus future environments (e.g., ocean acidification, warming). We will use existing complementary data sets provided by international project partners to achieve a wider spatial and temporal coverage of different parts of the Arctic Ocean. The unique combination of expertise (microbiologists, geochemists, ecologists, modellers) and facilities across eight leading UK research institutions will allow us to make new links between the quantity and quality of exported OM as a food source for benthic ecosystems, the response of the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning across the full spectrum of benthic organisms, and the effects on the partitioning of carbon and nutrients between recycled and buried pools. To link the benthic sub-system to the Arctic Ocean as a whole, we will establish close links with complementary projects studying biogeochemical processes in the water column, benthic environment (and their interactions) and across the land-ocean transition. This will provide the combined data sets and process understanding, as well as novel, numerically efficient upscaling tools, required to develop predictive models (e.g., MEDUSA) that allow for a quantitative inclusion seafloor into environmental predictions of the changing Arctic Ocean

Planned Impact

ChAOS has the potential to generate impact, beyond the academic community, that will benefit a number of groups or organisations:

The major deliverables of ChAOS will be of direct relevance to stakeholders with an interest in Arctic marine ecology and multiple use of the benthic environment. We will target beneficiaries at a range of levels, in particular 'hard to reach groups' from different local communities. Engagement with stakeholders and beneficiaries will be overseen by the module leaders, and co-ordinated fully by PI Maerz and Communication Officer Kate Lock (Leeds). We will hold an early impact meeting at the start of the grant for all consortium members, in order to co-ordinate our efforts across the entire research group.

At the community level, we will focus on reaching indigenous people, local councils, and regulatory bodies (in the UK and Arctic countries), who will benefit from a greater understanding of the sustainable and multiple use of the seafloor. On national levels, we will communicate directly with government organisations DEFRA and CEFAS to ensure our project outcomes directly inform political decision making in the UK. We will also engage with national organisations within the Arctic countries, including the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP, a working group of the Arctic Council); Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) and MAREANO. We will also forge links with the commercial and industrial sector - via official bodies both in the UK, such as the Renewable Energy Association, and in Arctic nations, such as working groups of the Arctic Council - and non-government organisations such as the World Wildlife Fund. We will form an Advisory Committee that consists of representatives from all of the government, industry and NGO stakeholders, which will meet twice yearly including a virtual link up to Arctic partners, and we will host a stakeholders' workshop towards the end of the project at the University of Leeds. We will encourage PhDs and postdocs to attend the NERC policy placement fellowship scheme.

We will engage with members of the public, in particular 'hard to reach' sectors of the community through exploring partnerships with dedicated organizations, such as the Active Learning Partnership. Public outreach will be led by a Communications Team who will focus on the broader importance of understanding future impacts on Arctic ecosystems. Firstly, we will involve project participants through direct communication with the public, through school visits and by participation on national and local events (e.g. Pint of Science, Soapbox Science, Royal Society events). Secondly, we will work with an experienced science journalist, Helen Scales, to produce a radio documentary and features for national and international magazines and websites, in order to broaden our audience further. We will build on successful programme sites (e.g. NERC Planet Earth) to promote our outreach products from the stakeholders' workshop and other meetings, and will publicise our events through social media.

All students, PDRAs and early career researchers across the consortium will be encouraged to undertake training in engagement and science communication activities, and take part in work shadowing of more established colleagues. The Communication Officer will work closely with each institute to monitor and ensure timely delivery of outreach, effective impact and assessment of feedback, assisted by the early career researchers on the project.

Publications

10 25 50

publication icon
Faust JC (2020) Does Arctic warming reduce preservation of organic matter in Barents Sea sediments? in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences

publication icon
Freitas F (2020) Benthic-pelagic coupling in the Barents Sea: an integrated data-model framework in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

publication icon
Stevenson MA (2020) Transformation of organic matter in a Barents Sea sediment profile: coupled geochemical and microbiological processes. in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences

 
Description There are significant differences in the ecosystems and biogeochemical element cycles across the winter sea ice edge/polar front in the Barents Sea. The depth to which the benthic animals burrow into the sediment, the recycling of nutrients from the seafloor, and the reactivity and burial of organic material all systematically differ depending on the position relative to the winter ice edge. This suggests that changes in the ice cover with ongoing climate change might fundamentally change the seafloor environment of the Barents Sea.
Exploitation Route Wide dissemination at international conferences
Sectors Environment

 
Description Warming, in combination with increased disturbance of the Arctic shelf seafloor, is already imposing significant changes to carbon and nutrient cycles, as well as ecosystems. Following scientific recommendation, areas with fishing restrictions or closure in the Barents Sea, particularly around Svalbard, were recently expanded by the Norwegian government. The ecosystem protection afforded by MPA or similar protection status increased the likelihood of safeguarding carbon stocks and the processes that control seafloor carbon sequestration. For example, modifying fishing gears, limiting or preventing seafloor trawling would reduce the physical disturbance that alters community composition and diversity, biogeochemical cycling, and the amount of carbon released back into the water; However, expansion of fishery exclusion zones in the Barents Sea is based largely on ecological/biodiversity criteria, rather than on the need for protecting carbon stocks. Recognition of the carbon burial aspect of marine ecosystem services is currently missing in Arctic seas, but is increasingly recognised elsewhere. Biologically rich, vulnerable marine environment hotspots can also be effective carbon sinks, as in the case of the first high seas MPA around the South Orkney Islands, Antarctic Peninsula. Consideration of both nature and its functionality (ecosystem services or nature-based solutions provides a stronger and more comprehensive approach compared to a focus on biodiversity alone. Societal and scientific pressure has recently resulted in creation of some Very Large Marine-Protected Areas (VLMPAs) but this includes few areas within the polar regions. The polar regions have more governance complexity than most Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs), but they lag behind global MPA creation, even though they could present new opportunities for carbon store protection. For example, 99% of most of Ascension Island's VLMPA is deeper than 1000 m, but the main carbon pathway to sequestration may occur in the shallowest 1000 m. Protection of this shallow seabed safeguards £1-2 million of carbon capture to sequestration at UN shadow price of carbon estimates. There are opportunities in the Arctic to target such shallow carbon burial grounds. It is crucial to learn lessons from rushed MPA designations, since those are often agreed on economically unattractive areas, or implemented with clauses that allow resource exploitation to continue. Society has to decide the type, rate and level of human activity that is acceptable in Arctic regions, while balancing competing demands and world views, and to agree on equitable ways to resolve conflict and maximise win-win strategies. However, the data needed to support effective marine management within the Arctic are sparse, incomplete or poorly quantified, making informed decision-making challenging. Even in the better investigated regions such as the Barents Sea, only parts of the carbon pathway (from capture to sequestration) are quantified and-even then-only for some habitats (e.g. muddy glacial troughs. When appropriate socio-ecological data do exist, the focus is spatially constrained and in a limited number of areas. However, we understand enough to know that vulnerable marine ecosystems on Arctic continental shelves are not necessarily co-located with the main carbon burial environments. The most productive and most heavily fished ecosystems are situated on shoals, around the coasts and above rocky ground, while most organic carbon is likely sequestered in muddy sediments of glacial troughs. We also know that high productivity and throughput of carbon do not necessarily mean high carbon sequestration. The prevailing systems controlling the cycling and storage of carbon in the Arctic seafloor are complex, and there is a general paucity of fully comprehensive datasets. Despite the challenges, it is possible to make considerable progress in identifying the most significant unprotected carbon burial hotspots, allowing for an effective assessment of the landscape of potential threats and the risks and rewards surrounding seafloor protection. Most ecosystems affected by human disturbance can recover when conditions improve, for example, if appropriate conservation measures are enacted and human pressure is managed. To continue to benefit from seafloor carbon sinks and buy more time against climate change, we contend that MPAs (no bottom fishing) for newly exposed ice-free regions in the Arctic will be beneficial.
First Year Of Impact 2020
Sector Agriculture, Food and Drink,Environment
Impact Types Societal,Economic,Policy & public services

 
Description ARCTIS Interdisciplinary Field Course in the Russian Arctic ARCTIS 2019 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact ARCTIS main goal was to facilitate bilateral and interdisciplinary cooperation of early career scientists from the United Kingdom and Russia on Arctic issues.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL http://polarnetwork.org/2018/10/ukpn-and-apecs-russia-present-arctis2019/
 
Description Benthic biogeochemistry, macronutrient and carbon cycling associated with low emission climate change scenarios - a UK-Canadian Shelf Sea Benthic Biogeochemistry Workshop 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The primary objective of the meeting is to stimulate discussions that may result in outputs relevant to the forthcoming assessments of the impacts of the Paris agreement. The intention was that all participants will have input and be on outputs relevant to these discussions. Hence, the challenge and the task for the workshop was to formulate the content (in the right order and with determined content goals), draft sections (in at least rough form) and agree on the message. We worked in dynamic subgroups to make the necessary incremental steps in thinking, coding, data extraction, writing, content need and order etc. All participants focused on what could be done as opposed to what cannot be done, and engage with the process. The workshop was driven by the knowledge that what we produce has a real potential to make a difference.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
 
Description Moscow UK-Arctic Early Career Researcher Meeting 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Moscow UK-Arctic ECR Meeting. Agreement together to gradually produce a wordpress website to show outcomes of the formation of links between UK and Russia ECR's on Arctic issues. A bit empty at the moment but will be filled over time. https://ukrussiaarctic.wordpress.com/

UK-Russia Arctic Network
ukrussiaarctic.wordpress.com
Fostering UK-Russia collaborations in the Arctic
A sub-group are producing an opinion piece (for submission to a journal/science mag) to highlight the importance of expanding research in this area despite diplomatic challenges.
Mark Stevenson (PDRA on the grant) is gathering potential funding future oportunities from participants/his own knowledge to go on the website. Other people are focused on other topics e.g. ways of working in challenging locations, visa issues etc.
As the participants had quite a lot of time to network each person forged their own potential links based on their interests. For example, we have made links with a colleague at the 'Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Moscow' who is looking at sediment cores from the Barents sea. Also links with people who want to do lake sediment coring in Ural mountains in 2019 based in St Petersburg & researchers who work on peatlands in Arctic Chukotka. With other ChAOS participants we made some links with benthic biologists who work on samples from the Arctic including Barents Sea (Based at Moscow State University). They could help the wider team with identification if neccessary or invite people to their 'White Sea Biological Station' for future co-projects. Further links were made with UK researchers too. E.g. Paul Mann (Northumbria University) on his new Russian Grant (PDRA availability) & his geomicrobiology PhD student who is also working on Arctic samples. Also Jon Hawkings who is currently based at Bristol and encouraged the use of seawater DOC analyser if we have time to sub-sample this on our Arctic cruise this summer. Links with a UK PhD student researcher at Sheffield who is investigating peatlands on Svalbard (sediment cores).
A sub-group to lobby Royal Society/NERC/Russian science funding for grants specifically targeted for ECR's to do Russian Arctic science.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description School Visit (Madrid) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact Presented a video on the research cruise through the Barents Sea (from ice-free to sea ice conditions) and presented our Arctic research (on how changing sea ice conditions impact biological communities, biogeochemical processes and ecosystems) to sixth formers at the Hastings School which is a British International School in Madrid, Spain.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Setting up a research group on the Cryosphere in the North East of England (Cryo-NE) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Discussing recent developments in Cryosphere-related research
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018