Why does Drosophila vary in susceptibility to parasitoid wasps?

Lead Research Organisation: University of Cambridge
Department Name: Genetics

Abstract

The aim of this grant is to understand why individuals within populations vary in their susceptibility to infection. This variation determines the burden of disease and allows populations to evolve resistance. For reseatchers, it can provide insights into host-parasite coevolution and functioning of immune systems. We will begin by using high-throughput genome sequencing to identify the genetic variants that make the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster resistant to its most important natural enemy, parasitoid wasps. These results will be verified by generating genetically identical flies that only differ in the variants in question.

We will next identify how these genes make individuals resistant. Hemocytes (blood cells) are the immune cells responsible for killing the parasitoid egg. In resistant flies we have found that hemocytes have moved from sessile clusters associated with neurons into circulation. Furthermore, in our preliminary data we have found a polymorphism in a gene called slit that is strongly associated with resistance. Slit is secreted by neurons and controls cell migration. We will test the hypothesis that resistance is caused by the expression of Slit changing in peripheral neurons so that hemocytes leave sessile clusters and move into circulation, resulting in a constitutively activated immune system that can rapidly kill invading parasitoids.

Genetic variation in susceptibility to infection is often thought to be maintained in populations because resistant alleles are costly, but the causes of these costs are poorly understood. We will examine whether costs result from collateral damage caused by a constitutively activated immune system. Flies that are resistant to parasitoids suffer a marked reduction in fitness, and we will use flies that are genetically identical apart from the variants controlling resistance to identify which resistance genes are costly. To test whether it is cellular immune defences that are costly, we can use genetic tools to remove the hemocytes from these flies and examine whether this removes the costs. To test whether it is the release of hemocytes into circulation that is costly, we will use genetic techniques to return the hemocytes of resistant flies to sessile clusters and release the hemocytes of susceptible flies into circulation, and then measure the effect on fitness.

Genetic resistance is sometimes effective against a broad range of parasites, but is often highly specific. This specificity is surprising in organisms like insects, as mechanistic studies have found that their innate immune system has limited discriminatory power. To resolve this paradox we will test the hypothesis that genes that alter the magnitude of the innate immune response provide broad-spectrum resistance, while genes that overcome parasite factors sabotaging immunity provide specific resistance. Resistance to parasitoids involves both broad-spectrum and specific resistance genes. By tracking genotype frequencies as populations evolve resistance in the lab, we will identify these genes and confirm the results using genetically engineering flies that are identical except for the variants in question. These flies will allow us to test our prediction that broad-spectrum resistance results from an increase in the magnitude of the innate immune response (number of circulating hemocytes), while specific resistance depends on the susceptibility of hemocytes to wasp venoms that disable the immune system.

Planned Impact

The primary aim of this grant is to contribute to our fundamental understanding of evolutionary biology and immunology. We will use techniques and theoretical frameworks from very different fields, ranging from ecology to developmental biology. Hence, on the long term, our results will certainly impact the work of applied researchers in these areas. This will, in turn, impact distinct areas such as health and environment. Moreover, our research is a striking way to engage the public to think about evolutionary concepts and their importance for everyday life.

Parasitoids and biological control

Parasitoid wasps are widely used in agriculture to control insect pests, and the evolution of host resistance could cause these programs to fail. Understanding the mechanisms by which hosts evolve resistance will inform efforts to prevent this from happening. For example, if resistance is costly, then resistance evolution can be avoided by strategies that maximise those costs while minimising the strength of selection for resistance. Pattern of cross resistance could be exploited by rotating the use of parasitoids. The rational design of such strategies requires an understanding of cross-resistance and the costs of resistance.


Hematopoiesis and non-communicable disease

Disorders in hematopoiesis cause a wide variety of non-communicable diseases, including leukaemia and various forms of anaemia, and Drosophila is an important model of this process. Our work will contribute to this medically important field in two ways. First, we will identify novel processes leading to the dysregulation of hematopoiesis related with nervous system. Second, we will demonstrate the evolutionary origins of disorders in hematopoiesis, by illustrating that harmful homing of blood cells may evolve because of selection by infectious diseases.

Insect vectors of infectious disease

Genetic variation in the immune response of insect vectors of human and animal disease determines the rate at which disease transmission occurs and therefore the burden of disease in humans and farm animals. In recent years there has been considerable effort into manipulating natural mosquito populations to increase resistance. For example, when a bacterial symbiont was found to make Drosophila resistant to viral infection, it was transferred into the mosquito Aedes aegypti, and is now being released on a large scale to block dengue transmission.

Our work will identify how insects evolve resistance to infection, and these processes can be targeted in mosquitoes. For example, transgenes could be driven through populations to mimic the phenotype we are studying to prevent parasite transmission. A fundamental understanding of how resistance evolves will allow transgenes to be designed that maximise resistance and reduce costs.



Delivering and training highly skilled researchers

With this project there will be many opportunities for a postdoc to develop skills in the generation and quantitative analysis of large genomic datasets, and in the analysis of insect immunity. The Jiggins lab is an excellent environment to learn these skills.

Public understanding of science

The determinants of disease susceptibility is an easily accessible topic to the public - people care what determines why they might get ill, or why a mosquito might transmit a disease. This makes it an excellent tool with which to engage the public, and make the case that evolution can affect their lives. Information on our research will be disseminated at public engagement events such as the Cambridge Science Festival, and events that are aimed at sixth formers who might apply to Cambridge. In the 'Pathways to impact' we propose a citizen science project. These approaches will allow us to talk with the public and communicate scientific concepts. We will also publicise our work to the public through the university press office and make our website accessible to the public.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description Working across multiple species we found that three species of fruit fly evolve resistance to parasitic wasps (parasitoids) by increasing investment in their immune defences but they achieve this in different ways. Resistance always involved increases in the number of the the blood cells that kill parasitoids. However, while some species simply produce more cells, others alter the differentiation and location of the cells. However, these changes are always extremely costly, which explains why these species are susceptible to parasitism in nature. Whether a population evolves resistance depends on ecological conditions, as resistance is only costly when food is in short supply, and evolving resistance to one parasite can have the added benefit of providing resistance to other parasites.

To understand the molecular causes of this variation, we have investigated the genetic basis of resistance to the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi in Drosophila melanogaster. We identified a cis-regulatory polymorphism in the gene Lectin-24A that was associated with a faster cellular immune response and greatly increased survival after infection. The resistant Lectin-24A allele encodes a protein that is strongly upregulated in the fat body after infection and localizes to the surface of the parasite egg. The susceptible Lectin-24A allele appearscontains to be a null mutation, where a deletion upstream of the gene has largely abolished expression. Other null mutations have arisen recurrently in this gene, with another loss-of-expression allele(s) and multiple premature stop codons segregating in natural populations. The frequency of these alleles varies greatly geographically, and in some southern African populations natural selection has driven them near to fixation. We conclude that there is a pleiotropic cost to Lectin-24A expression, and in some populations these costs outweigh the benefit of resistance, resulting in natural selection causing the repeated loss of this important component of the immune system.

We then extended this analysis to the immunological basis of resistance. The cells and molecules that defend us against infection are either induced after infection or produced constitutively regardless of whether an individual has been infected. This division is fundamental to the design of immune systems and has implications for many areas of biomedical science. Despite this, the question of why some immune defences are inducible and others constitutive has been almost entirely neglected by immunologists-aside from theoretical models, we are only aware of one study in bacteria. Motivated by this gap in our knowledge, we have investigated the evolution of the Drosophila cellular immune response. Theory predicts that inducible defences are favoured when infection rates are low and constitutive defences are favoured when infection is common. For the first time we provide support for the central prediction of these models, that inducible defences become constitutive when populations frequently encounter a parasite. Using single cell transcriptomics, we describe the differentiation of specialised immune cells after infection and identify previously unknown cell types. Combining this with a long-term experimental evolution lines, we demonstrate that this induced response becomes genetically hard-wired in populations that are frequently infected. Furthermore, this switch from inducible to constitutive immunity is associated with a considerable increase in survival after infection, providing a novel mechanism by which populations can evolve resistance. These findings represent a major advance in our understanding of immune systems and the evolution of resistance, which will interest a broad audience of immunologists and evolutionary biologists. We provide the first test of a key theoretical prediction, and reveal how selection by parasites can cause immune defences to switch between being inducible and constitutive over short periods of evolutionary time. Aside from our central biological insights, we would also highlight the novelty of our approach. Single cell sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool in recent years, but these studies remain overwhelmingly descriptive. Our combination of experimental evolution and single cell sequencing is unique, and demonstrates how the technology can be used in a hypothesis-driven way in fields beyond cancer and developmental biology.
Exploitation Route Our research has provided fundamental insights into the reasons why individuals vary in susceptibility to infection. The interaction of hosts and pathogens is fundamental to many areas of evolutionary biology, genetics and medicine. We therefore believe that the insights we have generated will underpin research in these areas. Insect immunity itself is of direct important for biological control of pests and disease transmission by mosquitoes. Again, out research will underpin research in these areas.
Sectors Agriculture, Food and Drink,Environment,Healthcare,Other

 
Description We ran an annual summer workshop for 20 sixth form students looking to apply to university. The students were drawn from schools with low rates of sending students to university and was integrated with the University of Cambridge summer school program. During the workshop the students had hands-on experience and exposure to the research we are doing as part of this project. This was repeated in a different format based in a school in 2019.
First Year Of Impact 2018
Sector Education
Impact Types Societal

 
Title Changes in gene expression and encapsulation in Drosophila melanogaster caused by exposure to parasitoid wasps 
Description Data consists of gene expression estimates and encapsulation rates in wild caught Drosophila melanogaster larvae following exposure to different treatments. Treatments include injection with wasp homogenate, injection with oil and no injection. Also provided are functional enrichment categories for differentially expressed genes and library generation and read mapping metrics. The data were produced under the grant: NE/P00184X/1 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2021 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/2998b066-6a35-4e4f-ae39-16838781856b
 
Title Changes in gene expression and encapsulation in Drosophila melanogaster caused by exposure to parasitoid wasps v2 
Description Data consists of gene expression estimates and encapsulation rates in wild caught Drosophila melanogaster larvae following exposure to different treatments. Treatments include injection with wasp homogenate, injection with oil and no injection. Also provided are functional enrichment categories for differentially expressed genes and library generation and read mapping metrics. The data were produced under the grant: NE/P00184X/1 Why does Drosophila vary in susceptibility to parasitoid wasps. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2022 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/06ea87f3-476d-40fd-acce-e6923e786d48
 
Title Research data supporting "Independent effects on cellular and humoral immune responses underlie genotype-by-genotype interactions between Drosophila and parasitoids" 
Description Datasets and scripts to generate each figure panel are divided in separate folders. Scripts generate and save each figure as a PDF file. Statistics are generated at the end of each script. Folders: Fig1A - The encapsulation phenotype is recorded for individual larva per treatment and genotype. Fig1B - The melanization phenotype is recorded for individual larva per treatment and genotype. Fig2 - The number of plasmatocytes and lamellocytes is recorded from pool of 6 larvae per treatment and genotype. Fig3A - Gene expression is recorded as raw Ct values from qPCR for housekeeping gene and test gene per treatment and genotype. Fig3B - Phenoloxidase activity is recorded as raw absorbance value per time point, treatment and genotype. FigS1 - The encapsulation phenotype is recorded per vial with 40 transferred larvae before infection. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2019 
Provided To Others? Yes  
 
Title Research data supporting "Parallel and costly changes to cellular immunity underlie the evolution of parasitoid resistance in three Drosophila species" 
Description Data and scripts from paper. Each experiment's data along with its plotting and analysis scripts occur within its own seperate folder. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2017 
Provided To Others? Yes  
 
Description Invited speaker at CNRS conference 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Invited speaker at high-profile conference in Roscoff organised by CNRS
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Workshop for School pupils attending summer school 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact A group of about 15 students attended a workshop in the lab. These students were attending a summer school for people from schools and backgrounds that are traditional underrepresented in the University of Cambridge and similar institutions. The aim was to engage them in scientific research and motivate them to study science as undergraduates and beyond.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017,2018
 
Description Workshop for school pupils 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact A workshop was held for secondary school pupils to explain and engage them with the research on this grant. It provided hands-on engagement with the research and techniques. The aim was to broaden participation in biology at University level.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019