Resilient coasts: optimising co-benefit solutions (Co-Opt)
Lead Research Organisation:
UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS
Department Name: Geography and Sustainable Development
Abstract
Sea and society interact most strongly at the coast where communities both benefit from and are threatened by the marine environment. Coastal flooding was the second highest risk after pandemic flu on the UK government's risk register in 2017. Over 1.8 million homes are at risk of coastal flooding and erosion in England alone. Extreme events already have very significant impacts at the coast, with the damage due to coastal flooding during the winter 2013/14 in excess of £500 million, and direct economic impacts exceeding £260 million per year on average. Coastal hazards will be increasing over the next century primarily driven by unavoidable sea level rise. At the same time, the UK is committed to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050. It is therefore essential to ensure that UK coasts are managed so that coastal protection is resilient to future climate and the net zero ambition is achieved. Protecting the coast by maintaining hard 'grey' defences in all locations currently planned is unlikely to be cost-effective. Sustainable coastal management and adaptation will therefore require a broader range of actions, and greater use of softer 'green' solutions that work with nature, are multifunctional, and can deliver additional benefits.
Examples already exist and include managed realignment, restoration of coastal habitats, and sand mega-nourishments. However, the uptake of green solutions remains patchy. According to the Committee on Climate Change, the uptake of managed realignment is five times too slow to meet the stated 2030 target. Reasons are complex and span the whole human-environment system. Nature-based solutions often lack support from public opinion and meet social resistance. Despite removing long-term commitment to hard defences, the economic justification for green approaches remains uncertain due to high upfront costs, difficulty in valuing the multiple co-benefits offered, and uncertainties inherent to future environmental and socio-economic projections. The frameworks used to support present day coastal management and policy making (e.g. Shoreline Management Plans) do not provide comprehensive and consistent approaches to resolve these issues. Consequences are that the effectiveness of these policy approaches is reduced. Delivering sustainable management of UK coasts will therefore require new frameworks that embrace the whole complex human-environment system and provide thorough scientific underpinning to determine how different value systems interact with decision making, how climate change will impact coastal ecosystem services, and how decision support tools can combine multiple uncertainties.
Co-Opt will deliver a new integrated and interdisciplinary system-based framework that will effectively support the required transition from hard 'grey' defences to softer 'green' solutions in coastal and shoreline management. This framework will combine for the first time a conceptual representation of the complex coastal socio-ecological system, quantitative valuation of coastal ecosystem services under a changing climate, and the characterisation of how social perceptions and values influence both previous elements. Our new framework will be demonstrated for four case studies in the UK in collaboration with national, regional, and local stakeholders. This will provide a scalable and adaptive solution to support coastal management and policy development. Co-Opt has been co-designed with project partners essential to the implementation and delivery of coastal and shoreline management (e.g. Environment Agency, Natural Resources Wales, NatureScot, coastal groups) and will address their specific needs including development of thorough cost-benefit analyses and recommendations for action plans when preferred policy changes. Co-Opt will further benefit the broad coastal science base by supporting more integrated and interdisciplinary characterisation of the complex coastal human-environment system.
Examples already exist and include managed realignment, restoration of coastal habitats, and sand mega-nourishments. However, the uptake of green solutions remains patchy. According to the Committee on Climate Change, the uptake of managed realignment is five times too slow to meet the stated 2030 target. Reasons are complex and span the whole human-environment system. Nature-based solutions often lack support from public opinion and meet social resistance. Despite removing long-term commitment to hard defences, the economic justification for green approaches remains uncertain due to high upfront costs, difficulty in valuing the multiple co-benefits offered, and uncertainties inherent to future environmental and socio-economic projections. The frameworks used to support present day coastal management and policy making (e.g. Shoreline Management Plans) do not provide comprehensive and consistent approaches to resolve these issues. Consequences are that the effectiveness of these policy approaches is reduced. Delivering sustainable management of UK coasts will therefore require new frameworks that embrace the whole complex human-environment system and provide thorough scientific underpinning to determine how different value systems interact with decision making, how climate change will impact coastal ecosystem services, and how decision support tools can combine multiple uncertainties.
Co-Opt will deliver a new integrated and interdisciplinary system-based framework that will effectively support the required transition from hard 'grey' defences to softer 'green' solutions in coastal and shoreline management. This framework will combine for the first time a conceptual representation of the complex coastal socio-ecological system, quantitative valuation of coastal ecosystem services under a changing climate, and the characterisation of how social perceptions and values influence both previous elements. Our new framework will be demonstrated for four case studies in the UK in collaboration with national, regional, and local stakeholders. This will provide a scalable and adaptive solution to support coastal management and policy development. Co-Opt has been co-designed with project partners essential to the implementation and delivery of coastal and shoreline management (e.g. Environment Agency, Natural Resources Wales, NatureScot, coastal groups) and will address their specific needs including development of thorough cost-benefit analyses and recommendations for action plans when preferred policy changes. Co-Opt will further benefit the broad coastal science base by supporting more integrated and interdisciplinary characterisation of the complex coastal human-environment system.
People |
ORCID iD |
| Timothy Stojanovic (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Apine E
(2024)
Is the coastal future green, grey or hybrid? Diverse perspectives on coastal flood risk management and adaptation in the UK.
in Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures
Apine E
(2026)
Navigating interdisciplinary coastal research in the UK: Challenges and solutions from an early career perspective.
in Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures
Apine E
(2025)
Community acceptance of nature-based solutions for coastal flood risk management
in People and Nature
Meschini M
(2025)
Building a Shared Perspective on Hesketh Out Marsh Through Co-Production
Stojanovic, T.A.
(2025)
Shoreline Management in the Eden Estuary and West Sands. CoOpt Project Report.
| Description | Our project has explored the impacts of climate change at the coast, and how conservation restoration strategies can respond to these but also the impacts on coastal communities. Dynamic coastal zones are under pressure from sea level rise putting coastal communities at increased risk of flooding and coastal erosion. Historically, coastal protection in the UK has prioritised "hard" engineering such as seawalls, but since the introduction of Shoreline Management Planning, other strategies such as managed realignment have been increasingly considered. A hard engineering strategy is not financially feasible everywhere and would not allow for adaptation to coastal change under future climate scenarios. Nature-based solutions have gained growing attention as they can mitigate and adapt to climate change impacts, enhance biodiversity and contribute to people's well-being. However, the implementation of such solutions is still relatively slow - even where they have been identified as the most sustainable option. We conducted a study using Q-methodology which is reported in the article highlighted below. We found that interested and/or affected groups such as risk management authorities, coastal partnerships and homeowners, express support for the direction of the UK national flood and coastal erosion risk management policy. All participants were convinced of the benefits of nature-based solutions. Yet, this study also highlighted that the current governance, appraisal and funding mechanisms are not fully equipped to consider the co-benefits of nature-based solutions and their role in coastal flood risk management. The core implication of this study is that stakeholders hold different perspectives/framings which affects the decision-making process. Whatever the strategies identified as technically optimal, the variety of framings held by different stakeholder groups need to be engaged to generate social acceptance, by identifying points of contention and agreement. Apine E. and Stojanovic T. (2024) Is the coastal future green, grey or hybrid? Diverse perspectives on coastal flood risk management and adaptation in the UK. Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures. 2:e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/cft.2024.4 |
| Exploitation Route | Government Agencies, Local Authorities, Environmental NGOs working to engage with the perceptions of Community Councils and local stakeholders to engage in order to take forward national targets for restoration strategies and make shoreline management policies more sustainable and socially acceptable. |
| Sectors | Communities and Social Services/Policy Government Democracy and Justice |
| URL | https://doi.org/10.1017/cft.2024.4 |
| Description | The CoOpt project has supported effective public policymaking and local adaptation. Through (1) interactive workshops involving government, business, third sector and community groups, (2) community events involving families, and (3) a role play game delivered at a national conference and local site, role holders in coastal management reported improved understanding of the coastal management by stakeholders and community representatives; better communication between stakeholders; and collation of disparate information to support coastal adaptation. At case study sites, Fife Council has subsequently decided to develop a Coastal Change Adaptation plan, whilst Falkirk Council have revised the adaptation options at the site on the basis of project research. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2025 |
| Sector | Environment |
| Impact Types | Societal Policy & public services |
| Description | Adapting to the impacts of climate change at the coast |
| Geographic Reach | Local/Municipal/Regional |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to new or improved professional practice |
| Impact | Role holders in coastal management reported improved understanding of the coastal management by stakeholders and community representatives; better communication between stakeholders; and collation of disparate information by the workshop report. Fife Council has subsequently decided to develop a Coastal Change Adaptation plan. |
| URL | https://projects.noc.ac.uk/co-opt/outputs |
| Title | Community Acceptance of Nature-based Solutions for Coastal Flood Risk Management - Survey and Focus Group Data, 2022-2023 |
| Description | This study aimed to understand what factors influence community acceptance of nature-based solutions (NbS) for coastal flood risk management. Coastal communities are already experiencing the impacts of sea level rise and more frequent storm events on property, infrastructure and livelihoods and accelerated coastal erosion. Various adaptation approaches exist, varying from hard engineering solutions to NbS, but whether these strategies are implemented often depends on social acceptance by local communities. This study is part of a large interdisciplinary NERC-ESRC funded project Resilient Coasts: Optimising Co-Benefit Solutions (Co-Opt) 2021-2025. To pinpoint what influences community acceptance of NbS for flood risk management in the UK, we employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods research design. We also used a case study approach focusing on four sites in the UK - St Andrews (Scotland), Airth (Scotland), Hesketh Bank (England), and Pensarn (Wales). The sites were selected to demonstrate a range of socio-demographic characteristics and baseline conditions, with a selection of coastal management solutions varying from "grey" to "green" that are already in place or could be implemented in the future. Firstly, we operationalised a questionnaire survey to identify values, norms and perceived trust that influence social acceptability in each case study site. The survey respondents were randomly selected from AddressBase Core product by the Ordnance Survey for each case study site and conducted from May 2022 to October 2023. A postcard introducing the survey with a QR code and a link to a Qualtrics online survey was sent first, followed by a printed copy with a pre-paid envelope two weeks later. A final reminder postcard was with a QR code and link to a Qualtrics online survey was sent 2-4 weeks later. In total 328 complete and valid responses were received (13.40% response rate). Secondly, focus group discussions were conducted to elaborate on the initial quantitative findings. In total, seven focus groups were hosted in the case study sites one in St Andrews and two in the rest of the three sites Airth, Hesketh Bank and Pensarn. Participants included interested and/or affected groups such as landowners, farmers, business owners, local councillors and representatives from local risk management authorities and environmental organisations. The mixed methods approach worked via quantitative data suggesting the strength and patterns of relationships, and qualitative data suggesting the nature and mechanisms of causal relationships. The results show that community acceptance is place-based and is influenced by the context, with certain factors being site specific. The study highlights the complexity of community acceptance of NbS for coastal flood risk management, indicating that local perceptions are influenced by a combination individual factors such as trust; the characteristics of schemes; and they ways in which governance systems interact with local communities. |
| Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
| Year Produced | 2025 |
| Provided To Others? | Yes |
| Impact | Apine, E., and T. Stojanovic 2026. Community acceptance of nature-based solutions for coastal flood risk management. People and Nature 8(1): 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70182 published on the basis of this dataset. |
| URL | http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/id/eprint/858015 |
| Description | Scottish Climate Adaptation Network with SEPA and Scottish Government |
| Organisation | Government of Scotland |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Engagement with Scottish Climate Change Adaptation Network to develop training tool |
| Collaborator Contribution | Local authority engineers and flood risk managers require professional development and training to engage with a range of activities, from commissioning coastal modeling, evaluating the cost-benefits of different options, considering the social acceptance of schemes, and understanding the perspectives of multiple stakeholders. This engagement in an established network allowed us to design training materials which can fit with their needs and current active questions of professional practitioners working at local and national levels |
| Impact | The University of St Andrews team trialed training materials which are to be delivered in national workshop in Liverpool as part of the UK Coastal Research Conference 2025 |
| Start Year | 2025 |
| Description | Deliberative Workshop: Airth Case, Resilient Coasts Monday 20 May 2024, Falkirk |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Researchers from the Resilient Coast project presented the findings of their research at a one day public workshop. People in attendance included local members of the public, interested landowners, farmers, community council members, local politicians, local authority flood risk officers and sustainability officers, national government agencies (conservation and environmental protection), and academics, and Scottish government. Via a deliberative approach, delegates were able to explore the permutations of options for different shoreline management strategies, the impacts which might arise for ecological, economic, social and flood risk factors. Delegates reported finding the process highly interesting, and also useful in creating a platform for debate and discussion, in the Forth Estuary where there had not been a formal coastal strategy extant. The workshop validated the relevance of the Resilient Coasts project and the. Considerable debate arose about the various merits of different defend or managed retreat strategies and the University of St Andrews offered to design a follow on workshop in 2025 to take the discussion forward, for which subsequent project follow-on funding was awarded. A summary report was prepared and handout summaries were distributed to delegates: "CoOpt Airth Workshop Summary: Notes for Delegates". |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Deliberative Workshop: Hesketh Bank Case. Resilient Coasts: Optimising Co-Benefit Solutions |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Researchers from the Resilient Coast project presented the findings of their research at a one day public workshop. People in attendance included local members of the public, interested landowners, farmers, community council members, local politicians, local authority flood risk officers and sustainability officers, national government agencies (conservation and environmental protection), and academics. By employing a modified DPSIR (Drivers-Pressures-State-Impacts-Responses) framework DPSIR+, delegates were able to communicate the perceived issues at the site and compare how various stakeholders perceive these challenges from their point of view. Finally, a shared understanding of the case was built by all workshop participants. Delegates reported finding the process highly interesting, and also useful in creating a platform for debate and discussion. The workshop validated the relevance of the Resilient Coasts project A summary report was prepared and distributed to delegates. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Deliberative Workshop: St Andrews and Eden Estuary Case, Resilient Coasts. 23 April 2025, Guardbridge |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Local |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | A multi-stakeholder workshop hosted the University of St Andrews/CoOpt project in April 2025 informed future shoreline management and coastal adaptation decisions for the Eden Estuary and West Sands. Bringing together government agencies, local authorities, land managers, community councils, NGOs and academic experts from 20 organisations, the workshop reviewed current initiatives, policy frameworks, scientific evidence and public attitudes, and tested decision-making approaches through a 'deliberative exercise' focused on a priority shoreline management unit 50 (Eden Estuary, South Shore), where there has been an historical proposal for 'managed realignment'. Session 1 of the workshop allowed a range of delegates and coastal stakeholders to update one another about current initiatives, work in the estuary, and relevant national policies and programmes. Session 2 of the workshop convened presentations on geomorphological, environmental and socio-economic aspects of shoreline management. Session 3 involved a deliberative exercise in which stakeholders were asked to review policy options for a section of the shore (Unit 50 in the Fife Shoreline Management Plan, 2011). |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2025 |
| Description | Developing exploratory scenarios to support coastal management workshop |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | This cross-sectorial capacity building exercise had a dual purpose of increasing the literacy of coastal stakeholders on the use of exploratory scenarios and providing input for co-design of national-scale and local-scale case studies. Discussions highlighted the need for a sound scientific basis with limitations and confidence levels well defined. Delegates acknowledged the importance of effective and adaptive communications based on the type of end-user. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Dr Apine Presentation "Managing Coastal Change: results of UK stakeholder perceptions study" at MARE Conference People & the Sea XII. 26-30 June 2023, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Dr Apine presented interim findings of the CoOpt research at this large scale European coastal conference, involving professional practitioners, scientists and students. The conference included a policy day on marine nature restoration in which Dr Apine participated in the debates about the way forward for nature based solutions |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| URL | https://marecentre.nl/2023-people-the-sea-conference/policy-day-2023/ |
| Description | Presentation to MASTS Annual Science Meeting. Glasgow, 5-7 December 2023 |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Presentation of interim results of our study to the major national gathering of marine professional practitioners and scientists in Scotland. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| URL | https://masts.ac.uk/annual-science-meeting/ |
| Description | Professional Development Event |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Professional Development Event for Scottish Local Authority Coastal Engineers. This day long event hosted by the CoOpt project at the University of St Andrews was well attended both in person and online by 32 delegates including local authority engineers from: Aberdeen City, Aberdeenshire, Angus, Argyll and Bute, Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Council), Dumfries and Galloway, Dundee City, East Lothian, City of Edinburgh, Fife, North Ayrshire, Orkney Islands, Shetland Islands, the Highland, and West Lothian, as well as national government agencies such as the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). Delegates reported being better informed about climate projections, economic valuation, stakeholder engagement, and coastal change policy development. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
| URL | https://mace.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/2022/10/06/professional-development-event-for-scottish-local-author... |
| Description | Resilient Coasts: Optimising Co-Benefit Solutions: Outputs and Policy Framework at MASTS 2024 |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | A talk delivered by Elina Apine at the SMMR workshop at MASTS 2024 Annual Science Meeting in Glasgow. The purpose of this talk was to give an overview on what has been achieved by CoOpt with regards to outputs, tools and policy impact. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Social acceptability of nature-based solutions for coastal erosion and flood risk management in Scotland. Key note talk at MASTS Annual Science Meeting. Glasgow, 5-7 December 2023 |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Presenting a keynote at MASTS 2023 allowed the CoOpt team to share findings of the social acceptance surveys to a wider audience of policy professionals including UK government agencies, academics, and Environmental NGOs, an audience of over 300, allowing reflections and debate about the challenges of nature based solutions and marine and coastal habitat restoration |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| URL | https://masts.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/MASTS-ASM-2023-programme-22Octversion.pdf |
| Description | Transdisciplinary use of coastal data workshop |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | This hybrid workshop was held at the SMMR conference discussing the challenges and opportunities and interpretation of transdisciplinary coastal data. Delegates acknowledged the need for further engagement amongst professional membership bodies and learned societies and workshops on data availability and data sharing for solving coastal challenges. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
| URL | https://projects.noc.ac.uk/co-opt/sites/co-opt/files/documents/SMMR%20Workshop%20Report%20-%20Transd... |
| Description | UK Coastal Research Conference Workshop on Decision-making for Coastal Schemes in the UK, 1 July 2025 |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | The CoOpt project ran a workshop for coastal stakeholders with training and role play exercises to explore the reality of decision-making about coastal schemes in the UK |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2025 |
| Description | Webinar by Dr Elina Apine and CoOpt research PDRAs on Interdisciplinary Coastal Research 6 March 2024 |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | SMMR webinar on interdisciplinary approaches in the coastal zone |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lE4TkLWiLKU |
| Description | Workshop on Coastal Resilience. Sustainable management of UK Marine Resources Conference, Bristol, 16-18 May 2023 |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Our workshop on coastal resilience drew together scientists from the NERC-ESRC Sustainable Management of Marine Resources Programme to debate and discuss the way forward on how to operationlise resilience as a concept in research and UK marine planning and coastal management. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |