New everyday practices of free speech on campus: Beyond racialised and religious stereotypes

Lead Research Organisation: SOAS University of London
Department Name: Sch of History, Religions and Philosophy

Abstract

Summary

Building on robust research findings about discrimination against Muslims on campus, this Follow on Fund will help universities to tackle religious, racial and gender discrimination by showing them how to encourage and facilitate difficult discussions, instead of avoiding them. Follow-on funds can address matters that could not be dealt with in the main research project and here we wish to draw attention to: a) racism that goes beyond the Muslim communities on campus, and b) potential opportunities to reduce racism through open yet civil discussions.
The findings from AHRC/ESRC 2015-18: Representing Islam on campus AH/M00841X/1 demonstrate that Muslim staff and students are often denied a voice by discriminatory practices and negative stereotypes triggered by skin colour, clothing or other perceived differences. This is a form of silencing or testimonial injustice: Muslim staff believe they are not considered to have opinions worth hearing, discussing or sharing. As such, they self-censor to avoid conflict. Our findings resonate with recent research on National Health Service (NHS) staff of colour, who also report finding themselves ignored or not heard when raising concerns during the COVID-19 crisis. In the AHRC project, we noted similar matters but were unable to explore these as they went beyond the focus of Islam on campus: now it is urgent that they are shared and explored in discussion.

So firstly, this Follow on Fund will disseminate our research findings and show the ways in which the student voice is silenced. We will engage key players actively in discussing these findings about Islam using a group discussion approach called Community of Inquiry. This approach facilitates honesty and deliberation in the face of controversial evidence. Providing solid evidence is only part of changing someone's views: engaging actively in discussion about such evidence is also necessary. By such means racism on campus can be recognised and addressed.

Secondly, the key finding to which we could not do justice during the project involves addressing broad spectrum racism directed towards those considered different. We were told of covert and overt racism towards Black students and staff, and the negative stereotyping of Jewish students. As the current focus upon inequalities in the NHS resonates with our findings, we will also work with medical students to disseminate our work more widely, on university campuses that also provide medical training. The core team provides expertise in Judaism, Black lives and Islam to support universities. The Community of Inquiry group discussion approach facilitates trust, openness and civility - while always working towards group solutions.

We will deliver significant economic, social, cultural and policy impacts by developing this into a training package for students and staff. The unspoken, discriminatory tendencies amongst students and staff can be reduced and replaced with critical dialogues and anti-discriminatory practices.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description University students and academic staff have become more reticent than they were in 2015-18 about discussing topics that are receiving controversial coverage in the media and in public life generally. This means it can take months, in one case a year, to establish trust with other universities.
This has combined with the undesirable deceleration of our methodological approach of building trust with other universities: as a result of Covid and various spates of strikes (sector wide and beyond) we have had to postpone or cancel events.
The communities of inquiry approach we use, based upon 20 century American pragmatism, is proving highly successful in facilitating discussion of complex topics including racism and systemic discrimination
The plan to take this approach into Westminster is very successful for a) helping students and staff reduce the democratic deficit by learning about democratic processes and using them to speak truth to power b) the SOAS ICOP team has improved academic influence in Westminster e.g. being mentioned in Hansard c) the SOAS ICOP team has become the secretariat for a new All Party parliamentary Group called Communities of Inquiry Across the Generations https://blogs.soas.ac.uk/cop/
Exploitation Route We are working with Advance HE and with UPEN to engage with other universities, provide training and engage universities in our work in Westminster so they can use the project as a template
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy

Education

Healthcare

Leisure Activities

including Sports

Recreation and Tourism

Government

Democracy and Justice

Security and Diplomacy

 
Description In parliament the products of our communities of inquiry are cited and used by MPs and peers In June 2022 we established an All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) called ' Communities of Inquiry across the generations' that implements our findings from the research by bringing parliamentarians and academics and other experts and students together to discuss intractable problems. Peers and MPs use and cite our evidenced research findings over a wide range of topics , especially regarding legislation in bill form being passed through various committees. SOAS is mentioned and thanked as a result of these procedures.
First Year Of Impact 2022
Sector Communities and Social Services/Policy,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Education,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Cultural

Societal

 
Description All Party Parliamentary Group called Communities of Inquiry across the generations
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Citation in other policy documents
Impact By creating communities of inquiry with academics, parliamentarians, lawyers and medics, we are improving the expert evidence base available to MPs and peers.
URL https://blogs.soas.ac.uk/cop/appg/
 
Description Consultation at St George's House Windsor Castle 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact 39 academics, policy makers, politicians , students, gathered together to debate the new legislation on free speech, and other ways of encouraging free speech e.g. the AHRC model of communities of inquiry.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2024