Why does transcription present a major barrier to genome duplication?

Lead Research Organisation: University of Aberdeen
Department Name: School of Medical Sciences

Abstract

When a cell divides, all of its DNA must be copied so that each of the two new cells contains a complete set of genes. The copying and passing on of genetic information is a central feature of life, and is performed in a similar manner by organisms from bacteria to humans. DNA replication must be accurate because mistakes can corrupt the genetic message with potentially fatal consequences. The DNA replication machinery must also be able to overcome any obstacles that it encounters, because a cell cannot divide until its genome has been fully duplicated. Potential obstacles to DNA replication are common, because DNA within cells is coated with proteins that package, repair or read the genetic material. In this project we aim to determine how the DNA replication machinery deals with a common and potent obstacle: collisions with the molecular machinery that 'reads' the information contained within genes. The central components of this machinery are enzymes called RNA polymerases. These enzymes unwind the double-stranded DNA molecule at the beginning of a gene so that they can use one of the two strands as a template for the construction of a temporary copy, called mRNA. In order to copy a complete gene the RNA polymerase must move along the DNA, unwinding it as it goes. During this process RNA polymerase binds tightly to the DNA to stop it falling off before it reaches the end. The copying of genes by RNA polymerase is regulated: the cell needs more copies of some genes than others, and so RNA polymerases are found rarely on some genes and in nose-to-tail traffic jams on others. Like RNA polymerase, the enzymes that replicate DNA move along, and unwind, the DNA double helix. As the DNA replication machinery has to copy the entire genome it will collide frequently with RNA polymerases that are copying individual genes. Because RNA polymerases bind tightly to DNA, the DNA replication machinery often has difficulty moving past them, and in some cases needs help from other proteins in order to overcome the obstacle. In our preliminary experiments we have identified two proteins that help the DNA replication machinery to push its way through obstacles. We have also shown that one of the main reasons that these proteins are needed by cells is to help overcome the 'roadblock' effect caused by RNA polymerases. The experiments that we now wish to undertake will enable us to discover what determines whether a particular RNA polymerase blocks DNA replication or is easily bypassed (for example, does the length of an RNA polymerase 'traffic jam' determine how easily the replication machinery can get through?). They will also enable us to define the various helper-systems that the cell uses to overcome such obstacles, and understand which systems help at which types of obstacle. There are many reasons why it is interesting and important to undertake this study. These experiments are exciting because they aim to understand the interface between two of the most fundamental and important processes in the cell: the copying and expression of the genetic material. These processes are well conserved in all organisms, and our findings will have implications beyond the experimentally tractable model system in which we will work. The understanding that we will gain will also have practical implications. It is now possible for scientists to construct organisms in which large sections of the genome, or even the entire genome, are artificially designed and constructed. A sound understanding of the interplay between genome replication and gene expression will be important if these designed organisms are to function correctly. Furthermore, by understanding how cells help the DNA replication machinery to overcome obstacles we can identify opportunities to disrupt those processes: drugs that target the helper-systems and prevent complete DNA replication may have applications in anti-bacterial or anti-tumour chemotherapy.

Technical Summary

Genome duplication requires high processivity and high fidelity but proteins bound to the DNA template, especially those associated with transcription, present barriers to replication and therefore challenges to genome stability. However, why transcription presents such a problem for replication is unknown. Head-on collisions between transcribing RNA polymerases (RNAPs) and replication complexes are inhibitory but emerging evidence suggests that codirectional collisions are as important in vivo. This may be because arrested RNAPs, formed either by pausing and backtracking or by lesions within the template, may be as important as actively transcribing RNAPs, possibly because arrested RNAPs result in accumulation of RNAP arrays in highly transcribed regions. We aim to establish the features of transcription that present barriers to genome duplication in vivo, to determine the impact of different features of transcription on replisome movement in vitro and to correlate in vitro blockage of replisomes with in vivo impacts on replication fork movement. We will also analyse systematically the mechanisms needed to minimise the impact of transcription on genome duplication. We will correlate the relative importance of transcription/replication elongation factors with the critical features of transcription that pose barriers to replisomes. We have also discovered recently that a helicase known to promote genome duplication in E. coli (UvrD) interacts specifically with RNAP. We will test the hypothesis that the most important nucleoprotein barrier to replication (RNAP) recruits the means (UvrD) of resolving conflicts between transcription and replication. This work will establish why gene expression poses such a problem for genome duplication, how cells minimise the conflicts between two such fundamental processes and the possible evolutionary constraints on all organisms with respect to simultaneous transcription and DNA replication.

Planned Impact

DNA replication, transcription and DNA repair are all important targets for cytotoxic agents and so one key beneficiary of this work will be pharmaceutical companies. Our analysis of these processes may aid therefore the development of antimicrobial and anti-cancer agents. Additionally, unresolved blocks to replication are either lethal or contribute to potentially catastrophic genome rearrangements. Many companies have developed therapeutic and/or diagnostic reagents related to genome instability and human health, and an increased understanding of how transcription contributes to replicative blockage, and how cells resolve this conflict, will increase the knowledge base needed for continued development. The emerging field of synthetic biology will also benefit from this project. Development of partially or fully synthetic cells requires the ability both to replicate the cell and to maintain gene expression. Any synthetic system must therefore either avoid conflicts between genome duplication and gene expression, or minimise such conflicts. This project is aimed at understanding the reasons why gene expression presents a major problem for genome duplication, and how evolution has resulted in natural systems that minimise this problem. The work will therefore inform the efforts of synthetic biologists to develop self-replicating systems that can sustain effective gene expression. Members of the public will also benefit from this proposed research. Understanding the interplay between genome duplication and gene expression may underpin development of novel pharmaceuticals related to human, animal and crop health. This project will also contribute to the design of synthetic organisms with potential benefits for energy production, bioremediation or pharmaceutical synthesis. This study will therefore contribute to the economic, health and environmental quality of life of those living in the UK. Increased understanding of how genome duplication, gene expression and genetic stability are linked will also contribute to the public understanding of healthcare issues related to genomic instability. The work described here will also contribute to the generation of a scientifically-literate workforce not only via training of the research assistants employed on this project but also by contributing to a research-led environment for the teaching of undergraduate students. The Research and Innovation Unit at the University of Aberdeen and the Research and Enterprise Development Unit at the University of Bristol both have extensive experience in the identification of research with potential for commercial exploitation and the protection of intellectual property. Both units also have multiple contacts with biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. These links will be exploited if findings resulting from this proposed research are assessed as having any commercial potential for development. Additionally, NS and MD are both members of the joint research council-funded 'Synthetic Components Network'. Interactions with this network will therefore ensure wide dissemination of our results to the synthetic biology field and may also lead to collaborative links with synthetic biologists. Communication of data arising from this project will not therefore rely solely on publication in peer-reviewed journals or presentations at specialised scientific meetings. We will also communicate our findings to the general public, aided by dedicated communication teams at the universities of both Aberdeen and Bristol. All research papers will be publicised on our websites. Additionally, key research findings that may be of general interest to the public will be communicated to both local and national media outlets via press releases. However, established media outlets will also be circumvented to provide more direct communication to the public by participation in public engagement with science events both in Bristol and in Aberdeen.

Publications

10 25 50
publication icon
Gupta MK (2013) Protein-DNA complexes are the primary sources of replication fork pausing in Escherichia coli. in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

publication icon
Haines NM (2014) Stalled transcription complexes promote DNA repair at a distance. in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

publication icon
Hawkins M (2016) Escherichia coli Chromosome Copy Number Measurement Using Flow Cytometry Analysis. in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)

publication icon
McGlynn P (2012) The conflict between DNA replication and transcription. in Molecular microbiology

publication icon
Smith AJ (2012) Multipartite control of the DNA translocase, Mfd. in Nucleic acids research

 
Description The genes that provide the blueprint of all life reside within DNA inside cells. However, these blueprints by themselves can accomplish nothing unless the genetic information is "read' and used to create proteins, the molecules that do most of the work inside cells. This requirement to read genes creates a problem for the cell. The genes encoded within DNA must not only be read, they must also be copied every time a cell divides so that the two daughter cells each receive an intact copy of all the genes necessary for living. This reading and copying of DNA is achieved by different molecular machines and both processes must go on at the same time. This means that these reading machines and copying machines must occasionally collide. Moreover, these reading machines occasionally "stutter" as they read the genes, creating immobile obstacles to the copying machines. We know that these collisions create problems for the copying machines since these copying machines occasionally break down during such collisions. These breakdowns are potentially very harmful since it can lead to mistakes being made during the DNA copying process and result in potentially lethal mutations within the genetic code. This project aims to understand the interplay between these reading machines and copying machines and how cells try and minimise conflicts between these essential processes.

We have used the bacterium Escherichia coli as a simple model organism with which to probe these problems. Our work has cast new light on how cells deal with frozen reading machines. By detecting individual proteins as they function we have visualised for the very first time how these frozen reading machines are pushed off the DNA. We have also demonstrated that the motors that push these reading machines off DNA actually scan the DNA within the facility in order to detect and rectify other problems that might hinder movement of DNA copying machines. We have also discovered that another motor protein interacts with these reading machines, suggesting that there might be more than one way of pushing frozen reading machines off the DNA. We have also investigated the relative importance of these reading machines in blocking DNA copying machines. It is well known that the DNA itself can be damaged, for example by ultraviolet light in sunshine. It has been generally accepted that this DNA damage is the main cause of blockage of DNA copying machines inside cells. Our work has revealed that it is actually reading machines on DNA that are the main causes of blockage of copying machines. The need to read genes, an essential process, creates therefore an unavoidable problem for the DNA copying machines. This internal conflict is unavoidable and is likely to be found in all organisms, including ourselves.
Exploitation Route Our findings have cast new light on how the problem of unavoidable collisions between DNA copying and DNA reading machines is minimised. This problem is a universal one. Our work will therefore provide underpinning knowledge for studying how these conflicts are reduced inside more complicated organisms such as ourselves. These conflicts are likely to be important sources of mutations within genetic material and might therefore contribute to diseases such as cancer. Moreover, if we are to realise the potential of synthetic biology then we need to understand what is required to ensure efficient copying of the DNA inside a synthetic, or partially synthetic, organism. Understanding what is needed to reduce the conflict between DNA copying and DNA reading is an essential part of ensuring that DNA copying can occur. Thus our findings will help other researchers in designing synthetic organisms.
Sectors Healthcare,Manufacturing, including Industrial Biotechology,Pharmaceuticals and Medical Biotechnology

 
Description This project is ongoing, having moved my group from the University of Aberdeen to the University of York in 2012. Please see BB/I001859/2.
First Year Of Impact 2014
 
Description FASEB Summer Research Conference on Prokaryotic Transscription (vermont, USA) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Research talk at international research conference, which sparked questions and discussion afterwards.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
 
Description Interview on Radio Bristol 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Local radio interview related to Government initiative to sequence genomes of cancer patients. Covered DNA sequencing, cause of mutations, DNA repair etc. 10 minute interview on BBC Radio Bristol "Saturday Surgery" Show hosted by Dr Phil Hammond.

no actual impacts realised to date
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2012
 
Description Press release (Gupta 2013 PNAS paper) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact The University of York received several queries from media organisations.

An article was written on a science website (Kurzweil) reporting key findings from the paper.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2013
 
Description Press release (Haines paper) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Not monitored.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
URL http://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2014/february/dna-scanner.html
 
Description Press release (Howan paper) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Not monitored

Not monitored.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2012
URL http://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2012/8765.html
 
Description Public lecture (University of Bristol) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Public lecture to approx 200-300 people. Sparked interest in science, and discussion afterwards
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
 
Description School Visit (Dean Close School, Cheltenham) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact Talk sparked questions and discussion afterwards.

Positive feedback received from teachers and pupils. Pupils aware of areas of scientific activity that they were not previously aware of.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
 
Description University of Bristol Open Days 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an open day or visit at my research institution
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact One-to-one discussions with members of the public about our research, biochemical sciences generally, and other aspects of University study.

It is difficult to report specific impacts. I have no doubt that the discussions influenced the life choices of many of the young people that I spoke with.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015