📣 Help Shape the Future of UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR)

We're improving UKRI's Gateway to Research and are seeking your input! If you would be interested in being interviewed about the improvements we're making and to have your say about how we can make GtR more user-friendly, impactful, and effective for the Research and Innovation community, please email gateway@ukri.org.

Understanding the coordination of DNA mismatch repair using live-cell single-molecule imaging

Lead Research Organisation: University of Oxford
Department Name: Biochemistry

Abstract

All organisms from bacteria to humans rely on molecular machines to ensure accurate replication of their genomes. The DNA mismatch repair pathway (MMR) spots and reverts errors during DNA synthesis. The proteins that perform MMR in cells solve a remarkable problem, detecting single misincorporated DNA bases amongst millions of correctly matched bases in the genome. Without MMR, mutation rates in cells increase 100 to 1000-fold. Loss of MMR is thus a driver of diseases, with accelerated genetic change leading to cancer development in humans and acquisition of drug resistance mutations in pathogens. Investigating the molecular mechanisms of MMR is therefore paramount for understanding its fundamental role in evolution, health and disease. MMR also plays an important role in the efficiency of genome engineering techniques that are currently revolutionising biological research, biotechnology, and medicine.

The mismatch repair mechanism must be both fast and accurate. This is achieved via the sequential action of different proteins (called MutS, MutL, MutH), whose recruitment and enzymatic activities on DNA are tightly controlled. Much has been learnt about the mechanism of MMR based on experiments with purified proteins, but it remains uncertain how the repair process works inside a living cell. Our proposal addresses this large gap in the understanding of MMR.

My lab specialises in the development of single-molecule microscopy methods to directly observe the unperturbed function of proteins in cells. Via high-speed fluorescence imaging, we can track the movement of individual proteins and detect when and where they bind to DNA. This allows us to obtain the exact information needed to address how MMR proteins search for repair sites and how the sequential steps in the pathway are coordinated. We will perform these experiments in E. coli bacteria - the organism in which MMR has been characterised in most detail. E. coli cells are also ideally suited for our imaging methods.

Visualising repair events in living cells will allow us to explore why MMR sometimes goes wrong. Although this happens rarely, each repair failure leads to a permanent mutation in a cell. One failure of the MMR pathway can be the moment when a human cell turns cancerous, or a pathogenic bacterium becomes drug resistant. We will extract quantitative information about the speed and location of repair events from our microscopy data, and feed this into a mathematical model to identify which factors determine repair success and failure.

Overall, this project will establish how MMR proteins work together in a pathway, providing direct insight into a central process that preserves the genetic information in cells.

Technical Summary

Conserved DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins act in a coordinated pathway to correct base incorporation errors during DNA replication. MutS and MutL detect rare DNA mismatches in a vast excess of correctly paired DNA, and subsequently coordinate the incision, degradation, and resynthesis of the DNA daughter strand that contains the mispaired base. The ability of MMR to discriminate between the parental and daughter strands is crucial to prevent mismatches from becoming fixed mutations. The E. coli MMR pathway uses DNA methylation at GATC sequences as the strand discrimination signal, targeting incision by MutH to the unmethylated daughter strand. A central unanswered question is how mismatch recognition is signalled to incision at a GATC site that can be several thousand nucleotides distant and on either the 5'- or 3'-side of a mismatch. This process has to be accurately completed before the transient strand-discrimination signal is lost.

Detailed genetic analysis and high-resolution structures of MutS, MutL, and MutH suggest mechanisms for how mismatch recognition and signalling are achieved. Our vision is to translate these mechanistic insights into the context of the living cell. The aim of this proposal is to use new single-molecule imaging methods with microfluidic technology to observe and perturb MMR in E. coli cells. We will track the intracellular motion of MMR proteins to monitor how they search for mismatches and form multi-protein assemblies at repair sites. By measuring protein recruitment and turnover kinetics, we will test alternative models for the coordination of sequential pathway steps in vivo. We apply microfluidic chips to monitor thousands of cells over tens of generations, providing substantial statistical power to characterise rare events in MMR. Using imaging, mathematical modelling, and machine learning approaches, we will determine how the timing and location of repair affects the success rate of the pathway in reverting mismatches.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Title Robust Quantification of Live-Cell Single-Molecule Tracking Data for Fluorophores with Different Photophysical Properties 
Description High-speed single-molecule tracking in live cells is becoming an increasingly popular method for quantifying the spatiotemporal behavior of proteins in vivo. The method provides a wealth of quantitative information, but users need to be aware of biases that can skew estimates of molecular mobilities. The range of suitable fluorophores for live-cell single-molecule imaging has grown substantially over the past few years, but it remains unclear to what extent differences in photophysical properties introduce biases. Here, we tested two fluorophores with entirely different photophysical properties, one that photoswitches frequently between bright and dark states (TMR) and one that shows exceptional photostability without photoswitching (JFX650). We used a fusion of the Escherichia coli DNA repair enzyme MutS to the HaloTag and optimized sample preparation and imaging conditions for both types of fluorophore. We then assessed the reliability of two common data analysis algorithms, mean-square displacement (MSD) analysis and Hidden Markov Modeling (HMM), to estimate the diffusion coefficients and fractions of MutS molecules in different states of motion. We introduce a simple approach that removes discrepancies in the data analyses and show that both algorithms yield consistent results, regardless of the fluorophore used. Nevertheless, each dye has its own strengths and weaknesses, with TMR being more suitable for sampling the diffusive behavior of many molecules, while JFX650 enables prolonged observation of only a few molecules per cell. These characterizations and recommendations should help to standardize measurements for increased reproducibility and comparability across studies. 
Type Of Material Technology assay or reagent 
Year Produced 2024 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact High-speed single-molecule tracking is increasing in popularity as a method for characterizing the movement of proteins within live cells. Users of this method now have a wide choice of different imaging modalities, fluorophores and labeling strategies, and various data processing approaches. A major advance has been the development of bright and photostable synthetic dyes that can be covalently linked to genetically encoded tags, enabling single-molecule tracking on the time scale of several minutes at a temporal resolution around 10 ms. The photophysical properties of fluorophores have also been engineered, yielding photoactivatable dyes for super-resolution localization and tracking analysis, while other dyes and imaging conditions are meant to provide long-lived emission without blinking behavior. With all of these available choices, it can be difficult to decide which nuance of the single-molecule tracking method is best suited for a particular application. Furthermore, it is often unclear if the quantitative results obtained from single-molecule tracking measurements are robust to differences in the experimental conditions and analysis procedures. In a previous study, we compared the utility of photoactivatable fluorescent proteins vs HaloTag-labeled proteins for single-molecule tracking measurements. We now characterized two synthetic fluorophores with very different properties, TMR and JFX650, and tested the reliability of the two most popular data analysis approaches, HMM and MSD. Our findings provide guidance for experimental design and analysis, as well as strategies to identify and eliminate biases in data quantification. 
URL https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c01454
 
Description Oxford University Open Day 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an open day or visit at my research institution
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Our group had a stall with activities and information boards about our research on DNA repair at two Departmental open days per year since 2020.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020,2021,2022,2023,2024
 
Description School visit 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact typically around 50 pupils attending a research talk and discussion session
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023,2024