GLTEN Africa: Cropping system diversity, a cornerstone of sustainable intensification.

Lead Research Organisation: Rothamsted Research
Department Name: Sustainable Agriculture Sciences-H

Abstract

The former Director General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, has called for a 'uniquely African Green Revolution'. Implicit in this statement is the acknowledgement that the first Green Revolution that provided the template for the modern intensive agriculture and that dominates landscapes in Europe, much of Asia and North America may not be sustainable in the long term. This first Green Revolution that began in the 1960s, was based on the breeding of high yielding varieties of a few crops coupled with high inputs of fertilisers and crop protection products. An emerging problem with this way of farming is that the heavy reliance on inorganic fertilisers and chemical pesticides results in 'open leaky' systems with impacts on the environment including diffuse pollution and losses of biodiversity. There is also evidence that these systems may not be sustainable from a farming perspective as the health of soils declines and pests, weeds and diseases evolve resistance to pesticides. In contrast, large areas of Sub-Saharan Africa are still cropped on a much smaller scale with lower inputs and a greater diversity of crops but with much lower productivity. It can be argued, therefore that the UK and Sub-Saharan Africa are at opposite ends of the intensification spectrum but both are unsustainable (either in terms of food production or the environment).

We expect that a more diverse system in terms of the number of different crops grown and variety of crop management practices used will provide food and nutrition more sustainably because different crops will be more or less affected by variability in the weather between years. Because, there are differences in how crops use nutrients from the soil, a more diverse mixture of crops would also be expected to be more efficient and reduce impacts on the environment. We will study the importance of the existing diversity in cropping systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. By doing this, we will be able to recommend ways of increasing production that retains the right level of crop and management diversity to ensure the systems are resilient.

To quantify the value of diversity of cropping systems in Africa, we will use data from Long Term Experiments (LTEs) that have been running over several decades in Africa and the UK. These experiments will be used to compare how farming in different ways over many years contributes to sustainability in terms of the health of the soil, stability of food supply and use of natural resources. When considering ideas such as 'sustainability' or 'resilience' it is important to have experiments like these that do not just look at short term effects of a change of practice but are able to capture effects that are only evident over the medium to long term - as is the case for the impact of management on soil health. The results of the work on the LTEs will be combined with a survey of farms in four regions in Sub-Saharan Africa (N-Nigeria, Eastern Rwanda, parts of Malawi and Western Kenya) to collect data on the existing variety in the types of crops and ways they are grown. We will particularly interested in the local use of crops that are not grown on a wide scale. By combining this information with what we have learnt from the LTEs about the relationship between cropping system diversity and sustainability, we will be able to compare the different systems and identify the ones that strike the best balance between providing food and protecting the environment. This work will be supported by computer models that are able to predict how potentially novel combinations would deliver food and environemntal benefits.

Technical Summary

We contend that many of the issues emerging from current, intensive farming systems are related to the over-simplification of rotations and agricultural landscapes. This has led to the over-reliance on inorganic fertilisers and a declining range of chemical crop protection active ingredients with the associated problems of diffuse environmental pollution, declining functionality of soils and the evolution of pesticide resistance. In contrast, much of Sub-Saharan Africa is still farmed on a smaller scale with lower inputs and a much wider diversity of crops. In this project, we aim to quantify the contribution of diversity in terms of the number of crops grown and their management at a field and farm scale to a range of sustainability criteria: yield stability, resource use efficiency, crop protection and soil health. In so doing, we will develop methodologies for comparing systems in terms of the level of cropping diversity and predicting their multi-criteria sustainability with the aim of recommending novel approaches that better balance productivity and the environment.

We have three main approaches. Firstly, we will interrogate data from Long Term Experiments at Rothamsted and IITA to develop generic metrics of diversity and quantify their relationships with the four sustainability criteria from data spanning several decades. These findings will be challenged with data from a survey of the existing diversity in current farming practice in SSA to identify the best performing systems in terms of SI. Finally, we will use a combination of simulation and empirical models to explore potential novel scenarios to improve SI through innovation that draws on elements of the farming systems identified from the farm surveys.

Planned Impact

The impact from GLTEN-Africa will be delivered via three avenues:

1. The project is part of a wider initiative, GLTEN (Global Long Term Experiment Network), that is made up largely of CGIAR Institutes (including IIRI, IITA, CIMMYT, CIAT and ICRAF) and co-ordinated by Rothamsted Research. This network will provide a vehicle for developing and disseminating the ideas generated by this project and also an infra-structure to support ongoing work arising from the analyses of the importance of cropping system diversity for SI. One outcome of WP4 will be recommendations for new or modified Long Term Experiments that trial contrasting cropping systems building on the predictions from the work done in GLTEN-Africa. We intend this to be an ongoing legacy of the project funded beyond the three years of the SASSA Call.

2. The analyses of cropping system diversity done in WP3 and 4 will draw heavily on the data on existing diversity and sustainability criteria (soil properties, yield stability, resource capture and crop protection) collected from farmers in our four study regions using existing IITA infra-structure and research sites. By analysing these data in terms of a gradient of diversity and it's association with sustainability metrics, we will identify potentially promising innovations that reconcile food production and human nutrition with sustainable management of natural resources. Our analytical framework will provide an understanding of the processes underlying these 'win-win' scenarios based on the analyses of Long Term Experiments. Our approach depends on a dialogue with small holder farmers in the four study regions throughout the project and will be maintained through farm visits and farmer workshops (in the last year of the project). Specifically, we aim to develop simple methodologies that will allow farmers to audit their systems in terms of the functional diversity of crops and practices to allow them to identify opportunities to improve system resilience through targeted innovation.

3. By consolidating and standardising under-utilised data on Long Term Cropping Experiments spanning several decades we will generate novel science on the relationship between diversity of crops and crop management on various criteria of SI. This new understanding will allow fundamental principles to do with the importance of re-diversifying agricultural systems to be elucidated that will serve as a basis for future strategies to improve the sustainability of systems with different starting points and in contrasting environments. As well as being of relevance to practitioners and advisors, we anticipate this new knowledge will serve as a catalyst for new scientific work based on novel long term cropping experiments designed at the system level.
 
Description Two key papers are either accepted or in final stages of revision in high impact journals summarising two key findings of the project:

A household survey of 1133 smallholder farmers in western Kenya and northern Nigeria collected data on the metrics of food security and related differences in, for example, number of hungry months to the diversity of crops and livestock produced on the farm. This was done in a way that controlled for the amount of land, labour and inputs (including fertilisers) that were available to the farmer. We found that households with more diverse farms had better food security and livelihoods. In particular, we found that it was possible for farms with a high species richness but limited access to resources such as land and fertilisers to achieve similar or better food security and income outcomes than farms with low species richness and more resources.

Secondly, an analysis of data from over 30 long-term experiments in Africa and Europe demonstrated the efficacy of ecological approaches to supporting yields of major crops including diversifying the number of species grown in a rotation, adding compost or manures, and reducing the intensity of tillage. This so called 'ecological intensification' consistently resulted in higher yields, while (in some but not all cases) mitigating the negative environmental impacts of inorganic fertiliser use. Importantly, the usefulness of these approaches was dependent on whether they were implemented in a high or low input system. In a high input system, they could be used to substitute for inorganic fertilisers and reduce inputs; in low input systems, there is the opportunity to maximise the return on low inputs of inorganic nutrients where access to fertilisers is limited.

Finally, new empirical data on the performance of different intercrops including orphan crop species is nearing the final stages of analysis and indicating the contribution of functionally distinct species pairs to maximising resource use complementarity.
Exploitation Route One of the impacts of covid was the loss of the opportunity to revisit the households who contributed to the household survey to disseminate the results at village meetings. However, the project has clearly demonstrated the value of crop diversity to food security and livelihoods at a large scale and also provided new insights into the potential for novel combinations of intercrops. This advances are being integrated into future research at IITA.

There is a lively ongoing debate about the appropriate use of the word 'intensification' in the context of the development of agriculture in Africa. The analysis of the contribution of ecological approaches to supporting yields has focussed attention on the balance between the intensification of inorganic fertiliser inputs to realise yield potential and the need to support sustainable systems that are also more resilient. We anticipate our paper analysing long term data will make a significant contribution to this ongoing debate.
Sectors Agriculture, Food and Drink,Environment,Government, Democracy and Justice

 
Description Thirt Percy Foundation Global Long Term Experiment Network Co-ordinator
Amount £225,000 (GBP)
Organisation Thirty Percy Foundation 
Sector Charity/Non Profit
Country United Kingdom
Start 02/2019 
End 01/2023
 
Title Modification of RHoMIS household survey tool 
Description RHoMIS (Rural Household Multi Indicator Survey) is an online tool developed by the CGIAR Centres to collate data on socio-economic metrics of small holdings in developing countries. The data can be used to derive smallholder typologies and indicators fo poverty, food security and gender issues. GLTEN-Africa has been working closely with the developers of RHoMIS to modify the tool to make it appropriate for capturing agronomic metrics such as cropping diversity and inputs. The new questionnaire has been used in two large surveys in Kenya and Nigeria covering >1000 households. 
Type Of Material Improvements to research infrastructure 
Year Produced 2019 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact The data from teh surveys are currently being analysed but have already been used to identify the most widely grown inter-crop mixtures and to explore the relationships between cropping diversity and metrics of poverty, food security and household income. 
URL https://www.rhomis.org/#
 
Title GLTEN meta-data portal 
Description An online meta-data portal has been launched to collect data on the location, design and background to Lon Term Agricultural Experiments around the world. The data base is searchable and can be added to be collaborators once they are registered. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2019 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact The first analyses using the experiments captured by the database of experiments are currently under way. 
URL https://glten.org/
 
Description Joint analysis of inter-cropping experiments 
Organisation ETH Zurich
Country Switzerland 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution We are using the plant competition model developed in the GLTEN-Africa project for further analysis of results from an inter-cropping experiment in Spain and to identify optimum combinations of species for maximum resource use efficiency
Collaborator Contribution ETH-Zurich have made available an extensive database of the results from inter-cropping experiments and additional data on teh eco-physiological parameters required by the growth model
Impact Model results should result in a publication in late 2020
Start Year 2019
 
Description Data science workshop 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Data science workshop to disseminate principles of long-term experiment design, data management and analysis to agricultural scientists in Africa hosted in Nairobi, Kenya (including participants from 6 countries).
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023