Decompression killing in laboratory rodents: a humane alternative to carbon dioxide?

Abstracts are not currently available in GtR for all funded research. This is normally because the abstract was not required at the time of proposal submission, but may be because it included sensitive information such as personal details.

Gradual exposure to carbon dioxide (CO2) remains the most common method of killing laboratory rodents, despite considerable evidence that it is aversive because it induces anxiety, dyspnoea and at high concentrations, nociceptive activation. Attempts to refine exposure to CO2 as a euthanasia method have not solved these issues, and there is an urgent unmet need to improve this aspect of laboratory animal welfare. There is increasing interest in progressive hypobaric hypoxia (gradual decompression) as a high welfare method of killing animals. Although hypoxia is also aversive to rodents, studies are limited and gradual decompression offers the control necessary to achieve slow rates of hypoxia (which cannot be achieved by replacement of air by inert gas), improving the likelihood of a humane death. We propose to systematically investigate the feasibility of hypobaric hypoxia as a humane and efficient method of killing for laboratory rodents.

Our specific objectives are to
(1) Determine candidate decompression curves by assessing the effectiveness of hypobaric hypoxia by characterising physiological, behavioural and pathological responses in anaesthetised mice and rats.
(2) Assess the welfare impact of candidate decompression curves, compared to gradual exposure to CO2, by determining the time to loss of consciousness via electroencephalogram recordings, assessing cardiac and respiratory responses, recording spontaneous behavioural responses and the effects of analgesic and anxiolytic drug interventions, and testing aversion to each killing method via an operant motivational trade off paradigm.

We aim to determine an optimal decompression curve, defined as one which causes less pain, anxiety and aversion than gradual exposure to CO2. This work has the potential to be hugely impactful, providing the possibility to refine the most common procedure carried out on laboratory rodents, improving the welfare of millions of animals at the time of their death.

A conservative estimate is that over 35 million mice and over 8 million rats are used in scientific research annually and the majority of these animals will be killed as part of the research or because they are surplus to requirements. This could represent an underestimate as it may not fully account for genetically modified rodents that are not used in further procedures or those animals killed by breeders as being surplus. The majority of these animals are killed using the Schedule 1 method of gradual exposure to carbon dioxide. Despite the research focus on alternative approaches to the humane killing of laboratory rodents, carbon dioxide exposure remains the standard method yet there is increasing evidence that it causes significant welfare harms including aversion, anxiety and fear-related behaviours. It is an ethical and legal requirement that laboratory animals are killed as humanely as possible, thus there is an urgent unmet need to refine this aspect of laboratory animal use. Our aim is to determine whether hypobaric hypoxia (achieved by exposure to gradual decompression) could represent a high welfare alternative method of killing for laboratory rodents with CO2. In line with the BBSRC (and NC3Rs) priority to improve the welfare of managed animals, this research will provide crucial proof of principle data on whether hypobaric hypoxia has the potential to provide a better death for laboratory mice and rats, based on direct comparison to carbon dioxide exposure. An iterative approach will allow for the determination of optimal decompression rates, evidenced by a comprehensive and corroborative approach to rodent welfare assessment. This information is needed to underpin the generation of novel policy, practice and legislation safeguarding welfare during the killing of laboratory rodents. This has been the case in our recent work on poultry, where our findings have directly informed a favourable European Food Safety Authority opinion allowing gradual decompression (also known as low atmospheric pressure stunning) to be added to the permitted approaches in Regulation (EC) no. 1099/2009 On the Protection of Animals at the Time of Killing. As a potentially humane alternative, wide adoption of hypobaric hypoxia by the laboratory animal science community would enable laboratory animals to be reliably killed with low welfare costs, benefitting many millions (and potentially billions) of animals worldwide. Application of a fixed hypobaric hypoxic dose via a purpose built device would provide greatly improved standardisation of killing, removing human error or variability in application, further protecting welfare. Such consistency in the killing process could also enhance tissue harvesting possibilities and improve scientific outcomes, potentially reducing animal numbers. It is well recognised that there is a potential negative psychological impact for technical staff that must carry out killing, and the provision of a standardised and humane decompression device is likely to improve staff experience when dealing with this difficult area, thus benefitting the wellbeing of technical and scientific staff. While killing methods are a difficult topic with which to engage the general public, societal trust is important for the financial support and advancement of science and wide uptake of a demonstrably improved approach to killing of laboratory animals is likely to enhance public acceptance of this problematic area of animal use.