Involving users in the school design process

Lead Research Organisation: University of Sheffield
Department Name: Architectural Studies

Abstract

The Government has committed to a 10-15 year programme of school re-building or refurbishment for England and Wales, commencing 2005-06. With the aim of achieving facilities 'of 21st century standard' for every secondary school pupil, the capital building expenditure is due this academic year to reach 2.2 billion. This programme calls for specialist skills and knowledge about the process of procuring, designing and constructing educational buildings, on a scale not seen since the 19th Century.This Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme has fuelled much activity, with large construction firms, architects and not-for-profit companies all keen to be involved. However, it has been noted that 'the science of designing learning environments is currently remarkably under-developed'. A recent comprehensive review of literature commissioned by the Design Council revealed a lack of research on effective learning environments. Clear conclusions were difficult to reach with regard to the effects of the physical environment on users' well-being, behaviour and attainment. However, one thing that emerged strongly was a link between the process of involving the building users and the success of environmental change: '...it is the extent to which, and the ways in which, school users are engaged in the school design process that determines the success or failure of the resulting design.' (Greany in Higgins et al.:3)While the over all message from the literature seems clear, it is also clear that there is little detailed evidence (of the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches) on which to base the design of these processes of user engagement. Participatory approaches to school design have been used in small pockets around the world and the UK has also seen a recent wave of relevant initiatives (though numbers still remain relatively small) which have pioneered a variety of approaches (e.g. School Works, Schools Renaissance project, and joined-up-design-for-school). While such initiatives have seen success, evidence is largely anecdotal. Despite this wave of activity and fact that the DfES have acknowledged the importance of user involvement, there remain concerns that '...consultation of users will be recommended and talked about, but might fail to be carried out in a way that satisfies those involved or produces useful information to feed into the planning process.' (Woolner et al, 2005:41)This study will identify effective approaches to user-involvement in the school design and procurement process, in order to support the delivery of people-centred schools. While the research will provide a valuable contribution to international research, it seeks in particular, to inform UK policy and the BSF programme. The project will include a literature review of policy and research documents to identify the variety of approaches taken to user involvement in school design, the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches and opportunities to effectively address user-involvement in policy. A survey of professionals and users involved in recently completed schools will further develop the findings. The core of the study will be 4 case studies which will track the design and procurement process of 4 schools as part of the BSF programme. The case studies will focus on describing and analysing the process of communication between the design/construction team and the users, identifying the effect of these interactions on the resulting design and on the users themselves. The study will result in good practice guidelines for user involvement in school design and recommendations for their integration into policy, to be launched at a symposium for beneficiaries.References: Higgins et al (2005) The Impact of School Environments: A Literature Review. London: The Design Council. Woolner et al, (2005) School Building Programmes: Motivations, Consequences and Implications. Newcastle: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
 
Description The research identified the value and various benefits of involving children in school design. A model was developed for categorising and understanding methods of involving the whole school community - and particularly children- in the process of designing and refurbishing schools. This model was also developed as a framework and guidance for schools and the design/construction industry to develop an effective strategy for engaging a school community in the school design process.
Exploitation Route In the development of effective strategies to engage the users of schools and other buildings in the building design and refurbishment process. In the development of policy related to the school design process and other building design processes more broadly.
Sectors Construction,Creative Economy,Education,Culture, Heritage, Museums and Collections

URL http://rosieparnell.staff.shef.ac.uk/DSIU/index.html
 
Description A series of presentations of the findings have informed a range of design, construction and education practitioners, generating questions and discussions, requests for further information and access to outputs, plus plans for future related activity. There is some evidence of having informed/changed practice as a result of these dissemination and engagement activities. Two sets of CPD training for practitioners were also requested and delivered by the PI, based on the research findings - one on behalf of CABE and one on behalf of PfS, (both non-departmental public bodies of the UK government). The first training was for RIBA client design advisers working on the Building Schools for the Future Programme (BSF) and the second was for local authority communications officers also working on BSF. Outputs of the research and findings have been cited in a policy-related document written by the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.
First Year Of Impact 2009
Sector Construction,Education
Impact Types Policy & public services

 
Description CABE Facilitation skills training
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Influenced training of practitioners or researchers
 
Description CPD Workshops for PfS
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Influenced training of practitioners or researchers
 
Description Research Grants Programme
Amount £231,059 (GBP)
Funding ID RPG-2012-682 
Organisation The Leverhulme Trust 
Sector Charity/Non Profit
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2013 
End 01/2016
 
Description Participatory Design of the Future-Building School. 
Organisation Maastricht University (UM)
Country Netherlands 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Member of the stakeholder group - advisory role and participant in this AHRC NWO Anglo-Dutch network initiative
Collaborator Contribution Participation in the two funded meetings of this network (1.5 days each), to develop understanding of the 'Future-Building School' concept and to propose abstracts for a special issue of a peer-reviewed journal.
Impact multidisciplinary - education and architecture proposal submitted to the Journal for Educational Change for a special issue - co-authored paper within
Start Year 2013
 
Description Participatory Design of the Future-Building School. 
Organisation University of Cambridge
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Member of the stakeholder group - advisory role and participant in this AHRC NWO Anglo-Dutch network initiative
Collaborator Contribution Participation in the two funded meetings of this network (1.5 days each), to develop understanding of the 'Future-Building School' concept and to propose abstracts for a special issue of a peer-reviewed journal.
Impact multidisciplinary - education and architecture proposal submitted to the Journal for Educational Change for a special issue - co-authored paper within
Start Year 2013
 
Description A Space for Learning Keynote 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Talk sparked questions from the audience and discussion afterwards.

Led to a chapter in a publication for by the Irish Architecture Foundation practitioners on engaging pupils in processes of school design. The publication was also intended build a case for school design engagement to influence Irish government policy.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2011
 
Description Findings workshop 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The talks and workshop stimulated discussion and debate and generated proposals for change to school design processes which engage the school community.

After this talk/workshop various participants requested copies of our preliminary research report and other research outputs and I was invited to present the research findings and proposals for change to participatory school design processes to a group of civil servants and representatives from government arms-length organisations, such as CABE (see separate entry). One local authority in Scotland subsequently used the framework developed through the research to evaluate and develop their own participatory approach to school design.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2009
URL http://rosieparnell.staff.shef.ac.uk/DSIU/background/record%20of%20research%20workshop.pdf
 
Description Helsinki Keynote 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Talk prompted discussion and questions afterwards, plus it led to a request to be involved in work by The Irish Architecture Foundation.

The Irish Architecture Foundation made plans to include me and these research findings in their work to influence the Irish government in their school design policy. This took the form of a publication (see outputs) and another conference talk to practitioners in Ireland.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2009
 
Description Partnerships for Schools 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact The 4 meetings sparked questions and discussion and led to the proposal that a) I deliver training on behalf of Partnerships for Schools to their network of local authority communications advisers involved in the Building Schools for the Future Programme and b) deliver a plenary presentation at the PfS National Design Conference.

The proposed training sessions and a conference presentation were organised and delivered (see impact of training and presentation in separate entry)
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2009,2010
 
Description PfS Awards shortlisting panel member 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? Yes
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact My voice was part of the debate about the relative quality of the processes described in the award entries, which in turn informed the decision about the award winners.

The recommended award winners were awarded the accolade and this process/project was publicised as leading good practice in the field by Partnerships for Schools.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2009
 
Description PfS National Design Conference 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Talk sparked questions and discussion afterwards and later queries from individuals via e-mail requesting further information, documents/research outputs etc. These individuals represented a range of organisations, including:
Hugh Dames at London Borough of Waltham Forest
Carla Driscoll at Portsmouth City Council,
Suzie Zuber at Open House,
Lawrence Seed at Interserve,
Catherine Andrews at Learning Through Landscapes,
Jennifer Whyte at the School of Construction Management and Engineering, University of Reading,
Tom Weaver at Flywheel,
Louise Innocent, Schools Business Coordinator at Bond Bryan
Martin Mayfield at Arup Associates, responsible for Education for Arup in the UK and Middle East.


Pratitioners used the research findings to inform their own practice. For example, Tom Weaver,Managing Director at Flywheel used our research as the basis for a facilitated session with staff on developing a learner engagement strategy, at a school in Redcar. Her subsequently reported that our research had 'gone down very well with the group I talked to.'
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2009
 
Description School Buildings Conference Keynote 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The talk prompted questions from the audience and stimulated discussion among practitioners across the disciplines of design and education, focused on processes of school design.

The talk became a chapter of an interdisciplinary book on school design (see outputs) which brought together the work of practitioners and academics and was aimed at a readership of practitioners as well as academics, to guide school design processes and decision making. The impact of this book (officially published 2015) is as yet unknown.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2011
 
Description Traiblazing EACT talk 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Talk sparked questions and discussion afterwards.

After my talk one of the schools - Parkwood, Sheffield - working with EACT in their process of school design and conversion to an Academy, used the trailblazing approach that I spoke about to engage staff and pupils in the school design process. This trailblazing project informed the final school building design.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2009