RIVERAS: Robust Integrated Verification of Autonomous Systems

Lead Research Organisation: University of Bristol
Department Name: Computer Science

Abstract

Any system used for a safety-critical task, like a pollution-monitoring unmanned aerial vehicle, a robot inspecting a nuclear plant or a human assistive nursebot in a hospital or at home, must have enough evidence to demonstrate its safety before we can use it. Gathering such evidence involves verification, the process of demonstrating that the implementation of a system meets the requirements laid down in its specification. Much work has been done to develop tools and methods for verification of microelectronic designs and software.

When we try to verify an autonomous, intelligent system (AIS), with existing methods, two problems arise:

First, traditional verification techniques rely on a specification that fully defines the functional behaviour of the system to be verified. But, we want to use an intelligent system - one that can adapt to circumstances, deciding what to do without being told exactly how - precisely so we can avoid having to specify a response for every possible scenario. There are usually far too many possible scenarios for this to be practical. Instead, we need flexible specifications expressed in terms of acceptable and required behaviour with associated precise limits for critical properties complemented by more vague indications of desired actions.

Second, the control software to achieve dynamic adaptation is very complex, using iterative optimization algorithms to combine discrete and continuous decision-making. Although there has been much research on how to design these algorithms, their verification is still an open research question.

The RIVERAS project aims to tackle both of these problems.

First, we will develop a way of verifying a system with a flexible specification. This will require a formal way to write a specification, using a modelling language that can capture these flexible requirements. Then, fuzzy concepts will be used to analyse how well we meet the specification. Fuzzy concepts are graded and properties or statements involving them are true (or false) to some degree. This means that specifications may only be partialy satisfied which introduces new challenges when verifying them.

Second, we will also develop ways of verifying control software that uses optimization, which is a general approach for making decisions. Given a cost model and a set of constraints that define permitted limits, an optimizer finds the best set of decisions to maximize or minimize the cost while staying within permitted limits. Most planning problems for intelligent systems can be expressed in the form of optimization and research on control theory proves properties that help us understand how well it should work. We will use the properties established with control theory as a specification to demonstrate that the optimizer software does what it should. Moreover, we will integrate these properties into the software. This allows us to detect, contain and correct failures should they occur.

Finally, we will integrate all these developments into an innovative "Design for Verification" (DFV) method. Engineers who use our DFV methods when specifying and designing an intelligent system, and when producing its optimization-based control software, will immediately be able to use our verification methods to determine if they have done it right. This will be far easier and a lot more efficient than designing it first, without thinking about verification, and then figuring out how to verify afterwards.

To help refine our methods and to evaluate them afterwards, RIVERAS will try them out on real robots. For example, we will design an intelligent exploration system for a Mars rover, implement it on a robot on Earth, and produce all the verification evidence to demonstrate it works as intended.

Planned Impact

The economic impact of this work comes from the UKs ability to exploit its results as it becomes a world leader in intelligent systems. The potential for this impact is highlighted by the industrial support for the Call for Proposals. The capacity to verify the behaviour of real-time decision making systems is a prerequisite for their use in many safety-critical applications. This certainly includes the four scenarios described in the Call for Proposals, in which the need for greater autonomy and flexibility must be balanced with strict requirements for safe operation. Indeed the importance of verification is recognized by EPSRC who have identified it as an area for growth in their recent Shaping Capability Policy. The verification capability developed by RIVERAS will boost the prospect for intelligent systems in safety critical market sectors. It also enables the mass production of the next generation of intelligent consumer gadgets and toys, unlocking huge market potential.

The social impact of this research comes from enabling the deployment of more autonomous intelligent systems in a wider range of missions and environments. This will reduce risk to humans operating in hazardous environments while extending capabilities in those environments in which it is impractical or too costly to deploy manned or human operated systems. It will also enable new opportunities such as human assistive robots, public safety applications, and the enormous potential of space exploration. We will engage with the industrial partners throughout the project and especially with regards to the case studies. In particular, knowledge exchange will take the form of input from partners regarding the selection of relevant test problems, and output to partners of research results. A contribution in kind has been requested for time and expertise from the industrial partners as well as travel funds for the necessary visits. We are also requesting access to simulation and experimental facilities where appropriate. Indeed, this goal of integrating our techniques with an industrial partner's platform, such as a robotic rover, provides avenues for direct industrial exploitation of the work. Overall the team has a strong track record in industrial engagement. In particular, Dr Eder's close collaboration with the local and international microelectronics design industry is evidenced in numerous collaborative projects.

A further societal impact is improved public perception of autonomous systems, which are often portrayed negatively in the public arena using terms like "Killer Drone". In reality, however, human-robot interaction offers great promise, such as assisted independent living, more economic services and improved public safety, e.g. when used by fire and rescue services. Close interaction with these robots will necessitate a degree of compatibility with us to ensure safety and dependability, requiring negative perceptions to be challenged. This challenge strays beyond engineering and includes ethical, legal and societal questions. Should intelligent systems imitate human behaviour? Who is liable when the system makes a mistake? Our proposal can contribute to this important debate. We aim to embed the same rigorous safety verification culture in autonomous systems as is found in aviation, whose safety is held in high regard by the public. This impact will be facilitated by Bristol's STAARS (Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Assistive Robots) initiative, bringing together researchers from law, psychology and robotics with members of the RIVERAS team.

The fields of autonomous systems and robotics need a new generation of researchers who possess specialist knowledge and expertise combined with an understanding of how this expertise fits within the broader endeavour of designing and building intelligent systems. The two researchers employed on the project will develop a set of sought-after skills highly valued by both industry and academia.
 
Description Verification of control software: We have demonstrated how formal verification in the form of automatic theorem proving can be used to verify high-level properties of control systems. We have shown how to specify these properties, starting from control theory requirements and refining these into formal logic properties expressed as assertions (logic expressions) that can monitor the control system's behaviour during simulation-based testing and also, where required, at runtime. The same properties can also be translated into proof goals for formal verification with theorem provers.

Verification of robotic code: Robot software developers usually point towards the cost of manual verification or lack of automated tools that would handle their code. We have demonstrated that the choice of programming language is essential both for finding bugs in the code and for proving their absence. Our re-implementation of three robot navigation algorithms in SPARK revealed bugs that for years have not been detected in their original code in C/C++. For one of the implementations we demonstrated that it is free from run-time errors. Our code and results are available online to encourage uptake by the robot software developers community.

Specification: Autonomous intelligent systems (AIS) must cope with complex and changing environments whilst operating under physical constraints dictated by their hardware and control software. We consider vaguely defined requirements (VRs) as well as probabilistic requirements (PRs), and how they can be combined. Analysis using formal methods, e.g. model checking, is available to determine how PRs are satisfied. VRs can be successfully modeled using fuzzy logic. We propose the complementary uses of both types of analysis to evaluate AIS designs, in particular when requirements may conflict with each other. We specify levels of requirements satisfaction, modeled with probabilistic model checking tools and fuzzy logic formalisation techniques. This description identifies a partial ordering of AIS designs, which provides a means to systematically explore the design space, i.e. ranking and discriminating between possible choices at design time. It allows to investigate the trade-offs between conflicting VR and PR satisfaction levels. We have demonstrated the potential of this approach using an autonomous robot case study based on a home care scenario. The ranking and comparison of the opposed VRs and PRs helps identify the "optimal" designs, i.e. those with the best trade-offs in terms of requirement satisfaction.

Exploiting formal methods: Intelligent techniques (such as machine learning) are delivering large advances in solving problems such as robotic path planning, where formal methods are infeasible due to state explosion. These novel techniques typically resist analysis for verification or determining performance bounds. We propose that, rather than solving the problem, formal methods be used to restrain these techniques with a supervising multi-policy that allows both high performance solutions and their analysis. We demonstrate the concept with a case study, delivering a guaranteed lower bound on performance while allowing scope for high performance.
Exploitation Route Industrial practitioners may reconsider the choice of programming language in their projects.

Control engineers can use the power of assertion-based verification and automatic formal verification in the design of control systems to gain full confidence that the systems they design actually meet the specified requirements.

Design space exploration can be supported and formal methods can be exploited more effectively during the design of autonomous intelligent systems. In addition, the techniques enable runtime monitoring of control systems.
Sectors Aerospace, Defence and Marine,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Electronics,Manufacturing, including Industrial Biotechology,Transport

 
Description The novel combinations of verification and test generation techniques as developed in RIVERAS have inspired industrial collaborators to investigate how they can enhance their practice to make best use of the combined strength of different verification and test generation techniques. The insights gained have resulted in invitations to collaborate in joint projects directly with industry to enable knowledge transfer.
First Year Of Impact 2018
Sector Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Electronics,Manufacturing, including Industrial Biotechology,Transport
Impact Types Economic

 
Description Connected and Autonomous Vehicles 2 (CAV-2) CAPRI
Amount £4,200,000 (GBP)
Funding ID 103288 
Organisation Innovate UK 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 10/2017 
End 09/2020
 
Description Connected and Autonomous Vehicles 2 (CAV-2) ROBOPILOT
Amount £6,820,000 (GBP)
Funding ID 103703 
Organisation Innovate UK 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2018 
End 03/2021
 
Description EPSRC iCASE award with Thales on Testing Agents for Verification of Autonomous Systems
Amount £30,000 (GBP)
Funding ID 18000191 
Organisation Thales Group 
Department Thales UK Limited
Sector Private
Country United Kingdom
Start 10/2018 
End 09/2022
 
Description Industrial CASE Award
Amount £27,150 (GBP)
Funding ID 16000135 voucher code 
Organisation Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 09/2017 
End 08/2021
 
Description Innovate UK Software Verification and Validation for Complex Systems
Amount £6,511 (GBP)
Funding ID 65045-471140 
Organisation Innovate UK 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 05/2016 
End 04/2017
 
Description Innovate UK Software Verification and Validation for Complex Systems
Amount £8,101 (GBP)
Funding ID 66584-471175 
Organisation Innovate UK 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 05/2016 
End 04/2017
 
Description UKRI Trustworthy Autonomous Systems Node in Functionality
Amount £3,315,003 (GBP)
Funding ID EP/V026518/1 
Organisation Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 11/2020 
End 04/2024
 
Title A Corroborative Approach to Verification and Validation of Human-Robot Teams: Data from Simulations and Experiments 
Description This dataset contains recordings and results from simulations and experiments of a robot to human object handover task that served as case study in the paper "A Corroborative Approach to Verification and Validation of Human-Robot Teams," by Matt Webster, David Western, Dejanira Araiza-Illan, Clare Dixon, Kerstin Eder, Michael Fisher and Anthony G. Pipe. Preferred dataset citation: David Western, Dejanira Araiza-Illan, Anthony G. Pipe and Kerstin Eder (2019): A Corroborative Approach to Verification and Validation of Human-Robot Teams: Data from Simulations and Experiments. University of Bristol Research Data Repository. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2019 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact This dataset provided the evidence for the associated research paper published in The International Journal of Robotics Research. 
URL https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/gw4qbvkmmekl1rlkgaqskdtyd
 
Description Autonomous Systems Verification and Validation collaboration with Thales UK 
Organisation Thales Group
Department Thales UK Limited
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution Expertise in test-based verification and validation for autonomous intelligent systems as developed in the RIVERAS/ROBOSAFE projects.
Collaborator Contribution Thales provides industrial expertise and use cases from their Autonomous Systems range for us to work on.
Impact joint applications for further funding (iCASE award and also Dstl application)
Start Year 2017
 
Description Collaboration with Nissan on human factors in automated driving 
Organisation Nissan Motor Company
Country Japan 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution This collaboration is building on the research findings, expertise and skills from the EPSRC funded Trustworthy Robotic Assistants project, the RIVERAS project and also two follow-on Innovate UK awards, CAPRI and ROBOPILOT. The visiting researcher from Nissan receives supervision and access to the lab resources as well as equipment to conduct his research.
Collaborator Contribution Nissan are funding a professional researcher to work in the Trustworthy Systems Laboratory at Bristol for two years with the objective to investigate human factors in automated driving. The research is focused on areas where the automated vehicle needs to navigate crowded spaces and interact with human-driven vehicles to gain their trust while achieving its objectives.
Impact no published papers yet
Start Year 2022
 
Description Collaboration with Nissan on human factors in automated driving 
Organisation Nissan Motor Company
Country Japan 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution This collaboration is building on the research findings, expertise and skills from the EPSRC funded Trustworthy Robotic Assistants project, the RIVERAS project and also two follow-on Innovate UK awards, CAPRI and ROBOPILOT. The visiting researcher from Nissan receives supervision and access to the lab resources as well as equipment to conduct his research.
Collaborator Contribution Nissan are funding a professional researcher to work in the Trustworthy Systems Laboratory at Bristol for two years with the objective to investigate human factors in automated driving. The research is focused on areas where the automated vehicle needs to navigate crowded spaces and interact with human-driven vehicles to gain their trust while achieving its objectives.
Impact no published papers yet
Start Year 2022
 
Description Dagstuhl Seminar 19081: Verification and Synthesis of Human-Robot Interaction 
Organisation Cornell University
Country United States 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I co-organized this Dagstuhl Seminar with colleagues from LAAS, France, and Cornell University, US. The seminar brought together experts in computational HRI, verification and synthesis of autonomous systems, formal methods, simulation-based testing, and cognitive and social psychology to exchange ideas, define research directions, and foster collaborations toward a new theory and practice of verifiable HRI. In particular, I contributed expertise in formal and test-based verification techniques for robots that work in close/direct collaboration with humans.
Collaborator Contribution I co-organized this Dagstuhl seminar with Rachid Alami (LAAS - Toulouse, FR), Guy Hoffman (Cornell University - Ithaca, US) and Hadas Kress-Gazit (Cornell University - Ithaca, US). They cover AI and robotics, synthesis and human-human/robot interaction. The seminar had more than 40 participants from a variety of backgrounds covering Human-Robot Interaction, Verification, Synthesis, Formal Methods and Testing and working in academia, industry or commercial research labs.
Impact 02/2017: Funding application for seminar has been successful. Further outputs are expected after the seminar. 02/2019: This seminar has just taken place (Feb 2019) and we are now preparing the following outputs (full details to follow once published and available): a jointly authored position paper, a literature survey on Verification and Synthesis Techniques for Human-Robot Interaction, and the Dagstuhl Seminar report. This is a multi-disciplinary collaboration, bringing together the verification, validation and synthesis community with the human-human/robot interaction community and the autonomous systems community in general. 12/2019: We submitted a position paper entitled "Formalizing and Guaranteeing* Human-Robot Interaction" to the ACM Magazine Communications of the ACM. This article is still under review at the time of this submission.
Start Year 2017
 
Description Dagstuhl Seminar 19081: Verification and Synthesis of Human-Robot Interaction 
Organisation University of Toulouse
Department Laboratory for Analysis and Architecture of Systems
Country France 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I co-organized this Dagstuhl Seminar with colleagues from LAAS, France, and Cornell University, US. The seminar brought together experts in computational HRI, verification and synthesis of autonomous systems, formal methods, simulation-based testing, and cognitive and social psychology to exchange ideas, define research directions, and foster collaborations toward a new theory and practice of verifiable HRI. In particular, I contributed expertise in formal and test-based verification techniques for robots that work in close/direct collaboration with humans.
Collaborator Contribution I co-organized this Dagstuhl seminar with Rachid Alami (LAAS - Toulouse, FR), Guy Hoffman (Cornell University - Ithaca, US) and Hadas Kress-Gazit (Cornell University - Ithaca, US). They cover AI and robotics, synthesis and human-human/robot interaction. The seminar had more than 40 participants from a variety of backgrounds covering Human-Robot Interaction, Verification, Synthesis, Formal Methods and Testing and working in academia, industry or commercial research labs.
Impact 02/2017: Funding application for seminar has been successful. Further outputs are expected after the seminar. 02/2019: This seminar has just taken place (Feb 2019) and we are now preparing the following outputs (full details to follow once published and available): a jointly authored position paper, a literature survey on Verification and Synthesis Techniques for Human-Robot Interaction, and the Dagstuhl Seminar report. This is a multi-disciplinary collaboration, bringing together the verification, validation and synthesis community with the human-human/robot interaction community and the autonomous systems community in general. 12/2019: We submitted a position paper entitled "Formalizing and Guaranteeing* Human-Robot Interaction" to the ACM Magazine Communications of the ACM. This article is still under review at the time of this submission.
Start Year 2017
 
Description Dagstuhl Seminar 19171: Ethics and Trust: Principles, Verification and Validation 
Organisation University of Liverpool
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I was invited to this seminar based on my expertise in verification and validation for safety in robots and autonomous systems. I contributed a presentation and worked in two different working groups. We are in the process of writing a joint paper.
Collaborator Contribution They organised this Dagstuhl Seminar.
Impact none yet
Start Year 2019
 
Description Dagstuhl Seminar 19171: Ethics and Trust: Principles, Verification and Validation 
Organisation University of Liverpool
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution I was invited to this seminar based on my expertise in verification and validation for safety in robots and autonomous systems. I contributed a presentation and worked in two different working groups. We are in the process of writing a joint paper.
Collaborator Contribution They organised this Dagstuhl Seminar.
Impact none yet
Start Year 2019
 
Description Network on the Verification and Validation of Autonomous Systems 
Organisation University of Liverpool
Department Department of Computer Science
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Presentations on the state of the art of test-based verification techniques, participation and contribution to networking events, organisation of a workshop.
Collaborator Contribution Leading network activities, organising networking events, community building, dissemination, research roadmap shaping, etc
Impact community building to date
Start Year 2015
 
Description Agent Verification Workshop associated with TAROS 2015 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact A workshop on Agent Verification Techniques to which I contributed a session on "Theorem Proving and Testing for Autonomous Systems" and participated at a panel on "Current Research Challenges in Agent Verification" which sparked interesting questions. A summary of the panel was created and will feed into a research roadmap in the context of the Network on the Verification and Validation of Autonomous Systems.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL http://cgi.csc.liv.ac.uk/~maryam/AVWorkshop15.html
 
Description Dagstuhl Seminar 17071 on Assisted Engineering for Robotics and Autonomous Systems (CAREAS) 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact This event was focused on Computer Assisted Engineering for Robotics and Autonomous Systems and addressed both academics as well as industrial developers and researchers. An entire week was devoted to discussions, identification of challenges, knowledge exchange and problem solving. New collaborations have already been established since then, e.g. with industrial collaborators who are sharing my interest in the verification of human assistive robots.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://www.dagstuhl.de/en/program/calendar/semhp/?semnr=17071
 
Description Dynamic Testing Workshop 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact The workshop aimed to develop links between communities (including structural testing, simulation-based testing, safety-critical testing and safety case construction, and formal methods) within academia and industry, so that we can join forces in addressing the intellectual challenges that lead to safe and trustworthy autonomous systems. The unifying theme was verification in the broad sense - the process of gaining confidence that a system meets its specification. In practice no single verification technique (or class of techniques) will be adequate on its own. The workshop was focused on how dynamic testing, specifically, can contribute to autonomous system verification. The workshop resulted in several collaborative project ideas being taken forward by participants.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL https://vavas.org/pastevents/workshop-dynamic-testing-for-autonomous-systems-1-2-february-2018/
 
Description Invitation to contribute to an Expert Panel on The Advancement of Medical Devices: Robots in Healthcare held at the European Parliament in Brussels 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact my presentation sparked questions and stimulated a discussion on safety of robots and the need to design for safety

contacts for future collaboration, invitation to serve on conference programme committees, invitation to attend and present at workshops
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2013
 
Description Invited presentation at the National Microelectronics Institute's event on Accelerating Verification - faster, smarter 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact presentation sparked invitations for more detailed discussions, knowledge transfer and collaborations

after the talk a company indicated their interest in taking some of the research further
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
URL http://www.nmi.org.uk/events/event-details/verif2014
 
Description Invited presentation at the meeting of the ISO WG Committee on Robots and Robotic Devices 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? Yes
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact I received an invitation to review and to contribute towards the development of the standards

offers for collaboration from both academic and industrial partners, nationally and internationally
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2013
 
Description Invited speaker at the 1st Verification and Validation for Autonomy Technical Working Group meeting 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other academic audiences (collaborators, peers etc.)
Results and Impact My presentation stimulated a discussion on the need to combine a variety of verification and validation techniques in recognition of the fact that in practice no single technique is adequate to cover a whole system.

offers for collaboration and to take this forward jointly
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
 
Description Lecturer at Winterschool on Verification of Robotics 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact Winterschool for graduate students (https://www.cs.york.ac.uk/circus/RoboCalc-event/)

Contribution of the session entitled "Practical Techniques for Verification and Validation of Robots"
Abstract
This session is focused on practical techniques for the verification and validation of autonomous systems from specification via design to the code level. Because no single technique is adequate to cover a whole system in practice, a variety of verification techniques, including formal methods, such as model checking and theorem proving, and state-of-the-art simulation-based methods, will be presented from first principles and brought into the context of robotics. How these techniques can be applied will be illustrated using real-world examples. We will start with the verification of control system designs with respect to high-level requirements, such as stability, using an assertion-based approach that combines simulation-based verification with automatic theorem proving. We will then focus on using model-based techniques to enhance test generation in the context of coverage-driven verification applied to code used in robots that directly interact with humans. The session will finish with the proposal to design autonomous systems "for verification"; this requires a paradigm shift towards more systematic design practices.

The research presented in this session is based on collaborations within the EPSRC funded projects "Robust Integrated Verification of Autonomous Systems" and "Trustworthy Robotic Assistants". This session will be supplemented with hands-on demonstrations presented by Dejanira Araiza Illan.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL https://www.cs.york.ac.uk/circus/RoboCalc-event/courses/practical-techniques-for-verification-and-va...
 
Description Verification and Control of Cyber-physical Systems: Theory and Applications 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact I gave an invited talk on "Intelligent test generation for advanced coverage-driven verification of robotic code" at this workshop. The event highlighted recent advances and developments in verification in the field of cyber-physical systems (CPSs), motivated by emerging applications involving autonomous systems such as automated vehicles and robotic systems. The talks focused on verification and control of complex CPS's, with the aim to facilitate an in depth understanding of the challenges posed by their hybrid dynamics, interconnected and distributed nature, the presence of exogenous and/or endogenous uncertainty affecting their evolution, their safety and operational critical nature, and with a wide coverage of possible solution methodologies. The goal of the workshop was to expose attendees to cutting edge research in the field, with an eye on both theory and applications, and to encourage the development of new results and the investigation of several important issues in the future of complex CPSs design, promoting novel collaborations. To this purpose, outstanding researchers from leading industries and universities worldwide were brought together by the organizers to offer their vistas on the field.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2016
URL http://cdc2016.ieeecss.org/workshops.php#w06
 
Description Verification and Validation of Sensing and Control Models in Autonomous Systems 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact This event was held as part of the EPSRC funded V&V Network. Researchers, certification experts and students met to present the latest results and to exchange knowledge as well as to foster new collaborations.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://vavas.org/events/verification-and-validation-of-sensing-and-control-models-in-autonomous-sys...