Modelling the Political, Societal and Regulatory Implementation of the UK Energy System Decarbonisation Transition

Lead Research Organisation: University College London
Department Name: Bartlett Sch of Env, Energy & Resources

Abstract

Conventional equilibrium and optimisation energy systems modelling approaches have been extensively used over the last two decades to identify the timing and scale for the deployment of low, zero or even negative carbon energy technologies as the key element of deep decarbonisation pathways to stay within a 2C temperature target by 2100.
However, these approaches suffer from a set of major simplifications. First, the lack of more detailed analysis on the economic trade-offs of large scale decarbonisation (beyond a single optimal decision maker); second, a clear link to the political dynamics (including the institutional and regulatory requirements) of such a transition; and third, an understanding of the societal acceptability, drivers and learning of large-scale low carbon technology uptake.
To help fill these major omissions, the emerging field of socio-technical energy transitions (STET) is an innovative and exciting approach. The STET approach is characterised by multi-level governance, a range of economic, technological and social feedbacks, and by many decision makers.
Attempts to operationalise such a rich conceptual approach (for example via EPSRC's Realizing Transitions Pathways project) has taken an interdisciplinary and participatory stakeholder approach that brought together quantitative and qualitative contributions from research, policy, industry and wider society.
To make STET analysis relevant for the implementation of energy system trilemma goals, requires transparent, sophisticated and scalable modelling frameworks that are explicitly targeted to answer the actual questions that energy decision makers have.
Therefore this scoping proposal has two primary goals:
1. To apply formal STET modelling - on heterogeneous economic actors, necessary policy consistency, and societal acceptance - to large-scale low carbon technology deployment within an energy systems framework.
2. To embed this process within an interactive and bidirectional stakeholder engagement to ensure that STET modelling meets the requirements of diverse UK energy decision makers.
The main tool for this scoping study is the Behaviour, Lifestyles and Uncertainty Energy model (BLUE); a system dynamics model of the UK energy system that simulates energy use and emissions through time as an energy transition unfolds. The main stakeholder engagement will be a coordinated pair of expert workshops, allied to an iterative bidirectional project website to enable a decision theatre approach to STET model development and application.
This is an inherently interdisciplinary scoping project that will better define the 'real world' feasibility of large-scale decarbonisation technology from a range of economic, political, institutional, regulatory and societal perspectives. It will hence lay the groundwork for a full project of linking STET modelling with UK energy decision maker needs.

Planned Impact

Comprehensive bi-directional interactions with the full range of UK (and international) energy systems expert stakeholders is a core goal of this scoping project.
We will provide a focused bridge between the wider energy systems academic community and the UK's energy modelling researchers. An (open access) journal paper will be produced on the conceptualisation of formalised energy systems STET modelling, with the placeholder for future papers from follow-up in-depth research. We will deposit in key repositories a novel set of layered data outputs characterising the economic, political and societal factors in long-term large-scale energy system decarbonisation. These innovative data sets represent a completely original resource on long-term transitional drivers and parameters for any future energy systems scenarios, giving new modellers a tractable set of parameters to continuing our STET analytical work on this vital topic.
In this project's iterative modelling process, the engagement - principally through our twin expert workshops - with a diverse and knowledgeable set of energy experts is critical. Leveraging longstanding and deep relationships - via wholeSEM, UKERC and the Transition Pathways projects -we will populate our workshops with the best energy systems experts from national and local governance; the Energy Systems Catapult and ETI, the energy regulator; principal industry players; nongovernmental organisations; consultants; and international organisations with expertise in energy systems analysis. We will utilise an active project website to ensure engagement between and after workshops with our core stakeholder group and the wider energy community. This will include a conceptualisation of the economic, political and societal parameters we are exploring under this call, a dedicated data section, and an interactive modelling outputs section for comment and critique.
One of the most important success criteria for the project will be the ability of policy and other decision-makers to understand, critique, deploy and exploit our modelling insights on large-scale energy decarbonisation. In addition to the routes to impact discussed above we will publish policy briefs to provide tailored information and support timely, evidence-based decision-making. These will be written in an accessible way and available from the project website, as well as emailed to relevant individuals, organisations, and networks. We will also deliver bespoke presentations designed to deepen the understanding of energy system decarbonisation drivers, and build upon existing advisory roles to BEIS, ETI, and the Energy Systems Catapult to inform key technical personnel and internal evidence-based reports.
Interacting with wider media, civil society organisations and students - will be facilitated by an active online presence, coordinated through our project website. Such public engagement will be heavily facilitated via electronic communication (based on the UKERC and wholeSEM successes in these methods), including the project website, social networking and a two-way blog function.
Finally our end of project report will codify and synthesize this scoping study's results on dedicated STET research and cementing relevant insights into a possible future major research effort.
 
Description MPSRI Transitions showed that it was possible to undertake novel modelling on one socio-technical energy transition (STET) approach - the multi-level perspective - using the BLUE model. BLUE is a system dynamics model of the UK energy system that has multiple actors who dynamically interact through time, incorporates non-price insights from behavioural economics into technology decisions, and has a Monte Carlo simulation for facilitating exploration of parameter uncertainty
The updated model then was used for a set of "Chicken or Egg" scenarios where the government or society was either leading or following. Key insights included:
• Multiple pathways for decarbonising the energy system exist, with different actors in the lead.
• Successful transitions are those where positive feedbacks allow initial momentum generated by the lead actor to be maintained, but negative feedbacks mean progress can collapse.
• With the technology options / calibration of behaviours / policy settings used in the scoping study, decarbonisation was found to represent an extreme challenge.
Exploitation Route The project workshops showed the high level of interest in our insights from key UK policy and industrial energy stakeholders. And the BLUE model is open to academic or policy collaborators who wish to use it.
Sectors Energy

URL http://www.ucl.ac.uk/energy-models/models/blue
 
Description The most exciting aspect of the scoping study was the depth of engagement by the UK academic, policy and stakeholder communities. Two hugely successful workshops were held in June 2017 (Modelling the Unmodellable) and in November 2017 (People, Governments, Chickens and Eggs). Academic participants came from 10 leading UK universities, plus an internationally leading STET scholar - Jonathan Kohler from ISI Franhofer (Germany) - as a keynote speaker. Stakeholder participants came from the Energy Systems Catapult, CCC, Ofgem, BIES, Shell and Baringa. The workshop participants welcomed the STET modelling concept and the new questions arising from this exploratory analysis. They also gave a challenge on the communication to policymakers of the novelty and additional benefits of STET modelling compared to conventional energy modelling.
First Year Of Impact 2017
Sector Energy
Impact Types Policy & public services

 
Description EPSRC/ESC Follow on Funding: Operationalising Socio-Technical Energy Transitions
Amount £510,111 (GBP)
Funding ID EP/S002707/1 
Organisation Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) 
Sector Public
Country United Kingdom
Start 11/2018 
End 10/2020
 
Title BLUE 
Description The Behaviour, Lifestyles and Uncertainty Energy model (BLUE) is a system dynamic model of the UK energy system that simulates future energy transitions and the associated changes to technologies, energy use and emissions. BLUE is conceptually aligned with the multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions in that it has landscape (government and the macro-scale socio-political environment), regime (the existing energy system) and niche (disruptive technology and lifestyle innovations) levels. Rather than relying on a single omnipotent social planner to allocate resources, BLUE is instead configured with multiple actors, each representing a decision-maker that is independently responsible for a single economic sector. Further work under the O-STET project aims to capture the imperfect socio-political elements of transition pathways, operationalising both the concept of political capital and of public willingness to participate 
Type Of Material Computer model/algorithm 
Year Produced 2021 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact Journal papers Trutnevyte E., Barton J., O'Grady Á., Ogunkunle D., Pudjianto D. and Robertson E. (2014) Linking a storyline with multiple models: A cross-scale study of the UK power system transition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 26-42. Li, Francis G. N. and Strachan, N. (2016) Modelling Energy Transitions for Climate Targets under Landscape and Actor Inertia. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. Li, Francis G. N. (2017) Actors behaving badly: Exploring the modelling of non-optimal behaviour in energy transitions. Energy Strategy Reviews, 15, 57-71. Li, F. G. N. and N. Strachan (2017). "Modelling energy transitions for climate targets under landscape and actor inertia." Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24: 106-129. Li, F. G. N. and N. Strachan (2019). "Take me to your leader: Using socio-technical energy transitions (STET) modelling to explore the role of actors in decarbonisation pathways." Energy Research & Social Science 51: 67-81. Conference papers Strachan N. and Warren P. (2011) Incorporating Behavioural Complexity in Energy-Economic Models. Energy and People: Futures, Complexity and Challenges , 20-21 September, Oxford. 
URL https://www.ucl.ac.uk/energy-models/models/blue
 
Description Invited talk at EPRG, University of Cambridge 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Invited presentation to the Electriicty Policy Research Group's seminar series at the University of Cambridge
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Workshop 1: Modelling the Unmodellable 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This was teh 1st (or 2) project workshops under Modelling the Political, Societal, and Regulatory Implementation of the UK Energy System Decarbonisation Transition (MPSRI)
Title: Modelling the Unmodellable
26th June 2017, University College London

The MPSRI Transitions scoping study is a highly ambitious exploratory effort to better model and analyse the critical societal and political drivers of the low carbon energy transition. We are investigating this via the lens of socio-technical energy transitions (STET), via a leading STET model of the UK energy system called BLUE . At present in BLUE, socio-political factors are generally including via exogenous narrative scenarios or via "on/off" switches in the model. We want to endogenise these factors within our BLUE model and explore how the consequences and socio-political factors iterate with the technological transition.
This workshop gathered a highly group of leading experts from academia, government and industry to advise and steer this novel and ground-breaking initiative. Following this summary of the key themes and findings from this workshop, the modelling team will now try to model the workshop's themes and key findings. W

The workshop's sessions highlight four critical modelling questions:
1. How to adequately yet succinctly frame the STET approach in a model?
2. How to categorise policy consistency, dynamics and vested interests?
3. How to capture changing societal patterns and values?
4. How detailed should heterogeneous actor behaviour be modelled?
From these discussions, three cross cutting themes emerged:
A. Modelling complexity vs. validation, taking into account the difficulties of communicating modelling and hence its trust, salience and credibility to decision makers;
B. Modelling and differentiating between endogenous niche developments (technology and society) vs. exogenous shocks that bring about new practices and innovations;
C. Modelling the circular feedbacks between new technologies and user groups, including a 'chicken-and-egg' situation of what is the key driver.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
 
Description Workshop 2: People, governments, chickens and eggs 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This is teh 2nd (or 2) workshops under teh project: Modelling the Political, Societal, and Regulatory Implementation of the UK Energy System Decarbonisation Transition
Workshop #2: "People, Governments, Chickens and Eggs"

28th November 2017: 1200 - 1600 (coffee from 1130, lunch at 1300)
UCL Energy Institute, Jevons Room, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London. WC1H 0NN


Synopsis
The MPSRI Transitions scoping study is a highly ambitious exploratory effort to better model and analyse the critical societal and political drivers of the low carbon energy transition. Most projects taking a socio-technical approach pair models with qualitative narratives, but usually the narratives take a back seat. In this project we seek to pioneer new ways to endogenise consumer behaviour, shifting societal attitudes and political dynamics - via a leading socio-technical energy transitions (STET) model of the UK energy system called BLUE).
A first workshop "Modelling the Unmodellable", took place on June 26th with 15 participants from across academia, industry and government. As detailed in the workshop report, four critical modelling questions and three crosscutting themes emerged:
1. How to adequately yet succinctly frame the socio-technical energy transition (STET) approach in a model?
2. How to categorise policy consistency, dynamics and vested interests?
3. How to capture changing societal patterns and values?
4. How detailed should heterogeneous actor behaviour be modelled?
A. Modelling complexity vs. validation, taking into account the difficulties of communicating modelling and hence its trust, salience and credibility to decision makers;
B. Modelling and differentiating between endogenous niche developments (technology and society) vs. exogenous shocks that bring about new practices and innovations;
C. Modelling the circular feedbacks between new technologies and user groups, including a 'chicken-and-egg' situation of what is the key driver.

For our second and final workshop, we report back on our work to date on STET modelling to generate insights on these key points, contrast our work with international cutting-edge STET research, and reflect on its current usefulness for real world decision making.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018