Trust in Human-Machine Partnership

Lead Research Organisation: King's College London
Department Name: Informatics

Abstract

Interaction with machines is commonplace in the modern world, for a wide range of everyday tasks like making coffee, copying documents or driving to work. Forty years ago, these machines existed but were not automated or intelligent. Today, they all have computers embedded in them and can be programmed with advanced functionality beyond the mechanical jobs they performed two generations ago. Tomorrow, they will be talking to each other: my calendar will tell my coffee maker when to have my cuppa ready so that I can arrive at work on time for my first meeting; my satnav will tell my calendar how much time my autonomous car needs to make that journey given traffic and weather conditions; and my office copier will have documents ready to distribute at the meeting when I arrive in the office. And they will all be talking to me: I could request the coffee maker to produce herbal tea because I had too much coffee yesterday; and the copier could remind me that our office is (still) trying to go paperless and wouldn't I prefer to email the documents to meeting attendees instead of killing another tree?

This scenario will not be possible without three key features: an automated planner that coordinates between the various activities that need to be performed, determining where there are dependencies between tasks (e.g., don't drive to the office until I get in the car with my hot drink); a high level of trust between me and this intelligent system that helps organise the mundane actions in my life; and the ability for me to converse with the system and make joint decisions about these actions. Advancing the state-of-the-art in trustworthy, intelligent planning and decision support to realise these critical features lies at the centre of the research proposed by this Trust in Human-Machine Partnerships (THuMP) project.

THuMP will move us toward this future by following three avenues of investigation. First, we will introduce innovative techniques to the artificial intelligence (AI) community through a novel, intra-disciplinary strategy that brings computational argumentation and provenance to AI Planning. Second, we will take human-AI collaboration to the next level, through an exciting, inter-disciplinary approach that unites human-agent interaction and
information visualisation to AI Planning. Finally, we will progress the relationship between Technology and Law through a bold, multi-disciplinary approach that links legal and ethics research with new and improved AI Planning.

Why do we focus on AI Planning? A traditional sub-field of artificial intelligence, Planning develops methods for creating and maintaining sequences of actions for an AI (or a person) to execute, in the face of conflicting objectives, optimisation of multiple criteria, and timing and resource constraints. Ultimately, most decisions result in some kind of action, or action sequence. By focussing on AI Planning, THuMP captures the essence of what a collaborative AI decision-making system needs to do.

We believe that most AI systems will (need to) involve a human in-the-loop and that it is crucial to develop new AI technologies such that people can use, understand and trust them. THuMP strives for complete understanding and trustworthiness through transparency in AI. We will develop and test a general framework for "Explainable AI Planning (XAIP)", in which humans and an AI system can co-create plans for actions; and then we instantiate two use cases for this framework that focus on resource allocation in two very different critical domains.

A cross-disciplinary project team of seven investigators, four collaborators and four postdoctoral research assistants will work with three project partners--a leading oil & gas services corporation; a leading international charity; and a leading global law firm--to move us into this envisioned future. An ambitious and realistic programme of networking, development, evaluation and public engagement is proposed.

Planned Impact

According to a June 2017 report from PricewaterhouseCoopers/PwC on the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the UK economy, the economic growth directly attributable to AI will be no less than 5% of GDP, and may be up to 10% by 2030. That figure represents a projected increase of more than 230 billion pounds in less than 15 years, and means that AI holds significant potential benefit for the UK. However, that potential is dependent on AI being seamlessly integrated throughout the economy: at work and at home; in factories, in offices, in shops and in schools. And that integration will not happen while people do not trust the technology. Unhappily, distrust in black-box AI techniques seems to be growing. THuMP directly addresses the issue of trust in AI, and one side effect of the overarching aim of the project--to achieve complete understanding and trustworthiness through transparency in AI systems--is to ensure that the promise of that additional 230 billion pounds a year is realised.

The main impact to be delivered by THuMP will be to demonstrate that trust in AI systems can be fostered if the AI can explain how it arrives at its recommendations. The demonstration will be in the context of AI planning, a sub-area of artificial intelligence that is already seeing deployment in industries such as our project partner, Schlumberger. Through the project evaluation, THuMP will demonstrate that "Explainable AI Planning" (XAIP) systems engender greater trust than planning systems that do not provide explanations. More specifically, THuMP will carry out this demonstration not only in a laboratory setting, but also in the real world setting of two of our project partners: an international oil & gas service company and an international charity. Thus, in addition to scientific results on the increase of trust that XAIP systems engender in humans, we will produce two use case studies for dissemination.

Of course, if AI is to become an accepted part of our lives, this will not happen by purely technological means. Magic technology will not make people's worries evaporate. Rather we need to understand the causes of people's concerns about AI, and overcome them. We need to establish a sound legal, ethical and regulatory framework in which AI systems will operate, and we need to help understand people's fears, and make sure that they are addressed by the composers of laws and regulations and the programmers who create the AI systems. Through a series of public engagement activities, THuMP seeks to identify and assuage the AI fears of the general public, to help educate not only the lay person, but also the engineers and policymakers responsible for enabling and regulating AI in society.

THuMP aims to have an impact on multiple audiences. On the question of a suitable legal and ethical framework, THuMP will identify how AI systems can be made to fit within the EU General Data Protection Regulation that is coming into force in the near future. On the question of understanding and addressing people's fears, THuMP will make progress through an ambitious programme of public engagement activities. These aim to both discover the issues around AI that concern young adults, a group chosen both for their tech savvy as "digital natives" and for the fact that they will be the first generation to live alongside AI systems for the bulk of their lives, and to provide a vehicle for working through these concerns.
 
Description Our Key Findings comprised a series of insights on applications of AI Planning to advance Explainable AI (XAI):

Our work on Motion Planning identified the kinds of questions and explanations that are most useful to users with diverse backgrounds and determined how these can relate to reasons for planner failure, unexpected behaviour, computation time, plan efficiency and other events. This enabled the development of a set of guidelines for XAI Planning system development focused on characterizing and reducing: complexity, event triggers, levels of abstraction, actionability, applicability on planning methods with common practical properties (sub-optimality and incompleteness).

Our work on Argumentation designed a novel approach that uses argument schemes to derive argument-based explanations of a plan and its key elements. Its two main tenets are: a set of key critical questions; and a novel dialogue system which provides users with interactive dialectical explanations. User studies (see below) are being used to evaluate how our technique can help users to better understand plans. This approach can be further extended to the wider domain of state-based artificial intelligence algorithm (i.e. search, reinforcement learning etc).

Our work on Verbalization established that users can better understand plans when they have access to summarized verbal explanations, compared to stepwise descriptions of a plan.

Our work to leverage the expressive power of Visualization as a mean to support understanding of the decisions made by an AI algorithm has: proven the effectiveness of Visual Storytelling when employed to describe sequences of events and actions executed by an AI Planner algorithm in the context of AI robotics; created a novel Visual Encoding which effectively supports the translation of machine readable code into a human readable visual representation (Visual Summaries); demonstrated the importance of Visual Summaries to be dynamic and interactive to support the user in the exploration of all the variables at play in decisions made by an AI algorithm.

Key Findings were advanced and reinforced through User Studies undertaken to validate these different approaches to XAI Planning explanations. Our observations showed that: verbalised accounts of behaviour were complementary to the visualization of robot movement; pseudo-verbal descriptions, in terms of goals and actions, appeared too fine grained, lengthy and "unnatural" linguistically and semantically; explanations were relevant when dealing with unexpected events; and synchronization between the different communication channels was fundamental to avoid confusion. This suggested that: more consideration should be paid to distinguish explanations from description of behaviour; explanations need to be related to the environment and context of the users; explanations could be produced in a step-wise fashion and tailored to the needs and circumstances of the users; and users need to be provided with explicit support to make sense of explanations.

Key findings were additionally augmented though Legal Research to develop critical perspectives on artificial intelligence governance dynamics, contributing to reflections on public policy aiming to encourage participation in relevant processes and trust in relevant technology.
Exploitation Route There is some open source software, which was used in our evalution.

PlanVerb: Software related to the paper "Canal, G., Krivic, S., Luff, P., & Coles, A. (2022, June). PlanVerb: Domain-Independent Verbalization and Summary of Task Plans. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 36, No. 9, pp. 9698-9706)." Available from: https://github.com/gerardcanal/task_plan_verbalization
Sectors Creative Economy,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Energy

URL https://kcl-thump.github.io/
 
Description The COHERENT project builds on the ideas from THuMP of explaining task plans, going further to provide coherent explanations that include information from other sources -- for instance, path and motion planning, and computer vision. For instance, a task plan for a robot may indicate the robot is going from the kitchen to the dining table via the hallway, but explanations based on the task plan alone cannot explain why this was a good idea: path planning may have identified this as a good route; computer vision may have noticed an obstacle; and so on. The ideas of semantic attachments for plan verbalisation developed in THuMP have provided the basis for the ontology approach being developed to generalise this in COHERENT. In line with the experience of the project team, the use cases in COHERENT focus on using robots to fold clothes, and mixed human-robot teams to solve common goals while accounting for use preferences. THUMP's ambition is to contribute towards fostering trust in the context of human machine partnership. A critical element to reach such objective is to engage and gain the trust of potential stakeholders. To achieve this goal, the research team created a series of videos that would showcase the core of the THUMP research work, and its results, using language and communication means closer to stakeholders. We therefore worked with a professional media team to create an engaging and informative video that explained the pillars guiding THUMP research and its outcomes. The video has been shared on social media platforms and the research team's website. The video will also be used in public events where outputs of THUMP are being showcased to: (1) present and explain the different system solutions that have been developed as part of the project, and ease interaction with the public before they try them out for themselves; (2) help the research team identify areas where people had concerns or reservations; (3) collect feedback to guide future work. By providing clear and concise information, and by showcasing the benefits of the technology, the team hopes to create a more positive perception of their work in the community.
First Year Of Impact 2023
Sector Creative Economy
Impact Types Societal

 
Description Evidence to Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
URL https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/9453/documents/161854/default/
 
Title Dry Harbour Image Dataset for Semantic Segmentation 
Description This dataset was used to produce the results in the paper "Integrated Design-Sense-Plan Architecture for Autonomous Geometric-Semantic Mapping with UAVs", Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2022. The dataset consists of training data for a semantic segmentation network targeted at robotic inspection of dry dock shipyard environments. The data was generated by using a combination of Unreal Engine 4 and AirSim: to create a realistic virtual dockyard environment and to extract images and corresponding labels (Sky, Harbor wall, Floor, Ship, Unknown). 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2022 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://kcl.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Dry_Harbour_Image_Dataset_for_Semantic_Segmentation/204488...
 
Title Dry Harbour Image Dataset for Semantic Segmentation 
Description This dataset was used to produce the results in the paper "Integrated Design-Sense-Plan Architecture for Autonomous Geometric-Semantic Mapping with UAVs", Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2022. The dataset consists of training data for a semantic segmentation network targeted at robotic inspection of dry dock shipyard environments. The data was generated by using a combination of Unreal Engine 4 and AirSim: to create a realistic virtual dockyard environment and to extract images and corresponding labels (Sky, Harbor wall, Floor, Ship, Unknown). 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2022 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://kcl.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Dry_Harbour_Image_Dataset_for_Semantic_Segmentation/204488...
 
Description BIICL 
Organisation British Institute Of International & Comparative Law
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution Concept and vision for events under THuMP project legal workstream & BIICL AI Regulation series.
Collaborator Contribution Networking, event organisation.
Impact https://www.biicl.org/events/11467/contesting-ai-explanations-in-the-uk Workshop under development.
Start Year 2020
 
Description Collaboration with Save the Children 
Organisation Save the Children UK
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution Through the THuMP project we are working with Save the Children to develop a use-case for our Explainable AI system and associated research issues. So far, we have held a workshop within Save the Children to explain what AI is, and how it may be applied to different functions within the organisation. This allows the cross-departmental Save the Children to consider potential applications of AI, the value of AI etc; for its further and potential application with Save the Children. A member of our team has also attended a workshop regarding one potential application to provide feedback to the Save the Children team on this proposed application area.
Collaborator Contribution Save the Children have provided us access to different personnel within the organisation with whom we are able to discuss issues related to our research. ~This is in particular to develop a mutually beneficial use-case, which from a project perspective will help us develop our prototype.
Impact Report on Use-Cases- which is an internal report detailing key use-cases that have emerged as part of the discussion with Save the Children.
Start Year 2018
 
Description Collaboration with Schlumberger 
Organisation Schlumberger Limited
Department Schlumberger Cambridge Research
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution As a team we have been working closely with Schlumberger to consider an oil-welling use-case which they are interested in, in relation to the application of Explainable AI. We have held two workshops with key personnel in relation to the development of this use-case and related issues. We hope to show how explainable AI can be usefully integrated within this use-case, and what issues may emerge in relation to this.
Collaborator Contribution Schlumberger have provided much information about a potential use-case, and spent time discussing this with the team- this is mutually beneficial as it allows us to explore key research issues in relation to our project themes. We will soon be interviewing personnel and will potentially have access to various resources to help us in our research endeavour.
Impact There are no formal or tangible outcomes yet. We have continue to develop our relationship with Schlumberger through meetings etc; and this will eventually result in tangible outputs in the form of reports and also developments to our technical project developments.
Start Year 2018
 
Title PlanVerb: Domain-Independent Verbalization and Summary of Task Plans 
Description Software related to the paper "Canal, G., Krivic, S., Luff, P., & Coles, A. (2022, June). PlanVerb: Domain-Independent Verbalization and Summary of Task Plans. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 36, No. 9, pp. 9698-9706)." The software narrates task plans obtained from an annotated PDDL or RDDL domain utilising the method described in the paper. 
Type Of Technology Software 
Year Produced 2022 
Open Source License? Yes  
Impact The software has been recently released, so it is still early to measure its impact. So far, the paper and the software have received some attention from other researchers. 
URL https://github.com/gerardcanal/task_plan_verbalization
 
Description 'Collaboration and interaction: Opportunities and challenges of interdisciplinary research in technological design and development' Keynote 'Digitalizing Social Practices: Changes and Consequences" University of Southern Denmark, 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This talk was to discuss the challenges of collaborative research between social scientists, computer scientists and participants from industry. The practitioners mainly addressed issues related to consumer behaviour and retail. But the conference also discussed social practices in businesses, institutions and organizations that are being digitalized. Examples included buying and selling, medical consultations, financial advising and business meetings, In the discussion the questions concerned whether and how to adapt research approach to make it appropriate for practitioners in these domains.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://www.conferencemanager.dk/resemina
 
Description A Provenance Tutorial, at ODSC conference 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This was a Provenance Tutorial delivered at the Open Data Science Conference in November 2019, London. While the live talk was attended by 50 participants in the room, the video recording was made available to the thousands of participants/
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8noJFOYFEk
 
Description AI & the Rule of Law: Regulation & Ethics 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact We are looking for high quality and focused contributions that consider the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the rule of law, both in terms of the regulatory and ethical implications. Whether based on doctrinal analysis, or empirical research, papers should offer an original perspective on the implications posed by AI to the rule of law here or internationally.

Topics of particular interest in include:
• Accountability and transparency in AI systems
• Automated decision making and privacy rights
• Data ethics and innovation
• Surveillance and data privacy
• Online harms and the regulation of social media
• Predictive policing
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://infolawcentre.blogs.sas.ac.uk/programme-ilpc-annual-lecture-conference-2020/
 
Description AI Planning for Robotics with ROSPlan. Tutorial given by Daniele Magazzeni (with Michael Cashmore) at ICAPS 2019. Berkeley, US. 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact ROSPlan tutorial was given to 40 participants, professionals from industry, researchers and academics. They had opportunity to learn about ROSPlan, AI Planning and Explainable AI Planning which were novel topics for some of them. Participant have shown interest in presented topics, asked many questions and triggered some discussions.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://icaps19.icaps-conference.org/tutorials
 
Description Artificial Intelligence in Society - KCL Impact Acceleration Network Event. Daniele Magazzeni chaired a panel on "Moving research towards real world impact in AI space". London, UK. 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact A panel aiming to help academics to user their research for real impact. Very lively discussion after the panel and very good feedback received.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://www.kcl.ac.uk/events/artificial-intelligence-in-society-kcl-impact-acceleration-network-even...
 
Description Collaboration and Interaction: Opportunities and Challenges of Interdisciplinary Research in Technological Design and Development 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact The conference aimed at bringing together researchers working with digitalization in all kinds of environments to share their research, the conference sought to at pave the way for new insights and approaches to digitalization. The interest in interdisciplinary dialogue sprang from a research project on the digitalization of buying and selling interaction, funded by the Velux Foundations.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://www.conferencemanager.dk/resemina
 
Description Data for Policy 2020 paper, presentation & panel 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact The Data for Policy conference series is the premier global forum for multiple disciplinary and cross-sector discussions around the theories, applications and implications of data science innovation in governance and the public sector. In partnership with Cambridge University Press, the conference series has also entered into a new open-access peer-reviewed journal venture, Data & Policy, in order to capture and archive scholarly discussions in this fast-growing field.

Paper submitted: https://zenodo.org/record/4026603#.YDTTGej7SF4
Presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpP-3jjElb4
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://zenodo.org/record/4026603#.YDTTGej7SF4
 
Description Expert workshop on 6 May 2021 in partnership with the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL). 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The workshop was successful in the following objectives:

Gathering a range of views from practitioners and researchers on the experience of AI/ADM contestation in legal practice.

Raising the question of effective public agency in public interest contestation of AI/ADM.

Shedding light on the dispersed, formative processes of law-based governance of AI/ADM.

Focussing on sectoral differences in law-based governance of AI/ADM.

There was a warm response to the workshop and over 40 participants on the day. This second workshop (continuing the series from a Feburary 2021 panel event reported last year) opened with a conversation between two prominent commentators in the field (Prof. Frank Pasquale & Swee Leng Harris). Its focus was five sector group discussions, covering: Constitution; Criminal Justice; Health; Education; and Finance. Each group was led by a research collaborator and included participants from activist, practitioner and other backgrounds as well as from within academia. See the Publications section for a rapid summary of the event and the eventual journal paper resulting from the event.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Explainable AI Planning: Overview and the Case of Contrastive Explanations. Invited talk by Daniele Magazzeni at International Joint Conference on Rules and Reasoning (RuleML-19). Bozen, Italy. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact This talk was given in the PhD School organised as a part of the conference. Around 40 PhD students attended the lecture with many questions and high interest. There have been several follow-ups from students interested in studying more Explainable AI Planning.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://rulemlrr19.inf.unibz.it/
 
Description Explainable AI as a Service. Invited talk by Daniele Magazzeni at EY. London, UK. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact Around 50 senior EY employees attended the talk. Great opportunity to connect King's College London with EY, and for receiving the feedback from industry on our academic research.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Explanations on the Web: A Provenance-based Approach. Keynote at WEBIST 2020 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Keynote at the WebIST conference. Due to the pandemic, the event was held virtually.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://vimeo.com/478043709
 
Description Explanations on the Web: a Provenance-based Approach, Expert Seminar Series, University of Warwick 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The Cyber Security GRP hosts seminars throughout the academic year, open to all University staff. Presenters include high-profile external speakers and internal staff. Each event is focused on a topic of their choice related to their current research interests, followed by a Q&A.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://warwick.ac.uk/research/priorities/cyber-security/seminarseries/
 
Description ICAPS XAIP workshop 2021 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Attendance and talk in the XAIP workshop during ICAPS 2021.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL http://xaip.mybluemix.net/#/program
 
Description IEEE Vis 2020 Visualization Psychology Workshop 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Before 2010, each VIS conference typically featured 0-2 papers on empirical studies. The VisWeek 2010 in Salt Lake City became a turning point, and since then more and more empirical study papers have been presented at VIS. Between 2016 and 2019, there were some 60 empirical study papers in VIS/TVCG tracks. Many young talents who are knowledgeable in both VIS and psychology emerged in the VIS community, while many colleagues in psychology are authoring and co-authoring such papers and attending VIS conferences. It is therefore timely to ask: Is there a need for "Visualization Psychology" as a new interdisciplinary subject? Led by young researchers in both VIS and psychology, this proposed workshop will complement BELIV and VISxVISION by (i) identifying a broad range of visualization phenomena that cannot be adequately explained by existing theories and experiments in VIS and psychology; (ii) Exploring the research questions beyond the scope of visual perception and reaching out to more research findings in psychology in many areas of cognition; and (iii) Enabling visualization and visual analytics to become a rich playground for making fundamental discoveries in psychology and cognitive science in general.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.13200
 
Description International Workshop on Explainable AI (XAI-19) at IJCAI. Workshop organised by Dan Magazzeni, together with Tim Miller and Rosina Weber. Macau, China 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact Around 60 academics attended the workshop where were presented more than 20 papers in the topic of Explainable AI. Participants presented their novel ideas and preliminary results. The workshop included fruitful discussions among researchers who attended the workshop, as well as conversations on potential collaborations.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://sites.google.com/view/xai2019/home
 
Description International Workshop on Explainable AI Planning (XAIP-19). Workshop organised by Dan Magazzeni, together with Tathagata Chakraborti, Dustin Dannenhauer and Joerg Hoffmann. Berkeley, US 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact The workshop attended around 60 PhD students, academics and researches who work on Explainable AI Planning. The workshop included 21 talks of participants followed with plenty of questions and discussions which continued also at the poster session. This resulted in exchange of ideas of the researchers in the field and useful feedback.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019,2020
URL https://kcl-planning.github.io/XAIP-Workshops/ICAPS_2019
 
Description Invited talk by Senka Krivic on Explainable AI at Twitter "London Machine Learning Seminar". 30 March 2019. London. UK 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Around 25 researches and engineers, mostly experts on machine learning and AI, of Twitter attended the talk in person or remotely which was part of their biweekly London Machine Learning Seminar. The talk triggered many questions and fruitful discussion on Explainable AI, AI planning and GDPR.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Invited talk on Explainabilty by design 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact Some 120 people attended the talk on Explainabilty by Design. During the session questions pertained to (1) provenance and knowledge representation (2) the applicability of the methodology to machine learning (3) the evaluation of the methodology, the size of the explanations and associated cost with designing them. After the session, further interest was expressed by representatives from various sectors: finance, autonomotive, and law enforcement. There was also interest about potential executive education.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://odsc.com/blog/explainability-by-design-a-methodology-to-support-explanations-in-decision-mak...
 
Description KeyNote: 'Ecologies of Action'. Halfway to the Future Symposium, Nottingham, November 2019, Keynote 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Invited Keynote to 200 people reviewed research relating naturalistic studies undertaken over the past 20 years to the development and conceptions of technology. This was to a mixture of academics and researchers engaged in HCI, Design and related fields. Responses on twitter (#httf2019) etc. report on how participants were inspired to see that very fine details of human interaction are important for our understanding of the design and use of technology.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://www.halfwaytothefuture.org/2019/
 
Description Legal workstream panel event with BIICL: Contesting AI Explanations in the UK 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact This event is co-organised by BIICL and The Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London.
Chair
Professor Julia Black, British Academy and London School of Economics and Political Science

Speakers
Perry Keller, Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College
Lilian Edwards, Newcastle School of Law
Jack Maxwell, Public Law Project
Ravi Naik, AWO
Rosa Curling, Foxglove
Conor McCarthy, Monckton
Robin Allen, Cloisters
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://www.biicl.org/events/11467/contesting-ai-explanations-in-the-uk
 
Description Model Based Explainable AI for Safe and Trusted Human-AI Teaming.Invited talk by Daniele Magazzeni at IEEE-RAS Spring School on "Social and Artificial Intelligence for User-Friendly Robots". Tokyo, Japan. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact Around 50 PhD students attended this lecture, with may questions and great interest. Discussions continued during the school with a number of follow up projects started after the school and originated from this talk.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://inic8.bitbucket.io/SoAIR19/
 
Description Model-Based Reasoning for Explainable AI as a Service. Keynote by Daniele Magazzeni at International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR-19). Otzenhausen, Germany. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Invited Keynote to 100 people which were participants of The International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR) which theme was Explainable AI. The talk triggered discussion among the CBR community, academics and researchers working on Case-Based Reasoning and related AI topics.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://iccbr2019.com/
 
Description Planning and Situating Actions: challenges for assessing autonomous systems Invited Talk: 2nd Naver Labs Europe International Conference on AI and Robotics . Naver Labs Europe, Grenoble 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact This talk was to discuss the challenges of assessing autonomous systems. It drew on previous and current research relating to AI and robotics (including that in THuMP and TAS). The audience was a mixture of international researchers mostly in industrial research laboratories. The talk and associated panel initiated discussion about the different outcomes of different kinds of research and the challenges involved in collaboration between engineers and computer scientists on the one hand and social scientists on the other. One outcome was a request by the organisers, Naver Labs Europe to become an international partner of TAS.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://europe.naverlabs.com/research/2nd-ai-for-robotics-international-workshop-by-naver-labs-europ...
 
Description Planning and Situating Actions: challenges for explanation and trustworthiness in autonomous systems Invited Talk: CHI Workshop 14: "Towards Explainable and Trustworthy Autonomous Physical Systems (ETAPS)" (Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems CHI 2021) Yokoyama, Japan. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact This talk was to discuss the challenges of assessing autonomous systems. It drew on previous and current research relating to AI and robotics (including that in THuMP and TAS). The audience was a mixture of international researchers both in academic and research laboratories, most of whom were researching into autonomous vehicles. The talk initiated discussion about the different outcomes of different kinds of research and the challenges of engaging engineers and computer scientists with qualitative social scientists.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://etapsworkshop.github.io/
 
Description Provenance: a fundamental data governance tool. A case study for data science pipelines and their explanations, a keynote 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The Open Data Science Conference is a major event for the data science community
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://odsc.com/
 
Description Robotics for Humanity: panel discussion 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The theme Robotics for Humanity is the umbrella theme for the Central Event overall. We know that negative stereotypes very often get a lot of attention in the public media. But our panel and many listening and watching will know how robotics can help make the world a better place, how robots can help to address some of our big global challenges. Our task now is to share some of those positive stories.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://www.eu-robotics.net/robotics_week/newsroom/press/robotics-for-humanity-panel-discussion.html...
 
Description SDTaP (PETRAS, Innovate UK and EPSRC ) Networking Lunch and Global State of IoT Governance Workshop - Tuesday 11 February 2020 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact LIghtning talk delivered by Luc Moreau
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Safe, Trusted and Explainable AI. Invited talk by Daniele Magazzeni at AI Week Middle East. Dubai, UAE. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact Around 200 people, mainly from industry and governments but also from universities, attended the talk. Great opportunity for disseminating UK research in the UAE. Many conversations and opportunities for joint projects originated from this event.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://www.aiia.net/events-aiweek/about-aiweekme
 
Description The Role of Interaction in Trust in Human-Machine Partnerships 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Artificial Intelligence (AI) and other computational processes continue to influence decisions
across a wide range of applications including healthcare decisions, vehicle navigation, data
science, and others. This Dagstuhl seminar reflected on some of the challenges inherent in the
goal of increasing the interpretability of these systems, and when applicable, increase the trust
people put into them to make decisions. The seminar participants discussed the complexity
of trust itself, and how the concept is multi-faceted, and likely outside of researchers in
technology and computer science to fully define. We discussed an inter-disciplinary research
agenda, as well as a manifesto that should help frame this direction going forward.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2021/13736/pdf/dagrep_v010_i004_p037_20382.pdf
 
Description Trust in Human-AI Partnerships. Invited talk by Daniele Magazzeni at Ericsson. Stockholm, Sweden. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact Around 40 people attended the talk. Great opportunity to connect King's College London with Ericsson and for receiving a feedback from industry on our research.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description WebSci'20 Workshop: Explanations for AI: Computable or Not?, 2020 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact This workshop (hosted by the WebSci'20 conference) will focus on socially-sensitive decisions made or assisted by AI systems which often involve more complex (e.g. machine learning) and opaque forms (also referred to as black-box algorithms) of underlying decision-making processes. The aim is to stimulate a lively debate on whether explanations for AI are computable or not by bringing together researchers, practitioners and representatives of AI (or AI-assisted) decision-making systems.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://git.soton.ac.uk/nt1n16/exAI2020
 
Description explAIn workshop 2021 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Talk at the explAIn workshop (https://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~afr114/explainAI21/index.html) to present some of the ongoing work in the project.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~afr114/explainAI21/index.html