Inefficient Capital Markets and the Macroeconomy
Lead Research Organisation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Department Name: Financial Markets Group
Abstract
The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) has impacted profoundly academic research, financial regulation and market practice. For example, (i) many macroeconomic models incorporate implications of EMH such as the Expectations Hypothesis and the Uncovered Interest Parity, (ii) regulators evaluate the solvency of many types of financial institutions based on the market value of their assets, and (iii) large pools of money track passively market indices, while active managers are evaluated based on such indices and are often constrained in their deviations from them. A large empirical literature documents, however, that asset prices deviate substantially from their EMH-implied fundamental values. Mispricing and its implications can be usefully studied within the "Limits of Arbitrage" (LoA) paradigm, which posits that agents differ in their expertise to access financial markets, and contracting frictions limit the capital of non-experts that experts can manage. The proposed research will strengthen the LoA paradigm and use it to determine how implications for EMH for asset management, financial regulation and macroeconomics should be modified in inefficient markets. We will put the LoA paradigm on firm foundations by deriving the constraints faced by experts based on endogenous contracting frictions. This will also allow us to determine whether privately optimal contracts render investment horizons sufficiently long and markets sufficiently stable. We will explore three areas of application. One is to derive a taxonomy of investment strategies in inefficient markets and determine how optimal strategies differ across long- and short-horizon investors. Another is to characterize how mispricing affects real investment, and whether short horizons by arbitrageurs spill over to those of corporate managers. A third is to embed the model into a New Keynesian open-economy setting and examine how LoA in bond and currency markets affect the transmission of shocks and policy actions.
People |
ORCID iD |
| Dimitri Vayanos (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Jiang H
(2023)
Passive Investing and the Rise of Mega-Firms
Polk C
(2023)
Long-Horizon Investing in a Non-CAPM World
| Description | A paper that performs the theoretical and empirical analysis described under Project 2 of the award has been written and is currently revise-and-resubmit at the Journal of Finance. The key finding from that paper is that optimal investment strategies depend significantly on investor horizon, with short-horizon investors giving larger weight to momentum-type strategies which chase price trends, and long-horizon investors giving larger weight to value-type strategies which compare asset prices to company fundamentals. This result was conjectured in the research proposal. The paper provides theoretical and empirical backing for it. A paper that performs the theoretical analysis described under Project 1 of the award will be ready within the next six months. Key challenges in setting up the contracting problem have been solved and results have been derived. A key finding is that repeated interaction between an investor and an asset manager allows the investor to evaluate the manager's performance with a longer-horizon perspective and not to deprive the manager of funds when the manager underperforms in the short-term. This renders markets more efficient. An additional paper that builds on project 1 has been written and is currently under revise-and-resubmit from the Review of Financial Studies. That paper examines the impact of passive investing on asset prices. The key findings are that passive investing benefits disproportionately the largest firms in the economy, and biases the aggregate market towards overvaluation. |
| Exploitation Route | The natural constituency for the key findings of the paper in Project 2 are long-horizon investors such as pension funds and sovereign-wealth funds, which invest social savings. These investors often invest through asset management firms, which follow strategies such as value and momentum, and evaluate the performance of these strategies using returns over short horizons. Our analysis indicates that these calculations are misleading, and provides guidance for the strategies that long-horizon investors should instruct their managers to follow so that social savings are better invested. A private firm is developing an AI-based diagnostic tool for assessing whether long-horizon investors are following value- or momentum-type strategies, with a view to facilitating the adoption of the main findings of our paper by these investors. We are in communication with that firm and with a number of pension funds. The key findings of the first paper pertaining to Project 1 are of interest to long-horizon investors such as pension funds and sovereign-wealth funds, as the paper provides guidance to them for how to write better contracts with their asset managers. The key findings of the second paper pertaining to Project 1 are financial regulators, tasked with evaluating the implications of the rise of passive investing, and financial-market participants. |
| Sectors | Financial Services and Management Consultancy Government Democracy and Justice |
| Description | A private firm is developing an AI-based diagnostic tool for assessing whether long-horizon investors are following value- or momentum-type strategies, with a view to facilitating the adoption of the main findings of the paper described under Project 2 by these investors. We are in communication with that firm and with a number of pension funds. The main findings of the second paper described under Project 1 have attracted large media attention, with write-ups in The Economist, The Wall Street Journal and Washington Post, and invitations to popular podcasts. They have also been mentioned extensively in a summary paper commissioned by the FCA on the impacts of passive investing. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2024 |
| Sector | Financial Services, and Management Consultancy,Government, Democracy and Justice |
| Impact Types | Economic Policy & public services |
| Description | Keynote address at a conference on asset management and pension systems |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | I presented my research and its policy implications to an audience of policy makers and professional practitioners in Santiago, Chile. Chile has a large industry managing pension contributions. My research has implications on long-term investment and market efficiency, which the audience was interested in. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |