Knowing about health care rationing

Lead Research Organisation: University of Bristol
Department Name: Social Medicine

Abstract

Abstracts are not currently available in GtR for all funded research. This is normally because the abstract was not required at the time of proposal submission, but may be because it included sensitive information such as personal details.
 
Description This was a 1 year post doctoral bridging fellowship principally aimed at writing publications from my PhD.
The publications reported on the following key findings from my PhD:
- Although clinicians want to be open about healthcare rationing, they meet a number of barriers to achieving this in practice
- Patients largely support a more open approach to be taken to rationing, although this is not universal and participants identified a number of downsides to explicitness
- When faced with a rationing decision, patients have a choice whether to accept it, contest it, or pay for private care. There are a number of internal and external factors that impact on this choice.
Exploitation Route The publications contribute substantially to our understanding of the healthcare rationing debate, particularly when it comes to the desirability of explicitness in decision-making. The papers report on what to our knowledge is the first study of patients' views on the desirability of being open about healthcare rationing.
Sectors Healthcare

 
Description To provide a bridge into my NIHR three year postdoctoral fellowship which further investigates healthcare rationing at the consultation level through the integration of observational techniques
First Year Of Impact 2011
Sector Healthcare
Impact Types Societal,Policy & public services