Rethinking learning disability: contexts, voices, policies

Lead Research Organisation: University of Dundee
Department Name: Education, Social Work & Community Educ

Abstract

Like many areas of publicly funded services, the provision of health and social services for adults with learning disabilities has been subjected to considerable pressure and change in recent years. This has been a result of various factors. Firstly, 'positive' factors, such as the recognition of the rights of people with learning disabilities and changes in policy and service philosophies towards more 'self-directed' models. Secondly, the increasing pressures being placed on services: ageing populations, reduced resources, and competing priorities has led to changing thresholds of qualification for services, often removing people with mild and moderate levels of learning disability from service entitlement altogether. However, given that the very idea of 'learning disability' implies additional support needs, the removal of services for people currently considered 'learning disabled' throws into question its very meaning.

Even the shift towards 'rights-based' thinking has cast questions over the nature of learning disability, indeed there is a looming question as to whether or not it even has a 'nature'. For instance, the suggestion that people with learning disabilities are 'the same as you' (to quote Scottish government policy), with the same rights and needs, casts an unexplored shadow over whether and in what circumstances learning disability can be said to exist and what it would mean.

Conceptually, the field of 'learning disability' is heavily dominated by medicine and psychology, often with a preponderance of empiricism in research. That said, it is well established that learning disability is not an immutable characteristic of individuals. However, the extent to which, as a social status, it is shaped by specific historical, cultural and socio-spatial circumstances is relatively under-explored. In particular, there is insufficient work that helps to connect the work of social science researchers with policy-makers and practitioners. This series of developmental critical dialogues will provide space for the development of new lines of thought that allow for the introduction of greater socio-spatial, cultural and historical dimensions to enrich the field.

Seminar 1: Intersections in time and space: new academic dialogues
The first seminar will bring together historians, geographers, sociologists and philosophers, into dialogue with medics and psychologists, to develop and reflect upon a contextually-sensitive understanding of 'learning disability'.
Seminar 2: The same as you?: voices of experience and encounter
The second seminar is perhaps the most challenging, but also the most crucial. The seminar will provide an open space for the voices of people with learning disabilities, and those who care for and support them, to examine and critique the contextually-sensitive model of learning disability developed in seminar 1. Appropriate formats will be used to encourage accessibility and representation for all participants, including drama and illustration to capture findings.
Seminar 3: Towards a contextually-sensitive landscape of care: new policy dialogues
The final seminar will bring together materials gathered in the previous seminars, seeking responses from learning disability policy makers in central government, government agencies, and third sector. New paths for policy shaped by a contextual model of learning disability will be examined.

Planned Impact

The key purpose of the seminar series is to produce a new conceptual framework that will impact on three interrelated groups beyond academia: people with learning disabilities, their carers and families; service providers and social care professionals; and policy makers (including national and local government, and the third sector).

An evidence base dominated by essentialist approaches and, by implication, professional and planning practices derived therefrom, are inadequate for dealing with future challenges to service provision. The development of a 'contextual model' of learning disability, and dialogue with service providers, service users, and policy makers thereon, will assist them directly in responding to key economic and demographic challenges.

The seminars will not provide policy makers, service providers, or users with blueprints for the future of service provision, it is beyond our scope and purview to do so. What the series will do, however, is to help put that service planning process and the negotiations amongst those directly involved (policy makers, professionals, service users and carers) on a more rational and constructive footing. This will encourage more creative and innovative thinking in response to future challenges.

At present, concepts of learning disability locate it as a 'condition' within individuals, rather than a social status that is the outcome of highly contingent and contextual factors. Such notions of learning disability, and service ideologies, also fail to recognise its extremely historically, culturally and spatially mutable nature. Introducing these elements, in the form of the contextual model, allows for a greater recognition that future possibilities for service provision are more open and flexible than we might currently suppose. We will help policy makers, service providers, and users to think of different possible futures.

The seminar series will take place (2012-2013) in a period of sustained change in policy and financial frameworks in social care in the UK. The seminars will be extremely well placed to engage with the key actors and organisations in informing and shaping this new social care landscape to make it more suitable, responsive and effective for the needs of people with learning disabilities, their families and carers.

The seminars will also provide an innovative forum for dialogue between people with learning disabilities, their families, service providers and policy-makers. The contextual model and the use of creative methods to stimulate discussion, particularly in seminar two, will help facilitate these new dialogues.

In addition, the series will have a number of other important impacts:

-Dialogues: Direct involvement of non-academic participants in the seminars, to co-produce with academic participants, a 'contextual model' of learning disability. Overall, the series will establish a new forum for dialogue and new networks between the various parties.
-Blogging and social networking: Extension of the dialogues into the blogosphere and the use of social networking, to engage people with learning disabilities, professionals and service providers (use of separate virtual spaces for the different groups).
-Consultation and training: Potential end-users of the research can commission the project team to facilitate staff training and help with policy development drawing on the contextual model.
-Research futures: New more productive cross-disciplinary research links and opportunities, relevant to policy makers, service providers and people with learning disabilities.
 
Title Rethinking Learning Disability 
Description 'Rethinking Learning Disability', reports on the whole seminar series, but particularly uses extracted segments from video-recordings of the presenters in Seminar 3. The video was professionally produced by 'Sync-or-Swim Productions', associated with the University of Glasgow. A voice-over was provided by Johnnie Crossan, postgraduate student at the University of Glasgow. The video is available on the 'Wordpress site' rethinkinglearningdisability.net, linked to Seminar 3. The research team is exploring the possibility of creating DVDs of the video to send to key personnel in Scottish learning disability policy and practice. The anticipation is that the primary users will be: academics in the field of learning disability research and education; policy-makers in the Scottish (and perhaps wider) learning disability field; professionals and practitioners in the field; third sector and campaigning organisations in the field; and possibly people with learning disabilities and their families/guardians/advocates (especially for Seminar 2). 
Type Of Art Film/Video/Animation 
Year Produced 2014 
 
Description The seminars highlighted both the potential and eagerness of participants from all sectors to come together in a meaningful and productive engagement. The three team members, as well as seminar participants, have continued to research and publish work that explores contemporary meanings of learning disability and the social position of people with learning disabilities.
Exploitation Route Summaries, videos and audio recordings of the seminars are available on the project website. These are available to other researchers for use with acknowledgement. Several of the participants are already drawing explicitly on the dialogues in their own research and publications.
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy,Healthcare,Leisure Activities, including Sports, Recreation and Tourism,Government, Democracy and Justice

URL https://rethinkinglearningdisabilitydotcom.wordpress.com
 
Description Recent policy developments in Scotland (Keys to Life, 2013) have placed a strong emphasis on public health issues and the significantly lower life expectations of people with learning disability. The Scottish Observatory for Learning Disability was also initially established with an essentially 'health' focus, albeit broadly defined. Although serving as an important counter-point to the much more social and rights-based approach of the earlier Same as You? (2000), the findings of Rethinking Learning Disability stress the importance of not losing sight of wider issues. This was further reflected in concerns and issues generated in seminar two, by people with learning disabilities themselves, highlighting the importance of capturing people's lived experiences and the relevance for policy development. The impact of this finding was already becoming clear in the concluding seminar. This included the participation of the primary civil servant behind the drafting of Keys to Life, the civil servant who will be taking forward the new policy programme, as well as Professor Anna Cooper, director of SOLD. At this event, a virtual dialogue was established with the findings of the first two seminars, and a new dialogue about taking forward key messages and findings - particularly around localisation and contextualisation - into policy and practice. Professor Philo is now an Advisory Board Member of the Scottish Observatory for Learning Disability - directed by Professor Anna Cooper, a presenter at seminar three. This presence means that the 'contextual approach' to learning disability, central to the project, will be fed into the work of SOLD. A further important, though unplanned, area of impact lay in the co-production methods involved, particularly in seminar two with Inform Theatre. This built an important and empowering bridge between the actors and the Universities. Dr Hall has continued his involvement with the group, using the approaches of the seminar series in a project on hate crime. Seminar two also produced benefits for the participants of Garvald Edinburgh, with Dr Hall had pre-existing contacts. Such links, especially involving bringing people with learning disabilities into the university, can bring important benefits in themselves, in terms of promoting social inclusion. In addition, the increasing use of co-productive approaches to research ensure that research agendas are consistent with the lives and aspirations of people with learning disabilities, and the process and findings also lead to tangible and meaningful improvements in the lives of individuals, families and communities. For the Rethinking Learning Disability seminar series, therefore, there was no clear distinction to be made between the generation of research findings, knowledge exchange and impact. Although the balance shifted as the series progressed, all three seminars involved aspects of all three elements. Whilst the impact of seminar one was principally academic - creating new partnerships and ideas, and the existence of the discussions as teaching resources on the project website - even here project impact was already being established.
First Year Of Impact 2014
Sector Communities and Social Services/Policy,Education,Healthcare
Impact Types Cultural,Societal,Policy & public services

 
Description Disability hate crime 
Organisation Inform Theatre
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution Dr Hall has continued the research partnership established with Inform Theatre Group for the Seminar Series in another project on disability hate crime.
Collaborator Contribution In conjunction with Dr Hall, Inform will work on the development of materials and performances designed to show the experience of hate crime as experienced by people with learning disabilities.
Impact The collaboration is ongoing at this point.
Start Year 2014
 
Description Young people with cognitive disability: relationships and support 
Organisation Southern Cross University
Country Australia 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Dr Hall has been using the model of the Rethinking Learning Disability series for a project in Australia. Dr Hall has brought his knowledge and experience of the Scottish context to that of the Australian. The principal contribution arising from the ESRC series was the partnership with service user groups in facilitating discussion through drama.
Collaborator Contribution The Australian universities are the direct hosts of the research, which is an Australian Research Council Linkage Project. They have employed researchers, organised participation and engagement, handled ethical approval and suchlike.
Impact Not yet at dissemination phase.
Start Year 2017
 
Description Young people with cognitive disability: relationships and support 
Organisation University of New South Wales
Country Australia 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Dr Hall has been using the model of the Rethinking Learning Disability series for a project in Australia. Dr Hall has brought his knowledge and experience of the Scottish context to that of the Australian. The principal contribution arising from the ESRC series was the partnership with service user groups in facilitating discussion through drama.
Collaborator Contribution The Australian universities are the direct hosts of the research, which is an Australian Research Council Linkage Project. They have employed researchers, organised participation and engagement, handled ethical approval and suchlike.
Impact Not yet at dissemination phase.
Start Year 2017
 
Description Membership of Advisory Board for Scottish Observatory for Learning Disabilities 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? Yes
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact These are estimated and projected figures. In time, the work of the Observatory will certainly reach directly or indirectly practitioners, managers and policy-makers in the field of learning disability throughout Scotland.

Professor Philo's presence on the Advisory Board has helped widen the focus of SOLD beyond just public health and medicine.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014