The Performance of Manufacturing: The UK in Comparison with Europe

Lead Research Organisation: University of Leeds
Department Name: Leeds University Business School (LUBS)

Abstract

There are two scientific goals of the fellow's project; first, it will overcome the problems associated with a single-country perspective, predominantly found in the existing literature on technological and non-technological innovation in manufacturing industry. Most studies analyse innovation in depth only for single countries, which contradicts the multinational focus of many firms. One aim of the fellow will therefore to be to produce outcomes that consequently take a cross-country perspective and to achieve this by building a community and establishing permanent co-operation between researchers from different countries. The project therefore aims to foster exchange in order to develop this common framework for empirical analysis of process and organizational innovation. This exchange should lead to more scientific publications by the partners involved and to a stronger visibility of the topic in the European political discourse. In addition to traditional peer reviewed publications the fellow will aim to regularly publish policy-oriented papers and contribute to the ISI papers series as well as in the working paper series of the partners.

A second scientific goal of the fellow will be to advance research on process and organizational innovation within manufacturing through the development of a common research agenda among the participants. The building blocks for such an agenda include:

Determinants: What factors determine firms to introduce various process and organizational innovations? How do these this decisions vary with size, sector, country, or with the characteristics of the production process?

Complementarity: How do processes and organizational innovations relate to product innovation? Do firms with a considerable level of process and organizational innovation also introduce more new products? Do they introduce more radical innovations, or introduce more services that complement their physical products?

Outcomes: How do different economics outcomes (e. g. productivity or employment growth) relate to different implementation strategies of process and organizational innovations? What is, for example, the impact of international outsourcing of firm employment growth? Is this different in different countries?

Planned Impact

This research will be novel in that it will have a study focus on both the importance and contribution of advanced manufacturing innovation to both the recovery as well as the rebalancing of the economy. It will investigate high capability and cutting edge management and leadership practice in leading manufacturing firms across Europe (including the UK, Germany, Spain and Austria).

There is a unique interdisciplinary focus to the fellowship as it aims to bring together world leading academic mentors from technology and innovation, leadership and supply chains, with cutting edge engineering and manufacturing industrial firms, many of whom are world leaders in engineering innovation.

It is anticipated that the research investigation will have a major policy impact on UK and European Industrial and Innovation Policy including the following issues:

1.Manufacturing of R & D offshoring activities and related opportunities and risks.
2.Technical and organizational process issues.
3.Supply chain design.
4.Value adding process improvement.
5.Leadership and strategy development.
6.Shifting modes of production.
7.Future of the European technological base.
8.Trainings and education provision.
9.Mapping of capabilities and competencies.
10.Social and flexible network design.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description We joined the consortium of the European Manufacturing survey (EMS) and created the basis for collaborations. We are representing UK in EMS and helped foster co-operation between members in empirical, firm-level research on technological and non-technological process and organizational innovation.The grant enabled cooperation and learning from EMS members. The grant enabled us to explore and investigate the practical ways to collect data from the manufacturing firms. Some insights with regard to organizational innovation and their impact on technological innovation were emerged.
Exploitation Route The first step to move forward would be a top institution, such as BIS who is committed to do the UK innovation survey (UKIS), to set itself a goal to consolidate the data collection exercise. They should ask for input in designing a comprehensive survey (complementing what they have in UKIS), so the survey combines the different existing one ( most of them overlap) and make the data available to all public research intuitions and leave the competition for the parts of asking the right questions, forming the right collaborations and the institutions ability to read through the data and perform rigour analysis.
This way the money and effort would be saved and the firms may welcome the idea of filling out a lengthy survey if they know this would be the only one.
Once the right data is provided we are confident that each institute could contribute to the better understanding of the innovation landscape in the manufacturing sector and for us in particular due to the established relationship we can take this understanding further by doing a cross country comparisons and seeing how UK compares against other European nations, and with a longitude data, in future we can see if coming out of EU would have helped or hurt the manufacturing sector and the complex collaborations across the borders.
Sectors Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Government, Democracy and Justice,Manufacturing, including Industrial Biotechology,Other

 
Description Seedcorn Funding
Amount £1,500 (GBP)
Organisation University of Leeds 
Department School of Business
Sector Academic/University
Country United Kingdom
Start 06/2013 
End 07/2014
 
Title innovation in manufacturing 
Description Data on different aspects of manufacturing from the sector with 20+ employees (sample of 40) 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Provided To Others? No  
Impact Better understanding the position of UK manufacturing sector, it will enable us to do cross country comparisions 
 
Description EMS 
Organisation Fraunhofer Society
Department Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research
Country Germany 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution This grant has enabled us to join the EMS consortium of institutes and universities in 14 European countries and 3 BRICS (major emerging national economies). We in collaboration with those institutes designed a core questionnaire to capture innovation activities of all kinds (process, product, organization) in the manufacturing sector. We act as the UK arm and sent this survey out in UK in 2012 and collected the results. Now are in the process of analysing the data.
Collaborator Contribution Our collaborators were all crucial in designing the questionnaire and each carries out the survey independently in their respective country. The core questionnaire allows for cross country studies which is done by agreement by any partner. We are working with Austria and Germany to produce a report on interaction of management innovation and technological innovations.
Impact The collaboration is multi-disciplinary, connecting the social sciences with technology (engineering and science) on the innovation front. Outcomes are under production, as most of the efforts so far has been put into setting up the data collection phase. The data collection and harmonization has been finalised and the analysis is taking place at the moment.
Start Year 2012
 
Description Industry visit 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Participants in your research and patient groups
Results and Impact Our individual face to face talks have resulted to understand better the needs of the industry and helped us craft the wordings of our questionnaire better to be understandable by the manufacturing sector.

The people have asked us to send them the results of our analysis on the manufacturing sector and a few showed interest to help us in the next rounds.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2013