From Rhetoric to Practice: Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

Lead Research Organisation: British Institute of International and Comparative Law
Department Name: Head office

Abstract

In December 2012 the 1st Annual Business and Human Rights Forum took place at the United Nations in Geneva to consider how best to implement the UN's Guiding Principles on Human Rights (UNGPs). These Principles were unanimously approved by the Human Rights Council in June 2011 after several years of work by the UN Secretary General's Special Representative on Business and Human Rights, John Ruggie. Over 1000 participants attended the Forum, representing 85 countries, including 50 State delegations, 150 companies and 180 civil society organizations, as well as other groups, illustrating the importance of the UNGPs as the current focus of the ongoing global debate about the responsibility of business actors for human rights violations. At the 2012 Forum, Ruggie himself emphasised the importance of the UNGPs, stating that they 'prescribe paths for strengthening and better aligning public governance with social compliance mechanisms and corporate governance in relation to business and human rights' and that 'they aim to generate a mutually reinforcing dynamic that produces cumulative change.' This seminar series will examine the extent to which the UNGPs can ensure business compliance with human rights standards and whether they are in fact acting as an effective catalyst for change.

The UNGPs establish three pillars: the State duty to protect human rights; the responsibility of business actors to respect human rights; and access to remedy. This ESRC Seminar Series proposes a thematic approach to the key implementation issues that emerged from the 2012 Forum and cuts across all three of the so-called 'Protect Respect Remedy' pillars. For example, during the inaugural Forum, concerns were expressed by business actors that many States are failing to uphold their human rights obligations and are seeking to scapegoat the business community for their own failures. Representatives of indigenous groups objected to the lack of specific understanding of the challenges facing indigenous communities and the failure to include indigenous rights within the UNGPs. Civil society generally complained about the lack of effective judicial and non-judicial remedies. These issues affect all business actors in all sectors whether based in the UK or elsewhere.

Building on existing national and international networks, this ESRC seminar series will bring together stakeholders from a variety of academic disciplines (law, geography, politics, international relations), the business sector (law firms, industry) and civil society (National Human Rights Institutions, Non-Governmental Organisations). Participants will contribute to the Annual UN Business and Human Rights Forum 2013 and beyond, as well as to the ongoing work of the Business and Human Rights Working Group established under the UNGPs with a view to influencing future implementation policy. UN Working Group members are keen to attend the Series events and a mechanism will be established to facilitate collaboration and cooperation between seminar participants and the UN Working Group. A series of nine one-day seminars will take place with core group of participants and 6-8 funded speakers will be invited from academia, NGOs, international and regional organisations, government, the legal profession and industry. Additional speakers may be invited at the expense of the host institution. A report from each seminar will be submitted to the UN Working Group, with a final report with recommendations being submitted at the end of the project. In addition, an edited collection of papers from seminars will be published as well as a special edition of the Journal of Conflict and Security Law. It is also hoped that the seminar series will help to establish a network of interested parties who could go on to apply for larger research grants in the area, such as the EU-funded Horizon 2020.

Planned Impact

The development of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights has led to an emerging global convergence of business and human rights standards after years of regulatory chaos and continuing human rights violations by business actors. International and regional organisations have started to incorporate the UNGPs within their own principles and policies. So, for example, they underpin the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2011, they are incorporated within the human rights chapter of the Guidance on Social Responsibility ISO 26000, and are embodied within the latest Sustainability Framework and Performance Standards of the International Finance Corporation. Furthermore, in 2011 the European Commission published a Communication on Corporate Social Responsibility which set out a new EU policy which should be 'fully consistent' with the UNGP framework.

Importantly, the UNGPs are addressed to all States and apply to all business actors irrespective of where they are operating in the world. Therefore, the UNGPs are of great global significance for governments, industry and their legal advisers, as well as civil society. It is crucial that UK business actors and their legal advisers understand their responsibilities to respect human rights under the UNGPs, both in the UK and abroad. Not only will such understanding ensure that adverse human rights impacts are avoided but adherence to internationally recognised standards will enhance the competitiveness of UK business. This seminar series will contribute to ensuring effective understanding and implementation of the UNGPs within the business community and wider society.

There is ongoing debate and disagreement about the substantive content of the UNGPs as well as a generalised concern about their effective implementation. It is, therefore, important that the academic community contribute to a better understanding and effective implementation of the UNGPs, as well as to their dissemination.

An ESRC Seminar Series which brings together stakeholders from academia, industry, civil society, government and the legal profession will make an important and timely contribution to this topic. Established networks are being utilised to create new collaborative and interdisciplinary research relationships. The structured seminar series proposed will bring together diverse experts and stakeholders working in the field which will enable an ongoing dialogue to take place and so the impact of this project will be wider than the academic community. One of the public seminars will be hosted by the leading international law organisation in the UK and is specifically targeted at industry and the legal profession. Representatives from NGOs and National Human Rights Institutions are involved throughout the project as speakers and participants.

In terms of academic impact, the project will contribute to a special edition of the Journal of Conflict and Security Law, a public website and an edited collection of seminar papers. Furthemore, it is hoped that the new networks established through the seminar series will seek funding for a bigger collaborative research project in the future.

The direct involvement of members of the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights means that the project partners have a unique opportunity to influence the implementation policy at a global level. Reports from each seminar will be submitted to the Working Group and a final project report will make recommendations for ensuring effective implementation of the UNGPs. The project partners will also submit the reports to the Annual Forum on Business and Human Rights at the UN. There will also be opportunities to engage with policy-makers from the EU and OECD. This research project and the findings generated have a high potential for informing an important ongoing debate about the role of business in society and influencing policy long term both nationally and internationally.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description This project was a seminar series on the implementation and application of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). Its aim was to deliver a series of seminars to bring together scholars, practitioners, international organisations, industry and civil society to explore key themes and issues in implementing the UNGPs.
The project achieved its aim. It delivered seminars at various partner organisations, on several topics relating to the UNGPs, including:
• Human Rights Due Diligence: From Rhetoric to Practice
• Corporate Accountability and Access to Remedies for Corporate Wrongs
• UNGPs, Post-Conflict Situations and Fragile States
• Private Security and Human Rights
• Access to Remedy in National Action Plans to Implement the UNGPs
• Improving Effectiveness of Non-Judicial Mechanisms: Reports from the Field: The Reality of Remedy at National Human Rights Institutions
These seminars were attended by academics, legal practitioners, international organisations, industry representatives, companies and civil society organisations.
In particular, Prof Michael Addo, member of the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights, was one of the co-investigators in this project. Prof Surya Deva, Chair of the UN Working Group, was keynote speaker at one of the seminars, and presented his findings on access to remedies in national action plans. This involvement of the UN Working Group ensured that the seminar series lead not only to academic output, but also to impact on the important work of the Working Group.
Moreover, the final seminar was hosted at the 2017 UN Forum on Business and Human Rights in Geneva. The UN Forum was attended by over 2500 representatives from governments, business, civil society, legal practice, and international organisations. This particular seminar was so well attended that participants sat on the floor of Room XXII in the Palais des Nations, and simultaneous translation took place in English and Spanish.
Due to the departure from the UK of the former Principal Investigator, in late 2016 the partner institutions requested the grant be transferred to the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL). BIICL finally received notification on 28 June 2017 that the transfer had taken place successfully, and confirmed its acceptance on 29 June 2017. The transfer was backdated to 1 January 2017 with the deadline for delivery remaining as the end of December 2017. An application to have this date extended was refused, which meant that BIICL was left with about 6 months to administer the remainder of the grant. As a result, the seminar which took place at the UN Forum on state-based non-judicial mechanisms, as contained in the project outline, only took place a month before the deadline, and it was not possible within this limited time frame to deliver a report on the seminar series to the UN Working Group. However, as described above, the UN Working Group was well represented during the course of this seminar series by its members attending, hosting or speaking at many of the seminars.
Exploitation Route They will be of great value to the reports of the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights as they clarify the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights for states, companies, international organisations, academics, civil society and others.
Sectors Aerospace, Defence and Marine,Agriculture, Food and Drink,Construction,Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Education,Energy,Environment,Financial Services, and Management Consultancy,Healthcare,Government, Democracy and Justice,Manufacturing, including Industrial Biotechology,Pharmaceuticals and Medical Biotechnology,Retail,Security and Diplomacy

 
Description This project was a seminar series bringing together the relevant practitioners and academics in this area. As such, the main purpose of the project was rooted in driving impact which extends beyond academia within this fast-growing field. The seminars included individual partner organisations which were all working on these issues in their various contexts, in order to share their research, and to draw out lessons and helpful findings that could be used in other contexts. The seminar series brought together audiences and attendees from legal practice, government and policymakers. Developments around implementation of the UNGPs are taking place rapidly, for example, regulation for human rights due diligence has been introduced in France, and has been proposed in Switzerland and the UK, and at EU-level. Seminar series participants have also been closely involved with developments at the UN and OECD-level. Due to this rapid development, it is easy for research to take place in silos, unless regular engagement takes place. Apart from the annual UN Forum on Business and Human Rights in Geneva, there are not many formal partnerships such as this, and these seminars brought together some of the lead researchers in the UK and elsewhere in Europe in order to share and progress their research. There has also been progress at UN level on the development of a treaty on business and human rights, with which many of the partner organisations are involved on an ongoing basis. Indeed, the topics covered by the seminar series and the key actors involved have developed significant impacts since the start of the seminar series. For example, Prof Michael Addo, who was leading at one of the partner organisations, was a member (and then chair) of the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights, and as such directly fed the work of this group into ongoing developments at UN level. Since the start of the seminar series, the UN Working Group has undertaken a significant amount of work on the topics covered in this seminar series, including on National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights, access to remedy, and human rights due diligence, for which they relied on the studies and work undertaken by the relevant series participants. Prof Sorcha MacLeod, the original Principal Investigator, is currently a member of the UN Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination. This adds a further dimension to the impact of the series as she can bring her knowledge of the work of the partner organisations to this work. Business, government and lawyers are increasingly confronted with the questions addressed by this seminar series. This series enabled partner organisation to engage directly with these wider participants at these events. For example, at the seminar on private security and human rights, legal practitioners that are advising large transnational companies on these issues were able to engage and connect with experts working in these areas. The impact of the connections made during this seminar series is dynamic and ongoing.
First Year Of Impact 2017
Sector Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software),Financial Services, and Management Consultancy,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Societal,Economic

 
Description BIICL Norton Rose Fulbright project on Human Rights Due Diligence
Amount £65,000 (GBP)
Organisation Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 
Sector Private
Country United Kingdom
Start 03/2015 
End 06/2016
 
Description Sorcha MacLeod and ICoCA 
Organisation International Code of Conduct
Country Switzerland 
Sector Charity/Non Profit 
PI Contribution Dr Sorcha MacLeod, former principal investigator, has been invited as an expert to the International Code of Conduct Association, which certifies and monitors human rights in the private security and private military sector.
Collaborator Contribution Sorcha MacLeod has been invited to be an expert to ICoCa and has assisted it with developing guidance for establishing and operating fair and accessible company grievance procedures that offer effective remedies in the private security industry.
Impact Various expert meetings and roundtables with ICoCA in formulating and implementing its Code of Conduct.
Start Year 2014
 
Description Access to Remedy in National Action Plans to Implement the UNGPs: Are States Still Taking a Nap? 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Third sector organisations
Results and Impact On 22 June 2017, the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL) hosted an event on access to remedies in National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights. The speaker was Prof Surya Deva, Chair of UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights. Despite an impressive uptake of the UNGPs by almost all stakeholders, the victims of business-related human rights abuses continue to struggle in holding corporate actors accountable. This seminar explore Surya Deva's research on why this is so, in relation to National Action Plans (NAPs) released so far by states. Surya Deva proposed certain key elements that should guide future NAPs as well as the revision of existing NAPs in improving access to effective remedy in business-related human rights abuses. The event was attended by civil society who advocate for effective remedies and policy reforms, legal practitioners working in the area, and academics, students and other interested stakeholders.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://www.biicl.org/event/1269
 
Description Corporate Accountability and Access to remedies for Corporate Wrongs, University of Bristol Law School 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact On 8 November 2014, the partner organisation the University of Bristol Law School hosted a full-day conference on Corporate Accountability and Access to Remedies for Corporate Wrongs. It was attended by an international audience, including academics, postgraduate students, practitioners, civil society organisations and national human rights institutions. Speakers included Dr Sorcha MacLeod (University of Sheffield), Michael Addo (UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights), Richard Meeran (Leigh Day), Simon Baughen (Institute of International Shipping and Trade Law, Swansea University), Tricia Feeney (Rights and Accountability in Development, RAID), Dr Claire Methven-O'Brien (Danish Institute for Human Rights), Rory Sullivan (University of Leeds), Prof Andrew Griffiths (University of Newcastle). Some of the speakers presented papers which were subsequently published.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
 
Description Due Diligence: From Rhetoric to Practice 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact This seminar was held on 16 June 2014 at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL) in London. It address the various meanings and impacts of the concept of human rights due diligence, which is described in the UN Guiding Principles, and the consequences and implementation of HRDD in practice. The seminar was divided into two sessions, namely "The Meaning of Due Diligence" and "The Application of Due Diligence. Speakers included Michael Addo (UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights), Andrea Shemberg (LSE and former Legal Adviser to John Ruggie), Robin Brooks (Norton Rose Fulbright), Dr James Harrison (University of Warwick), Mark B Taylor (Fafo Institute for Applied International Studies, Norway), Prof Robert McCorquodale (BIICL), Rae Lindsay (Clifford Chance),
Margaret Wachenfeld (Institute for Human Rights and Business) and Rachel Wilshaw (Oxfam). The audience similarly consisted of those from legal practice, corporations, academia and non-governmental organisations, as well as others who are addressing these issues. Subsequently to this event, BIICL received funding from one of the speakers' law firm (Norton Rose Fulbright LLP) to undertake a 16-month project on human rights due diligence.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
URL https://www.biicl.org/event/1042
 
Description Improving effectiveness of non-judicial mechanisms: Reports from the field: the reality of remedy at NHRIs, UN Forum on Business and Human Rights 2017 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact On 28 November 2017, at the annual UN Forum on Business and Human Rights, United Nations, Geneva, on of the partner institutions, the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights, co-organised a session with the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GAHNRI). The title was: Improving effectiveness of non-judicial mechanisms: Reports from the field: the reality of remedy at national human rights institutions
It was the second half of a joint session with the UN Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights' (OHCHR) Accountability and Remedy Project. Following on from the more general survey of state-based mechanisms through OHCHR, the goal of the GANHRI session was to present concrete case reports from different remedy functions that NHRIs exercise and support across the globe, to show where the strengths and weaknesses of remedy lie in practice. The session aimed to demonstrate how non-judicial remedy currently works in day-to-day practice in a variety of different jurisdictions. It identified advantages in pursuing the non-judicial remedy route, especially for difficult or unusual cases, as well as systematic difficulties faced by efforts to achieve non-judicial remedy. It introduced practitioners to the wide variety of functions exercised by National Human Rights Institutions in the hope that these mechanisms are used more frequently going forward.
Key discussion questions:
- What alternatives to judicial proceedings are already available to those seeking remedy in your jurisdiction?
- How can human rights be leveraged before a mechanism that may not have an explicitly human-rights-based mandate?
- What are the deciding factors that determine whether or not effective remedy is achieved with these mechanisms?
Speakers:
• Daniela Ortega, Coordinator, International Relations, INDH Chile
• Roberto Cadiz, Commissioner, Philippine Human Rights Commission (CHRP)
• Khalid Ramli, Head of External Relations and Cooperation, National Human Rights Commission of Morocco (CNDH)
• David Rutherford, Chief Commissioner, New Zealand Human Rights Commission
• Marie-Claire Konkombo, Regional Secretary, National Human Rights Commission of Cameroon.
• Alvaro Amaya, Deputy Defensor, Defensoría del Pueblo de Colombia
The session was exceptionally well attended, with the UN Palace of Nations Room XXII ll to full capacity with audience members sitting on the floor. The event was simultaneously translated into English and Spanish.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/ForumSession6/25_StateBasedNonJudicial.pdf
 
Description Private Security and Human Rights, BIICL 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact The event 'Private Security and Human Rights' was held on 24 May 2017 at BIICL under the Chatham House Rules. The event was convened with an interest in putting the UNGPs into practice and providing insight that companies could use in so doing.

The panel included Dr Sorcha MacLeod of Freie Universität Berlin, Sylvia White of Gardaworld and Oona Muirhead CBE of MSS Global and was chaired by Lise Smit, Fellow in Business and Human Rights at BIICL.

The discussion began with an overview of the phases of development of the private security industry and how the regulatory framework has developed in this area as the use of private security has both changed and proliferated. Next, the current framework was discussed, in particular, the monitoring and compliance functions of the ICoCA and the efforts to create regulatory standards through the ICoC, ICoCA and national accreditation bodies. The panel also considered the importance of coordinating regulatory standards and the limitations of the existing standards such as the ICoC which only applies to complex environments. Further, the panel discussed the importance of effective national accreditation bodies that ensure that individual auditors act responsibly and maintain high standards in discharging their duties. The discussion also explored the processes for and challenges faced in ensuring effective auditing.

Consideration was also given to the importance and challenges in ensuring that the various parts of private security companies are informed about human rights and the need for understanding the relationship between human rights and security. Finally, the panel reflected on the importance and impact of a multi-stakeholder initiative and an international monitoring body in driving change.

Audience engagement was high, reflecting positively on the interesting nature of the subject area and the calibre of the panellists' contributions. After the event a networking function took place where audience members, including several practitioners, and speakers engaged in conversations about advising clients on private security and grievance mechanisms.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017
URL https://www.biicl.org/event/1263
 
Description UNGPs, Post-Conflict Situations and Fragile States, University of Nottingham 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact On 20-21 May 2015 the partner institution the University of Nottingham International Law and Security Centre (NILSC) hosted a two-day conference on the UNGPs, Post-Conflict Situations and Fragile States. This seminar considered the two key facets of privatisation in post-conflict situations and fragile states related to the UNGPs: the regulation of private security companies and contractors (PSCs) and the operationalisation of the UNGPs where the operations of TNCs and other business enterprises are linked to natural resource exploitation and human rights abuses. The speakers included experts such as Prof Gabor Ronan (UN Working Group on the use of Mercenaries, and Cardozo Law School, New York), Prof Nigel White (University of Nottingham), Prof Elke Krahmann (Brunel University, London); Dr Mirko Sossai (University of Rome 3), Prof Olympia Bekou (University of Nottingham), Dr Sorcha Macleod (University of Sheffield), Professor Mary Footer (University of Nottingham), Karlijn Kuijpers, SOMO (Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations, Amsterdam), Dr Rajiv Maher (Danish Institute for Human Rights, Copenhagen), Dr Sorcha Macleod (University of Sheffield), Dr Karin Buhmann (Copenhagen Business School/Roskilde University, Denmark). It was attended by those from academic, business, legal practice, civil society and policy-makers.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2015
URL https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/law/research/projects/business
 
Description Workshop: Investigators plan the series 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact This was the first workshop of the Seminar Series. Representatives of partner institutions convened at the School of Law of the University of Sheffield on 24 January 2014 to discuss the scope of the Seminar Series. We welcomed our investigators to share their ideas for the project and make plans for the project future. The workshop was attended by: Dr Sorcha MacLeod (Sheffield), Professor Nigel White (Nottingham), Professor Robert MacCorquodale (BIICL via video link), Dr Michael Addo (Exeter and UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights), Mr Douwe Sikkema (International Commission of Jurists), Professor Jean Grugel (Sheffield), and PhD students: James Heydon, Luke Blindell and Lee McConnell (University of Northumbria).
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2014
URL https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/law/research/projects/business