A Randomized Controlled Trial of Functional Family Therapy: An EIF Partnership between Croydon Council and Queen's University Belfast

Lead Research Organisation: Queen's University Belfast
Department Name: Sch of Social Sci, Edu & Social Work

Abstract

This application proposes to undertake a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a new intervention aimed at families with children and young people who are at risk of juvenile offending and/or being placed in local authority care. The main aim of the intervention will be to reduce risk of offending and risk of children being placed in care. The intervention aims to intervene at the family level using Functional Family Therapy (FFT). FFT is a strengths-based behavioural family intervention.

FFT has shown positive results in terms of reducing juvenile offending during previous design experiments and RCTs in the USA. However, the proposal details a with a plan to systematically examine the impact of FFT using an RCT as it is introduced as a new initiative as part of the Early Intervention Foundation Centre work in Croydon. Data is not yet available that provides a definitive answer as to how this programme will translate to the Croydon context.

The design of the work is an RCT. Families will be randomly assigned to treatment (FFT) or control group (treatment as usual). Primary outcomes will be risk of offending and risk of care orders. Secondary outcomes will include family functioning and school attendance. Data will be collected over a six-month treatment period. All families assigned to control group will be offered FFT after a wait time if FFT proves to be of benefit. Strong checks and measures are in place to finish the RCT early if overwhelming evidence arises as to the benefit of FFT to families. In this instance all families would be reassigned to treatment group.

One of the strong feature of this proposal is the collaboration between Queen's University Belfast (QUB) and the Early Intervention Foundation Centre in Croydon (EIFC). This goes beyond data sharing. The partnership will help evaluate the efficacy of the introduction of FFT in Croydon in a systematic manner. Staff will be 'seconded' to QUB from Croydon and this will help with data collection and organization as well as building evaluation skills in EIFC that will exist beyond the life of the project. The project shows a strong commitment to knowledge exchange, both within EIFC and externally to the sector at large. The strong professional practice of the team at EIFC and the credible and scientifically valid work of the staff at QUB should enable compelling arguments to be presented regarding whether this intervention has positive outcomes or not.

Planned Impact

There will be a number of beneficiaries from this research. Firstly, and foremost there may be a positive impact for families in crisis and at risk in terms of the fact that they will be able to stay together and build a future without the complexities of coping with juvenile detention or children in local authority care. It will provide high quality information on whether Functional Family Therapy (FFT) is an effective intervention for families in this position. It will provide high quality data on the impact of FFT on juvenile offending, care orders, attendance at school and family functioning. If data indicates that FFT is effective in this respect, then a wide range of impact and knowledge exchange activities will ensure this message is taken to therapists (who will be encouraged to use FFT), local authorities and academics. In this respect then it is hoped that therapists would adopt this therapy as an intervention for families who may benefit from it. In order for this to happen then local authorities would need to be convinced that investment in FFT will be worthwhile. The research will provide compelling evidence if this is the case. In addition then there will be a need to engage with academics who are training future therapists. To this end papers will be made freely available via open access publishing and members of the academic community will be sent these papers. There is a company based in the USA who manualised FFT. Whilst they would have no part in measuring outcomes of the research (quite rightly) they are in a position to roll out the manualised version of the therapy to UK based therapists should it prove to be an effective intervention. If FFT proves to be effective it is hoped that there will be wider benefits to society. Although these are difficult to quantify then one could look at potential savings through less demand placed on juvenile justice system or less children going into care. Enhanced attendance at school could lead to greater qualifications being gained and less risk of ending up on benefits. These benefits would accrue directly within the jurisdiction of Croydon Council, but it would be hoped that beneficiaries would widen as impact and knowledge exchange activities increase. In addition more socially adjusted individuals and lowered crime may benefit people in the local communities where the intervention is used directly in terms of their quality of life. Finally, the researchers and wider staff will benefit the researchers involved. The high integrity design will lead to a high quality data set that should enable researchers to publish international quality research. ESRC awards are prestigious, but few and far between in Northern Ireland. This will bring status and credit to the researchers (you will note three of the researchers at QUB are early career and involvement in a successful ESRC funded research project should enhance their careers) and If the therapy is effective then the therapists delivering it might find enhanced employment opportunities.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description The grant was closed early due to the fact that staff at Croydon Council were unable to continue participation in the trial and complete their required work, as per the project plan. This prevented the randomization of the full sample and the subsequent planned analysis.

There are lessons to be learned from this project.

1. It was possible to establish an effective working relationship and build and evaluation with a high degree of scientific integrity into the development of new initiatives within local authorities. There was an appetite in service delivery teams to contribute to the professional knowledge in their area of professional work. Other opportunities could be built into future specific calls, rather like the recent overseas aid calls. However, there would have to be a level of buy-in above middle management at local authority level to ensure projects can run to completion.
2. Local authorities appear to be developing complex and comprehensive data management systems for at risk families. These data management systems could be an invaluable tool in identifying at risk children and ensuring they get the help they deserve. For this to happen there needs to be synergy between data management personnel, managers and those delivering front line services in local authorities. The diagnostic ability of 'big data' may be worthy of future research.
3. There was not incompatibility between the ethical requirements of universities research review boards and the data protection requirements that both universities and local authorities work under. A method was found of securing and transferring data between Croydon and QUB. All are bound by the same legal framework and adherence to good working practices was evident in each institution.
4. If ESRC is funding collaborative grants between universities and local authorities, then it is important that prior to award a legally binding contract is obtained with the local authority. This should include penalty clauses should the local authority and the contract would need to be signed at Chief Executive level. This would be similar within a University where only the Vice-Chancellor and University Secretary/Registrar would usually make final decisions on acceptance. Good will and compromise on behalf of universities will not be enough to keep projects on track.
Exploitation Route Recommendations and key learning

There are lessons to be learned from this project.

1. It was possible to establish an effective working relationship and build and evaluation with a high degree of scientific integrity into the development of new initiatives within local authorities. There was an appetite in service delivery teams to contribute to the professional knowledge in their area of professional work. Other opportunities could be built into future specific calls, rather like the recent overseas aid calls. However, there would have to be a level of buy-in above middle management at local authority level to ensure projects can run to completion.
2. Local authorities appear to be developing complex and comprehensive data management systems for at risk families. These data management systems could be an invaluable tool in identifying at risk children and ensuring they get the help they deserve. For this to happen there needs to be synergy between data management personnel, managers and those delivering front line services in local authorities. The diagnostic ability of 'big data' may be worthy of future research.
3. There was not incompatibility between the ethical requirements of universities research review boards and the data protection requirements that both universities and local authorities work under. A method was found of securing and transferring data between Croydon and QUB. All are bound by the same legal framework and adherence to good working practices was evident in each institution.
4. If ESRC is funding collaborative grants between universities and local authorities, then it is important that prior to award a legally binding contract is obtained with the local authority. This should include penalty clauses should the local authority and the contract would need to be signed at Chief Executive level. This would be similar within a University where only the Vice-Chancellor and University Secretary/Registrar would usually make final decisions on acceptance. Good will and compromise on behalf of universities will not be enough to keep projects on track.
Sectors Healthcare,Government, Democracy and Justice,Other

URL https://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/end-of-award-report-for-a-randomized-controlled-trial-of-functional-family-therapy-an-early-intervention-foundation-eif-partnership-between-croydon-council-and-queens-university-belfast(a395a93d-3c4f-42ad-9fed-76fb87a3d037).html
 
Description The teams from Queen's University Belfast and Croydon attended a seminar hosted at Nuffield and run by ESRC/EIF to talk about the project. A disparate audience then discussed how to encourage links between local authorities and universities. The team used the design of the randomisation from this project to explain minimisation in a publication for British Educational Research Association on Randomised Controlled Trials in Education by Connelly, Biggart, O'Hare, Miller & Thurston (2017) Sage Publishers.
First Year Of Impact 2015
Sector Education,Healthcare
Impact Types Cultural,Societal,Economic