A Dynamic Analysis of Poverty and Vulnerability in Wales: Moving Beyond the "Conventional" Approach

Lead Research Organisation: Aberystwyth University
Department Name: Sch of Management and Business

Abstract

There is increasing recognition among academics and practitioners that poverty is multidimensional and context specific. It is the multiple aspects of poverty that together define the experience of the poor. Considering the various dimensions independently is insufficient but existing methods for computing Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) have several weaknesses that prevent meaningful poverty comparison over time, thereby limiting the ability to assess policy impact. Ravallion (2011, 12), for example, has criticised the MPI on the grounds of arbitrariness in selecting indicators and their weights. Another criticism of the MPI is that it measures poverty using a single year survey and therefore lacks dynamics (Addison et al. 2009). There is thus scope for serious empirical research to understand Multi-dimensional Poverty (MDP) as the outcome of dynamic processes in which a personal history, experience, livelihood strategy and associated risks drive some people to enter into a particular dimension of poverty (e.g. health) or make it difficult to help the poor in other dimensions (e.g. asset) escape from poverty.

Evidence suggests that in-work poverty in Wales has been on the rise in the past decade (Gottfried and Lawton, 2010; JRF, 2013). Drawing upon the most recently available panel data on Wales and the wider UK (BHPS and Understanding Society) and combining them with qualitative information, we propose to go beyond the existing analysis of MDP by applying state-of-the-art econometric methods which allow us to understand MDP dynamics in Wales in general and in-work poverty in particular. More specifically, our models will help us understand mechanisms by which the duration of poverty in a particular dimension in the past potentially affects subsequent transitions of each component of poverty by modelling unobservable capabilities. The proposed research will establish the scale, importance and geography of in-work poverty in Wales. We will create maps of our MDP results for Wales.

Furthermore, the results of the quantitative and spatial analyses will be validated through qualitative interaction on two levels: with departments of local government and voluntary sector organisations which work to tackle poverty at the level of individuals and households; and with individuals and households themselves which are experiencing multidimensional poverty. We will work through established networks of NGOs, such as the Homelessness Forum, and the Supporting People Forum, which unite the first category of participants in the qualitative phase of the inquiry. We will use an accessible briefing describing poverty determinants and proposed frameworks to tackle their effects as an introduction, a semi-structured interview with 15 purposively sampled participants. We will use the same local organisations to identify and interview the second category of participants, again with 15 purposively sampled interviews in situations which represent the key categories elicited from secondary data analysis. This will provide a clearer and more nuanced perspective on the mechanisms determining, and consequent problems arising, from in-work poverty and the families affected by it. Interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed in NVivo, using a phenomenological approach to obtain lived experience accounts from the perspective of practitioners and their clients.

We will use mixed method procedures, giving equal precedence to the two major methodological perspectives, to provide new insights into efficient and effective approaches to tackling poverty in Wales. In a final stage these insights will be introduced, debated and consolidated into recommendations for policy development through three regional workshops with wider groups of stakeholders in North, Mid and South Wales, respectively. From this concluding round of discursive evaluations of our overall results, we will formulate our policy recommendations.

Planned Impact

This project will provide research-based policy recommendations on poverty reduction to the Welsh Government, local authorities, public bodies and non-profit organisations and practitioners working on poverty reduction in Wales and beyond.

We will target the generation of impact primarily on the voluntary sector, by providing evidence of the mechanisms determining poverty and communicating the perspective of the socially and economically disadvantaged. Our objective is to improve their effectiveness in delivering support, particularly in identifying locational and other factors which let individuals and families slip through the safety net of official statutory provision. All stakeholders will benefit from PI's extensive experience in working on poverty reduction in developing countries.

We will interact directly, by allowing the issues identified by them to be incorporated into research agenda of the project and more widely academic poverty research. Our well-established relations with Ceredigion Care Society, and Midmore and Henley's respective involvements in social enterprise and faith-based organisations, provide us with direct access to the main networks of anti-poverty organisations in Wales. We will actively seek invitations to participate in these forums and network meetings, gain discursive insights through semi-structured interviews, jointly formulate recommendations to inform their policy and practice in the regional workshops, and promote greater coordination among various stakeholders on reducing poverty in Wales by providing an evidence-based bridge between policymakers and practitioners. Networks of exchange formed in the course of the proposed project will provide a legacy for future collaboration.

The policymaking community in Wales will benefit from our results directly through the networking of projects under this theme managed by the Public Policy Institute for Wales. We plan to cooperate closely with other "What Works in Tackling Poverty" funded projects by holding interim progress meetings and making joint presentations to public policy stakeholders. We will also make two presentations of our results to the annual WISERD conference which attracts users as well as producers of research data. We also plan to produce learning materials for use in schools and colleges in Wales which have adopted the Welsh Bacc, introducing the next generation to issues of social responsibility and ethical choices in policymaking.

More broadly, our results will have implications for the policy choice between place-based versus people-centred (social) policies in poverty reduction. We will use the comparative regional dimension of our results to contrast with experience elsewhere in Britain, producing technical and non- technical versions of our result for circulation to bodies such as the European Commission Cohesion Policy Unit and the European Anti-Poverty Network. We will produce media releases to engage with print, broadcast and social networking media, in collaboration with the press office at Aberystwyth University, to disseminate our findings to and engage with the wider general public.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description Poverty and deprivation in Wales: cross sectional view
We developed a multi-dimensional poverty index for Wales (MDP-Wales) incorporating non-monetary indicators of poverty and deprivation available in Understanding Society data (waves 1 - 7).
Our index is based on five main facets: resources and living standards, education, health, housing conditions, civic engagement and social participation. We find that about 9% of the Wales population in 2010/11 was multi-dimensionally poor (raw headcount: 21.5%) falling to 6% for the year 2015/16 (raw headcount: 14%). We find statistically significant poverty reduction, both in terms of incidence and intensity over the period under investigation. We also find that slightly less than 6% of Wales population are both income and multi-dimensionally poor, in terms of headcount ratio. However, significant mismatch between traditional income-based poverty measure and non-monetary multidimensional measure is identified.
Understanding poverty persistence and dynamics: longitudinal view
Our dynamic analysis reveals significant transitions in and out of poverty, irrespective of poverty definition, monetary or non-monetary. Considering income poverty we find that around 65% of the Wales population never experienced poverty over the 7 year period. For MDP-Wales this is slightly over 77%. At the other extreme, only 0.7% is found to be income poor in all 7 years, but 4.6% are multi-dimensionally poor in all years. Slightly over 3% are found to be persistently income poor (defined as four consecutive years of poverty), whereas 2.5% are multi-dimensionally persistently poor. 56% of those who slipped into income poverty managed to escape after just one year. The corresponding figure for multi-dimensional poverty is slightly lower at 52%. Similarly, around one in five who recently escaped poverty in either definition are likely to fall back into poverty in just one year. This reinforces the notion that poverty can be transitory in nature and that cross-sectional analyses could be highly misleading for policy assessment.
Our results also indicate duration dependence in poverty: the longer someone stays in poverty the more likely it is that one will continue to experience poverty in subsequent periods. The result is true for both definitions. Similarly, the longer one spent out of poverty, the less likely one is to re-enter.
Results from multivariate discrete time duration modeling reveal heterogeneity across the population with regard to risks of exit and re-entry to poverty, indicating vulnerability to persistent poverty for some. This is more so for the multidimensional context. Individuals from households with higher numbers of children, with a household head without qualifications, and with health problems are found to be particularly susceptible to persistent poverty. This arises from a combination of higher probability of re-entry and lower probability of exit. This result is true for both measures but is more pronounced for multidimensional poverty.
Validation through qualitative consultations
MDP-Wales was used as a framework for semi-structured interviews, conducted in diverse locations in Wales, initially with professionals who work to reduce social disadvantage and later with people experiencing disadvantage to explore their experience.
Analysis reveals a range of different patterns of disadvantage, particularly how vulnerability to employment, health and relationship disruptions affects a wide range of in-work families. Mental health was seen as a stand-alone reason for entering disadvantage separate from general health problems. The role of debt, and especially the difficulty of extrication from it, emerged as one of the most important barriers to movement out of deprivation. Changes to the welfare system, implemented during our study, caused a compounding of disadvantage. Poor access to transport, support services and information technology was a debilitating factor in both rural and urban locations. Homelessness was the key trigger for extreme deprivation, compounded by substance abuse and associated crime. Access to secure housing was seen as a requirement to exit deprivation. Supportive family networks were the most common means of moving out of deprivation.
Exploitation Route Scientific impact:
During the project life from 2014-2017, we discussed preliminary analysis on various occasions with an expert group and with policy makers convened and facilitated by Public Policy Institute for Wales (PPIW, now Wales Centre for Public Policy WCPP). We will continue to work with WCPP to further disseminate and discuss results with policy makers, local government entities, independent think tanks, charities. We will also present to the 2018 WISERD annual conference. We will submit three academic papers for publication.
Potential use in a non-academic context:
The index is intended to capture not only poverty in a narrower sense, but also the much wider concept of social exclusion in line with the growing emphasis in European social policy, covering dimensions, beyond income or economic poverty, such as health, education, political participation and social contact. The MDP-Wales could be used to benchmark and monitor poverty and deprivation over time, for example as part of the new Wales economic strategy "Prosperity for All". Better understanding of the determinants of poverty persistence and dynamics in terms of exit (re-entry) will help shape and target short, medium and long term economic and social policy to mitigate deprivation and address structural issues.

Specific policy recommendations arising from our research include:
• The need to separate mental health as a reason for disadvantage in multidimensional indices, and the allocation of specific resources to tackle mental health issues of low-income people.
• Decentralization of health assessment centres and other resources to facilitate access for people experiencing disadvantage in both rural and urban areas. Access to services including transport requires system-wide consideration.
• Improved access to information and funding for families, facing lack of formal employment opportunities in rural areas, to address, for example, opportunities for self-employment.
• The need for a long-term perspective focused on community social capital formation.
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy,Creative Economy,Education,Financial Services, and Management Consultancy,Healthcare,Leisure Activities, including Sports, Recreation and Tourism,Government, Democracy and Justice,Transport

 
Description The primary focus of our study is to examine poverty, vulnerability to poverty, and the underlying dynamics that generates experiences of poverty at individual and household level in Wales. In the process, we propose a set of multidimensional poverty measures in order to understand the causes, depth, and the consequences of poverty. The other major aspect of our study is to assess whether a more detailed and direct understanding of poverty compared to the conventional income-based approach could improve insights of whether and how policies work, and how better effectiveness of policies could be achieved. Throughout the course of our research, we have engaged through validation/feedback workshops with practitioners from various public, private, and third sector/ voluntary organisations concerned with education, health, housing, and social services in multiple locations in Wales. We provided relevant concepts, evidence, and analysis from our quantitative results to initiate discussion around people's lived experience of poverty. The participants discussed the causes, duration, contexts and implications of poverty, including how such social disadvantages are perceived and measured. In the process, participants interacted with each other outside of their respective organizational settings, shared their experiences and exchanged ideas on ways to address multidimensional deprivation and policy effectiveness. This facilitates cross fertilization of ideas and also makes them aware of various trade-offs and bottlenecks. The knowledge (co)produced as a result of these workshops informs their practices and enriches the approaches that have been applied in their work dealing with people experiencing poverty and deprivation. From these interviews we followed up contacts which enabled us to hold (smaller) group and individual interviews with people who have or have had recent experience of poverty. Rather than treating the individuals helping us with the research as subjects, we followed the participatory approach including them as participants in the research process. Doing so raises the status of people experiencing poverty, providing some empowerment for individuals and families who are primarily disempowered by the condition of poverty. Interaction with the researchers in a consultative process has had a positive effect on the participants as exemplified by the following excerpt from the focus group discussion at Llandysul Family Centre: "I think this is a good way of doing it though, it's nice to know that- I'm not the only one. Our lives are --Important. Making a difference." "And we're not the only ones going through it, that makes it more, easy" This illustrates that participation in the social welfare policy formulation process (bottom-up policies) by people experiencing deprivation has a potential to empower and encourage their participation in society. This makes participatory approach to policy formulation intrinsically more valuable than the stand alone top-down approach. Our research provides rich and insightful analysis of poverty and its underlying dynamics. This could potentially have major impacts in terms of designing and implementing effective social welfare and service delivery mechanism in Wales. We expect to continue to communicate our findings to various stakeholders including the government.
First Year Of Impact 2018
Sector Communities and Social Services/Policy,Financial Services, and Management Consultancy,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Societal,Economic,Policy & public services