Strategic 'offloading' of intentions: Neurocognitive mechanisms and effects of ageing

Lead Research Organisation: University College London
Department Name: Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Every day, we form many intentions for behaviours that we plan to execute after a delay. These intentions might be postponed for just a few seconds (e.g. intending to add an attachment to an email before clicking 'send'), or minutes, days, or longer (e.g. intending to attend a planned hospital appointment). If we are to live independent, purposeful lives, it is essential that we are able to fulfil such intentions. Yet we all know how easily forgotten they are. This can have catastrophic effects in safety-critical fields such as nursing or aviation, and serious consequences for health-related behaviours such as remembering to take medication. Understanding how we fulfil delayed intentions will allow us to develop techniques to optimise this aspect of memory, and potentially compensate for any difficulties.

Researchers have developed many experimental tasks for studying memory for intentions in the laboratory. Virtually all of these tasks prevent participants from using external tools and reminders. However, in everyday life we often use diaries or to-do lists, or we set up reminders in our environment. How do we decide whether or not to use these strategies? What consequences do they have for our behaviour? How much do individuals differ in whether or not they use reminders, and what can we do to influence this? While some studies have investigated these questions in brain-injured individuals, we know very little about healthy people. Yet, with new technologies such as smartphone reminder apps and wearable devices, we increasingly 'offload' intentions into the world around us. This proposal describes a systematic and detailed investigation of 'intention offloading'.

In the first strand of research, we will conduct a scientifically rigorous study of intention offloading behaviour. Participants will perform a task requiring them to remember a briefly-delayed intention, with the option to set a reminder if they wish. We will investigate whether people use reminders optimally, or show biases towards overusing or underusing them. We will also examine whether we can influence people's use of reminders by subtle changes in the feedback we give them about their performance. Further, we will test whether using reminders can harm our ability to remember intentions by ourselves. These questions have not been investigated before, but they have clear implications for how we can boost people's ability to fulfil their intentions.

The second strand will examine the effect of ageing on the use of reminders. It has often been suspected that older adults use reminders more than younger adults, to compensate for a decline in their unaided ability, but this has not been systematically examined in the laboratory. Understanding how our use of reminders changes as we get older can help us to design interventions that allow us to remain independent and healthy throughout the lifespan.

The third strand will use brain imaging to examine how reminders affect our brain processes. Our previous research has shown that we can decode people's intentions by looking at their neural activity. We will investigate whether this is still true after a reminder has been set: when we offload an intention, how does this affect the way it is represented in the brain? We will also investigate whether the brain systems we use to decide whether or not to set reminders are similar or different to brain systems we use to actually remember intentions. Difficulty remembering intentions is one of the most common effects of brain injury. These studies can inform the development of rehabilitation strategies tailored to different forms of brain damage.

In combination, these three strands of research will deliver fundamental insight into our everyday ability to fulfil intentions, with direct relevance for strategies that can support this ability in healthy young adults, and promote behavioural independence in the context of ageing and memory impairment.

Planned Impact

Alongside academic researchers working in relevant fields, the proposed research has the potential to impact a wide range of user groups, described below. For detailed information on how research outputs will be disseminated to these diverse groups, see the 'Pathways to Impact' section.

Clinicians and applied psychologists

While there has been a paucity of research into intention offloading in healthy individuals (the topic of the present application), the importance of intention offloading as a compensatory strategy for memory difficulties has long been recognised within the field of neurorehabilitation. The proposed research will provide theoretical background with direct translational relevance to this field, delivering practical guidelines for the optimal use of this strategy based on individualised assessment. Further, a central aim of the proposed research is to investigate interventions that can influence participants' choice to use, or forgo, external reminders. Such interventions can lead to improved ability to fulfil intentions in healthy young individuals, across the lifespan, and in the context of acquired memory impairment.

Behaviour change practitioners and theorists

Individuals often hold behaviour change intentions (e.g. to exercise more or reduce one's impact on the environment), which are associated with strong individual and societal benefits, but hard to achieve in practice. Creating external cues to prompt intended behaviour is recognised as a powerful method for translating intentions into action, but there is relatively little empirical evidence to guide the effective promotion of such strategies. The proposed research will directly investigate interventions to modify intention offloading behaviour, which can lead to the development of effective behaviour change techniques.

Interaction design / human-computer interaction practitioners

Computers, smartphones, and wearable devices are increasingly used as tools to support memory for intentions. In order to optimise design of such technologies, it is important to understand individuals' biases towards using, or avoiding, reminders. This can lead to improved user interface guidelines, particularly as they relate to users at different stages in the lifespan. In particular, an important focus of the proposed research is to investigate how individuals' appraisal of their own memory abilities (i.e. 'metacognitive evaluation') relate to their use of intention offloading strategies. Incorporating tools to promote accurate metacognitive evaluation can potentially play an important role in improving the effectiveness of such devices, but this approach has not yet been implemented in currently available technologies.

General public

The question of how we remember intentions, and what methods we can use to improve our abilities, is of great interest to the general public. (E.g. Dr Gilbert gave a talk on this topic during the 2015 Royal Society Summer Science exhibition, attended by approximately 200 individuals). As part of the proposed research, a 'citizen science' website will be created, allowing participants to take part in experimental tasks at home, and containing practical advice and guidelines on how best to fulfil intentions (e.g. 'implementation intentions' and intention offloading). Dissemination of this information can yield clear potential benefits for health and wellbeing. Alongside this website, other public engagement activities (e.g. British Science Festival) will be pursued, and publicised via social media such as Facebook and Twitter.
 
Description Every day, we make constant decisions about whether to store information by simply trying to remember it or by using a memory tool such as a written note or smartphone alert. This is known as 'cognitive offloading'. One of the key objectives for this award is to investigate whether people have systematic biases in whether they prefer to use their own memory or an external memory tool. Our findings show that individuals do indeed have such biases. In many situations, but not always, people are biased so that they use an external reminder when they could have just remembered the information by themselves. We have also found that different people vary in whether or not they have this bias, and individual differences in the bias are stable over time.

We have also investigated whether younger and older adults differ on their preference to use external reminders compared with their own memory. Initially, we predicted that older adults would be less confident in their memories, so they would have a stronger bias towards using external reminders. However, we actually found the opposite effect. Older adults did not fully compensate for memory difficulties when they were allowed to use external memory support. This underlines the importance of designing interventions, so that people make the best use of external tools to support their memory processes. Such interventions will help us to maintain independence as we grow older.

Finally, we examined the brain processes involved when people decide between remembering with their own memory or using an external reminder. We demonstrated that there are overlapping brain mechanisms linked with A) people's feeling of confidence about their memory, and B) people's decisions about whether to use memory support. This shows that there is an intimate link between people's ability to think about their own minds (for example thinking about our memory abilities) and the ability to make use of external cognitive tools such as reminders.
Exploitation Route The main impact of this work is that it can help influence the design of interventions that make people use memory tools more efficiently. In particular, this work shows that an important determinant of the uptake of memory technology is how good people *think* their memory is, not necessarily how good it *objectively* is. This underlines the importance of designing interventions to improve how well people evaluate their own memory abilities, or in other words their "metacognitive" evaluations.

We have also shown that the way people evaluate their memory and use external memory support differs between younger and older adults. It is important to take this into consideration for the design of memory tools to support independence in older adults.

Finally, we have identified the overlapping brain systems that are used when people A) think about their memory and B) decide on whether to use external memory tools. This can be used by researchers to identify the mechanisms that the human brain uses to "offload" its own processes into external tools such as reminders. It can also be used to understand how this process might differ between individuals, such as younger versus older adults or those with neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism.
Sectors Healthcare

 
Description Multiple media interviews including BBC Radio 4, CBS News, EuroNews
First Year Of Impact 2020
Sector Healthcare
Impact Types Cultural,Policy & public services

 
Description Cited by the Psychonomic Society COVID-19 Working Group recommendations to promote hand washing
Geographic Reach Multiple continents/international 
Policy Influence Type Citation in other policy documents
URL https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/hand-washing/
 
Title Data and code to reproduce analyses in Gilbert et al. (2020) article on Optimal Use of Reminders, JEP:General. doi:10.1037/xge0000652 
Description This OSF page offers downloads of the raw data and analysis scripts to reproduce the main analyses reported in: Gilbert, S.J., Bird, A., Carpenter, J.M., Fleming, S.M., Sachdeva, C., & Tsai, P.-C. (2020). Optimal use of reminders: Metacognition, effort, and cognitive offloading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 501-517. 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2018 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact This resource has allowed other researchers to reproduce and extend the analyses reported in the original article. 
URL https://osf.io/t9scx/
 
Title Data and code to reproduce the analyses in Scarampi, C., & Gilbert, S.J. (2020). The effect of recent reminder setting on subsequent strategy and performance in a prospective memory task. Memory, 28, 677-691. 
Description CSV data files and R analysis scripts 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2019 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact n/a 
URL https://osf.io/9wtd8/
 
Title Data and code to reproduce the analyses reported in Scarampi, C., & Gilbert, S.J. (2021). Age differences in strategic reminder setting and the compensatory role of metacognition. Psychology and Aging. 
Description CSV data files and R analysis scripts 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2020 
Provided To Others? Yes  
Impact n/a 
URL https://osf.io/4utrs/
 
Description Collaborative research project with Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedian (Tübingen) and University of Tübingen, Germany 
Organisation Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen
Country Germany 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Designed experimental procedures in research project derived from prior ESRC-funded work
Collaborator Contribution Designed experimental procedures, collected and analysed data
Impact https://psyarxiv.com/du7bz/
Start Year 2019
 
Description Collaborative research project with Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedian (Tübingen) and University of Tübingen, Germany 
Organisation Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien
Country Germany 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Designed experimental procedures in research project derived from prior ESRC-funded work
Collaborator Contribution Designed experimental procedures, collected and analysed data
Impact https://psyarxiv.com/du7bz/
Start Year 2019
 
Description Collaborative research project with University of Texas at Arlington 
Organisation University of Texas at Arlington
Country United States 
Sector Academic/University 
PI Contribution Designed experimental procedures in research project derived from prior ESRC-funded work
Collaborator Contribution Designed experimental procedures, collected and analysed data
Impact https://psyarxiv.com/42mxw/
Start Year 2019
 
Description Article for general public published in The Conversation 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Article published in The Conversation - "Parents, stop nagging kids not to forget - set visual cues instead". As of March 9th, this article has been viewed 7,830 times and attracted international attention (e.g. Australian Daily Mail).
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL https://theconversation.com/parents-stop-nagging-kids-not-to-forget-set-visual-cues-instead-90306
 
Description Blog post for Psychology Today (tweeted to > 650,000 followers of @PsychToday) 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Blog Post for Psychology Today
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-extended-mind/201910/technology-is-changing-memory-how-c...
 
Description Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel - Blog post for the UCL Age Innovation Hub and moderation of discussion on the platform 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Blog post for the UCL Age Innovation Hub and discussion moderation on the platform.
Age Innovation Hub aims at crowdsourcing ideas and needs for technologies to enable healthy ageing throughout the life-course. The needs and ideas identified will directly inform future research into healthy ageing.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020,2021
URL https://ageinnovationhub.crowdicity.com
 
Description Interview for BBC Radio 4 All in the Mind 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Interview about research on BBC Radio 4's programme 'All in the Mind'
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://samgilbert.net/news.html
 
Description Interview for BBC Radio 4 World at One 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Live radio interview on BBC Radio 4 World at One discussing research, including work funded by this grant
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://samgilbert.net/news.html
 
Description Interview for website of Chilean radio station Radio Pauta 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Sam Gilbert was interviewed about research funded by this grant by Chilean radio station Radio Pauta, during a visit to Santiago in November 2019
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL https://www.pauta.cl/ciencia-y-tecnologia/sam-gilbert-el-cientifico-promotor-descarga-cognitiva-impu...
 
Description Interview on CBS News 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact TV interview for CBS News about research, including work funded by this grant
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://samgilbert.net/news.html
 
Description Interview on EuroNews 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Interview on EuroNews about research, including work covered by this grant
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://samgilbert.net/news.html
 
Description News story for the UCL website and social media channels 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact News story for the UCL's news channels including the website, e-newsletters, blogs and social media
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://www.ucl.ac.uk/brain-sciences/news/2020/jun/how-use-digital-devices-can-aid-memory
 
Description Podcast interview to discuss ESRC-funded research 
Form Of Engagement Activity A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press)
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Interview with Psychonomic Society podcast 'All Things Cognition', sparking further discussion and enquiries into our ESRC-funded research (e.g. on Twitter).
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
URL https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/for-a-cognitive-boost-offload-it-interview-with-boldt-and-gi...
 
Description Presentation by Chiara Scarampi for "Researchers on a Train" - Saturday 28th September 2019, organised by the University of Bath. 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Researchers on a Train is a science busking activity which took place on trains between Bath Spa and Westbury. The event challenged researchers to engage passengers using just a single research object and their own science busking skills. This involved being brave and going up to chat to passengers about your research.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
URL http://blogs.bath.ac.uk/publicengagement/2019/08/14/what-is-researchers-on-a-train/