Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on youth smoking uptake

Lead Research Organisation: University of Glasgow
Department Name: College of Medical, Veterinary, Life Sci

Abstract

Although the ban on smoking in public places has improved health by reducing exposure to second-hand smoke, it is not yet clear whether this has had any impact on youth smoking uptake. Particularly, we do not know whether this has changed the long-standing trend for youths from more disadvantaged backgrounds to be more likely to take up smoking. We will use annual survey data on 11-15 year olds from 1994-2015 to understand the impacts of the smoking ban on inequalities in the chances of young people trying smoking, becoming occasional or daily smokers, or quitting after starting smoking. We will look to see if there is an immediate impact, or a more gradual impact that increases over time.

In addition, it is well known that the smoking behaviour of parents can be an important influence on smoking uptake among their teenage children. It is unclear how a smoking ban will affect the smoking behaviour of parents. A ban on smoking in public places may mean that parents of young people smoke more at home to compensate for restrictions on their smoking elsewhere. Alternatively, it may lead to it being viewed as less acceptable to smoke around young people, and parents may smoke less at home around their children. Either effect would be an important influence on youth smoking uptake, and effects could vary depending on how disadvantaged the home is. We will therefore investigate what effects the smoking ban has had on the smoking behaviour of young people's parents, and how much of any impact on youth smoking uptake is explained by this.

The smoking ban is not the only important change happening in the UK that might impact on youth smoking uptake. We will use differences in the timing of these events to differentiate between the impacts of the smoking ban and other changes such as the raising of the legal age for purchasing cigarettes from 16 to 18 years, and the increasing availability and use of e-cigarettes within the UK.

Planned Impact

Beneficiaries from this work would include:

UK Government: the findings will be of benefit to the UK government as they will provide information on important impacts of an existing policy. This information will be of use if the policy is ever considered for repeal or modification. The evidence that we will generate around the mechanisms of impact on young people's smoking uptake via their parents will be particularly valuable as extensions to smoke-free policies are considered (eg to more private spheres such as cars and homes).
ASH & ASH Scotland: these groups have an active interest in tobacco control and contribute widely to public debates and policy consultations in this area, and the evidence we will generate around the impacts of this policy and mechanisms of action are likely to be of use to them as they advocate for effective tobacco control policy.
NHS Health Scotland: this national health board work within Scotland to reduce inequalities and improve health. The evidence we generate will help inform their work, and help evaluate one of the existing policies in place within this context.
Academics with an interest in public policy and tobacco control: the findings will be of interest to academics within these and similar fields as noted above in the section on academic beneficiaries.
The UK General Public: issues around tobacco control are of wide public interest and our evidence will contribute to these wider public debates. Prior studies by members of the project team in this area have been picked up by national news media and we would expect similar interest in the findings of this study.
Policymakers in other countries: The findings will be of international relevance as many countries have not yet implemented smoke-free public places legislation. The understanding of impacts and mechanisms gained from this study will help policymakers evaluate whether similar effects could be gained by implementing such policies within their own countries.
 
Description We investigated the impact of the 2006/7 smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in smoking uptake among young people aged 11-15 in the UK. Smoking uptake was viewed as a staged process consisting of the following main transitions: initiation (i.e. trying cigarettes for the first time), progression to occasional smoking, quitting before escalating to daily smoking, and escalation to daily smoking. There was an immediate drop in young people's initiation of smoking after the smoke-free legislation, and inequalities in initiation between young people with more and less educated parents narrowed in the years following implementation. Escalation to occasional or daily smoking were not impacted by the legislation, and upward trends in quitting before establishing a daily habit actually slowed after the legislation (which may be due to a more select group ever trying smoking). These findings were robust to adjustment for change in cigarette prices and the rising availability of e-cigarettes from 2011. However, the impacts disappeared when adjusting for the almost concurrent change in the legal age for cigarette purchase from 16 to 18 in 2007/8. Thus, to the extent we could statistically distinguish impacts for these concurrent policies (with implementation differing by only a year in Scotland and Northern Ireland), it seemed impacts were more attributable to the change in legal age, though considering the near-coincident implementation dates it may be more appropriate to interpret the findings as representing the combined effect of these two policies.

We further investigated impacts on inequalities in smoking among the parents of these young people, and assessed the extent to which this explained the observed impacts on initiation of smoking. The smoke-free legislation was actually associated with a brief slowing of declining trends in parental smoking, though inequalities in parental smoking were narrower after the legislation was implemented. Adjusting for parental smoking did not explain the impacts of the legislation on initiation of smoking among young people, either the immediate drop or the subsequent narrowing in inequalities. The strength of association between parental smoking and initiation also did not change following the smoke-free implementation. If parental smoking had explained some of the impact, this may have supported the impacts being at least partially due to the smoke-free legislation rather than the change in legal age, which we would not expect to have impacted on parental smoking. Ruling out parental smoking as an explanatory mechanism therefore means the observed impacts are more are more likely to be attributable to other mechanisms, e.g. changes in social norms, or to the increase in legal age for tobacco purchase. This opens up potential new research paths, where we could investigate these other mechanisms and see if these are helpful in explaining the observed impacts.

The development of the stakeholder network is another key achievement, which has benefited other research Dr Green has been conducted on the related topic of e-cigarette use in the UK. Members of the network are now helping engage with and inform plans for future work.
Exploitation Route The members of our stakeholder network are a key pathway to impact for our findings. Morris Fraser, who is the Scottish Government Tobacco lead, has shown interest in the work by email and at engagement presentations, and will be targeted for dissemination of the published findings. Sheila Duffy from ASH Scotland, an independent charity focused on reducing tobacco harms has also engaged positively with us and has agreed to host blog posts on the findings when they are published. Our ESRC festival of social sciences event has also helped gather interest and establish communications with the Youth Scotland and the British Heart Foundation, and we are using a blog post on the event to further establish interest in the findings and maintain links with appropriate audiences. When the findings are published we'll work with our digital communications team to produce engaging infographics and/or animations/videos to further facilitate dissemination and impact.
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy,Environment,Healthcare,Government, Democracy and Justice

 
Description ESRC Festival of Social Sciences: Tobacco Free Generation: Where Next? 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact I presented findings on smoke-free public places and e-cigarettes to the audience, and then had an expert panel debating them with the audience. We used live-polling to record audience reactions to the findings, and suggestions for further work. We then put together a post for our unit blog reporting on the audience reactions and promoted this post on Twitter to broaden the reach of the message and encourage further engagement with us.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
URL https://www.gla.ac.uk/researchinstitutes/healthwellbeing/research/mrccsosocialandpublichealthscience...
 
Description Invited talk at Imperial College 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Invited presentation at Imperial College London, spoke about ESRC and unit work to audience of 20-30 academics, students and doctors. Sparked some discussion afterwards and interest in further work.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Podcast: 15 Minutes on Health Inequalities 
Form Of Engagement Activity A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press)
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Recorded a podcast discussing key findings from this award, and released it on UK national no smoking day (10th March) for maximum effect/reach.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://soundcloud.com/user-776545020/15-minutes-on-health-inequalities-michael-green
 
Description Scottish Tobacco Alliance Research Group 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Third sector organisations
Results and Impact Opportunity to present some other research on e-cigarettes to Scottish Tobacco Alliance research group, made links with other academics in the field, and Morris Fraser,Tobacco Lead in Scottish Government showed interest in the findings and ongoing work on smoke-free public places both during presentation and in conversation afterwards.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2018
 
Description Virtual Stakeholder Network 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Set up a network of stakeholders interested in the grant. Disseminated project protocol and received feedback from representatives at ASH Scotland, NHS health Scotland, the Scottish Government, and Public Health England, which has helped shape the protocol. ASH offered help in dissemination of the findings when they are ready.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017