Individual Differences in Comprehension across the Lifespan

Lead Research Organisation: University College London
Department Name: Experimental Psychology

Abstract

The ability to communicate using spoken language is a core human ability. Language provides the foundation for social and educational development and without strong language skills, people struggle to participate positively in society. Spoken language allows us to rapidly transfer ideas from the mind of the speaker to the mind of the listener. This transfer relies on the ability of the listener to quickly access the meaning of each word that they hear: they must make 'best guesses' about the intended meaning of each word. The ability to rapidly and accurately understand the meanings of spoken words is vital, not only for communication using spoken language, but also to provide the foundation for skilled reading comprehension.

Accessing the meanings of words is made more difficult by the presence of 'lexical ambiguity': words that can refer to more than one concept. For example, when accessing the sentence "What an enormous trunk!" the listener must work out whether the speaker was referring to an elephant's nose, a large suitcase, a car's boot, or the main stem of a tree.

The ability to accurately and rapidly disambiguate word meanings is vital for communication: approximately 80% of common words in English have multiple dictionary definitions. Take for example the first sentence of the text given to 11-year-old children across England as part of the national curriculum tests: "Dawn was casting spun-gold threads across a rosy sky over Sawubona game reserve". The words in this sentence have on average 8.8 dictionary definitions: children must, for example, work out that "Dawn" does not refer to a girl's name and that "game" does not refer to a competitive sport. In addition, "cast" and "threads" do not refer to physical actions or objects, but have more metaphorical interpretations.

While many of us are able to accurately disambiguate most words without obvious effort, research has revealed large individual differences in this skill: some people are slower and more error prone and the same people also tend to perform poorly tests of comprehension more generally. This project aims to uncover the causes of these difficulties as a first step to identifying how best to help them in the classroom or clinic. This is important as poor language comprehension is associated with difficulty learning to read, with social and emotional unhappiness and with poor behaviour.

The current research will develop novel child-friendly methods for assessing the ability to understand spoken sentences containing ambiguous words. We will use these methods to discover the factors that contribute to individual differences in the ability to understand words. We will test two types of explanation. The first sees linguistic factors as critical - qualitative or quantitative differences in the stored knowledge a person has about word meanings. The second type of explanation is that people differ in how flexible they can be in selecting and switching between alternative meanings, rather than their knowledge of the meanings themselves. We will use computational models and experimental methods to assess how these factors work together to bring about comprehension. Finally, we will move from the laboratory to the classroom to conduct an intervention study in primary age children to assess whether comprehension can be enhanced by playing word games while listening to carefully constructed stories.

Answers to these questions are critical for efforts to improve comprehension skills in school aged children. The National Curriculum sees language and communication as essential for educational achievement, and considerable teaching time is devoted to improving performance in national tests. Unfortunately, evidence-based teaching strategies for improving comprehension are not well-developed, certainly in comparison with those in place for word reading. This research will provide the theoretical framework and empirical basis for larger scale interventions.

Planned Impact

Who will benefit?
The proposed research has implications that have the potential to influence a number of groups in wider society. These include teachers and education practitioners, policy makers, third sector organisations (e.g. charities that support children with comprehension difficulties) and children and their families. Many children enter secondary school with low levels of literacy skill[13]. The social, educational and economic consequences of this could be lessened by appropriate teaching and intervention, informed by theoretical advances in understanding what children need in order to comprehend complex language.

How will they benefit?
To develop effective and evidence-based teaching/interventions, we need to determine the key factors that contribute to individual differences in language comprehension. The proposed research will achieve this. Findings will be shared with the wider community and relevant stakeholders so as to provide opportunities for dissemination and interactive discussion between research and practice (see Pathways to Impact for discussion of how we propose to optimize this).

1. Teachers and education practitioners
The proposed research will benefit teachers, special educational needs co-ordinators, teaching assistants, speech and language therapists, and other education professionals. It will articulate the knowledge and skills that children need to comprehend complex language. Evidence-based teaching practice regarding phonics instruction in the early years is well-established in policy and teacher training; by developing and testing a new theoretical framework focused on word-meaning access we hope to establish, in the longer term, a similar evidence-based practice approach for supporting children in the development of their comprehension skills.

2. Policy makers and charities supporting children's education
The importance of comprehension skills is clearly highlighted by the prominence of this skill in the current Year 6 SATS assessments[14]. However, in contrast to the evidence-based phonics-based curriculum, which has had a clear positive impact on the teaching of single word reading in the UK, policies concerning the teaching of comprehension skills is currently lacking the appropriate evidence base to determine how best to support the development of these skills during primary education. We are optimistic that the current research will have a positive impact on policy decisions by specifying how successful comprehension can be promoted through modifications to a child's language experience. This is especially important for those children from less-advantaged backgrounds who will have more limited access to the resources that help provide a rich and varied linguistic environment (e.g., books in the home, access to libraries and the internet).

3. Children
Finally, our research will benefit children themselves. First, the children who take part in our experiments will benefit from an opportunity to do game-like tasks that provide exposure to interesting and varied linguistic input. More importantly, children will benefit in the longer term through potential improvements to educational practice and policy that will be informed by a stronger evidence base, as a consequence of our research.