BIAS: Responsible AI for Labour Market Equality

Lead Research Organisation: Lancaster University
Department Name: Management Science

Abstract

What do we study? BIAS is an interdisciplinary project to understand and tackle the role of AI algorithms in shaping ethnic and gender inequalities in the labour market, which is now increasingly digitized. The project seeks to understand and minimise gender and ethnic biases in the AI-driven labour market processes of job advertising, hiring and professional networking. We further aim to develop 'responsible' AI that mitigates biases and attendant inequalities, by designing AI algorithms and development protocols that are sensitive to such biases. The empirical context of our investigation includes these labour market processes in organisations and on digital job platforms.

Why is it important? Labour market inequalities need to be tackled because they deny and thwart equitable and sustainable socio-economic development. In both the UK and Canada, access and rewards to work remain patterned around social distinctions, like gender, race, and ethnicity. The deployment of AI in labour market processes is known to exacerbate such inequalities through perpetuation of existing gender and ethnic biases hiring and career progression. From the point of view of policy our proposal speaks directly to the following priorities in both countries-the UK's Industrial Strategy, which has 'putting the UK at the forefront of the AI and data revolution' as one of its grand challenges; the UK's AI sector deal that aims to 'boost the UK's global position as a leader in developing AI technologies'; and the Canadian SSHRC's goal of tackling persistent demographic (ethnic and gender) disparities in workforce selection and development.

Why is it unique? Although we know that AI can exacerbate biases in the labour market, we do not know how AI can mitigate these biases. The project develops responsible and trustworthy AI that reduces labour market inequalities by tackling gender and ethnic/racial biases in job advertising, hiring and professional networking processes. It enhances capacity development for responsible AI applications through training of early career researchers, builds on existing and develops new UK-Canada research partnerships, and develops outputs for multiple stakeholders (researchers, companies and policy units). It speaks to multiple objectives of the funding call.

Why is it intellectually original and challenging? The project is interdisciplinary. It integrates and cuts across three distinct streams of research (the first two are from the social sciences and the third from the computational and mathematical sciences) to tackle the research objective through an interdisciplinary approach. The first includes studies on socio-economic antecedents of labour market inequality, which underscore the persistence and prominence of gender and ethnic/racial inequalities in the UK and Canada. The second includes studies from business management (digitalisation, technology/AI adoption and human resource management). It emphasizes that while we know that the use of AI in the labour market processes of job advertising, hiring and professional networking can strengthen ethnic and gender bias in these processes we do not know what those biases are and how AI algorithms can mitigate them, as opposed to merely (re)producing them. The third draws on computational statistics (Bayesian statistic/machine learning) to design new AI algorithms and development protocols that integrate human and machine inputs/outputs.

What is the work plan? Our project comprises two interlinked work packages that respectively (1) understand the different dimensions of bias from a multi-stakeholder perspective (e.g. employer, employee, digital platform developer) through in-depth data mining and qualitative investigations when AI algorithms are used in the labour market processes of job advertising, hiring and professional networking; and (2) test/design new AI algorithms to mitigate them and create protocols for their development and implementation.

Planned Impact

Potential 'biases' produced by AI technologies may significantly undermine labour market equality and stymy equitable and sustainable socio-economic development. BIAS's objectives speak directly to multiple national priority agendas in both the UK and Canada - gender pay gap, ethnic/racial disparity, digital and industrial strategy. As both the UK and Canada look to embrace digital transformations as part of their national (economic and industrial) strategies, our focus on the implications of such transformations for labour market equalities and our objective to reduce such inequalities through the responsible development and deployment of AI promises a broad range of impacts, which are pertinent to the future of labour relations, economic competitiveness, human resource management, and industrial strategies.

Who are the beneficiaries?
We expect our project to achieve impact on and through at least six stakeholder groups: (1) data science developers, computer scientists and technicians involved in the designing, testing and maintenance of AI algorithms and platforms for job advertising, hiring and professional networking, (2) international, national and professional associations responsible for regulating the design and deployment of AI and for skill/labour management, (3) platforms (e.g. LinkedIn) that use AI to broker labour market processes, (4) employers that use AI to facilitate hiring, retention and renumeration, (5) job seekers and employees; (6) the general public who are interested in and undergoing digital transformations in society.

How will they benefit?
The stakeholders will benefit from our co-production of open-source AI development protocol and packages, which promises to set new industrial standards for the workflow of AI development that is sensible to 'biases' and accountable for gender and ethnic inequalities. The project will thus inform policy and regulation developments in the design and use of AI. Our findings will also inform platform developers and owners to operate AI-driven labour market platforms in a transparent and explainable manner to ensure egalitarian labour market opportunities and outcomes. In doing so, employers will be able to combine gender and ethnic equality liability into efficient hiring and human resources management practice in their use of AI platforms. A good understanding of potential AI biases and inequality implications will also empower individual job seekers and employees to devise personalised strategies as they engage with AI. Digital transformations in the labour market and more broadly in society concern all citizens. Our project therefore contributes to citizen digital education in soliciting public opinions to input into AI design and in making the AI workflow explainable to the general public.

What are our pathways to impact?
Our anticipated impact will be achieved through a number of channels. First, we will co-produce with research participants (e.g. public sector organisations, governmental departments, the Cabinet Office, platform owners, employers, individual employees, AI developers) and influential industrial stakeholders (e.g. Output, Profusion) an open-source AI development protocol. We have already secured the named stakeholders to form a learning network to take part in the project. Throughout the life of the project, four (international) knowledge exchange workshops will be hosted for the research team and stakeholders to engage with one another. We will also produce regular newsletters, media engagements, vlogs, policy reports, and a short documentary. Members of the project team will work closely with the Cabinet Office through links such as the Lancaster-Cabinet Office Innovation Partnership to partake in the government consultations and development of national strategies. Project members will also speak at AI developer conferences to job fairs felicitate impact among frontline AI practitioners and users.
 
Description Pilot Study on the digital job platform 'Adzuna' in the UK: We conducted a pilot study of this job platform. The objectives of this study were: (1) to understand the kinds of data fields available on typical digital job platforms (We analysed various fields such as salary, location, industry, rank, etc), (2) to examine the job postings by industry and job type; (3) to test the bias detection algorithms discussed in 3b. above, and use the results to inform the main studies and analyses.

Analysis and contextualisation of labour market compositions with secondary data: In parallel to 3d above, we conducted an analysis of labour markets in the UK and Canada. Drawing on the secondary data sources, such as Labour Force Surveys (LFS) and Annual Population Surveys (APS) in the UK, and Census in Canada, we performed descriptive analysis of occupational and industrial compositions by gender and ethnic minority status. The analysis reveals substantial differences in gender composition across industries and occupations, with some industries and occupations being male-dominated, some female-dominated, and some are more balanced. The comparative analysis between Canada and the UK highlights similarities in gender distribution. Further analysis of occupational/industrial representation was conducted by ethnic/racial minority status. In both Canada and UK, industries and occupations have diverse representation of ethnic minorities, with some fields with an underrepresentation of ethnic minorities and other fields with an overrepresentation of ethnic minorities. Since Canada and the UK employ different definitions of ethnic/racial minorities, additional comparative analysis will be explored in the future. This step has laid the foundation for data and measurement harmonisation for our comparative analysis of the UK and Canadian labour market data.

To supplement the analysis of current industrial and occupational distributions by gender, we conducted a review of gender employment trends, and equity legislation over the last decades in Canada and the UK. This analysis helps to contextualize this current inquiry in the historical context of women's participation in the labour force. Focusing on legislation helps to trace the development of equity/equality concepts and its legal implementation. A general trend suggests a considerable improvement in women's employment rates over time, in both Canada and the UK. At the same time, it highlights women's persisting over-representation in part-time employment, underrepresentation in professional and managerial positions and lower wages, on average

Another finding is that bias in labour markets is a socio-technical rather than just a technical issue. In order to understand and mitigate the harm that AI-related bias can do, not only is it important to design AI that addresses bias, it is important to build trust in AI.

We have identified technology enabled best practices that can make workplaces more exclusive.
Exploitation Route The findings provide an initial analysis of labor market differences in gender and ethnicity. We have shared them with our stakeholders and they will be able to use them in their work.
Sectors Digital/Communication/Information Technologies (including Software)

 
Description We submitted evidence to the 'Diversity in STEM' inquiry, Science and Technology Committee, House of Commons, UK Parliament. The evidence was published on the committee's website - https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/43175/pdf. We infer that the evidence will be used to inform the committee's decisions. Hu, Y., Tarafdar, M., Al-Ani, J. A., Rets, I., Hu, S., Denier, D., Hughes, K. D., Konnikov, A., & Ding, L. (2022). Gendered STEM workforce in the United Kingdom: The role of gender bias in job advertising. BIAS project evidence submission to the 'Diversity in STEM' inquiry, Science and Technology Committee, House of Commons, UK Parliament.
First Year Of Impact 2022
Impact Types Policy & public services

 
Description CDEI consultation
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
URL https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-to-data-and-ai-tracker-survey-wave-2
 
Description Project evidence submission to the 'Diversity in STEM' Parliamentary Panel
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
 
Description Current and potential partnerships 
Organisation Reed
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution Developing Partnerships and Impact: We have completed the following activities a. We created an advisory board comprising members from the academic and business communities, spanning the UK, Canada, the USA, and Australia. The members of the advisory board include the following: Industry: Henrik Nordmark, Profusion UK; Lee Gudgeon, Reed Talent Solutions UK; Jonathan Crook (UK). Academic: Nancy Reid (University of Toronto), Charmaine Dean (University of Waterloo), and Randy Goebel (University of Waterloo); Matissa Hollister (McGill University and World Economic Forum), Leah Ruppanner (University of Melbourne), Professor James Hendler (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA). b. We have developed a knowledge exchange partnership with Reed Recruitment, the UK's largest online platform for job postings. Reed offers end-to-end recruitment solutions, and partnering with them offers us insight into the full recruitment pipeline (from defining the specifications for a job advertisement, advertising, sourcing candidates, CV building, applicant screening, to shortlisting and onboarding). We will work with Reed to understand and inform them of where gender and ethnic biases exist in different parts of the AI-moderated recruitment process. We are currently in discussions with jobs.ac.uk for a similar knowledge exchange partnership. c. As another potential knowledge exchange partnership, the Canadian team met with the Canadian Human Right Commission and Federal Office of the Privacy Commissioner, to exchange areas of focus, concerns, and current portfolios. Further meetings will be organized to keep each other abreast of relevant updates. d. The Canadian team also initiated collaboration with the Career Services at the University of Alberta. Specifically, they introduced our project in their newsletter that was circulated through their network, which includes selected companies and HR professionals. We hope to develop this collaboration further in the second phase of the project.
Collaborator Contribution As a result of the stakeholder engagement meetings, we have been granted access to the datasets on job advertising and recruitment (see 5a and 5b below). We have secured representatives from the stakeholder organisations to serve on the project's advisory board to provide ongoing expert advice from an industrial perspective. The stakeholders are at different stages of AI adoption, and they provide distinctive insights into questions and issues that arise from the application of AI in job advertising and recruitment - these questions have usefully informed our ongoing research implementation.
Impact None yet
Start Year 2020
 
Description Job Consolidator UK 
Organisation Reed
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution We are working with the company to understand the role of technology in how they work to improve their diversity and inclusion. 1. We have provided them with an actionable dossier of what practices they can engage in, to enhance workplace inclusion. 2. We also analyzed data from job postings from their platform for gender bias. This will be the basis for action they can take to tackle the bias.
Collaborator Contribution Their contribution: Interviews with technical and professional experts in the company, and company documents and memos.
Impact 1. We have provided them with an actionable dossier of what practices they can engage in, to enhance workplace inclusion. 2. We analyzed data from job postings from their platform for gender bias. This will be the basis for action they can take to tackle the bias Multi-disciplinary collaboration involving: management scientists, sociologists, computer scientists, psychologists
Start Year 2020
 
Title Code for mitigation of gender bias in text 
Description The software is code that has been developed for gender bias mitigation in biased text 
Type Of Technology Software 
Year Produced 2022 
Impact The code is used/published in this peer-reviewed paper: Hu, S., Al-Ani, J. A., Hughes, K. D., Denier, N., Konnikov, A., Ding, L., Xie, J., Hu, Y., Tarafdar,M., Jiang, B., Kong, L., and Dai, H. (2022). Balancing Gender Bias in Job Advertisements with Text-Level Bias Mitigation. Frontiers in Big Data. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.805713 It is available at https://github.com/Lei-Ding07/Word_Debias_DeSIR 
 
Description Ada Lovelace Institute roundtable on Public Attitudes to Data 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Bran Knowles was an invited participant at this closed door policy event.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Ada Lovelace Institute roundtable on Public Attitudes to Data Regulation 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Bran Knowles was an invited participant at this closed door policy event.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description CNA podcast 
Form Of Engagement Activity A broadcast e.g. TV/radio/film/podcast (other than news/press)
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact Research collaboration between Bran Knowles and IBM TJ Waston research was discussed on the Center for Naval Analysis (CNA) Podcast, 1 July 2022. This episode explored the implications of this research for the future of trustworthy AI.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://www.cna.org/our-media/podcasts/ai-with-ai/season-5/5-18
 
Description Engagement Report to influence management practice 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact We provided two reports to Reed Incorporated UK: The first is an actionable dossier of what practices they can engage in, to enhance workplace inclusion. The second is a report of the extent of gender bias in the language of their job postings by sector. These will be the basis for action they can take to tackle enhance workplace inclusion and gender bias in their job postings. The report is expected to reach every member of the organization. Conservatively we expect this to reach the 30 or so people who engaged directly with us on the research.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Evidence submitted to Diversity in STEM parliamentary panel 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Hu, Y., Tarafdar, M., Al-Ani, J. A., Rets, I., Hu, S., Denier, D., Hughes, K. D., Konnikov, A., & Ding, L. (2022). Gendered STEM workforce in the United Kingdom: The role of gender bias in job advertising. BIAS project evidence submission to the 'Diversity in STEM' inquiry, Science and Technology Committee, House of Commons, UK Parliament.

The report has been posted on the website - https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/43175/pdf
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Global engagement event - Work-Family Researchers Network - Public Engagement Event - Advancing Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Work and Family Research: Bringing Marginalized Identities to the Forefront. 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact The WFRN Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) subcommittee organised this virtual event to bring together research that advances Equity, Diversity and Inclusion as it relates to work and family for a fair and just social world. Marginalised identities and those at the intersections of-gender, race, dis/ability, inequalities, ethnicity, colonialism, and migrants will be brought to the forefront in the presentations and our discussion. This event is publicly faced, with participation from both non-academic general public and organizational participants and academic participants. Two members of the BIAS project participated in this event (Yang Hu and Nicole Denier) to present findings from the project on the implications of the use of AI in hiring for labor market gender and ethnic inequalities.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
 
Description IBM UK seminar 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact Bran Knowles was invited to present her research on "Humble AI" (publications written within this grant) to IBM UK's Seminar Series.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description International Conference on Information Systems 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presentation at the International Conference on Information Systems to a practitioner and scholarly audience.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Invited expert on a panel on AI and Data 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Tarafdar, M., & Rets, I. (2021). What matters now: Artificial Intelligence and the data revolution. Management School, Lancaster University, 5 November 2021.
https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lums/news/lancaster-university-event-tackles-artificial-intelligence-issues

Expert presenters on a panel on the following topic; "Experts from LUMS and the business world will discuss the challenges and opportunities for businesses in working with AI and data analysis, and how it can help to improve their practices and productivity, and take their organisation into the next generation."
Attendees; 62
Types of roles; Director, Managing Director, Senior Analyst, Partner, Civil Servants, Productivity Improvement Leader, Technology Consultant, EC&I Engineer, IT Project Manager, Data Practice Lead, Head of Marketing and Communications, Investment Analyst, Web Developer
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description Media interview on bias in hiring and recruitment 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact The interview was undertaken by Reuters and the report / article published here - https://www.reuters.com/article/global-women-workers/corrected-feature-can-artificial-intelligence-help-close-gender-gaps-at-work-idUSL8N2S66FE
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
 
Description PADAI invited talk 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Bran Knowles was invited to present to the UK Government's Public Attidues to Data and AI (PADAI) network of cross-Whitehall organisations involved in data policy. She spoke about her work on trust in AI (conducted during this grant) to a group of about 40 individuals from a range of organisations, including NHS, MOD, DfT, the home office, DCSM, ONS and many others. This talk was arranged through the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, a group that Bran will continue to work with as they develop their public sector algorithmic transparency standard.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Population Association of America - Invited panel discussion on the implications of AI for labor market racial inequalities 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact Nicole Denier is invited to participate in a formal expert panel discussion on the implications of AI for labor market racial inequalities at the 2023 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. A selected group of four expert panellists are invited and involved on the panel.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
 
Description Stakeholder Meetings 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Study participants or study members
Results and Impact We have held a series of engagement meetings with key stakeholders in the UK (i.e. Reed recruitment, Jobs.ac.uk, Adzuna) to establish industrial collaborations and explore stakeholder interests/concerns related to AI biases in labour market processes. The meetings focused on (1) accessing job advertising and recruitment data from the stakeholders, (2) exploring key questions and challenges related to AI biases in which the stakeholders were interested, (3) developing strategies for ongoing engagement and impact dissemination, and (4) establishing access for our WP2 qualitative fieldwork in recruitment organisations.

As a result of the stakeholder engagement meetings, we have been granted access to the datasets on job advertising and recruitment (see 5a and 5b below). We have secured representatives from the stakeholder organisations to serve on the project's advisory board to provide ongoing expert advice from an industrial perspective. The stakeholders are at different stages of AI adoption, and they provide distinctive insights into questions and issues that arise from the application of AI in job advertising and recruitment - these questions have usefully informed our ongoing research implementation.

In October 2020 we organized our first stakeholder meeting involving all UK, Canadian and US stakeholders. The objective of the meeting was to obtain insights on their ideas and concepts regarding gender and ethnic biases in their organizational settings. Prior to the meeting we provided them with an overview of the results from our pilot study. After the meeting we generated a document that captured the key insights from the discussion and distributed it to our stakeholders.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description UKRI-SSHRC Policy Conference 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact a. Members of our team attended the UKRI-SSHRC policy conference panel on Interdisciplinary research.
Ours was one of two projects to have been selected for this conference. The panel discussion was well received. Some taking home messages include; 1. The network was able to build on the initial trust and mutual interest from graduate students who had previously collaborated. 2. A blend of senior and early-career researchers (ECRs) contributed to the success of the program. 3. The international lens was seen as important, as some of the problems are universal (e.g., online hate speech, racism and other forms of discrimination), though cultural contexts may be different. 4. AI can help identify and understand labour market inequalities and biases, informing more equitable recruiting. There are some proposed further actions; 1. Additional support is recommended for international and interdisciplinary efforts like this program, where mutual benefits can exceed what would otherwise be possible. Initial 'brain-storming' meetings are a good mechanism to explore synergies and develop the right questions. 2. Such programs need to take an interdisciplinary and international approach, with the social science and technology built in together from the start, vs. social science as a token add-on. 3. Careful consideration needs to be given of the ethics, equity issues and other potential impacts of these tools.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020