Orthodox Christian Material Ecology and the Sociopolitics of Religion

Lead Research Organisation: University College London
Department Name: Anthropology

Abstract

Aims: This project asks 'What role does the material ecology play in shaping the sociopolitics of Global Orthodoxy?' as a case study for global political discourse and the role of material in the social dynamics of religion.
Impact: Orthodox Christianity is a tradition based on discourse, but there has been very little research looking at the specifics of how it works. Focusing on discourse also tends to over emphasise words and belief. But what if, like Max Muller, we insist that religion must start with what is perceived, not with concepts like 'belief in the supernatural'? This means we situate discursive traditions like Orthodoxy not in concepts but in the material culture of local and global religious groups. This reframes how we understand religion, and forefronts the impact that religious practice has upon material aspects of our experience like health, the environment and geopolitics.
Context: Much social scientific interest in religion looks at the variation in the lived religion from one place to another. However, there are moments - such as in April 2018 when the President of Ukraine asked the Greek Patriarch to intervene into the Russian Church in the Ukraine - when religion can not be studied only in the local lived expression. Situations such as the conflict in Ukraine are complicated by historic tension between local Orthodox Churches. Disagreements in the interpretation of the theology of the body, person, and environment foment political tension within the Churches, between the Churches and external bodies, and between nations. The materiality of discourse must be seen as central to the form and practice of the tradition.
Research: Framed in terms of three research domains, this project focuses on the material conditions of Global Orthodox sociopolitics, conducting research amongst Orthodox Christians and religious institutions. The project investigates how the properties and affordances of the material ecology (including the body, the built environment and wider 'natural' order) shape and are marshalled within the discourse of the Orthodox Churches. The three domains are the Body, Person, and Environment. The Body domain addresses issues such as medical interventions, like IVF and organ donation, which are, across Global Orthodoxy, contentious to varying degrees. The material body becomes a place for negotiating ethical goods (eg extending life, fertility, honouring God). The Person domain examines the variance in permission different churches grant concerning family and marriage practices (eg divorce, family planning). There is also a mounting discourse around identity politics, with some voices pushing for an open approach to homosexuality and women clergy. The material of the body, person, and Church are marshalled as the grounding for historically contingent, philosophically premised, and scientifically inflected arguments for or against 'progressive' movements. Finally, the Environment domain examines the relationship between humans, specific locations, and the earth as a whole. Orthodox theologians highlight an emphasis on 'stewardship of the earth' and call for active engagement in ecological conservation. Issues such as Global Warming take an explicitly religious imperative, as scientific data points to human failure to fulfil their God-given role as caretakers. The control of land (including places like Crimea and Jerusalem) also becomes a religious duty with geopolitical impact.
Output: This project will produce one academic book on the material aspects of the sociopolitics of Orthodox Christianity, a book written for a general audience looking at key case studies around contemporary issues in Orthodoxy, six academic articles, white papers and policy advice on various issues relating to the health and wellbeing of Orthodox Christians and their homelands, and pamphlets written with stakeholder community leaders to help address social issues within the community settings.

Planned Impact

In addition to academic beneficiaries, this project will benefit (1) specialists within stakeholder communities and professional practitioners in NGO's, community groups, and health and conservation authorities; (2) policy makers; and (3) members of the general public.

(1) Specialists within stakeholder communities and professional practitioners: This includes three overlapping categories of (a) clerical, (b) medical, and (c) environmental.
(a) For clergy (and others) involved in the official discourses of Orthodox Christianity the project outputs I produce (academic publications, policy papers, procedure pamphlets) will be ready sources of consolidated information.
(b) For medical personnel, of various kinds, the procedure pamphlets and my book on contemporary issues will help explain concerns and priorities held by patients and families.
(c) For environmental projects, including community groups, parishes and monasteries which operate as centres for environmental conservation, both in resistance to genetically modified (GM) plant varieties and in sustainable models of communal living, the network I will help establish during the project will offer a forum for knowledge exchange, collaboration and sustained support. This knowledge exchange will include, in the first instance, pamphlets on critical topics I will co-write with specialist stakeholders (e.g. religious & community leaders, practitioner academics).

(2) Policy makers: Case studies with impact into national and international policy (on, for example, health of Orthodox populations, diplomacy with Orthodox countries and refugee/migrant care) will be drafted as white papers for Westminster and European parliaments. Working with international collaborators, similar briefs will be drafted for lobbyist groups and congressional/parliamentarian representatives of stakeholder communities.

(3) General public: Public engagement events during the project will bring members of Orthodox Christian communities into discussions around key case studies, allowing the general public to shape the direction of project enquiry. The project will produce six articles; a monograph on the material ecology of the sociopolitics of religion; a second book, for general readership, based on specific case studies of contemporary relevance within global Orthodoxy; and various policy papers and information pamphlets. All off this will be made available open access, in highly accessible language, first on the project website and then via UCL Press. Similarly, a project website which will be updated throughout the project years will remain as a legacy site within UCL's web domain. This will be a site for the general public and other interested parties to access data, information and resources produced during the project.
 
Description During the pandemic, religious communities responded to health policy which infringed upon or limited their religious practice in different ways. In this project, focusing on the ways theological principles relate to material objects and social practices, we looked at how idioms of contagion - around both religious blessing and viral loads - come into conflict and are mediated by deep ethical commitments. We found that the ethical obligation to love the neighbour, working alongside a logic of negation (apophaticism), meant that community uptake of public health policy was done in tandem with the perceived threat from and concern for the neighbour. This finding, the first of its kind to be based on comparative ethnographies from four distinct national fieldsites, has allowed us to make specific recommendations about how public health policy be addressed to Orthodox Christians in the future, both in the UK and abroad. An article arising from the findings is currently under review.
Exploitation Route I am in discussion with SciPod to have them make an episode about these findings, however this is contingent on the OA fee being paid. As this is not a standard peer reviewed publication, my host institute does not see this as falling within the OA budget. I have contacted UKRI RO and the FLF team, and have heard no response from them.

I am also in conversation with a colleague seconded to the cabinet office, trying to get some headway on getting these findings on governments might best approach religious communities.
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy,Healthcare,Government, Democracy and Justice,Other

 
Description Ongoing research around mental health within the Orthodox Christian communities with whom I conduct research has led to formal agreements between the Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese and the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese in the UK. This formal agreement paves the way for collaboration - to be carried out during this next year - toward establishing a centre for mental health and wellbeing. This is a major achievement, and is part of a larger agreement which I have similarly helped arrange in terms of intention to collaborate between these distinct ecclesiastic and ethnic bodies. These agreements have been secured after demonstration of common needs and interests, not only in vague terms of good will between religious communities, but based on specific findings around common needs concerning the health and wellbeing of clergy and laity within these communities and problems members of the communities face in gaining support through national infrastructure due to the distinct needs and priorities borne from their religious commitments.
First Year Of Impact 2021
Sector Other
Impact Types Cultural,Societal,Policy & public services

 
Description British Academy Writing Workshops 2020
Amount £19,999 (GBP)
Funding ID WW20200117 
Organisation The British Academy 
Sector Academic/University
Country United Kingdom
Start 01/2020 
End 12/2021
 
Description UCL SHS Dean's Strategic Funds
Amount £4,942 (GBP)
Organisation University College London 
Department Faculty of Social & Historical Sciences
Sector Academic/University
Country United Kingdom
Start 12/2021 
End 07/2022
 
Description Invited speaker to 3rd sector conference hosted by Churches Together in England 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Third sector organisations
Results and Impact The PI was invited to speak on mental health in mission to a conference that drew together 3rd sector professionals as well as students who were identified as 'future leaders' in the sector. The talks were run as workshops, and the session given twice, with roughly 25-35 people attending each session. The intended purpose was to raise awareness of the issues around mental health within the sector, provide opportunity for knowledge exchange (between the PI and professionals and between professionals), and provide recommendations to professionals about how their companies/charities might better equip themselves to address these challenges.

The sessions catalysed ongoing discussions past the workshop setting. One of the organisers, who was in charge of the 'future leaders' session, reported back to the PI that the session was 'profound' and 'transformative'.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
 
Description Paper presented at IOTA's second international mega-conference 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact "Church, State, Politics, Science: Notes on Greece's COVID-19 Experience," paper presented at IOTA's second international mega-conference, Volos, Greece, 14 January 2023. The conference had circa 450 participants, mainly academics. The paper raised the audience's interest in the published outputs related to the wider research endeavour on the titular subject.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
URL https://iota-web.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Volos-2023-Conference-Program-Draft-FINAL.pdf
 
Description Personally invited to give a lecture at an international postgraduate summer school in Belgrade, Serbia 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact Dr Lackenby was invited to give a lecture at an international summer school held at the Philosophy Faculty, University of Belgrade (Empires and Emotions: Rethinking intellectual and cultural transfers/translations in southeastern Europe and the Mediterranean (15th - 19th centuries). The school brought together postgraduate students from across Europe and was funded by a European COST action grant. Dr Lackenby gave a 60 minute lecture entitled 'Religion, nationalism, and belonging after socialism: anthropological approaches'. Afterwards he led a 30 minute discussion with the students.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description Presentation at the UCL Social Anthropology seminar 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact Dr Nicholas Lackenby presented a seminar paper at the UCL Social Anthropology seminar. It was entitled 'Holy People: Ethno-Moral belonging in central Serbia.' He spoke for an hour after which the audience asked questions for the remaining hour. The paper was well-received and stoked a lively discussion.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
URL https://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/news-and-events/seminar-series/social-anthropology-seminar-series
 
Description Television interview with the Serbian television channel "TV Hram" 
Form Of Engagement Activity A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Lackenby was invited to be interviewed on "TV Hram", a Serbian TV channel dedicated to Orthodox Christian themes and aimed primarily at the general public. He discussed his previous research in Serbia, as well as the new project. He talked about the importance of anthropological fieldwork, and the sort of insights that it gives. The presenter suggested that, in the future, Lackenby could give another interview, dealing with his research themes in more depth.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021