Enhancement to: "Earthquakes Without Frontiers: a partnership for increasing resilience to seismic hazard in the continents"
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Cambridge
Department Name: Earth Sciences
Abstract
This proposal is to integrate researchers from India into an existing International Partnership that brings together scientists from countries affected by damaging and potentially catastrophic earthquakes in the Alpine-Himalayan region and central Asia. This Partnership, established through an earlier (and current) NERC-IOF grant and a current NERC-ESRC consortium grant and led by investigators in the NERC-funded COMET+* consortium, will be enhanced and expanded through the participation of India.
The Partnership was formed as a response to a series of high-impact earthquakes over the last decade, which emphasized the stark contrast existing today between the effects of earthquakes in rich and developing nations. In terms of human life, the risk is overwhelmingly concentrated in the developing world, and predominantly in continental interiors, with the Alpine-Himalayan region and central Asia being particularly threatened. Many communities and cities in this region are known to be vulnerable because of past earthquakes, but they now have considerably larger exposed populations.
A first and essential step in reducing that vulnerability is to improve the level of knowledge and characterization of the hazard concerned; which is far below, for example, California or Japan. That task requires the engagement of scientists in the countries concerned, but would be greatly aided by the expertise available in the international scientific community, even in countries where the local scientific base is already strong.
In particular, two geological effects contribute to continental Asia's special vulnerability: (1) Earthquakes in continental interiors typically occur on widely-distributed faults that are poorly known and move relatively infrequently. By comparison, those on plate boundaries adjacent to oceans (such as Japan, Chile) occur on faults that are more localized, better known and move more often. (2) Many human settlements in continental interiors concentrate (and then grow) in locations close to earthquake-generating faults, which control topography, water supply or trade routes.
Improving knowledge and understanding of the earthquake hazard is therefore inescapably linked to the first-order scientific question of how continental tectonics works: a cutting-edge priority at the highest level in international science, which also requires the full range of observational, theoretical and technical capabilities now available to the scientific community.
The issues involved in addressing earthquake hazard and earthquake science in the Alpine-Himalayan region and central Asia are therefore best tackled by international partnerships of scientists, which can help bring an appropriate mixture of expertise, technology, man-power and training to bear in each area or country. That is the point of the Partnership we aim to enhance here by facilitating the participation of scientists from India.
The Partnership functions through meetings, workshops and training activities, including a summer school and exchange visits, principally of young scientists between the UK and participating countries. The principal Project Partners in the original IOF proposal, who also contribute substantially to the costs, are Italy, Kazakhstan and China. Supporting members include Greece, Turkey, Iran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan. It was always the intention that others would join later, and the addition of India proposed here will add one of the most vulnerable countries in the entire Alpine-Himalayan-Asia region. The intention is that the benefits and functioning of the Partnership will continue well beyond the duration of the IOF award.
*COMET+ is the Dynamic Earth and Geohazards Group of NERC's National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO): see (http://comet.nerc.ac.uk)
The Partnership was formed as a response to a series of high-impact earthquakes over the last decade, which emphasized the stark contrast existing today between the effects of earthquakes in rich and developing nations. In terms of human life, the risk is overwhelmingly concentrated in the developing world, and predominantly in continental interiors, with the Alpine-Himalayan region and central Asia being particularly threatened. Many communities and cities in this region are known to be vulnerable because of past earthquakes, but they now have considerably larger exposed populations.
A first and essential step in reducing that vulnerability is to improve the level of knowledge and characterization of the hazard concerned; which is far below, for example, California or Japan. That task requires the engagement of scientists in the countries concerned, but would be greatly aided by the expertise available in the international scientific community, even in countries where the local scientific base is already strong.
In particular, two geological effects contribute to continental Asia's special vulnerability: (1) Earthquakes in continental interiors typically occur on widely-distributed faults that are poorly known and move relatively infrequently. By comparison, those on plate boundaries adjacent to oceans (such as Japan, Chile) occur on faults that are more localized, better known and move more often. (2) Many human settlements in continental interiors concentrate (and then grow) in locations close to earthquake-generating faults, which control topography, water supply or trade routes.
Improving knowledge and understanding of the earthquake hazard is therefore inescapably linked to the first-order scientific question of how continental tectonics works: a cutting-edge priority at the highest level in international science, which also requires the full range of observational, theoretical and technical capabilities now available to the scientific community.
The issues involved in addressing earthquake hazard and earthquake science in the Alpine-Himalayan region and central Asia are therefore best tackled by international partnerships of scientists, which can help bring an appropriate mixture of expertise, technology, man-power and training to bear in each area or country. That is the point of the Partnership we aim to enhance here by facilitating the participation of scientists from India.
The Partnership functions through meetings, workshops and training activities, including a summer school and exchange visits, principally of young scientists between the UK and participating countries. The principal Project Partners in the original IOF proposal, who also contribute substantially to the costs, are Italy, Kazakhstan and China. Supporting members include Greece, Turkey, Iran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan. It was always the intention that others would join later, and the addition of India proposed here will add one of the most vulnerable countries in the entire Alpine-Himalayan-Asia region. The intention is that the benefits and functioning of the Partnership will continue well beyond the duration of the IOF award.
*COMET+ is the Dynamic Earth and Geohazards Group of NERC's National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO): see (http://comet.nerc.ac.uk)
Planned Impact
Who will benefit?
The principles beneficiaries of the Partnership that will be enhanced in this proposal are:
(1) The countries participating in the partnership, including the new partner India: that is its point.
(2) The relations between UK government institutions, NGOs and foreign equivalents.
(3) International institutions and organizations concerned with earthquake hazard.
(4) The Insurance and Risk Industry concerned with earthquake hazard and catastrophe planning.
(5) The wider public understanding of science.
How will they benefit?
The countries participating in the partnership include a number of government-funded or -run institutions charged with advising on earthquake risk. This proposal is to stimulate and enhance their earthquake science capabilities: and these organizations are well aware of the importance of that science in helping them with their government advisory roles. Our scientific input will aid them in this important additional function, as will the experience we can bring of government and inter-government interaction through our colleagues in the British Geological Survey (BGS), including its Director and a KE Fellow.
UK institutions are likely to benefit through increased contacts and interaction with their overseas equivalents that are likely to lead to other cooperative activities or contracts. The most obvious is the BGS, which has a lot of experience and advice to offer countries concerned with enhancing their national capabilities, such as monitoring networks. They may well involve other UK institutions in this endeavor.
This project will provide input to international institutions and organizations concerned with earthquake hazard. The most obvious is the Global Earthquake Model (GEM), concerned with a global characterization of potentially earthquake-generating faults: essentially an international scientific data-gathering project. NERC and BGS are partners in GEM, and some COMET+ investigators are already contributing their own inputs on faults and countries they have been studying. Several of our overseas Partners are also their own national representatives on GEM, so there are multiple and clear links to make sure the new science from this Partnership, which will be highly relevant, is channeled effectively into the GEM project.
Insurance and Risk Industry, both in the UK and overseas, is concerned with earthquake hazard and catastrophe planning. It is a principal driver behind the GEM project and is clearly interested in the constantly-evolving understanding of earthquake hazard. We are well connected to this industry through: (1) the BGS and NERC Council, which includes Mr. Rowan Douglas of Willis Re; (2) the COMET+ Advisory Board, which includes Dr. Andrew Coburn of Risk Management Solutions (RMS); (3) Prof. Robin Spence of Cambridge Architectural Research Ltd, who is a member of the Willis Research Network and on the Scientific Board of GEM.
Large, damaging earthquakes are rarely out of the news for long, and so the potential for engagement with the public understanding of science is considerable. There is a constant demand for COMET+ and BGS investigators to appear on radio and television broadcasts, to write articles in the popular press, and to give public lectures. All the investigators on the original IOF proposal and this pump-priming enhancement are regularly engaged in this activity, even when the earthquake is not in a country where we work directly. The public appetite for informed, clear, understandable and jargon-free explanations of natural catastrophes is insatiable. Such events are virtually certain to occur during the duration of an IOF award. We will pursue energetically the opportunities to engage with the public through lectures, broadcasts, web sites and briefings to UK government agencies and NGOs.
The principles beneficiaries of the Partnership that will be enhanced in this proposal are:
(1) The countries participating in the partnership, including the new partner India: that is its point.
(2) The relations between UK government institutions, NGOs and foreign equivalents.
(3) International institutions and organizations concerned with earthquake hazard.
(4) The Insurance and Risk Industry concerned with earthquake hazard and catastrophe planning.
(5) The wider public understanding of science.
How will they benefit?
The countries participating in the partnership include a number of government-funded or -run institutions charged with advising on earthquake risk. This proposal is to stimulate and enhance their earthquake science capabilities: and these organizations are well aware of the importance of that science in helping them with their government advisory roles. Our scientific input will aid them in this important additional function, as will the experience we can bring of government and inter-government interaction through our colleagues in the British Geological Survey (BGS), including its Director and a KE Fellow.
UK institutions are likely to benefit through increased contacts and interaction with their overseas equivalents that are likely to lead to other cooperative activities or contracts. The most obvious is the BGS, which has a lot of experience and advice to offer countries concerned with enhancing their national capabilities, such as monitoring networks. They may well involve other UK institutions in this endeavor.
This project will provide input to international institutions and organizations concerned with earthquake hazard. The most obvious is the Global Earthquake Model (GEM), concerned with a global characterization of potentially earthquake-generating faults: essentially an international scientific data-gathering project. NERC and BGS are partners in GEM, and some COMET+ investigators are already contributing their own inputs on faults and countries they have been studying. Several of our overseas Partners are also their own national representatives on GEM, so there are multiple and clear links to make sure the new science from this Partnership, which will be highly relevant, is channeled effectively into the GEM project.
Insurance and Risk Industry, both in the UK and overseas, is concerned with earthquake hazard and catastrophe planning. It is a principal driver behind the GEM project and is clearly interested in the constantly-evolving understanding of earthquake hazard. We are well connected to this industry through: (1) the BGS and NERC Council, which includes Mr. Rowan Douglas of Willis Re; (2) the COMET+ Advisory Board, which includes Dr. Andrew Coburn of Risk Management Solutions (RMS); (3) Prof. Robin Spence of Cambridge Architectural Research Ltd, who is a member of the Willis Research Network and on the Scientific Board of GEM.
Large, damaging earthquakes are rarely out of the news for long, and so the potential for engagement with the public understanding of science is considerable. There is a constant demand for COMET+ and BGS investigators to appear on radio and television broadcasts, to write articles in the popular press, and to give public lectures. All the investigators on the original IOF proposal and this pump-priming enhancement are regularly engaged in this activity, even when the earthquake is not in a country where we work directly. The public appetite for informed, clear, understandable and jargon-free explanations of natural catastrophes is insatiable. Such events are virtually certain to occur during the duration of an IOF award. We will pursue energetically the opportunities to engage with the public through lectures, broadcasts, web sites and briefings to UK government agencies and NGOs.
Publications
Copley A
(2018)
Unexpected earthquake hazard revealed by Holocene rupture on the Kenchreai Fault (central Greece): Implications for weak sub-fault shear zones
in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Copley A
(2017)
The strength of earthquake-generating faults
in Journal of the Geological Society
Elliott J
(2016)
Himalayan megathrust geometry and relation to topography revealed by the Gorkha earthquake
in Nature Geoscience
England P
(2015)
The Shillong Plateau and the great 1897 Assam earthquake
in Tectonics
James Jackson
(2016)
Earthquake science and hazard in Central Asia - conference summary
Kumar A
(2017)
The 2015 April 25 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake and its aftershocks: implications for lateral heterogeneity on the Main Himalayan Thrust
in Geophysical Journal International
Mitra S
(2018)
Crustal Structure and Evolution of the Eastern Himalayan Plate Boundary System, Northeast India
in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Najman Y
(2016)
Evolving strain partitioning in the Eastern Himalaya: The growth of the Shillong Plateau
in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Penney C
(2021)
Lateral Variations in Lower Crustal Strength Control the Temporal Evolution of Mountain Ranges: Examples From South-East Tibet
in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Priestley K
(2019)
The crustal structure of the Himalaya: A synthesis
in Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Description | The extensions to the EwF and IOF project allowed (a) the purchase of additional satellite-based data to extend our work into new areas and (b) specifically an increased engagement with earthquake scientists in India, initiated through a joint workshop in Jammu in November 2016. This cemented and enhanced our joint reaction and involvement in the aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquake, where considerable hazard remains that we continue to monitor together. The other major impact has been in immediate and continuing advice to government (DFID, GO-science, SAGE) on the aftermath of the Nepal earthquake. As part of this engagement with India, Jackson spent a month with Indian EwF partners in the field in central India, and in teaching a graduate course in Continental Tectonics at IISER Kolkata in November 2016. |
Exploitation Route | The Jammu workshop cemented and enhanced our joint reaction and involvement in the aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquake, where considerable hazard remains that we continue to monitor together. The other major impact has been in immediate and continuing advice to government (DFID, GO-science, SAGE) on the aftermath of the Nepal earthquake. The course taught at IISER Kolkata was attended by about 50 students from all over India, so the brand of Earthquakes Without Frontiers is now well known. |
Sectors | Education,Environment |
URL | http://ewf.nerc.ac.uk/publications/ |
Description | The extensions to the EwF and IOF project allowed (a) the purchase of additional satellite-based data to extend our work into new areas and (b) specifically an increased engagement with earthquake scientists in India, initiated through a joint workshop in Jammu in November 2016. This cemented and enhanced our joint reaction and involvement in the aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquake, where considerable hazard remains that we continue to monitor together. The other major impact has been in immediate and continuing advice to government (DFID, GO-science, SAGE) on the aftermath of the Nepal earthquake. The impact has been further enhanced by the course taught by Jackson at IISER Kolkata in 2016, reported on in the previous section. |
First Year Of Impact | 2017 |
Sector | Education,Environment |
Impact Types | Cultural,Societal,Policy & public services |
Description | Jammu, India, Nov 2016 Earthquake Hazard: Basic Approaches, Field Investigations and Modeling |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | One week training programme on Earthquake Hazard: Basic Approaches, Field Investigations and Modeling' at Kalika Dham, Jammu, India 10-16 Nov 2016. The programme was organised by the School of Innovation and Community Development, SMVD University with Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, and Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge. Young scientists working in the area of earth sciences from National Institutions, Central and State Universities from India and University of Cambridge participated in the programme which comprised of lectures, interactions, hands on tutorials and field training. James Jackson, Keith Priestley and Alex Copley were among the mentors. In addition a series of lectures and talks were given by James Jackson on earthquake hazard and preparedness at the Indian Academy of Sciences and to municipal government officials/policymakers and the public in Jammu. He also gave several interviews for Indian media. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
URL | http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/serb-programme-on-earthquake-hazard-concludes/ |
Description | Kazakhstan Feb 2016 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | For discussions with the Yessenov Foundation (a charity), the Institute of Seismology (Academy of Sciences), and the mayor's office in Almaty (former capital of Kazakhstan, destroyed by earthquakes in 1887, 1889, 1911), who are co-sponsors of an EwF meeting to raise awareness of earthquake safety and hazard in Kazakhstan in September 2016. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Meeting with Ambassador of Kazakhstan 6 June 2015 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Meeting with the Ambassador of Kazakhstan in London on 6 May 2015 to brief him on EWF's involvement with earthquake sciences and risk mitigation in Kazakhstan and about our collaboration with Kazakh scientists. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | Meeting with High Commissioner of India, London, 28 April 2015 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Meeting with the High Commissioner of India on 28 April 2015 to brief him about EwF's involvement with earthquake sciences and risk mitigation in India and about our collaboration with Indian scientists. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | Talk to Arup, London, 30 June 2015 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | An invited presentation to the geotechnical group of Arup consulting engineers (London) on recent advances in understanding earthquakes in continental interiors. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | Turkemenistan September 2015 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | To establish relations and collaboration with the Academy of Sciences in Turkmenistan, whose capital Ashgabat was destroyed in an earthquake in 1948, killing 100,000. We plan joint fieldwork on the Ashgabat Fault, thought to have been responsible for the 1948 earthquake, in May 2016. (Turkmenistan has been virtually closed to outside interactions fro at least 20 years: this would be a major step, if it comes off). |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |
Description | Visit to Iran May 2015 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | This was a workshop and conference on earthquake science and hazard evaluation, run by EwF at the Geological Survey of Iran. Two days of research talks, attended by 100+ Iranian scientists, followed by 5 days of lectures and practical demonstrations, attended by over 50 Iranian graduate students. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |