Assessing the scope for on-site wetland technology to treat de-icer contaminated runoff at airports

Lead Research Organisation: Lancaster University
Department Name: Lancaster Environment Centre

Abstract

For safety reasons, airports in many parts of the world use large volumes of chemical de-icers during winter months. De-icers are applied directly to runways and taxiways and are spayed onto aircraft to remove ice, snow and frost and to prevent these substances from reoccurring on aircraft prior to take-off. However, de-icing chemicals accumulate on airport surfaces, either following direct application to runways or taxiways or following shearing of the chemicals from aircraft during take-off. Rainfall that subsequently falls on airport surfaces can mobilise de-icing chemicals, generating large volumes of contaminated surface water within airport storm water systems. This contaminated surface water must be treated before being released into the environment. If released into the environment without treatment, negative effects can occur, primarily because de-icing chemicals remove substantial quantities of oxygen from water.

The traditional approach to treating de-icer contaminated runoff from airports involves discharging the runoff to water company sewers for off-site treatment at a waste water treatment works. This involves a substantial financial cost to the airport operator and is also associated with negative environmental effects, including greenhouse gas emissions during off-site waste water treatment. As airports grow in the future to accommodate increased demand for air travel, the volume of de-icer application and the volume of contaminated surface runoff at airports are likely to increase significantly. Under these conditions, it is highly likely that the traditional approach to treatment of de-icer contaminated runoff, through discharge to water company sewer, will become both economically and environmentally unsustainable.

Therefore, alternative treatment options are required to address de-icer contaminated runoff from airports. This internship will draw on NERC-funded science and on-going PhD research at Lancaster University to assess the potential for on-site wetland technologies to treat contaminated runoff. These alternative technologies are based on pollutant removal processes that operate within natural wetland ecosystems. The intern will build on an existing collaboration between Manchester Airport, Lancaster University and Peak Associates to develop and assess on-site wetland treatment options for application at Manchester Airport, but with broader applicability to airports in the UK and worldwide. The intern will evaluate the specific design requirements of a treatment system, examine how on-site treatment systems can be incorporated within airport infrastructure, and undertake an economic feasibility study comparing these alternative treatment systems to traditional approaches for dealing with contaminated surface runoff.

This is a particularly timely opportunity for the internship given the recently announced £1bn, 10-year expansion project at Manchester Airport. Working with our partners, the internship has the potential to directly influence the early stages of the planning for surface water management as part of this expansion. We will also work with the broader UK airport industry to maximize the impact of the NERC-remit science that will form the basis for the intern's work.

Publications

10 25 50
 
Description Future scenarios of airport development, de-icer consumption and global climate change indicate additional inputs and pressure on existing surface water systems, which warrants investigations of alternative management solutions to mitigate these impacts. However there is no one technology or solution to meet the treatment requirements and constraints at all airport and therefore an assessment of the best available technology is recommended when considering the implementation of de-icer treatment technologies.
Exploitation Route Can be used to drive assessments of future inputs and alternative management methods such as implementing onsite treatment technologies.
Sectors Aerospace, Defence and Marine,Agriculture, Food and Drink,Chemicals,Construction,Education,Energy,Environment,Transport,Other

 
Description Used to deliver water quality monitoring programme and assessment of best available treatment technologies for implementation within the application of dairy production by Peak Associates Environmental Consultants Ltd.
First Year Of Impact 2015
Sector Agriculture, Food and Drink,Environment
Impact Types Economic

 
Title Assessing the Scope for Implementing Onsite Technologies such as Aerated Wetlands, to treat De-icer Contaminated Storm Runoff at Airports. 
Description The concept of using aerated wetlands to manage de-icer contaminated discharges is considered within this study along with methodologies for determining the size, configuration, layout, blower and nutrient requirements based on site specific treatment requirements. The method specifically addresses selection of the best available technology to meet individual airport constraints and requirements. Methods of water quality monitoring are central to this and explained in detail within the report. The study concludes by considering the economic feasibility of aerated wetlands including capital costs, operating and maintenance costs and payback time to help inform business cases. Whilst the methodologies presented in this study specifically focus on the implementation of aerated wetlands at airports, they are also highly relevant for sizing, design and implementation of aerated wetlands within other wastewater treatment applications. 
Type Of Material Improvements to research infrastructure 
Provided To Others? No  
Impact Notable impacts include; the use of best technology selection and water quality monitoring methods by Peak Associates to quantify water quality characteristics and feasibility of implementing treatment systems in the application of dairy production. It is envisaged that the methods described within the report will be used by Peak Associates to undertake water quality monitoring at other airport sites in the foreseeable future to quantify treatment requirements and establish the feasibility of implementing treatment systems. 
 
Description Three way collaboration between Peak Associates, Manchester Airport and Lancaster University 
Organisation Manchester Airport Plc
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution Outputs from the research provided a methodology for investigating the feasibility of implementing treatment systems to manage de-icer contaminated runoff. It is envisaged that the methodology will be used within a service offered by the SME Peak Associates to produce the conceptual design for treatment of airport runoff. The methods have been applied to Manchester Airport as a case study with outputs delivering forecasts for future treatment requirements along with the costs and economic payback required to treat existing discharges.
Collaborator Contribution Provision of support in terms of project management and quality assurance of final outputs were provided by Peak Associates, whilst support in provision of data and reports were specifically provided by Manchester Airport Plc.
Impact Guidance report on the methods of assessing the scope and feasibility of implementing treatment at airports.
Start Year 2012
 
Description Three way collaboration between Peak Associates, Manchester Airport and Lancaster University 
Organisation Peak Associates Environmental Consultants Ltd
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution Outputs from the research provided a methodology for investigating the feasibility of implementing treatment systems to manage de-icer contaminated runoff. It is envisaged that the methodology will be used within a service offered by the SME Peak Associates to produce the conceptual design for treatment of airport runoff. The methods have been applied to Manchester Airport as a case study with outputs delivering forecasts for future treatment requirements along with the costs and economic payback required to treat existing discharges.
Collaborator Contribution Provision of support in terms of project management and quality assurance of final outputs were provided by Peak Associates, whilst support in provision of data and reports were specifically provided by Manchester Airport Plc.
Impact Guidance report on the methods of assessing the scope and feasibility of implementing treatment at airports.
Start Year 2012