Harmonising and UPgrading GREENhouse gas removal (GGR) consequential Life Cycle Assessment (UP-green-LCA)

Lead Research Organisation: Cranfield University
Department Name: School of Water, Energy and Environment

Abstract

"GGR topic-specific" project proposal. To achieve the UK targets for cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a steady reduction of 3% should be achieved and maintained every year by the whole UK economy. This is the requirement for UK in order to achieve the potential target of 1.5 degrees C of global warming. Different techniques (e.g. land management and use change, ocean fertilisation, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, biochar, direct air capture) have been proposed to remove GHG; but their implementation can have large and unforeseen effects considering all the impacts across the economy. Some techniques such as afforestation, bioenergy, carbon capture and storage could potentially have large land use change and affect the food chains.
Methodological approaches, such life cycle assessment (LCA), have been widely adopted to assess different greenhouse gas removal techniques (GGRT). LCA allows to account for all the impacts from raw material extraction, production, transport, use and waste disposal of a production systems, product or service. In particular consequential LCA approaches have been used to assess the consequences of the various applications of greenhouse gas removal techniques. However consequential LCA is largely based on assumptions and large uncertainties are bound to this approach. Further there is no consensus on the LCA methodology to assess GGRT, let alone the results, and a fair comparison of the efficacy and cost of the different GGRT is required to have an accurate assessment of the benefits of GGRT.
This research proposal is an attempt in reducing the lack of consistency and increase accuracy and robustness of the impacts of alternative GGRT. The main aim of this project is to harmonise the various LCA approaches to assess GGRT, including biochar application, biomass carbon storage, land management change, ocean fertilisation and direct air capture. The project also aims to systematically test and assess the uncertainties related to the application of the consequential LCA to GGRT to improve consequential LCA approaches for greenhouse gas removal. The new approaches are compared with other consortia and research projects targeted to greenhouse gas removal techniques and will be used in a consequential LCA of specific case studies for each greenhouse gas removal group.
The methodology adopted consists in a systematic review across economic sectors and focuses on the specific methods of analysing consequential impacts and uncertainties in the analyses (e.g. assumptions about economic responses). Selected case studies will be used to test the current approaches to identify and rank the importance of the various sources of uncertainties (and other strengths and weaknesses) related to consequential LCA. This will be combined with a series of workshops with other researchers and key advisers involved in assessing GGRT to harmonise the developed approaches. The advisors will form an advisory panel and will represent areas of the economy, policy and third sector organisations that would be affected by large scale implementation of GGRT. This will feed into an upgrading process of current consequential LCA methods with the aim of making the assessment of GGRT more robust and more accurate to achieve a real and substantial reduction of global warming (at least 1-10 Gt of CO2eq per year worldwide).

Planned Impact

The UP-Green-LCA project will impact different audiences and stakeholders both nationally and internationally. The UP-Green-LCA will include synergies between the economic, climate change and the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) research communities, impact on greenhouse gas and LCA emission research community, impact on wider UK public, UK government and parliament, the training of new researchers. The synergies between the various research communities will be achieved by a series of workshops of an advisory panel composed of social and policy scientists and stakeholders. The synergies will be also achieved through setting up a project website and 2 workshops with other project and consortia leaders involved with greenhouse gas removal announcement of opportunity. The workshops will be held within Cranfield facilities keeping the cost to a minimum.
The project will also have impact on the climate change and LCA scientific community. The project partners will participate to at least 2 conferences on LCA scientific communities and 2 on climate change by presenting posters and oral communications. Several papers (including a review paper, a LCA paper and a discussion paper) will be published on high impact factor journals (e.g. Nature communications, Nature climate change, Journal of Cleaner Production, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment). These planned activities will insure impact on the climate change and LCA research community.
This project will have impact on the LCA and climate research community through participation in LCA and climate change conferences. Instead the impact on the wider public is guaranteed by a website section for press releases, a video which will be hosted on YouTube, the project website and participation in British Science Week. Supported by the Cranfield University (CU) marketing, press and social media teams the applicants will promote key developments and research outcomes of the project by means of CU press releases and social media posts such as on LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter. At least one update will be posted every month. These activities will be carried out to ensure proper and consistent engagement with the wider public. The project will have an impact on the UK government through the engagement with the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), Commission on Climate Change (CCC) and the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) by inviting them to the workshops. A policy briefing will be also prepared to inform the UK parliament in the last year of the programme on the social and political drivers affecting the introduction of greenhouse gas techniques worldwide. This will be carried out through a collaboration with the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology.
 
Description An original framework has been conceived to assess greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRT) which allows comparison among different technologies and assure consistencies across the economic sectors which are concerned including energy, concrete production, agriculture and marine technologies. This contributes in benchmarking the technologies. This methodological framework will also inform policy by allowing a common ground for comparison of effectiveness of different technologies. This first achievement would partially fulfill the first objectives as it contributes in identifying main sources of uncertainties and inconsistency. It also contributes to harmonising consequential LCA approaches for GGRT.
This is summarised in the next two paragraphs.
Several LCAs of different GGRTs were reviewed to present the framework used and understand them better, to pinpoint the current limitations in applying LCA to GGRTs and propose some recommendation and approaches to the best practices that should be applied. From this review, we recommend that future LCA studies of GGRTs should follow more strictly the ISO 14040 and 14044 norms in order to ensure comparability and consistency amongst LCAs, and they should pay more attention to certain aspects that have been previously neglected (e.g. boundaries definition, life cycle inventory, uncertainty). Valuable information can be gathered from the existing literature on GGRTs LCAs in order to improve the environmental performance of GGRTs, but, comparing existing LCAs of GGRTs is spurious because of the lack of consistency and standardization between the studies, e.g. in functional units and system boundaries. Each study had its own aims, whereas the ability to compare GGRTs requires a coherent approach. Therefore, we propose a set of recommendations for GGRT LCA. The standardization should address aspects such as, choosing the right functional unit and consequential approach based on an agreed consensus of drivers, defining the right boundaries, selecting relevant impact categories and sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. LCAs of land based GGRT must make a full allowance for the alternative current management of "wastes" and ensure that all carbon flows are fully accounted for. Although they still in early stages, social LCA and life cycle costing seem to be efficient and promising tools to compliment the environmental assessment. We recommend that LCA practitioners discuss the socio-economic aspects in future GGRTs LCA in order to make them more valuable for policy and decision-makers.

Several greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs), also called negative emissions technologies (NET) have been proposed to help meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. However, there are many un- certainties in the estimation of their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) removal potentials, caused by their different levels of technological development. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been proposed as one effective methodology to holistically assess the potential of different GGRT removal approaches but no common framework is currently available for benchmarking and policy development. In this article, challenges for LCA are reviewed and discussed together with some alternative approaches for assessment of GGRTs. In particular, GGRTs pose challenges with regards to the functional unit, the system boundary of the LCA assessment, and the timing of emissions. The need to account within LCA of GGRTs for broader implications which involve environmental impacts, economic, social and political drivers is highlighted. A set of recommendations for LCA of GGRTs are proposed for a better assessment of the GGRTs and better accounting of their carbon removal potentials to meet the targets established within the Paris Agreement.
Exploitation Route This key findings will be brought in different conferences to the life cycle assessment (LCA) communities and to the national workshop on GGRT which will be later organised. Within the project, scientific consensus will be built across LCA community and climate change community. This framework will constitute the basis of the harmonisation of the various aspects of the life cycle assessment technologies and the basis for integrating social and political drivers in consequential LCA.

We were able to generate a set of recommendations for how LCA to GGRT should be conducted and how to improve the reporting of such studies.
Sectors Agriculture, Food and Drink,Energy,Government, Democracy and Justice,Manufacturing, including Industrial Biotechology

 
Description The key findings UP-Green-LCA helped LCA practitioners in the field of greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRT), also called Negative Emissions Technologies (NET), to frame their analyses and reporting in a more consistent way than was previously practised. We helped inform BEIS with a keen interest in this subject through our findings. Our insights were shared with other members of the GGRT community.
First Year Of Impact 2020
Sector Agriculture, Food and Drink,Chemicals,Construction,Energy,Environment,Government, Democracy and Justice
Impact Types Societal,Policy & public services

 
Description Building the UP-Green-LCA 
Form Of Engagement Activity Engagement focused website, blog or social media channel
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Postgraduate students
Results and Impact The Website was conceived to have broader audience than the scientific community. The aim were the following:1) present the main outcomes of the project; 2) show the work carried out; 3) showcase offer of employment 4) present the project team. Several people of the general public interacted from the website and it is an important show-case for the project. the activity will be carried out throughout the life of the grant and will be updated with all the scientific and communication material produced.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2017,2018,2019
URL http://www.upgreen.lca
 
Description Discussion with Project managers at BEIS 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Media (as a channel to the public)
Results and Impact Discussion on LCA and its use in meeting net zero,
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2022
 
Description NERC GGRT Programme event 27-28 June 2019 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Presentations to the NERC GGRT Programme event 27-28 June 2019, Royal Holloway University and participation in group activities.
The event provided a great opportunity to present our work, discuss it with others, obtain feedback and provide it.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019,2021