Feasibility of Afforestation and Biomass energy with carbon capture storage for Greenhouse Gas Removal (FAB GGR)
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Aberdeen
Department Name: Inst of Biological and Environmental Sci
Abstract
GGR Consortium: FAB GGR
Future climate change is projected to have overall negative impacts on many aspects of human society (e.g. health, availability of food, rising sea levels) and on natural ecosystems (e.g. loss of biodiversity). In Paris in December 2015, countries agreed to limit the increase in global mean temperature to well below 2 degrees C above pre-industrial and to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5 degrees C. This poses a phenomenal challenge because most of the allowable 'budget' of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to stay within these temperature targets has already been spent, and global CO2 emissions are still increasing.
Current efforts to limit the negative impacts of climate change focus on reducing the amount of greenhouse gases especially CO2 that we put into our atmosphere, by changing how we generate and use electricity, how we power our transport, and how we heat or cool our homes. However, keeping the increase in global temperature to well below 2 degrees C above pre-industrial will also require us to actively remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere on a very large scale. Two ways that scientists and economists suggest we could do this are by (1) planting forests to lock up carbon and (2) using energy crops or waste from the timber and agricultural industries to generate electricity and capture and store underground the CO2 produced when the electricity is made. Both of these approaches require large areas of land on which to grow the energy crops or trees.
This project will investigate how realistic it is to depend on these methods of CO2 removal, and what the consequences would be for the climate, land-use, ecosystems, and wider social and political systems.
We aim to more accurately determine the amount of CO2 these methods are able to remove from the atmosphere for a given amount of effort. Many factors contribute to this calculation, some of which are highly uncertain. For example, how the carbon cycle will respond to a large shift in land use for energy crops or forests. Social factors are also critical. The development of these important technologies depends on understanding social reactions and the right policies being in place to stimulate uptake.
We will use an interdisciplinary mix of quantitative models and qualitative social science methods to address these issues. The models represent relevant aspects of the Earth system from farm to global scales, including the land, soils, plants, and atmosphere. A key aim is to make a comprehensive (termed 'consequential') life cycle assessment of the effect of the chosen technologies on the carbon cycle, working from the scale of supply chains to particular power plants, to the UK national scale, to the whole Earth system.
We aim to go beyond this and also consider the wider effects and trade-offs of the technologies on societies and policy, the climate system, land-use, and ecosystem services. These include impacts on the release of other greenhouse gases, physical effects on the climate system (for example changing the reflectivity of the land surface to sunlight), effects on the water cycle and water quality, on biodiversity, and on the recreational value of landscapes.
Working together with the quantitative analysis we will conduct a comprehensive assessment of the societal, policy and governance-related uncertainties, implications and bottlenecks associated with the real world implementation of the project's two chosen GGR methods. This draws on state-of-the-art social science approaches developed by the research team for the review and analysis of how members of the public and stakeholders perceive and respond to emerging technologies, including those for CO2 removal.
The consortium team will meet every six months to exchange ideas and learn from each other. At the end of the project we will present our most important findings to policy makers so they can better understand how realistic it is to depend on these methods.
Future climate change is projected to have overall negative impacts on many aspects of human society (e.g. health, availability of food, rising sea levels) and on natural ecosystems (e.g. loss of biodiversity). In Paris in December 2015, countries agreed to limit the increase in global mean temperature to well below 2 degrees C above pre-industrial and to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5 degrees C. This poses a phenomenal challenge because most of the allowable 'budget' of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to stay within these temperature targets has already been spent, and global CO2 emissions are still increasing.
Current efforts to limit the negative impacts of climate change focus on reducing the amount of greenhouse gases especially CO2 that we put into our atmosphere, by changing how we generate and use electricity, how we power our transport, and how we heat or cool our homes. However, keeping the increase in global temperature to well below 2 degrees C above pre-industrial will also require us to actively remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere on a very large scale. Two ways that scientists and economists suggest we could do this are by (1) planting forests to lock up carbon and (2) using energy crops or waste from the timber and agricultural industries to generate electricity and capture and store underground the CO2 produced when the electricity is made. Both of these approaches require large areas of land on which to grow the energy crops or trees.
This project will investigate how realistic it is to depend on these methods of CO2 removal, and what the consequences would be for the climate, land-use, ecosystems, and wider social and political systems.
We aim to more accurately determine the amount of CO2 these methods are able to remove from the atmosphere for a given amount of effort. Many factors contribute to this calculation, some of which are highly uncertain. For example, how the carbon cycle will respond to a large shift in land use for energy crops or forests. Social factors are also critical. The development of these important technologies depends on understanding social reactions and the right policies being in place to stimulate uptake.
We will use an interdisciplinary mix of quantitative models and qualitative social science methods to address these issues. The models represent relevant aspects of the Earth system from farm to global scales, including the land, soils, plants, and atmosphere. A key aim is to make a comprehensive (termed 'consequential') life cycle assessment of the effect of the chosen technologies on the carbon cycle, working from the scale of supply chains to particular power plants, to the UK national scale, to the whole Earth system.
We aim to go beyond this and also consider the wider effects and trade-offs of the technologies on societies and policy, the climate system, land-use, and ecosystem services. These include impacts on the release of other greenhouse gases, physical effects on the climate system (for example changing the reflectivity of the land surface to sunlight), effects on the water cycle and water quality, on biodiversity, and on the recreational value of landscapes.
Working together with the quantitative analysis we will conduct a comprehensive assessment of the societal, policy and governance-related uncertainties, implications and bottlenecks associated with the real world implementation of the project's two chosen GGR methods. This draws on state-of-the-art social science approaches developed by the research team for the review and analysis of how members of the public and stakeholders perceive and respond to emerging technologies, including those for CO2 removal.
The consortium team will meet every six months to exchange ideas and learn from each other. At the end of the project we will present our most important findings to policy makers so they can better understand how realistic it is to depend on these methods.
Planned Impact
GGR Consortium: FAB GGR
Who and How?
The main beneficiaries outside of the scientific community for our project are:
Policymakers: National and international policymakers will benefit from results of FAB GGR to inform policy on climate change, land-use and innovation. At the UK-level relevant policymakers and advisory groups include BEIS, Defra, the Climate Change Committee (CCC), and the Natural Capital Committee (NCC). The Paris Agreement seeks to hold global mean temperature to well below 2 degrees C and to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5 degrees C. Future emission pathways that are commensurate with these temperature increases rely extensively on the use of carbon dioxide removal. The two most commonly used methods of carbon dioxide removal in these emission pathways are afforestation and Biomass Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage, which both involve large-scale changes in land-use. FAB GGR will provide information on the feasibility of the large scale application of these methods. This information is relevant to determine what CO2 emissions pathways are realistic for given climate targets and informs policies for driving innovation (BEIS, CCC). FAB GGR will also provide information on the implications of these methods for land-use and ecosystem services at global and UK scales (Defra, NCC), and the proposal team includes Co-I Bateman who is a member of the NCC.
The IPCC and UNFCCC: FAB GGR will provide key information on the feasibility of large scale afforestation and BECCS as currently used in future emission pathways that limit temperature increase to 1.5-2 degrees C. This will contribute to decision making associated with how to achieve the aspirations of the Paris Agreement on climate change, by improving our understanding of how much carbon dioxide can be removed by these methods at a national and global scale, which will influence the revisions of Nationally Determined Contributions. The IPCC WGIII report identified the importance of assessing not just the technical potential of mitigation and GGR activities but more importantly their real world feasibility. FAB GGR will directly address this question which impacts on the ability to 'overspend' cumulative carbon budgets in the near term by conducting GGR in the longer term. The improvement in understanding presented by FAB GGR will therefore impact directly upon near term policy choices and will make significant contributions to AR6 and AR7.
The media and the public: FAB GGR researchers are active in promoting a good public understanding of climate science and policy, particularly greenhouse gas removal and climate change mitigation. The work of FAB GGR will contribute to the ongoing public discussions about how to address climate change, how much climate change, and impacts that might be expected.
Other scientists across disciplines: FAB GGR research spans a broad range of disciplines. We will engage within disciplinary and at interdisciplinary academic peers through publication in high impact disciplinary and interdisciplinary journals and attendance at key national and international conferences for these communities. Our academic impact will be increased through our extensive national and international networks and be supported by our advisory panel.
Who and How?
The main beneficiaries outside of the scientific community for our project are:
Policymakers: National and international policymakers will benefit from results of FAB GGR to inform policy on climate change, land-use and innovation. At the UK-level relevant policymakers and advisory groups include BEIS, Defra, the Climate Change Committee (CCC), and the Natural Capital Committee (NCC). The Paris Agreement seeks to hold global mean temperature to well below 2 degrees C and to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5 degrees C. Future emission pathways that are commensurate with these temperature increases rely extensively on the use of carbon dioxide removal. The two most commonly used methods of carbon dioxide removal in these emission pathways are afforestation and Biomass Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage, which both involve large-scale changes in land-use. FAB GGR will provide information on the feasibility of the large scale application of these methods. This information is relevant to determine what CO2 emissions pathways are realistic for given climate targets and informs policies for driving innovation (BEIS, CCC). FAB GGR will also provide information on the implications of these methods for land-use and ecosystem services at global and UK scales (Defra, NCC), and the proposal team includes Co-I Bateman who is a member of the NCC.
The IPCC and UNFCCC: FAB GGR will provide key information on the feasibility of large scale afforestation and BECCS as currently used in future emission pathways that limit temperature increase to 1.5-2 degrees C. This will contribute to decision making associated with how to achieve the aspirations of the Paris Agreement on climate change, by improving our understanding of how much carbon dioxide can be removed by these methods at a national and global scale, which will influence the revisions of Nationally Determined Contributions. The IPCC WGIII report identified the importance of assessing not just the technical potential of mitigation and GGR activities but more importantly their real world feasibility. FAB GGR will directly address this question which impacts on the ability to 'overspend' cumulative carbon budgets in the near term by conducting GGR in the longer term. The improvement in understanding presented by FAB GGR will therefore impact directly upon near term policy choices and will make significant contributions to AR6 and AR7.
The media and the public: FAB GGR researchers are active in promoting a good public understanding of climate science and policy, particularly greenhouse gas removal and climate change mitigation. The work of FAB GGR will contribute to the ongoing public discussions about how to address climate change, how much climate change, and impacts that might be expected.
Other scientists across disciplines: FAB GGR research spans a broad range of disciplines. We will engage within disciplinary and at interdisciplinary academic peers through publication in high impact disciplinary and interdisciplinary journals and attendance at key national and international conferences for these communities. Our academic impact will be increased through our extensive national and international networks and be supported by our advisory panel.
People |
ORCID iD |
Astley Hastings (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Sandison F
(2021)
The environmental impacts of pelagic fish caught by Scottish vessels
in Fisheries Research
Shepherd A
(2020)
Commercial experience with miscanthus crops: Establishment, yields and environmental observations
in GCB Bioenergy
Shepherd A
(2021)
Uncertainty of modelled bioenergy with carbon capture and storage due to variability of input data
in GCB Bioenergy
Stavridou E
(2016)
The impact of soil salinity on the yield, composition and physiology of the bioenergy grass Miscanthus × giganteus
in GCB Bioenergy
Taft H
(2019)
Estimating greenhouse gases emissions from horticultural peat soils using a DNDC modelling approach
in Journal of Environmental Management
Wagner M
(2017)
Novel Miscanthus Germplasm-Based Value Chains: A Life Cycle Assessment.
in Frontiers in plant science
Description | If BECCS or CCS is going to used in the UK then to take advantage of the skills, infrastructure and resources available in the declining offshore oil and gas industry, projects must be started now, otherwise this window of opportunity will be lost and the UK will struggle in the future with skills and the cost of storing the CO2 will increase. The UK has the capability to grow only a small amount of biomass to be used for BECCS in comparison to the energy consumption of the UK. This is limited by the area of land available without impinging on food production, which is estimated by this study and others to be around 1.5 million ha. This would produce around 16.5 million tons of biomass. This is only equivalent to the consumption of 2.2 Drax power stations. This is equivalent to 6.2 million tons of oil or 4% of UK's primary energy consumption. Given that land is the limiting factor to land based GGR in the UK on balance growing biomass where possible is wil store the most carbon. Other land can be afforested and together with better management of existing woodlands and forest can store carbon both in the standing biomass but also in the longer life wood products like building structures etc. the residue can also be use to produce energy and enhance GGR by BECCS. There are no technical limits to the amount of Carbon Dioxide that can be stored.in the UK. There are just policy and incentive limits. The MiscanFor model has been further developed to produce hi resolution 1x1 km grids of Miscanthus yield globally with current and future scenarios. We have added the RCP 2.6 scenario to the future emissions scenarios that can be run. This is in addition to the AI, A2, B1 and B2 SREC scenarios. |
Exploitation Route | Policy changes are required to get the starting gun fired on the first CCS. This will facilitate the start up of a demonstration BECCS project. In addition there are links to the NERC funded ACESS-BECCS and ADVENT projects. /There are many peer reviewed papers that have been listing but also members of the project are now on the ELMS modelling advisory board for DEFRA. The tea has also continued to work together with collaborators in the UKERC-4 and ADVANCES project and have also pu in proposals for future GGR fundimg/ |
Sectors | Agriculture, Food and Drink,Energy,Leisure Activities, including Sports, Recreation and Tourism,Government, Democracy and Justice,Transport |
Description | Led to many public engagement with the oil and gas industry in the N Sea and with power generators on the subject of BECCS. We have also has ongoing collaborations with a biomass producing company Terravesta Ltd. We are also starting collaborations with Pale Blue Dot Ltd. This has also led to futher awards amd work on the BBSRC GGR projects for afforestation NETZERO+ and PCB4GGR. This in turn has led to futher work for DEFRA with Forest Research on land use oftions and also membership of ELMS expert committees. |
First Year Of Impact | 2020 |
Sector | Agriculture, Food and Drink,Energy,Environment |
Impact Types | Societal,Economic,Policy & public services |
Description | ADVENT (ADdressing Valuation of Energy and Nature Together) |
Amount | £182,321 (GBP) |
Funding ID | NE/M019691/1 |
Organisation | Natural Environment Research Council |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 06/2015 |
End | 08/2021 |
Description | Greenhouse Gas Removal Plus (GGR+): Sustainable Treescapes Demonstrator & Decision Tools |
Amount | £4,311,888 (GBP) |
Funding ID | BB/V011588/1 |
Organisation | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 05/2021 |
End | 11/2025 |
Description | Perennial Biomass Crops for Greenhouse Gas Removal |
Amount | £3,908,830 (GBP) |
Funding ID | BB/V011553/1 |
Organisation | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 05/2021 |
End | 10/2025 |
Description | Supergen Bioenergy Hub 2018 |
Amount | £5,323,434 (GBP) |
Funding ID | EP/S000771/1 |
Organisation | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 11/2018 |
End | 10/2023 |
Description | UK Energy Research Centre Phase 4 |
Amount | £18,206,734 (GBP) |
Funding ID | EP/S029575/1 |
Organisation | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 05/2019 |
End | 04/2024 |
Description | Collaboration with Terravesta Ltd on the further development of Miscanthus and seed Based Miscanthus |
Organisation | Terravesta Ltd |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Private |
PI Contribution | Provided modelling for Miscanthus in Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria Unraine and Moldova |
Collaborator Contribution | Started to have commercial activity in planting and supplying material for planting Miscanthus in these countries. |
Impact | Continues activity with a Supergen fellowship for the Post Doc on the project |
Start Year | 2018 |
Description | EAGE virtual conference presentation |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Achieving Net Zero emissions requires the knowledge and skills of the oil and gas industry |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020 |
URL | https://eage.eventsair.com/annual-conference-online/ |
Description | EGE virtual presentation 2020 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Early commercial experience with Miscanthus crops: establishment, yield and environmental observations |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020 |
URL | https://egu2020.eu/ |
Description | Membership or THe UK DEFRA ELMS review committee |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Memebership of two committees approximately 1 meeting per month |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021,2022,2023 |
Description | Presentation at SPE Offshore Europe Technical Conference |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Industry/Business |
Results and Impact | Presented the need for CCS for Net Zero and highlighted the potential Market size in the UK and discussed the potential for the oil and gas industry to morph into a CCS industry or combine the two |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
URL | https://www.spe-aberdeen.org/events/offshore-europe-2019/ |