Thirty years after the privatisation of water. What have we learned?

Lead Research Organisation: University of East Anglia
Department Name: Economics

Abstract

Thirty years after western countries started a very ambitious privatisation program, the outcomes of its success remain controversial. In this research, we focus on the privatisation of water companies in the UK and Spain and empirically assess the economic consequences of the privatisation programs. In the UK, water companies were privatised in the late 1980s, and a regulatory framework with price caps has been established gradually at the national level. In Spain, municipalities are still in the process of privatising their water services and there is not a national regulator. First, we study the success of water privatisation in both countries in a time series perspective. Has privatization increased efficiency and productivity of the water firms? The literature has mainly focused on cross-sectional studies, with ambiguous results, and this research will contribute to the debate around the success of privatisation using panel data econometric analyses. Secondly, we study the effect of different regulatory regimes to assess its effects in promoting efficiency: both between the UK and Spain and across Spanish municipalities. Thirdly, we analyse if the privatisation process has generated monopoly profits and promoted rent-seeking behaviour on the privatised firms. This last question has not been systematically analysed in the literature and arises as one of crucial importance since monopoly power is seen as one of the main forces driving the increase in income inequality of the last decades.

Publications

10 25 50

Studentship Projects

Project Reference Relationship Related To Start End Student Name
ES/P00072X/1 01/10/2017 30/09/2027
1948726 Studentship ES/P00072X/1 01/10/2017 30/09/2020 Vicenc Esteve Guasch
 
Description This research project has so far focused in the capital structure decisions of the England and Wales Water Sector. That is, in how the regulatory regime influences firm's decision to increase their debt levels. In the last years, the sector has received a lot of attention in the media and also on more specialised academic circles, because of the high levels of debt. The companies have been accused to issue massive amounts of debt to pay high dividends at the expense of consumers, that will eventually have to repay via higher prices in water bills.
I have extensively reviewed the literature on capital structure and regulation and empirically tested competing hypothesis of why regulated firms might have an incentive to increase debt. My conclusion so far is that there is an incentive created by the regulator which pushes companies to increase debt, and that could be above optimal debt levels if investors believe that the regulator might intervene in the case of financial distress.
Some of these mechanisms have been already highlighted in the literature, but my paper is the first one to empirically test them using econometric techniques on this particular case study.
Furthermore, my research highlights the need to expand the theoretical literature on the incentives for regulated firms to leverage, project in which I am working on right now.
Exploitation Route -Publishing in academic journals.
-Conferences.
-Potentially publishing work in a non-academic context, given that the topic is very policy relevant in the current moment.
Sectors Communities and Social Services/Policy,Creative Economy,Financial Services, and Management Consultancy,Government, Democracy and Justice